Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .net, "KØHB"
writes: "Dee D. Flint" wrote It's often helpful to have insight into the past and past systems to come up with the future proposals. If you can persuade me that a transmitter comprised of 2 obsolete 1930's tubes cobbled together on a wooden chassis gives insights which lead to future breakthroughs in the radio art, then I'll owe you a lobster dinner at Dayton. I doubt anyone could convince you, but... The publication of actual homebrew equipment in today's ham mags may just get some folks to actually start tinkering. The fact that a 21st century had restored *and used* a ~50 year old homebrew rig says that it's not just something hams used to do years and years ago. The technology isn't nearly so important as the mindset that homebrewing is a viable alternative. And if the signal is up to modern requirements and the ham has fun, what's the problem? Couple months back there was a homebrew 17 meter DSB transceiver article in QST. Not exactly bleeding edge technology but it worked and the ham learned things and had a ton of fun. So it ain't just vintage stuff in QST. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General |