Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() It seems to me it would be a lot simpler to have the rules say that *any* class of code tested license or equivalent CSCE would grant Element 1 credit, but they don't. The written test situation is even odder, but it could be argued that the old writtens did not include RF exposure questions and the regs have changed quite a bit. I'll bet you have a headache now, Jim! Its kind of like what I was saying about actions and their consequences. Any time you change a rule there are plenty of consequenses - like removing Element one without any other changes. (which I think is impossible anyway, BTW) Some brearucrat must have wrote those rules. And didn't understand that a 13wpm or 20wpm code test would imply the ability to do 5wpm, and thus deserve credit for element 1. Said brearucrat was probably told to get the ham rules done this afternoon, and get on the new cell phone or whatever rules tommrow. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General |