| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
"N2EY" wrote in message ... In article . net, "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com writes: The point I have is the ARRL has proven beyond a doubt they are a bunch of world class hypocrites. And who elected the directors, Dan? I don't know who 'elected' the directors. I know I didn't. They trash ham radio with 'Incentive Licensing' to FORCE hams to upgrade and 'improve'. How did "incentive licensing" trash ham radio? btw, it was FCC's idea, and they made it clear they weren't going to leave the system alone. It trashed ham radio by creating a CLASS system in our ranks, forcing seperation by license class, making one feel superior and others thus inferior. This was NOT THERE before Incentive Licensing. The FCC did not propose Incentive Licensing. It was the ARRL back about 1963 or so. The FCC followed up on it and 'modified' it and it was implemented beginning November of 1968. Why do I know this? Because I read QST cover to cover while stateside in the military. And when I went overseas I lost track due to military activities. I returned to the USA in 1968. I operated on 7.010 and received a notice of violation from the Cleveland Ohio FCC monitor. I was out of band for my class of license. Then 40 years later they totally reverse themselves. Who? I don't think there's a single person at Hq or in the Board of Directors today who was a League official of any kind back in the '60s. Most of the '60s BoD and Hq folks are dead. So it's a completely different bunch that reversed the policies. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
| Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1412 Â September 3, 2004 | General | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1412  September 3, 2004 | Dx | |||
| Excellent ARRL proposal | General | |||