Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 05:34:03 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote: Len Five Decades Over 21 but not acting a day over eleven wrote: If you're waiting for radio amateurs to be impressed by your professional credentials, you're likely going to be disappointed. I must admit, I've taken a shot or three at Len over exactly the same issue - no Amateur callsign = no valid opinion on Amateur issues. However, a little research reveals that this distinction would be irrelevant in Canada, as we grant full Amateur license privileges upon request to persons with appropriate Professional license qualifications. An excerpt from Industry Canada's Radio Information Circular follows: ================================================== ===== Persons holding any of the following Canadian certificates may be issued an authorization to operate in the amateur radio service with the same operating privileges as the holder of an Amateur Radio Operator Certificate with Basic, Morse Code and Advanced Qualifications: (** NOTE: equivalent to US Amateur Extra license) - Radiocommunication Operator’s General Certificate (Maritime) - Radio Operator's First Class Certificate - Radio Operator's Second Class Certificate Persons holding any of the following Canadian certificates may be issued an authorization to operate in the amateur radio service with the same operating privileges as the holder of an Amateur Radio Operator Certificate with Basic Qualification: (** NOTE - approximately equivalent to US Technician license) - Radiotelephone Operator’s General Certificate (Aeronautical) - Radiotelephone Operator’s General Certificate (Maritime) - Radiotelephone Operator’s General Certificate (Land) - First-class Radioelectronic Certificate The full text of IC RIC-3 is available at: http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/insmt-gst.nsf/vwapj/ric3.pdf/$FILE/ric3.pdf ================================================== ====== It would seem to me that this makes perfect sense - radio operation is radio operation, and the Pros have made a career of it - and invested considerably more education, time, effort and ongoing training than would be possible for most hobbyists. After all, it would be pretty silly for the folks at the local photo club to argue that Yosuf Karsh's pictures were pretty good, but not up to "Amateur" standards! After all, the testing done for Amateur licences today is pretty easy to pass, even without a formal education in electronics. Too easy, I'd say, but that is another issue......(when 7 year olds can pass exams with questions requiring calculation of squares, logs and complex numbers - which sure as heck weren't part of my kids Grade 2 syllabus - I start thinking rote memorization of question pools....) A question - was a similar arrangement for the recognition of professional credentials in the Amateur service ever in place in the US? With the reciprocity agreement between Canada and the US, someone who has obtained their Amateur licence based on their Professional qualifications automatically gains full Amateur operating privileges when travelling in the US. One would think it logical for this arrangement to be bidirectional, n'est pas? I'm not sure if Len's First Class license is equal to any of the Canadian ones listed in RIC-3 above - but if they are, the Canadian equivalent to his license would be sufficient to acquire a VEx callsign absolutely free upon request. Well, for a 49-cent stamp, anyway ![]() Dave K8MN 73, Leo |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Extra class - question about the test | General | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | General | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | Policy | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
1x2 Calls--automatic when upgrading to Extra? | Policy |