Remember Me?
Menu
Home
Search
Today's Posts
Home
Search
Today's Posts
RadioBanter
»
rec.radio.amateur
»
Policy
>
My Idea For A New License Structure
LinkBack
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes
Prev
Next
#
11
February 2nd 04, 11:54 AM
N2EY
Posts: n/a
In article ,
writes:
N2EY wrote:
Yep. But there's also the aspect of "self-training", where the person with
the
question tries to find the information on their own *before* asking.
For that I definitely blame the Internet.
In days gone by when one had to go to the library for information, two
things were different:
1) The world in general wasn't made aware of your ignorance.
2) By having to go through a book you usually picked up some other pieces
of information.
Agree on both counts!
In today's age, the Internet is touted as the grand source of all
information with instant response.
Hence the huge number of really ignorant questions on USENET and mailing
lists that show the questioner has obviously never bothered to read a book
or manual because anything you want to know can be found through the
Internet just by asking.
And here I thought it was just me getting ornery!
What's even worse is these people don't bother to do a search of archives or
FAQs to see if the question has already been asked, which it generally has.
EXACTLY!
I first noticed this on rec.radio.amateur.antenna. Despite lots of websites
dealing with the G5RV and T2FD antennas, it seemed that about every other
thread was about either one or the other of those two. Worse, the *same*
questions would be asked over and over.
This mode of operation is by no means limited to amateur radio; it appears
to an epidemic of major proportions.
Agreed.
Unfortunately, I can think of no solution to the problem in general, nor
one specific to amateur radio other than to just accept the situation for
what it is and get on with life.
On the one hand, folks like me *want* to Elmer the newcomers, but on the other,
we don't want to spend all our time answering the same questions over and over
and simultaneously reinforcing the behavior of "learned helplessness" where the
person doesn't even *try* to figure out or research the answer.
One thing I've done is to respond more to questions where it's obvious that the
person has at least tried to find the answer themselves, and is now stumped on
a particular point. Another approach is to answer in URLs.
73 de Jim, N2EY
Reply With Quote
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Show Printable Version
Search this Thread
:
Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode
Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode
Posting Rules
Smilies
are
On
[IMG]
code is
On
HTML code is
Off
Trackbacks
are
On
Pingbacks
are
On
Refbacks
are
On
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License)
N2EY
Policy
0
November 30th 03
01:28 PM
Low reenlistment rate
charlesb
Policy
54
September 18th 03
01:57 PM
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules
JJ
General
159
August 12th 03
12:25 AM
ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st
Dwight Stewart
Policy
300
August 12th 03
12:25 AM
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement
Scott Unit 69
Policy
9
August 1st 03
02:08 AM
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
10:00 PM
.
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
Contact Us
RadioBanter forum home
Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2017
LinkBack
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks