LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2   Report Post  
Old February 5th 04, 12:16 PM
N2EY
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
(Brian Kelly) writes:

This one is as bad a Bonnie's abomination. Maybe worse.

http://www.arrl.org/announce/reports...f-digital.html

How is it as bad or worse? I think it's much better!

First off, it does not widen the 'phone bands anywhere near as much as the
KQ6XA plan. Nor does it decrease the Extra segments.

Second, the 200/500/2700 Hz rules are for a *voluntary bandplan*, not FCC regs.

Third, it actually acknowledges that hams use modes like CW and Baudot RTTY.

73 de Jim, N2EY
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access Lloyd Mitchell Antenna 43 October 26th 04 01:37 AM
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions Louis C. LeVine Dx 36 September 9th 04 09:30 AM
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions Louis C. LeVine General 8 September 8th 04 12:14 PM
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions Louis C. LeVine Dx 0 September 5th 04 08:30 AM
We Need a BANDWIDTH-BASED Frequency Plan - NOT Mode-Based. Expeditionradio Policy 43 February 8th 04 08:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017