LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13   Report Post  
Old February 8th 04, 08:19 PM
N2EY
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , ospam
(Larry Roll K3LT) writes:

In article , Leo

writes:


An article in today's Toronto Star, which covers our amusement with
the Janet Jackson issue pretty well! Double standards abound......


http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Con...star/Layout/Ar
ticle_Type1&call_pageid=971358637177&c=Article&ci d=1076022610517


Leo:

I don't even have to bother to read it. I'm guessing it says that all of us
hyper-conservative, redneck UhmurriKans are so backwardly non-progressive
in our morality that we're shocked and outraged by the little act put on
during Super Bowl XXXVIII by Jackson and Timberlake. Yada, yada,
yada.


No, it's not like that at all, Larry. You should read it, because it's a
perfect
example of a bunch of good facts connected by a bit of muddle-headed
illogic.

I'm no prude, but I know obscenity when I see it, and that was obscene --
the whole half-time show, not just the Jackson thing.


I didn't watch past the part where the psuedo-cheerleader-dancers took
off their outfits. I flicked back briefly and saw some no-talent wearing
the American flag like a poncho, and tuned away.

If it were being
shown after 11 PM or on a cable channel, that would be a different
matter, but this was shown on a major network during Prime Time, and
during a high-profile sporting event with a maxxed-out audience, including
young children.


It's even simpler than that: It was aired with no warning of the content, so
that those who would be offended could not make an informed choice. That's
what's really offensive - and a point totally missed by the above article.

If there was anything that was designed to bring our
culture "...one step closer to extinction," this was it. Fortunately, the
negative reaction, while not understood by our ever-so-liberal neighbors
to the North, had the effect of at least getting Janet Jackson booted from
the Grammys, and forced CBS to change the Grammys from a real-time
"live" broadcast to a delayed broadcast, so that any other such
shennanigans can be edited out. Unfortunately, all the dumbed-down
New-Age pop-culture idiots out there will probably buy Janet's new
CD in record numbers, and that was her intention from the beginning.


The article fails to note the difference between movies (which are rated)
and live TV (which isn't).

73 de Jim, N2EY
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is Michael Jackson Innocent? Steve Stone Policy 254 December 26th 03 09:26 PM
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) N2EY Policy 0 November 30th 03 01:28 PM
Low reenlistment rate charlesb Policy 54 September 18th 03 01:57 PM
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules JJ General 159 August 12th 03 12:25 AM
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement Scott Unit 69 Policy 9 August 1st 03 02:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017