Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 21:42:25 -0500, Mike Coslo
wrote: Leo wrote: It was pretty accurate and intelligently written, actually! But I assume from your statement that it didn't agree with your own viewpoint, as it too is "wrong". I consider the points it makes accurate enough, but it makes glaring errors too. The biggest one is the comparison between violence and sex. In it's own context, I agree, there is a weirdness about how some of us accept violence, but not sex. But that ain't the argument. If she were to become topless as an accident, I'd wager that the event would be a momentary thing to talk about around the water cooler. "That's the hazard of live TV" would be what people would say. "Poor Janet! She must have been mortified!", would be another. But since the whole thing was planned, and they lied about it afterward, it changes the whole thing around. THAT has no place in a halftime show. Agreed. But it just ain't that big a deal. And to listen to people like Spike Lee deriding the incident as possibly the worst thing that has ever happened in the entertainment biz is absolutely imbecilic, given the content of some of his own productions. But. these guys know where the money comes from and how to stay on the right side of public opinion. Personally, I'd consider Kid Rock's treatment of the flag far more disrespectful and tasteless - yet that got hardly any press at all. Or the lyrics to some of the award-winning rap music - plenty of hate in there....and racism, and violence, and immorality. But, they give performers like Eminem big awards and big bucks to spread their sinister messages of hate and apathy to our kids - and get big-time upset over a televised breast, as if that would cause irreprable harm to their young psyches and moral character. That's just stupid. Fact is, the shows have deteriorated in content over the last several years, and a large portion of the audience doesn't like the emerging format. They (we) are complaining, and they (we) have a right to. It really isn't about sex versus violence. I no more want to see trashy, sexually oriented "entertainment" during the superbowl halftime than I want to see people being stabbed or hurt during it, or to have Peter Popoff come out and do faith healing and ask for donations. I'd prefer that they drop the entire halftime big talent show entirely. Remember when the SuperBowl was all about the game? We can thank our media friends for trying to jazz it up to appeal to the largest number of viewers possible, in an effort to boost advertizing revenues. Now, because of this incident, broadcasters are installing tape delay equipment to ensure that inappropriate things are not aired. This is not being done for the benefit of the public good, mind you - it is being done so as to placate the advertizers, so that they don't end up on the wrong side of public opinion and lose market share - and keep those big bucks coming in..... Even the FCC has ruled that profanity is OK on broadcast services. Is this not more repugnant than a breast? Hmmmm. Nice value system. Where was the outcry a few years ago when Bono let loose a string of expletives on the Grammys? That was at least an order of magnitude worse than a televised breast, and a lot harder to explain to the kids....where were the 7-second tape delays and prophesies of the end of his career? But hey, there were no nasty body parts involved, so that was OK..... And that is why I think the article is way off base. Not sure that I agree, Mike - the point was, the breast thing was just not that big a deal. There are far worse things that society should be concerned about - one need only look to the movies, video games or even network TV to see that although sex has been somewhat removed from our kids view, an incredible amount of graphic violence is pumped out at them on a daily basis. That ain't good - and the impact on society is well documented. All too frequently. With tragic results. I take it you're not a Robbie Burns fan: "Oh wad some power the giftie gie us To see oursel's as others see us!" Sigh..... 'Tis true, though - however difficult it may be. 73, Leo |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Is Michael Jackson Innocent? | Policy | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules | General | |||
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | Policy |