Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Leo
writes: On 09 Feb 2004 01:21:52 GMT, (N2EY) wrote: snip Last night, the local PBS station showed "Catch-22". More than a little nudity, sex and violence. But they showed it at 10 PM, with content warnings. Anybody who might be offended knew *ahead of time* to avoid it. No such warning or rating on the superbowl. That's the point that the Toronto Star article completely misses. Jim, my friend, if you had cared to read past the title you may have noted the other far more important points that the article was actually making..... I read the whole article. The author missed the most important point of the whole wardrobe malfunction. Muddle-headed thinking on his part. Just my opinion. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Is Michael Jackson Innocent? | Policy | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules | General | |||
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | Policy |