| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
"N2EY" wrote in message om... "Bill Sohl" wrote in message thlink.net... "N2EY" wrote in message (SNIP) Personally, I don't think the 5 wpm code test is a real "barrier" to anyone given the wide range of accomodations now in place and the training methods now available. But if it's going to be dropped for some license classes, it seems to me that B makes more sense than A. Agreed. If I had my way there'd be at least 5 wpm code for all classes of license. Why not? Why not? Let's not open that issue all over again :-) :-) IOW, ARRL would spread the free upgradees out and give them a smorgasboard of options, FAR would concentrate them and give them a restricted diet. Which do you think makes more sense? Agree again. I presume you prefer the ARRL scenario to the RAF one. Yes. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FISTS petition to the FCC | Policy | |||
| NCI Petition available on FCC ECFS | Policy | |||
| FCC taking Comments on RM-10787 Morse Code Elimination Petition | Policy | |||
| NCI filed Petition for Rulemaking Aug. 13 | Policy | |||
| Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||