LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21   Report Post  
Old February 25th 04, 02:06 AM
Bill Sohl
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"N2EY" wrote in message
om...
"Bill Sohl" wrote in message

thlink.net...
"N2EY" wrote in message


(SNIP)

Personally, I don't think the 5 wpm code test is a real "barrier"
to anyone given the wide range of accomodations now in place
and the training methods now available.
But if it's going to be dropped for some license classes, it
seems to me that B makes more sense than A.


Agreed.


If I had my way there'd be at least 5 wpm code for all classes of
license. Why not?


Why not? Let's not open that issue all over again :-) :-)

IOW, ARRL would spread the free upgradees
out and give them a smorgasboard of options,
FAR would concentrate them and give them a restricted diet.

Which do you think makes more sense?


Agree again.


I presume you prefer the ARRL scenario to the RAF one.


Yes.

Cheers,
Bill K2UNK


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FISTS petition to the FCC Hans Kohb Policy 320 September 29th 03 02:46 PM
NCI Petition available on FCC ECFS Carl R. Stevenson Policy 7 September 8th 03 12:27 AM
FCC taking Comments on RM-10787 Morse Code Elimination Petition Dan/W4NTI Policy 3 August 29th 03 03:44 PM
NCI filed Petition for Rulemaking Aug. 13 Carl R. Stevenson Policy 74 August 25th 03 02:18 AM
Some comments on the NCVEC petition D. Stussy Policy 13 August 5th 03 05:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017