Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Heil" wrote in message ... Bill Sohl wrote: "Dave Heil" wrote in message ... N2EY wrote: "Bill Sohl" wrote in message thlink.net... "N2EY" wrote in message ... I believe there are a good number of family member techs who probably have limited desire even to get on HF at all. Around here we had lots of "honeydew hams" in the '80s and '90s (people who got ham licenses to keep in touch with family members, not because they were interested in radio itself). Nice folks but many disappeared when cell phones became cheap and good coverage. FRS/GMRS took some othere. And some discovered they were interested in radio for its own sake, too. I think that phenomenon is the main reason for the somewhat-lower renewal percentage of Techs. Overheard on a 2m repeater in this area of the Ohio Valley yesterday: "KC8--- this is KC8***, come back". "KC8*** this is KC8--- . I have a copy on you. What's yer twenty?" "I'm up here on the hill but you're scratchy. You must be overmodulatin or somthing". "Well I'm copyin' you pretty good considering the distance between us". "Yeah, 4-Roger. It's pretty amazin' that these little hand held radios will talk this far from each other". It is a brave new world of amateur radio. Dave, Exactly what is wrong with the above dialog between the two parties involved? Now before answering, consider this: 1. Both parties ID'd as required by law. 2. Neither party used any type of clandestine or secret code. 3. Both parties appear to have understood each other. They certainly understood each other. OK Neither understood the concept of a repeater. So what? Does that bother anyone? Now, to what I understand: I understand that both of these ops have brought their bad habits from CB radio with them. What bad habits. I don't see any at all. You may not like their conversation, but there is NO aspect of Part 97 that requires any specific use of only "ham" approved lingo...or did I skip that chapter somehow. Neither has bothered to listen to other hams. For what reason must they do so? What about their use of the repeater as you dicribed is wrong? These two were joined by a new YL op the other day. She was a "do you want me to pick up bread and milk?" type. One of my best ham buddies is a long time Extra and his wife chats with him on almost every homebound commute. In some cases she gives him a "honey do" list of things to get from the market on the way home. What's wrong with that (i.e. what's wrong with "pick up bread & milk." I'll be very surprised if any of the three will be active on the ham bands in five years. I'll presume that should make you very pleased then. Who cares about how we dialog with each other as long as the parties involved are operating within the law as per Part 97 rules and regs? I do. Based on what authority? You are free to worry your poor self about whatever you want, but thankfully you have no authority to enforce your own standards of how to speak on the air on anyone but yourself. We've even got a new op who can be heard moving between the several local repeaters for a goodly part of each day saying, "This is KC8*** radio check". And that violates what in Part 97? He'll sometimes pull this stunt on top of an ongoing QSO. That then IS a violation. I'd fully support the area hams directing him as to the rules to NOT QRM an existing QSO. He has been informed on a number of occasions about how to make it clear that he is seeking a contact and how not to QRM an existing contact but he persists. If, that is as you say, then report him to the FCC. When he does enter a QSO, he normally asks the individuals he contacts if they have any radios they'd like to part with. And that violates what Part 97 rule? He has now asked me about six times. Maybe he has Alzheimers. This fellow is annoying and others--old timers and recent licensees--are beginning to avoid him. Which is perfectly OK. There is another new ham in the area who was previously a CBer. He was licensed only this past May. He quickly became adjusted to how things are done on the ham bands. He asks questions about antennas, modes other than FM, bands other than 2m and about operating practices. He aroused interest in his grandson, who is now licensed. I'm betting that these two will stick. Fine with me. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FISTS petition to the FCC | Policy | |||
NCI Petition available on FCC ECFS | Policy | |||
FCC taking Comments on RM-10787 Morse Code Elimination Petition | Policy | |||
NCI filed Petition for Rulemaking Aug. 13 | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy |