Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Robert Casey
writes: N2EY wrote: In article , (Len Over 21) writes: It's generally agreed that Access BPL will be a bad thing in any urban radio environment. Generally agreed by whom? The BPL developers don't agree. And they're professionals. Sure, they were by investors told to build something that could get digital information over power cables. The fact that it will radiate was not an issue for them. But a big issue for us. The FCC doesn't agree. They're professionals too, and regulators of all "civilian" radio and wire communications in the USA. Bullshjt, they're just brearucrats who are lawyers and not engineers. They probably figure that they can sue whatever out of existance to solve problems.... The FCC also created the six-tiered amateur license structure prior to R&O 99-412 and established 13 and 20 WPM morse code rates. :-) ARRL didn't do a thing, did they? :-) LHA / WMD |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NPRM and VEC | General | |||
BPL NPRM Approved | Policy | |||
BPL NPRM | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse coderequirement. | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |