Subject: BPL NPRM v. NOI
From: (Len Over 21)
Date: 3/28/2004 3:32 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
In article , (the
paralegal gunnery nurse) rants, raves, and writes:
But, on the thread SUBJECT...the FCC cannot directly stop Access
BPL. It doesn't have the direct legal authority to do so. All the FCC
can do right now is to set standards on the levels of incidental RF
radiation from an Access BPL system. That is what NPRM 04-29
is all about.
Sure it can.
The second a complaint is filed by an FCC licensee they ahve the
authority to stop it.
To "stop" WHAT? There's NO Report and Order from the FCC saying
that Access BPL exists per se. If the proposed rulemaking given in
NPRM 04-29 becomes an R&O, then it has a specific definition in
terms of incidental RF radiation levels.
What "R&O" is required for the FCC to go to Joe Schmo's Cable Company and
say "your system is interfering with Commission licensees, and you'll either
stop it or we'll invoke NAL's..???
Right now, the FCC regulations on incidental radiation devices...(SNIP)
Thank you for YOUR "paralegal" advice, Lennie, but it doesn't stack up.
Kind of spoils all your ranting and posturing with reality of the
situation, doesn't it? Tsk, tsk.
Lennie, NOTHING you cited "ruins" anything.
I am a Commission licensee. If I start experiencing interference to my
otherwise properly operating station, it's teh FCC's OBLIGATION to resolve the
issue.
Sorry you don't agree.
Steve, K4YZ
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
