Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
:
If the existing Technicians are upgraded to General, this means that after we do this, we are discriminating against all that come afterward. There will be a *powerful* argument that "The Tech elements were good enough for the majority of hams to become General, so why should I have to take a harder test?" And although there is really no test process needed at all to get on HF (witness CB'ers that run illegal power levels) Well, they're not *legal* and should not be there. And legal CB operators are not supposed to talk internationally. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert Casey" wrote in message ... : If the existing Technicians are upgraded to General, this means that after we do this, we are discriminating against all that come afterward. There will be a *powerful* argument that "The Tech elements were good enough for the majority of hams to become General, so why should I have to take a harder test?" And although there is really no test process needed at all to get on HF (witness CB'ers that run illegal power levels) Well, they're not *legal* and should not be there. Absolutely agree. And legal CB operators are not supposed to talk internationally. I know there's a distance limitation...but what about a legal CBer in the USA talking to a legal Canadian CBer over a distance of less than the specifid threshold limit? Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 23:10:51 GMT, "Bill Sohl"
wrote: "Robert Casey" wrote in message ... : snip And legal CB operators are not supposed to talk internationally. I know there's a distance limitation...but what about a legal CBer in the USA talking to a legal Canadian CBer over a distance of less than the specifid threshold limit? I'm pretty sure that cross-border communications between Canada and the US were illegal back in the 70s when I had a CB license.....apparently, that restriction no longer exists. In the US, Part 95 subpart D disallows International communications, *except* between US and Canadian CB stations. http://www.noard.com/citizensband.htm On the Canadian side, RIC-18 mentions no specific restrictions on International communications at all. There is a limitation on communicating beyond the 'normal range' of the station (i.e. other than by ground wave transmission only) which pretty much rules out International comms except with anywhere but the US, geographically speaking. http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/insmt-gst.nsf/vwapj/ric18.pdf/$FILE/ric18.pdf Cheers, Bill K2UNK 73, Leo |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert Casey wrote:
: If the existing Technicians are upgraded to General, this means that after we do this, we are discriminating against all that come afterward. There will be a *powerful* argument that "The Tech elements were good enough for the majority of hams to become General, so why should I have to take a harder test?" And although there is really no test process needed at all to get on HF (witness CB'ers that run illegal power levels) Well, they're not *legal* and should not be there. And legal CB operators are not supposed to talk internationally. Sure, but if you make it legal, is there any reason to require any test at all? - Mike KB3EIA - |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Do we really need a new Novice class? | Policy | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules | General | |||
ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st | Policy | |||
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | Policy |