Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Sohl wrote:
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message ... "Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... Indeed, if we support the lowered power limits, and all, is there a good argument for simply letting Novices on the air with no requirements? Learn as they go? - Mike KB3EIA - If the new "Novice" or "Communicator" proposals get instituted, I will tell any beginning class that I teach that we are going to go all the way to General. It won't be worth my time to teach otherwise. Do you really believe that bringing in a new ham at the proposed novice level isn't worth it? If the tests are going to be geared to "an average sixth grader", and one of the requirements is to sign a paper stating that you have read part 97, exactly what is the class going to consist of? And since ther is a good possibility that the General test is going to end up being at the level of the Technician license. I know I'm mixing proposals there, but the point is, maybe the new novice or communicator should be easy enough that people *don't* have to take any classes for it. My goal or objective would be to encourage as many new people, especially kids, to get a novice license and just see how it goes from there. Sure, I will work with whatever we have. That doesn't mean that I have to like it tho' - Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Do we really need a new Novice class? | Policy | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules | General | |||
ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st | Policy | |||
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | Policy |