Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Coslo" wrote in message news ![]() Carl R. Stevenson wrote: "Mike Coslo" wrote in message I support a system that is basically like what we have now. Only difference is that Morse code is not tested for AT ALL. I would think NCI would prefer a system like that instead of one in which there is still a test for Extra. The one part of the ARRL proposal that NCI opposes is the "keep the Morse test for Extra" part. Do you think my proposal is BS? - Mike KB3EIA - You are free to have your own views/proposals. I didn't say they were BS .... I was ONLY talking about the assertion that NCI was "supporting a reduction in written test requirements" and your "spin" comments. Carl - wk3c |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|