Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... Idly musing, I thought of this a few moments ago. It isn't a CW testing question, but is related by being a CW operating question. With the likely demise of Morse code testing, is there any reason to have contests give double the points for Morse code contacts? While of course all contest rules are inherently arbitrary, does it make sense to have one mode of contact be "more equal" than others? Put another way, if you think that CW contacts should be worth double points, is it fair to have say, PSK31 contacts worth the same double points such as in Field day? Our GOTA station racked up a fair number of points operating PSK31, and it was certainly no more difficult than operating Phone. I've seen a number of cases where a phone operator has worked hard and logged a lot of QSO's, only to be beaten by a CW op with little more than half that number. - Mike KB3EIA - Yes it is worth giving the CW contacts double points. It will serve as an aid in preserving a valuable communications tool. Some people will learn it for the very purpose of getting more points in the contest. This last Field Day, conditions were so poor that our two CW stations netted more contacts than our three voice stations and GOTA station combined. Not just points mind you but actual number of contacts. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC Assigns RM Numbers To Three New Restructuring Petitions | Policy | |||
Rev.Jim the troller (was Bootlegging in 1948?) | Policy | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | Policy | |||
Ham Radio In The Post-Code Testing Era | Policy | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | General |