| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
April 29th 04, 03:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote: Subject: Morse and Contests From: "Dee D. Flint" Date: 4/27/2004 8:55 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: I've tried running a frequency on SSB contests but just don't get enough takers to make it worthwhile so I finally end up doing the "search and pounce". I'm not good enough yet to run a frequency on CW so by necessity do "search and pounce" when operating in this mode. I had a lot more fun just setting a "personal goal" and working towards that when I get into a contest. I set out to get a "Clean Sweep" a few yeas ago and did it...with less than 150 Q's on each mode! My goal is to try to up my personal best each time I revisit the same contest. Two years in a row now, I have missed getting all 67 counties in the PAQSO by *one* county. That is my biggest goal this year. Second goal is to be first from PA in the New England QSO party. I've been stuck at third for the last two years. I did a lot better last year than the year before, but so have the people I'm competing with. I'm wondering how many S-units will be added to my 100 watt mobile signal if it's "/VO1" in the next Sweepstakes...?!?! You gonna be pop-u-lar! 8^) - Mike KB3EIA - |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FCC Assigns RM Numbers To Three New Restructuring Petitions | Policy | |||
| Rev.Jim the troller (was Bootlegging in 1948?) | Policy | |||
| With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | Policy | |||
| Ham Radio In The Post-Code Testing Era | Policy | |||
| With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | General | |||
Threaded Mode
