Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 "Dan" == w4nti Dan writes: [...] Dan A real ham is the proper answer. Dan You know one that paid his dues, passed his tests in front of the Dan FCC. Demonstrated his abilty to not only receive....but to SEND Dan CW in front of the FCC examiners. And has 43 years of experience Dan since then. You know....a real ham. Dan Make of that what you must. Huh. I'm so glad I'm not an old, bitter, frustrated person. I might run the risk of being a real ham. Dan Dan/W4NTI Jack. (I'm happier being me, thanks.) - -- Jack Twilley jmt at twilley dot org http colon slash slash www dot twilley dot org slash tilde jmt slash -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAm+TbGPFSfAB/ezgRAsjOAKDNQUy5b62MY53oGofMP3/azLWoDwCfcEXM dvXTKkm8BLVTxuI/keHV3PA= =vNwr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC Assigns RM Numbers To Three New Restructuring Petitions | Policy | |||
Rev.Jim the troller (was Bootlegging in 1948?) | Policy | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | Policy | |||
Ham Radio In The Post-Code Testing Era | Policy | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | General |