LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #31   Report Post  
Old May 8th 04, 12:27 AM
William
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message nk.net...


A real ham is the proper answer.

You know one that paid his dues, passed his tests in front of the FCC.
Demonstrated his abilty to not only receive....but to SEND CW in front of
the FCC examiners. And has 43 years of experience since then. You
know....a real ham.

Make of that what you must.

Dan/W4NTI


That would be an anachronism. It can't be done for real anymore, but
you're welcome to petition the SCA to start a chapter where you can
play at it.

One day QST will run that article in their April issue.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FCC Assigns RM Numbers To Three New Restructuring Petitions N2EY Policy 165 April 6th 04 07:44 PM
Rev.Jim the troller (was Bootlegging in 1948?) Len Over 21 Policy 25 October 20th 03 04:31 AM
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? K0HB Policy 68 August 4th 03 02:28 PM
Ham Radio In The Post-Code Testing Era Larry Roll K3LT Policy 41 August 2nd 03 07:51 PM
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? Dee D. Flint General 18 July 25th 03 01:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017