Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message nk.net...
A real ham is the proper answer. You know one that paid his dues, passed his tests in front of the FCC. Demonstrated his abilty to not only receive....but to SEND CW in front of the FCC examiners. And has 43 years of experience since then. You know....a real ham. Make of that what you must. Dan/W4NTI That would be an anachronism. It can't be done for real anymore, but you're welcome to petition the SCA to start a chapter where you can play at it. One day QST will run that article in their April issue. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC Assigns RM Numbers To Three New Restructuring Petitions | Policy | |||
Rev.Jim the troller (was Bootlegging in 1948?) | Policy | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | Policy | |||
Ham Radio In The Post-Code Testing Era | Policy | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | General |