Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 28th 04, 08:11 AM
Jack Twilley
 
Posts: n/a
Default

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thank you for the useful information.

Out of curiosity, do you know how these agreements came about, and who
agreed to what? Is this something the ARRL just announced one day, or
did these band plans arise out of years of usage clustering, or what?
I figure you might know, considering your position in the organization,
or at least you'd be able to find out. :-)

Thanks again.

Jack.
- --
Jack Twilley
jmt at twilley dot org
http colon slash slash www dot twilley dot org slash tilde jmt slash
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAtuY3GPFSfAB/ezgRAo1UAJ9oIKCGVAE8qs26jUrmVzSHtq/7UACfRmNg
XbrP/dBWjW/1EstdC21rp3k=
=ulCL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why You Don't Like The ARRL Louis C. LeVine Policy 803 January 23rd 04 01:12 AM
S band antenna testing Allan Butler Antenna 4 December 21st 03 07:26 PM
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC Brian Policy 3 October 24th 03 12:02 AM
Low reenlistment rate charlesb Policy 54 September 18th 03 01:57 PM
BPL Video On-Line JJ Policy 31 August 17th 03 09:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017