Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Vanity Call fee going up in August
From: "Dee D. Flint" Date: 7/10/2004 7:19 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: "me" wrote in message news:FJQHc.62140$Oq2.29491@attbi_s52... Personally, I believe Amateur Radio Licenses should cost $75 per year for regulatory fees and the Commission should elimanate testing. I also believe that is how it will eventually be in the near future. 73, Me Doubtful that testing would be eliminated. International treaties require that there is proof the operators meet minimum qualifications. Since the FCC has given testing responsibility to the amateur community, the FCC simply issues the license so they don't have any vested interest in eliminating testing. And of course they issue the regulations and enforce those regulations like they do for all communications services. Besides testing is needed to attempt to insure that the licensees will have learned the basics of operating. Hams have such a wide range of privileges and frequencies that some basic knowledge truly is a necessity. We already have enough lids slip through so let's not make it worse. Dee, I was going to dismiss the troll's post simply on the basis that it was written by someone who doesn't have the gonads to sign his/her name to thier public comments (read that: coward) but then I got to thinking that there might be something to it. You know, of course, that I work in healthcare as an ER nurse...And you would be absolutely shocked at the number of people who come to the ER in distress because they claim they can't "afford" thier medicines...Of course they either wreak of cigarette smoke, metabolized alcohol, or both...but they can't "afford" medicine. So...ballpark the number of Amatuers at 650K...At $75/license that is over $48M a year for the General Treasury coffers. Of course for that I'd expect a lot stricter policing of the bands by Riley & Co for it, but hey, let's do it... I am willing to bet that most of the idiots who are discipline problems on the bands are smokers, too. That $75 would be a whole lot of cigarettes, even at present day prices. And there is one ultimate truism...Smokers will forego food, debts and common sense in order to buy more cigarettes (as will alcoholics for more alcohol...). I am willing to bet the scufflaws on 75 and 20 meters would go away in short order after the extra money for enforcement nails them to the wall. My license is worth $75/year to me. I'd pony up the cash. And I can promise you you will never see my name in one of Riley's "letters" on the ARRL website! 73 Steve, K4YZ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
and just who do you think you are that everyone should give their name and
call on here??? I certainly don't have to answer to you!! Ciao, Me "Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote in message ... Subject: Vanity Call fee going up in August From: "Dee D. Flint" Date: 7/10/2004 7:19 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: "me" wrote in message news:FJQHc.62140$Oq2.29491@attbi_s52... Personally, I believe Amateur Radio Licenses should cost $75 per year for regulatory fees and the Commission should elimanate testing. I also believe that is how it will eventually be in the near future. 73, Me Doubtful that testing would be eliminated. International treaties require that there is proof the operators meet minimum qualifications. Since the FCC has given testing responsibility to the amateur community, the FCC simply issues the license so they don't have any vested interest in eliminating testing. And of course they issue the regulations and enforce those regulations like they do for all communications services. Besides testing is needed to attempt to insure that the licensees will have learned the basics of operating. Hams have such a wide range of privileges and frequencies that some basic knowledge truly is a necessity. We already have enough lids slip through so let's not make it worse. Dee, I was going to dismiss the troll's post simply on the basis that it was written by someone who doesn't have the gonads to sign his/her name to thier public comments (read that: coward) but then I got to thinking that there might be something to it. You know, of course, that I work in healthcare as an ER nurse...And you would be absolutely shocked at the number of people who come to the ER in distress because they claim they can't "afford" thier medicines...Of course they either wreak of cigarette smoke, metabolized alcohol, or both...but they can't "afford" medicine. So...ballpark the number of Amatuers at 650K...At $75/license that is over $48M a year for the General Treasury coffers. Of course for that I'd expect a lot stricter policing of the bands by Riley & Co for it, but hey, let's do it... I am willing to bet that most of the idiots who are discipline problems on the bands are smokers, too. That $75 would be a whole lot of cigarettes, even at present day prices. And there is one ultimate truism...Smokers will forego food, debts and common sense in order to buy more cigarettes (as will alcoholics for more alcohol...). I am willing to bet the scufflaws on 75 and 20 meters would go away in short order after the extra money for enforcement nails them to the wall. My license is worth $75/year to me. I'd pony up the cash. And I can promise you you will never see my name in one of Riley's "letters" on the ARRL website! 73 Steve, K4YZ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
and OTOH, Riley is an ass...If he was smart, he'd have his own law firm
making hundreds of thousands of dollars a year defending clients against the FCC. But working a Gov't job proves that he can't survive in the REAL world, folks. I'll just give you a couple of examples of his stupidity. First he tells hams that they can't operate on 146.52 and that they should make contact and then QSY. Second, he tells us hams that we can't use phonetics when ID'ing...I mean come on people, you don't need to be a rocket scientist to know that!! Ciao, Me "me" wrote in message news:BVZHc.63953$XM6.30522@attbi_s53... and just who do you think you are that everyone should give their name and call on here??? I certainly don't have to answer to you!! Ciao, Me "Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote in message ... Subject: Vanity Call fee going up in August From: "Dee D. Flint" Date: 7/10/2004 7:19 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: "me" wrote in message news:FJQHc.62140$Oq2.29491@attbi_s52... Personally, I believe Amateur Radio Licenses should cost $75 per year for regulatory fees and the Commission should elimanate testing. I also believe that is how it will eventually be in the near future. 73, Me Doubtful that testing would be eliminated. International treaties require that there is proof the operators meet minimum qualifications. Since the FCC has given testing responsibility to the amateur community, the FCC simply issues the license so they don't have any vested interest in eliminating testing. And of course they issue the regulations and enforce those regulations like they do for all communications services. Besides testing is needed to attempt to insure that the licensees will have learned the basics of operating. Hams have such a wide range of privileges and frequencies that some basic knowledge truly is a necessity. We already have enough lids slip through so let's not make it worse. Dee, I was going to dismiss the troll's post simply on the basis that it was written by someone who doesn't have the gonads to sign his/her name to thier public comments (read that: coward) but then I got to thinking that there might be something to it. You know, of course, that I work in healthcare as an ER nurse...And you would be absolutely shocked at the number of people who come to the ER in distress because they claim they can't "afford" thier medicines...Of course they either wreak of cigarette smoke, metabolized alcohol, or both...but they can't "afford" medicine. So...ballpark the number of Amatuers at 650K...At $75/license that is over $48M a year for the General Treasury coffers. Of course for that I'd expect a lot stricter policing of the bands by Riley & Co for it, but hey, let's do it... I am willing to bet that most of the idiots who are discipline problems on the bands are smokers, too. That $75 would be a whole lot of cigarettes, even at present day prices. And there is one ultimate truism...Smokers will forego food, debts and common sense in order to buy more cigarettes (as will alcoholics for more alcohol...). I am willing to bet the scufflaws on 75 and 20 meters would go away in short order after the extra money for enforcement nails them to the wall. My license is worth $75/year to me. I'd pony up the cash. And I can promise you you will never see my name in one of Riley's "letters" on the ARRL website! 73 Steve, K4YZ |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Vanity Call fee going up in August
From: "me" Date: 7/10/2004 5:17 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: BVZHc.63953$XM6.30522@attbi_s53 and just who do you think you are that everyone should give their name and call on here??? I certainly don't have to answer to you!! No, you don't. That's your right. And the Constitution guarantees EVERYONE the right to be a coward if they so choose. You chose. No problem. If you place so little value in your own opinion that you won't sign your name to them, what makes you expect that anyone else should take them seriously? Steve, K4YZ |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"me" wrote in message news:BVZHc.63953$XM6.30522@attbi_s53...
and just who do you think you are that everyone should give their name and call on here??? I certainly don't have to answer to you!! Ciao, Me Welp, there's where you're wrong. Steve is judge, jury, executioner, undertaker and worm around here. Get used to it. You play by his rules or you will be stalked into submission. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote:
So...ballpark the number of Amatuers at 650K...At $75/license that is over $48M a year for the General Treasury coffers. Of course for that I'd expect a lot stricter policing of the bands by Riley & Co for it, but hey, let's do it... Won't happen, government budgeting doesn't work that way. All taxes and fees collected get dumped into one giant pot, and Congress divies it up regardless of the sources. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert Casey wrote:
Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote: So...ballpark the number of Amatuers at 650K...At $75/license that is over $48M a year for the General Treasury coffers. Of course for that I'd expect a lot stricter policing of the bands by Riley & Co for it, but hey, let's do it... Won't happen, government budgeting doesn't work that way. All taxes and fees collected get dumped into one giant pot, and Congress divies it up regardless of the sources. That is so they can keep money from agencies that could serve the public and do some good, to other worthless projects that waste huge amounts of money and mostly serve their own interest. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote So...ballpark the number of Amatuers at 650K...At $75/license that is over $48M a year for the General Treasury coffers. No it isn't, because the 650K would dwindle within a decade to somewhere around 20K if a 10-year license renewal cost $750.00. Then, with only 20K licensed amateurs the service would be folded up as a poor reason to occupy the valuable spectrum it holds. I am willing to bet that most of the idiots who are discipline problems on the bands are smokers, too. I was a smoker for about 40 years (quit 7 years ago) and am a lifelong unrepentent metabolizer of modest amounts of adult (spirited) beverages. My only citation from the FCC was for sending Morse code at 24WPM where the rules specified 20WPM as maximum. Sunvagun! With all kind wishes, de Hans, K0HB 24WPM Discipline Problem |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Vanity Call fee going up in August
From: "KØHB" Date: 7/11/2004 7:08 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: t I was a smoker for about 40 years (quit 7 years ago) and am a lifelong unrepentent metabolizer of modest amounts of adult (spirited) beverages. Well HALLY-LOO-YA Hans...I'm proud of you. Now, with that extra $2.50/day you're NOT spending on cigarettes, you could SPONSOR at least 11 other guys for THIER licenses! My only citation from the FCC was for sending Morse code at 24WPM where the rules specified 20WPM as maximum. Sunvagun! With all kind wishes, Somehow me think you insincere. Steve, K4YZ |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"KØHB" wrote in message nk.net...
My only citation from the FCC was for sending Morse code at 24WPM where the rules specified 20WPM as maximum. Sunvagun! Damned repeaters! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FYI: Vanity Call fee going up in August | General | |||
FCC Vanity Call Sign Dispute | Policy | |||
Vanity Call Sign Lookup | Policy | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #620 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #620 | General |