RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/27628-fcc-morse-testing-16-20-wpm.html)

Dee D. Flint July 15th 04 12:40 PM


"Robert Casey" wrote in message
...


Not only was it easy to enforce but it was selected because it was a
desireable enough reward that people would put in the training to get

it.

Most rewards in the real world have little relationship to the work
requested. You see it in the home too. Kid asks, "Dad can I borrow the
car?" Parent replies, "After you mow the front & back lawn and run the
edger." There is absolutely no relationship between the two activities.
The kid gets a highly desired reward for work that he/she probably

doesn't
care to do but does it anyway to get the reward.


SOme kids and others may decide that the reward is not worth the trouble
and time needed to do the required chore. If it's an option, vs having
to take some stupid class in HS or college because some curriculum
committee decided that it was necessary. Not graduating is not
a desirable option. I had to take 3 years of Spanish class in HS, but
as I don't own a landscaping company, it was a waste of time. :-)
Japanese would have been a better choice, but they didn't have it.
Some kids may feel that they are saddled with non-optional requirements
may decide to edit out of their lives any optional requirements and
forgo the ham license or similar.


If the resulting "reward" isn't worth the effort, then the person doesn't
really want it bad enough and won't be much of an asset anyway. Shear
numbers really don't help in any activity.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


Dee D. Flint July 15th 04 12:48 PM


"N2EY" wrote in message
...
In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes:

"N2EY" wrote in message
...
In article , Robert Casey
writes:

Hams - old and new - didn't change the exam procedures. Neither did
ARRL, NCI, NCVEC or any other ham group. FCC did, because it saved
them resources.

We aren't going to a system other than multiple-choice
published-Q&A-pool exams in the foreseeable future. Just not gonna
happen.

ANd then there's the question of what knowledge should be expected

from
applicants anyway. Does it really require more knowledge and skill to
operate on 14.167 vs 14.344?

More spectrum is simply the reward system in use. It was chosen in

large
part because it's easy to enforce.


Not only was it easy to enforce but it was selected because it was a
desireable enough reward that people would put in the training to get it.

Most rewards in the real world have little relationship to the work
requested. You see it in the home too. Kid asks, "Dad can I borrow the
car?" Parent replies, "After you mow the front & back lawn and run the
edger." There is absolutely no relationship between the two activities.


Actually, there is a relationship - or connection might be a better word.


Connection would be the better term I think since the activities are
unrelated in what they are.

You're right that driving a car doesn't require lawn-mowing skills or
accomplishments.

But in the case cited above, Kid is part of the family. In order to use

the
family's resources (the car, which Parents bought and paid for) Kid has to
contribute something - in the cited case, the lawn care. The relationship
between the car use and the lawn care is one of responsibility and being

part
of a group.


Excellent. We can apply that similar logic to amateur radio requirements.
The spectrum is a public resource. The prospective ham needs to demonstrate
that he has the potential to be a contributor. This is accomplished by the
testing process. The connection is then similar: demonstrating the
potential for responsibility and being part of a larger group. Notice that
I tag it as potential since there will always be a few who are willing to
put in the effort but then end up being problems.

Have you ever seen a family where the kids are given everything they want

but
not required to contribute anything? Ever see what sort of adults those

kids
become?

73 de Jim, N2EY



The kid gets a highly desired reward for work that he/she probably

doesn't
care to do but does it anyway to get the reward.


Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


Geoffrey S. Mendelson July 15th 04 04:16 PM

In article , Len Over 21 wrote:

AMATEUR radio long ago CEASED to be a "pool of experienced morse
operators" for any national need. The nation does NOT need morse
operators, haven't for a long time.


That's an intresting point. 9/11 showed the need still exists for
experienced radio operators who can communicate under pressure.
Morde code is no longer necessary, but a clear voice, understanding
a phonetic alphabet, etc is.

Having a pool of responsable well trained and practiced radio operators
is still needed. They get that training on VHF/UHF repeaters, not operating
morse on HF or contests, etc.

Skills leared from contests are helpful, such as being able to dig a specific
signal out of the QRM and noise, etc, but the majority of operators don't
need it.

Just face the reality of the matter. Morsemen got their little CW
playground and should be happy. Professional communicators they
ain't, even if they want, desperately, to be oh, so very pro.


That's about it. If they want to keep morse active, they should encourage it,
not discourage it. How many hams are on the air that say that they learned
morse code for the license and haven't used it since?

I never thought I'd say that about myself, but unfortuntely it is true.
I've tried to get my speed back up to something reasonable and expect
that it would take an hour a day for at least a month.

Peopl who work 9-5 5 days a week may actualy be able to do it. I don't
(more like noon (or eariler) to 3am).

Geoff.

--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, C.T.O. GW&T Ltd., Jerusalem Israel

IL Voice: 972-544-608-069 IL Fax: 972-2-648-1443 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838


Steve Robeson K4CAP July 15th 04 04:53 PM

Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM
From: "Henry Code Pro"
Date: 7/15/2004 7:39 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"Hans K0HB" wrote in message
. com...

1) The operator will not (consciously or unconsciously) attempt to
anticipate the word being sent, thus will not get 'flummoxed' when the
expected word is incorrect (for example hearing 't h e s' he might
expect the word to be "these" and transcribe it that way, only to have
it turn out to be "thespian", causing him to drop out of his "zone" to
fix the error, perhaps missing the following word.

2) If the operator is not trying to 'understand' the message being
copied, the mechanics of copying become more 'automatic' with (as one
old telegrapher described to me) a mode in which "the message follows
a short circuit between the eardrum and the fingertips without passing
through the brain". From this mode come the (true) tales of operators
who could seemingly "multi-task" copying Morse at a subcounscious
level, and carry on other activitives like carry on a conversation,
retune the receiver, or read a book at the same time.

73, de Hans, K0HB


BULL****!


A nickle says Lennie the Lame found yet another anonymous server to hide
behind.

If not, it's someone he's slept with.

Steve, K4YZ







Steve Robeson K4CAP July 15th 04 05:09 PM

Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM
From: (Geoffrey S. Mendelson)
Date: 7/15/2004 10:16 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In article , Len Over 21 wrote:

AMATEUR radio long ago CEASED to be a "pool of experienced morse
operators" for any national need. The nation does NOT need morse
operators, haven't for a long time.


That's an intresting point. 9/11 showed the need still exists for
experienced radio operators who can communicate under pressure.
Morde code is no longer necessary, but a clear voice, understanding
a phonetic alphabet, etc is.


Geoffrey, you'll notice Lennie interjected "morse" operators, although he
does take great liberties with trying to discredit Amatueur Radio at any
opportunity.

Additionally he was in error that stating that "Amateur radio long ago
ceased to be a "pool of experienced morse operators" for any national need."

Indeed Amateur Radio is the ONLY pool of Morse capable radio operators
remaining, the very small contingent of military and SIGINT operators not
withstanding.

Having a pool of responsable well trained and practiced radio operators
is still needed. They get that training on VHF/UHF repeaters, not operating
morse on HF or contests, etc.


That's why they are spending tons of bucks on the Emergency Communicators
course. Also, here in Tennessee, funds were allocated to equip EVERY hospital
in Tennessee with at least one VHF/UHF and one HF transceiver, along with funds
to get folks qualified to use them. I don't know if that program is a TN-only
program or not.

Skills leared from contests are helpful, such as being able to dig a specific
signal out of the QRM and noise, etc, but the majority of operators don't
need it.


And as much as being able to pull "the weak ones" out is a plus, ACCURACY
is more important...That's why contests ding you if you miscopy an exchange.
Those skills are collateral benefits to emergency communications...Lennie's
uninformed opinion and ranting to the contrary.

Just face the reality of the matter. Morsemen got their little CW
playground and should be happy. Professional communicators they
ain't, even if they want, desperately, to be oh, so very pro.


That's about it. If they want to keep morse active, they should encourage it,
not discourage it. How many hams are on the air that say that they learned
morse code for the license and haven't used it since?


If what Lennie is is being "pro", then I dare say we should take some
EXTRA pride in NOT being "pro" ! ! ! !

Len Anderson has absolutely ZERO experience in emergency communications,
save for what he cuts-and-pastes about CA's ACS system and MARS. No experience
as an Amateur operator, none in any capacity with any civil or federal program.
He is not a licensed Amateur, nor is he in any other program affilitated with
emergency communications, MARS included.

I never thought I'd say that about myself, but unfortuntely it is true.
I've tried to get my speed back up to something reasonable and expect
that it would take an hour a day for at least a month.


In regards to emergency uses, Geoffrey, it's irrelevent. It's nice to
have, especially for health and welfare trafficing, but otherwise not
necessary.

People who work 9-5 5 days a week may actually be able to do it. I don't
(more like noon (or eariler) to 3am).


Sure you can! Just one or two QSO's a day will get your speed up in no
time, regadless of when you work! I work 7P to 7A three to five days a week,
and I am able to KEEP my speed above 20WPM with little effort.

73

Steve, K4YZ







N2EY July 15th 04 05:44 PM

In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes:

In article ,
PAMNO
(N2EY) writes:

In article , Robert Casey
writes:

Hams - old and new - didn't change the exam procedures. Neither did
ARRL, NCI, NCVEC or any other ham group. FCC did, because it saved
them resources.

We aren't going to a system other than multiple-choice
published-Q&A-pool exams in the foreseeable future. Just not gonna
happen.


ANd then there's the question of what knowledge should be expected from
applicants anyway. Does it really require more knowledge and skill to
operate on 14.167 vs 14.344?


More spectrum is simply the reward system in use. It was chosen in large

part
because it's easy to enforce.


Nonsense for the new millennium.


That's what you're giving us, Len!

The separate, elite morsemen-only portions of the ham bands were
put there by old morsemen who were able to influence League
lobbying.


Len, what are "morsemen"?

And if you're talking about how the bands got carved up into Extra-only,
Advanced-and-Extra-only, and General-and-above subbands, that wasn't an ARRL
idea at all. It came from elsewhere.

What is this "easy to enforce" nonsense?


It's not nonsense at all, Len.

The FCC reads morse
easier than it can voice? [I don't think so] Can the FCC DF on
OOK-CW signals "easier" than voice signals? [I don't think so]

The easy to enforce *fact* is that it's simple to check the frequency of a
signal against the license class. It's not nearly so easy to verify things like
power level.

All of the morsemen's propaganda is just spin to keep their little
morse playground. No more, no less.


What are you talking about, Len?

The only Morse-code-only segments of US amateur radio are the lowest 100 kHz of
6 and 2 meters. Open to all hams except Novices.

You will be angry and disturbed at such direct language, but, like
Ernestine's creator put it..."plbthththt...and that's the absolute
truth." :-)


And it's as true as what Ernestine says. IOW, what you wrote is absolute
nonsense, Len, and the historical records prove it.

Besides, why do you want to live in the past so much? Since 1990 it has been
possible to get any class of US ham license with just a 5 wpm code test and a
medical waiver. Since 2000, the only Morse code test left has been the 5 wpm
test.

Here's a challenge for ya, Len:

Tell us, in brief and clear terms, without your usual level of insults, exactly
what *you* think the US amateur license requirements and privileges should be.
We already know you don't like the code test so that issue is clear.

But what about the rest? How many license classes? Subbands by mode, license
class, power? What sort of written exams? Other requirements?

Let's see what *you* would enact if you could.

Or are you only interested in nonsense?


Robert Casey July 15th 04 07:52 PM


You're right that driving a car doesn't require lawn-mowing skills or
accomplishments.

But in the case cited above, Kid is part of the family. In order to use the
family's resources (the car, which Parents bought and paid for) Kid has to
contribute something - in the cited case, the lawn care. The relationship
between the car use and the lawn care is one of responsibility and being part
of a group.



I suspect that many kids see a disparity between their education
(like Physics class, algebra class, and such) and the kind of
paying minimum wage jobs they can get (flipping burgers, stocking
supermarket shelves) and may conclude that school work doesn't
really apply to anything in the real working world. And see no
real reason to graduate other than a vague argument that school
is "good for you". I've told kids to stick it out, and that
you will get your payoff later on (in the form of better paying jobs).
And that stuff like English class is actually valuable (you need to
be able to write well so your boss understands what you are doing
so he thinks that you should get a raise and/or not get laid off).
The subject matter in English class may be stupid, but it's just
what the English teacher knows about (Shakespeare plays and such).
History class is not that important; I got thru life without
knowing about King Louie the VII. Get the C and be done with it.


Steve Robeson K4CAP July 15th 04 08:37 PM

Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM
From: "Kelley James"
Date: 7/15/2004 1:02 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote in message
...


Indeed Amateur Radio is the ONLY pool of Morse capable radio

operators
remaining, the very small contingent of military and SIGINT operators not
withstanding.



Tell me more about military and SIGINT operators.


What's to tell?

The Army still trains AD personnel from all services in Morse Code in
Arizona. This can be verified via independent sources so I will leave you to
it.

Of course Lennie willl jump in and tell us "IT"S FOR RECEIVE ONLY ! ! ! !"

Uh huh.

Steve, K4YZ






Steve Robeson K4CAP July 15th 04 08:54 PM

Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM
From: PAMNO (N2EY)
Date: 7/15/2004 11:44 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In article ,

(Len Over 21) writes:


Nonsense for the new millennium.


That's what you're giving us, Len!


Of course it is.

Without any practical experience in Amatuer Radio, how could he render an
INFORMED opinon on ANYthing having to do with Amateur Radio...???

The separate, elite morsemen-only portions of the ham bands were
put there by old morsemen who were able to influence League
lobbying.


Len, what are "morsemen"?


Anything and everything he's not.

Reminds me of the TV evangilist who was always hollering about the
immorality of the flesh, then got caught renting it!

And if you're talking about how the bands got carved up into Extra-only,
Advanced-and-Extra-only, and General-and-above subbands, that wasn't an ARRL
idea at all. It came from elsewhere.


Don't confuse him with the truth, Jim.

What is this "easy to enforce" nonsense?


It's not nonsense at all, Len.

The FCC reads morse
easier than it can voice? [I don't think so] Can the FCC DF on
OOK-CW signals "easier" than voice signals? [I don't think so]

The easy to enforce *fact* is that it's simple to check the frequency of a
signal against the license class. It's not nearly so easy to verify things
like
power level.

All of the morsemen's propaganda is just spin to keep their little
morse playground. No more, no less.


What are you talking about, Len?


The propaganda is coming from the Loser on Lanark.

The only Morse-code-only segments of US amateur radio are the lowest 100 kHz
of
6 and 2 meters. Open to all hams except Novices.


More facts to choke on, Jim.

You will be angry and disturbed at such direct language, but, like
Ernestine's creator put it..."plbthththt...and that's the absolute
truth." :-)


And it's as true as what Ernestine says. IOW, what you wrote is absolute
nonsense, Len, and the historical records prove it.


As always.

Besides, why do you want to live in the past so much? Since 1990 it has been
possible to get any class of US ham license with just a 5 wpm code test and a
medical waiver. Since 2000, the only Morse code test left has been the 5 wpm
test.


I don't think Lennie's diagnosis of ACRI (*) counts for Amateur testing
waiver purposes, Jim.

Here's a challenge for ya, Len:


Tell us, in brief and clear terms, without your usual level of insults,
exactly
what *you* think the US amateur license requirements and privileges should
be.
We already know you don't like the code test so that issue is clear.

But what about the rest? How many license classes? Subbands by mode, license
class, power? What sort of written exams? Other requirements?


Yeah...let's get another dose of that age limit thing, and please include
some FCC statistics on age-vs-infraction occurences...Better yet, let's see
some of your credentials on child rearing and development that support your
assertion for the need of an age limit.

Let's see what *you* would enact if you could.


He'd just take an eraser to the whole thing.

Or are you only interested in nonsense?


My bet's on the nonsense. That's all he's produced here.

73

Steve, K4YZ

(*) Acute Cranial Rectal Inversion








Phil Kane July 15th 04 09:31 PM

On 15 Jul 2004 16:09:57 GMT, Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote:

That's why they are spending tons of bucks on the Emergency
Communicators course. Also, here in Tennessee, funds were allocated
to equip EVERY hospital in Tennessee with at least one VHF/UHF and one
HF transceiver, along with funds to get folks qualified to use them. I
don't know if that program is a TN-only program or not.


It's in the new nationwide JACO (Hospital Joint Accreditation
Committee) standards. That's how I got co-opted from the county
RACES/AREC program into the Providence St. Vincent Hospital (former
Catholic Charities Hospital) Disaster Communications Team although I
am neither Catholic nor Charitable.

We were lucky that we had two nurses who were hams before this
project started, and that the hospital administration has been very
generous in putting its hand into its pocket and coming up with
funds whenever we needed them. Five dual-band and two tri-band
VHF/UHF radios, three TNCs, two recycled laptop computers......we're
the packet node for the inter-hospital and RACES/AREC packet network
plus three voice circuits (two to the county and one regional
inter-hospital), plus SSTV which the administrators use to transfer
status diagrams between hospitals. We back up the regional and
local 800 MHz systems totally.

Our next quarterly exercise will involve relocation of the EOC (and
the radio equipment) from its primary position to a backup site
across the campus while the exercise is running. That ought to be
fun.

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane

From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest
Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon



N2EY July 16th 04 12:57 AM

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

The exact process I used for getting my license was:

First I took an online test. First couple times did just awful. In both
General and Extra, I started out at about the 50 percent level.


That's really pretty good for a start, with no preparation.

Downloaded the question pool. Used it as reading material on the throne
and around the house. But mostly as a post-test reference


Did you highlight the right answers or black out the wrong ones?

Continued taking the online tests. For every question I got wrong on
the tests, I researched out the answer. Sources were reference books and
the 'net.


Yep.

Continued until I scored 100 percent pretty consistently.


And the actual test was a breeze, right?

What you did was to 'study the test'. Which isn't "wrong" or illegal, despite
what some may rant about it. You did what worked for you, within the rules.

Which do you *really* think requires more understanding of the mateiral and
the
concepts behind it - a test where you don't know the exact Q&A beforehand,
or one where you do?


All the same to me.


Really?

And I think my method above says something more.
Being smart is not necessarily knowing something - it is knowing what
you know, knowing what you don't know, and knowing where to get the
answer so you *do* know.


Kinda like the difference between schooling and education.

If you make questions up, you have to have a
reference for them someplace. Is it in a book? fine, study the book
then. Is it a question pool? Fine also.


*If* you only care about right answers rather than understanding.


Not really. I saw a electrician licensing test book with question pool
recently. Lives depend on the electrician doing safe and proper work.
and they are depending on the Electrician knowing.


But someone cannot become a licensed electrician by written tests alone. There
are extensive practical tests and experience requirements as well, and several
levels of licensing. IIRC, here in PA it takes 9000 hours of documented work
experience under the supervision of a licensed electrician to be licensed at
the highest level.

Rote memorization? Seriously if anyone rote memorizes the General and
Extra tests, they are very intelligent and very stupid at the same time.


Depends on the person and the subject. In some areas, the only way to know
the
material is rote memorization. (How long is a ham license term?)


Of course, but that is diluting the issue. No other way to learn that
stuff.


The problem is that more and more of the test is becoming "that stuff".

And they will have a few curves thrown at them at test time.


How? The test questions are all in the pool. Read the pool and you have
seen every possible question and answer.


All my tests have been from the question pool, so it is something I
have some advantage over many people here. Actual knowledge rather than
opinion.

I take a simulated test every so often just to maintain an even strain.

The answers are not always in the same order as they are in the pool. I
experienced this in my Extra test. And if the person knows the text of
the answer, they almost certainly *know* the answer. That takes a level
of understanding much greater than "This question's answer is "D"


Nobody with any sense memorizes the answer letters! But being able to know
which answer is right after having seen the exact Q&A several times before
doesn't guarantee any level of understanding.

For example, I could ask:

- Which of the following are blunatrons? (Flufnagles, zinthorps, calinars,
rhenotors)

A) Fluffnagles and rhenotors only
B) Zinthorps only
C) Calinars and zinthorps only
D) Calinars, zinthorps and fluffnagles

(Of course the correct answer is C)

Now, if you remember that calinars and zinthorps are blunatrons but fluffnagles
and rhenotors aren't, you'll always get the question right. But do you really
understand anything about blunatrons?

Heck, download the pool as a Word or text document, edit out the wrong
answers,
print the questions up on 3x5 cards and just read the dern things while in
the room of many doors.

Remember the game "Trivial Pursuit"? When it was a big deal ~20 years ago,
I
used to carry a handful of the cards in my pocket and read them at odd
times
(on the subway, waiting for the elevator, etc.) Didn't consciously try to
memorize them, just read them. I was soon nearly unbeatable - as long as
the game used the Original edition cards.


The question pools have far fewer questions than the Trivial Pursuit cards
did.


A thought: If a question pool is cheating, then a book with the answers
in the test in the course of reading is cheating too


Question pools don't equal cheating unless they are supposed to be
secret.


So...

The only way that *some* Hams will be happy is if the test questions
have answers in no book - that is to say that all testing will have to
be in the form of basic research - the new ham will have to advance the
state of the art in his/her admission test.


bwaaahaahaa


Otherwise the new ham is cheating and isn't as good as the old ham. 8^)



(I just recently had to listen to an old timer in person on a tirade
about the worthless new hams - again.)




Why did you have to listen? I find turning on my heel and walking away
does wonders. Or, looking the ranter straight in the eye and saying,
"You're just wrong...." (lookit how the oldest ranter here on rrap
reacts to being told he's wrong - which he often is....)

Well, it wasn't a case where I could or should have turned away. I
supposed I could have kicked the person out, but I also needed the help
he was giving on a task. Real life has a habit of modifying our
behavior. Plus ut wasn't a personal attack. Most hams I know think I'm a
relative old timer. But its still irritating.



Well, he was just plain wrong. The test is just one part of being

qualified.

Of course. But sometimes we have to work with people that are just
plain wrong.


Yep.

Every once in a while, I'll mention something like "Hey, I resemble
that remark!"


There was an old song called "Patches" that you may recall from high school
days. Man is remembering how tough he had it as a kid. Among the folks I
grew up with, we still use the line

"And then the rains came, and washed all the crops away"

whenever somebody starts geezering.


hehe, I used to do a good rendition of the line after that - "And at
the age of thirteen, I felt I had the weight of the whooole world on my
shoulders" 8^)


"And Mama knew what I was going through..."

That's the one!

It's particularly effective when someone is going on and one about something
like how tough it was to find a parking space, or how long the line at
Starbucks was this morning, and three people do it, one taking each line...

Besides, what it all comes down to is this:

Hams - old and new - didn't change the exam procedures. Neither did
ARRL, NCI, NCVEC or any other ham group. FCC did, because it saved
them resources.

We aren't going to a system other than multiple-choice
published-Q&A-pool exams in the foreseeable future. Just not gonna
happen.

Just a thought here... If we were to say, go to a book oriented
reference for the tests, I can assure you that it would be no better
than the pool based system.


Sure it would. But we're not going to go back to secret tests. Not gonna
happen - at least not anytime soon. Why get in a lather over it?


Thousands and thousands of college students
prove this on a daily basis, pulling all-nighters, cramming to take
their tests. All the crammed knowledge is placed in shirt term memory,
to quickly fade after the test is over.


That only works for some people. And recall that for most of those
students, the cramming is not the only preparation done.

Maybe the answer is to have on on one testing, where the test
administrator comes to love with you for a week, to see if you *really*
have knowledge of Ham radio....hehe.


If the test administrator looks like Heidi Klum, or if I get to be *her*
test
administrator, I'll volunteer to put the system throuigh its paces. Heck,
I'll sign up for two weeks......


Hey, maybe my dum typo was Karma!


I've got dibs on Ms. Klum if she ever needs a ham radio instructor.

This might be the way to increase the
numbers of Hams! People would demand to be retested every year or so.
And the YL's could pick their own instructors........


Yep.

73 de Jim, N2EY

William July 16th 04 01:17 AM

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , "Dee D. Flint" Mama Dee
speaking to her children writes:

"N2EY" wrote in message
...
In article , Robert Casey
writes:

Hams - old and new - didn't change the exam procedures. Neither did
ARRL, NCI, NCVEC or any other ham group. FCC did, because it saved
them resources.

We aren't going to a system other than multiple-choice
published-Q&A-pool exams in the foreseeable future. Just not gonna
happen.


ANd then there's the question of what knowledge should be expected from
applicants anyway. Does it really require more knowledge and skill to
operate on 14.167 vs 14.344?

More spectrum is simply the reward system in use. It was chosen in large

part
because it's easy to enforce.


Specially now that enforcement is a rare thing, i.e., the last 30
years or so.

Not only was it easy to enforce but it was selected because it was a
desireable enough reward that people would put in the training to get it.


Utter nonsense, Mama Dee. Spin-like rationalization.


Yep, that's absolute crap.

One license would be even easier to not enforce.

AMATEUR radio is a hobby, not a national service, not an arm of the
United States Navy or the rest of the military, and not a public safety
organization. Just a hobby involving radio.


It can be a service, and many actually do dedicate themselves to that
service. They train and practice, take turns at being NCS, and
affiliate with county emergency offices and the American Red Cross.

But there is a large contingent that brags about copying an ARRL
message before field day starts, how they can send code so poorly that
a NCT with an electronic reader cannot copy, etc, etc, etc. Shining
examples of service.

AMATEUR radio long ago CEASED to be a "pool of experienced morse
operators" for any national need. The nation does NOT need morse
operators, haven't for a long time.


But when the aliens arrive and don't know the code... they'll be in
for a rude awakening. We'll have 'em right where we want 'em!

Most rewards in the real world have little relationship to the work
requested.


More spin crappola. The influential morsemen at the League
managed to carve out a separate little morse playground for
themselves with all sorts of fatuous phrases of "national need" and
"importance of a pool of trained operators" and the FCC caved in
to their demands.


I think it's just a legacy carry-over from a time when it was
necessary and useful. Those days are long past being necessary.

You see it in the home too. Kid asks, "Dad can I borrow the
car?" Parent replies, "After you mow the front & back lawn and run the
edger." There is absolutely no relationship between the two activities.
The kid gets a highly desired reward for work that he/she probably doesn't
care to do but does it anyway to get the reward.


So, the League is a surrogate parent?!? I don't think so.


Maybe the FCC? Some here obviously need a little extra parenting.

Like Old Yeller and Old Yeller Teeth Kelly.

Are all the Amateur Extras surrogate parents now? I don't think so.


I hope not.

Dee, quit this infernal nattering about "parentage" and ham radio.


Kind of irritating, huh?

Quit trying to sound off like you've got an influential pair.


Maybe somehow she got hold of 146.34/94.

You aren't
a radioactive au pair and this ain't the Children's Hour (even is some of
the other extras act like children).


Sherry and Lambchop?

Just face the reality of the matter. Morsemen got their little CW
playground and should be happy. Professional communicators they
ain't, even if they want, desperately, to be oh, so very pro.


They're always welcome to pay some COLEM $90 for random groups of
five.

Len Over 21 July 16th 04 02:41 AM

In article , (Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes:

Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM
From:
PAMNO (N2EY)
Date: 7/15/2004 11:44 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In article ,

(Len Over 21) writes:


Nonsense for the new millennium.


That's what you're giving us, Len!


Of course it is.

Without any practical experience in Amatuer Radio, how could he render an
INFORMED opinon on ANYthing having to do with Amateur Radio...???


Riiiiiiight, Stalker. How can ANYONE possibly know anything
about anything without being federally licensed in it?

Gosh, in your psychotic fantasyland, amateur radio must be a
classified, sensitive, deep dark secret, revealed only to those "eyes
only" folks who have been background-checked, right? :-)

NOBODY unlicense can possibly know anything at all!

So, therefore, howinnaheck is anyone going to find out about
supersecret classified hum raddio? :-)

Poor baby Stalker. Still off on that delusional psychosis of
hate-hate-hate suffered from grievous woundings in old newsgrope
messaging! [he needs a purple heart or something for that shoe
box of medals]

The separate, elite morsemen-only portions of the ham bands were
put there by old morsemen who were able to influence League
lobbying.


Len, what are "morsemen"?


Anything and everything he's not.


I'm a retired electronics engineer with a good retirement income.

That means a professional. Sunnuvagun!

Stalker Stevie a pro? Stalker have a pro kit?

Stalker do good yell-yell-murine imitation. Did "seven hostile
actions." Never explained that. Might have been done in hum
raddio "actions?"

Stalker did "combat trianing" in Barstow, CA, murine warehouse
and supply depot? Tough duty. Very hostile. Action?


Reminds me of the TV evangilist who was always hollering about the
immorality of the flesh, then got caught renting it!


Stalker Stevie get in trouble again with religion? Tsk.


The propaganda is coming from the Loser on Lanark.


Poor delusional, hate-filled psychotic now wants to go geographic.

Tsk.

10048 Lanark Street, Sun Valley, CA. Nice neighborhood.
Upscale. Mortgage got paid off fully years ago. Adjoining
walled community of 44 homes, one going for $860,000.

Look it up on MapQuest.

Know how? [no license required to use MapQuest...]


I don't think Lennie's diagnosis of ACRI (*) counts for Amateur testing
waiver purposes, Jim.


Poor delusional, hate-filled psychotic snitting in public again.

Poor Stalker needs mental therapy.

Medical science may not be up to his level of psychosis.
Too much hate, too thin a skin for sustained newsgrope
living. Tsk.

But, it's okay for all extras to say or do anything, to be the role-
model evangelists for Olde Tyme Hamme Raddio...the one where
Kode was King and strictly enforced by Mighty Macho Morsemen.


My bet's on the nonsense. That's all he's produced here.


Sorry, can't venture into your psychotic fantasyland. Too weird
in there. It isn't reality. It is the Twilight Zone pesonified.

Try a different mix of pilfered drugs from the "ER" medicine room
next time.

Steve, K4YZ

(*) Acute Cranial Rectal Inversion


Tsk, tsk, tsk. The same snit from one who DEMANDS genteel,
civil behavior, no nasty words.

A good example of top-of-the-line Amateur Extra behavior?

LHA / WMD

Len Over 21 July 16th 04 02:41 AM

In article , (Stevie
Stalker, Mighty Macho Morseman Ethnic Cleanser of Olde Tyme
Hamme Raddio using a Fleet Kit) writes:

Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM
From: "Kelley James"

Date: 7/15/2004 1:02 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

"Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote in message
...

Indeed Amateur Radio is the ONLY pool of Morse capable radio operators
remaining, the very small contingent of military and SIGINT operators not
withstanding.


Tell me more about military and SIGINT operators.


What's to tell?

The Army still trains AD personnel from all services in Morse Code in
Arizona. This can be verified via independent sources so I will leave you to
it.


Fort Huachuca, Arizona. "Home of the Buffalo Soldiers."

U.S. Army Military Intelligence Center, School, and also the Hq
for Army MARS. :-)

Huachuca has a nice website which includes an on-line "museum"
of important Military Intelligence folks.

Of course Lennie willl jump in and tell us "IT"S FOR RECEIVE ONLY ! ! !
!"

Uh huh.


Absolutely for RECEIVE ONLY! :-)

Passive signal intelligence work is done that way. The other side has
no idea they are being intercepted. Sunnuvagun! How about that?

The curricula for all MOSs was on-line at Fort Huachuca. Haven't
been there lately (on-line) so it might have been re-arranged. They
had the names of the computer programs used in teaching morse
code. All were commercial packages. Sunnuvagun! How about
that!

Been to Fort Huachuca in person. Hotness rules. Stalker Stevie
will say "he's been there too" if his paranoic psychosis is working
the same. :-)

LHA / WMD

Len Over 21 July 16th 04 02:41 AM

In article , "Kelley James"
writes:

"Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote in message
...

Indeed Amateur Radio is the ONLY pool of Morse capable radio operators
remaining, the very small contingent of military and SIGINT operators not
withstanding.


Tell me more about military and SIGINT operators.


Don't ask too much. Stalker Stevie never did any Signals
Intelligence work in the military. He was too busy doing his
hamme raddio thing in between his "seven hostile actions." :-)

He will tell you to "call the VA" to find out everything!

Or, he will say stuff like "Sorry Hans, MARS IS ham radio!"

Hi hi ho ho

LHA / WMD

Len Over 21 July 16th 04 02:41 AM

In article , PAMNO
(N2EY) writes:

In article ,

(Len Over 21) writes:

In article ,


(N2EY) writes:

In article , Robert Casey
writes:

Hams - old and new - didn't change the exam procedures. Neither did
ARRL, NCI, NCVEC or any other ham group. FCC did, because it saved
them resources.

We aren't going to a system other than multiple-choice
published-Q&A-pool exams in the foreseeable future. Just not gonna
happen.

ANd then there's the question of what knowledge should be expected from
applicants anyway. Does it really require more knowledge and skill to
operate on 14.167 vs 14.344?

More spectrum is simply the reward system in use. It was chosen in large

part
because it's easy to enforce.


Nonsense for the new millennium.


That's what you're giving us, Len!


Now, now Rev. Jim. You're off on an evangelical Sermon on the
Antenna Mount again!

You just didn't answer the question I posed about "enforcement
ease." Tsk. tsk. tsk.

Tell us how morse signals are "easier to enforce" than voice
signals. Try a few details of how that is done.

The separate, elite morsemen-only portions of the ham bands were
put there by old morsemen who were able to influence League
lobbying.


Len, what are "morsemen"?


An elite band of beepers stuck in a time warp of yesteryear.

Amateurs, of course.

The rest of the radio world has given up morse code modes for any
primary communications. Most other radio services never even
considered it!

And if you're talking about how the bands got carved up into Extra-only,
Advanced-and-Extra-only, and General-and-above subbands, that wasn't an ARRL
idea at all. It came from elsewhere.

What is this "easy to enforce" nonsense?


It's not nonsense at all, Len.


So...answer how it is "easy."

The FCC reads morse
easier than it can voice? [I don't think so] Can the FCC DF on
OOK-CW signals "easier" than voice signals? [I don't think so]

The easy to enforce *fact* is that it's simple to check the frequency of a
signal against the license class. It's not nearly so easy to verify things
like power level.


Oh, yeah, the Magick of Morse!

All morsemen are superbly honest and without fault...would not
dream of falsifying anything, would they?

Hello? Ever hear of audio recorders? Those have been around
since WW2. Really. More modern stuff than wire recorders
nowadays, old timer. Combine that with modern DF techniques
(no rotating loop antennas required) and modern data recorders
and ANY signal can be found out.

All of the morsemen's propaganda is just spin to keep their little
morse playground. No more, no less.


What are you talking about, Len?


YOUR spin on morse code. And the Belief System of the Church
of St. Hiram.

The only Morse-code-only segments of US amateur radio are the lowest 100 kHz
of 6 and 2 meters. Open to all hams except Novices.


WE weren't talking about "morse code only" stuff, Rev. Jim.

[got some bad peyote again? tsk]

You will be angry and disturbed at such direct language, but, like
Ernestine's creator put it..."plbthththt...and that's the absolute
truth." :-)


And it's as true as what Ernestine says. IOW, what you wrote is absolute
nonsense, Len, and the historical records prove it.


Yah, yu be all hot and bothered! :-)

SPIN doctoring you do, Rev. Jim, and you don't have the license
to practice doctoring. Tsk, tsk.

Besides, why do you want to live in the past so much?


Moi? HAH!

Who was talking up "T.O.M." olde tymer? YOU were.

EIGHTY YEARS AGO.

Tsk, tsk, tsk.

Since 1990 it has been
possible to get any class of US ham license with just a 5 wpm code test and a
medical waiver. Since 2000, the only Morse code test left has been the 5 wpm
test.


So?

The morse code test is STILL THERE, isn't it?

All U.S. amateur radio licenses with below-30-MHz privileges
require passing that morse code test. NOW. Not 14 years ago,
not 80 years ago. NOW.

WHY?

Here's a challenge for ya, Len:


Lissen up, peyote breath. Here's YOUR challenge:

Try to go a whole 48 hours of NOT accessing the newsgroup and
telling everyone a sermon or preaching that Code Is Good, the Best.

Bet you can't do it. :-)

You can't. You are fixated on Being Here, the Voice of "Truth"
about olde-tyme hamme raddio, telling all heretics to your
Belief System that they are "wrong," "incorrect," and other
indelicate nasties when they don't like Mighty Macho Morse.

Ho hum.

LHA / WMD


Len Over 21 July 16th 04 02:41 AM

In article , (Stevie
Stalker, Ethnic Cleanser of Olde Tyme Hamme Raddio) writes:

A nickle says Lennie the Lame found yet another anonymous server to hide
behind.

If not, it's someone he's slept with.


Poor Stalker making LIES again. Tsk, tsk.

Poor boy just doesn't know when to quit with that terrible hate
psychosis. Can't realize that his fantastic thoughts just aren't
liked by others. That's how it is with the mentally disturbed...

No problem here on walking or leg useage, working fine. No
"lameness." However, poor Stalker must have stepped in
something long ago...probably his first set of LIES in here.

No need to hide identities here. I'm still at the same address
as given in those Ham Radio magazine articles. You can also
send e-mail to the following very valid e-address:



Len Over 21 July 16th 04 02:41 AM

In article , (Stevie
Stalker, Hamme Raddio Ethnic Cleanser with his Fleet Kit) writes:

Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM
From:
(Geoffrey S. Mendelson)
Date: 7/15/2004 10:16 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In article , Len Over 21

wrote:

AMATEUR radio long ago CEASED to be a "pool of experienced morse
operators" for any national need. The nation does NOT need morse
operators, haven't for a long time.


That's an intresting point. 9/11 showed the need still exists for
experienced radio operators who can communicate under pressure.
Morde code is no longer necessary, but a clear voice, understanding
a phonetic alphabet, etc is.


Geoffrey, you'll notice Lennie interjected "morse" operators, although he
does take great liberties with trying to discredit Amatueur Radio at any
opportunity.


Poor Stalker, still deep in delusional psychosis thinking that all who
disagree with Him are "discrediting amateur radio" (not "amatueur"
radio, hi hi).

No other radio service in the USA uses morse code for ANY
emergency communications, nor do they do that for primary
radio communications purposes. No Public Safety Radio group
needs any morse qualifications to do their work.

Additionally he was in error that stating that "Amateur radio long ago
ceased to be a "pool of experienced morse operators" for any national need."


No "error." REALITY.

Stevie Stalker LIES again, but doesn't understand he does. Tsk.

He confuses his fantasy with reality. Bad scene. He need mental
help.

Indeed Amateur Radio is the ONLY pool of Morse capable radio operators
remaining, the very small contingent of military and SIGINT operators not
withstanding.


VERY small. The Military Intelligence Center at Fort Huachuca
trains signal intercept operators. A few of the MOSs in that school
learn International Morse Code from computer programs. Those same
trainees also learn to operate a variety of recorders to record those
intercepts for later analysis. Just one small facet of MI training.

On-off keying morse code is falling in the rest of the world. Eventually
even they (the U.S. military) will drop that training. They have the
recorders and the recorded intercepts if some idiot foreign force wants
to use morse...and thus be open to signals attack by just about
anyone.


And as much as being able to pull "the weak ones" out is a plus, ACCURACY
is more important...That's why contests ding you if you miscopy an exchange.
Those skills are collateral benefits to emergency communications...Lennie's
uninformed opinion and ranting to the contrary.


Poor delusional Stalker, still mixing up his hate-filled dystemper of a
fantasyland continuum with reality. Tsk. He needs mental help.


If what Lennie is is being "pro", then I dare say we should take some
EXTRA pride in NOT being "pro" ! ! ! !


More delusional Stalker fantasyland hate.

There are NO Public Safety Radio Services now using morse code
in any form for public safety communications. None.

Len Anderson has absolutely ZERO experience in emergency communications,
save for what he cuts-and-pastes about CA's ACS system and MARS.


Untrue, but trying to convince a delusional psychotic with a gigantic
hate complex living in his fantasyland is a non-starter.

Poor Stalker needs mental therapy.

No experience
as an Amateur operator, none in any capacity with any civil or federal

program.

Untrue. But Stalker will insist that I have none until the last psychotic
delusion is ripped from his hate-filled little mind...

He is not a licensed Amateur, nor is he in any other program affilitated with
emergency communications, MARS included.


"Sorry, Hans, MARS IS amateur radio!" Hi hi ho ho.

Department of Defense Directive 4650.2, effective November 2003
says otherwise.

Amateur licensee Stalker says MARS is amateur radio.

Just who is the LIE spreader there?

Hint. It isn't DoD. :-)

I never thought I'd say that about myself, but unfortuntely it is true.
I've tried to get my speed back up to something reasonable and expect
that it would take an hour a day for at least a month.


In regards to emergency uses, Geoffrey, it's irrelevent. It's nice to
have, especially for health and welfare trafficing, but otherwise not
necessary.


RED ALERT! ALL HANDS TO BATTLE STATIONS!

REALITY BROKE OUT! :-)


People who work 9-5 5 days a week may actually be able to do it. I don't
(more like noon (or eariler) to 3am).


Sure you can! Just one or two QSO's a day will get your speed up in no
time, regadless of when you work! I work 7P to 7A three to five days a week,
and I am able to KEEP my speed above 20WPM with little effort.


There ya go, Stalker. You just keep on beepin...and imagining
yourself a big fat Hero of the Homeland for beeping fast.

So long, Reality again. Hello fantasy! :-)

LHA / WMD

Len Over 21 July 16th 04 02:41 AM

In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes:

Excellent. We can apply that similar logic to amateur radio requirements.
The spectrum is a public resource. The prospective ham needs to demonstrate
that he has the potential to be a contributor.


Morsemanship left the "public resource" zone a long time ago for
all the other radio services.

You, and all other morsepersons, seem to think that amateur radio
is all concerned with morse code skills. That's hardly in any "public
interest" except to that tiny slice of the "public" that worships at
the Church of St. Hiram.

You and all the other morsepersons are Believers in that "church."

This is accomplished by the
testing process. The connection is then similar: demonstrating the
potential for responsibility and being part of a larger group.


Becoming a part of a slightly larger group of morse code users.

ONLY in amateur radio.

Hundreds of thousands of others have "demonstrated their
'potential' for responsibility...and DEMONSTRATED that very
responsibility" in the military and/or commercial radio...WITHOUT
having to do that testing for morse code cognition.

As one of that group, I don't feel chastened by those spankaroony
words from a self-styled "parent" who was into such responsibility
beginning a half century ago.

Notice that
I tag it as potential since there will always be a few who are willing to
put in the effort but then end up being problems.


Notice: Mama Dee wants to play "parent" again, thinking that all
others not thinking as she does are "children." Tsk, tsk.

Poor Dee. Still on that self-elevated elitist pedestal again, trying
to spank others for not thinking properly. :-)

LHA / WMD

Len Over 21 July 16th 04 02:41 AM

In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes:

If the resulting "reward" isn't worth the effort, then the person doesn't
really want it bad enough and won't be much of an asset anyway. Shear
numbers really don't help in any activity.


Dee, look at all the "assets" championing olde tyme hamme raddio
in here. :-)

An earthquake with high shear forces wouldn't convince them (or you)
that morsemanship is not necessary. That's sheer supposition, of
course. :-)

LHA / WMD

Len Over 21 July 16th 04 02:41 AM

In article , PAMNO
(N2EY) writes:

Have you ever seen a family where the kids are given everything they want but
not required to contribute anything? Ever see what sort of adults those kids
become?


Six-year-old Novices and Nine-year-old Extras? :-)

LHA / WMD

Len Over 21 July 16th 04 02:41 AM

In article , PAMNO
(N2EY) writes:

In article , Robert Casey
writes:

ANd then there's the question of what knowledge should be expected from
applicants anyway. Does it really require more knowledge and skill to
operate on 14.167 vs 14.344?

More spectrum is simply the reward system in use. It was chosen in large
part because it's easy to enforce.


Not only was it easy to enforce but it was selected because it was a
desireable enough reward that people would put in the training to get it.


But what does the FCC get out of it?


The whole concept of a license system with multiple levels of knowledge and
privileges.


Hardly. Just a nice little CLUB rule set devised by those wonderful
morsemen of olde tyme hamme raddio (when men were "men" and
kode was king). Yawn.

At three years into the new millennium, a time when all the other U.S.
radio services have dropped morse code for any sort of
communications, the olde tyme hammes insist on Kode is King.

That's the divine religious order dictum from the Church of St. Hiram.

FCC got talked into keeping it by all those morsemen who elevated
themselves (by their bootstrap circuits?) as grande champion
radio ops and using morse to "get through when nothing else
would" (incorrect, but one can't convince a Believer in real truth).

You can gloss up the "federal" rules any way you want as "so very
important" but that whole rule set is going by inertia and FCC isn't
all that interested in bothering with a bunch of amateur hobbyists
to change the rules. Lots more REAL radio for FCC to regulate.

Have fun pretending you are necessary for Homeland Security,
defending the nation by morsemanship. :-)

LHA / WMD

Len Over 21 July 16th 04 05:35 AM

In article ,
(William) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article , "Dee D. Flint" Mama Dee
speaking to her children writes:

"N2EY" wrote in message
...
In article , Robert Casey
writes:

Hams - old and new - didn't change the exam procedures. Neither did
ARRL, NCI, NCVEC or any other ham group. FCC did, because it saved
them resources.

We aren't going to a system other than multiple-choice
published-Q&A-pool exams in the foreseeable future. Just not gonna
happen.


ANd then there's the question of what knowledge should be expected from
applicants anyway. Does it really require more knowledge and skill to
operate on 14.167 vs 14.344?

More spectrum is simply the reward system in use. It was chosen in large

part
because it's easy to enforce.


Specially now that enforcement is a rare thing, i.e., the last 30
years or so.


The Great Guru hasn't explained the "how" of that "easy enforcement."

He's getting into the Proclamation Zone, sort of a derivative of the
yell-yell's Twilight Zone. :-)

Not only was it easy to enforce but it was selected because it was a
desireable enough reward that people would put in the training to get it.


Utter nonsense, Mama Dee. Spin-like rationalization.


Yep, that's absolute crap.

One license would be even easier to not enforce.


Shhhh...don't spread out the obvious!

Dee is into the Maternal Zone and thinks of all who don't think like
Mama to be "children" with reward/punishment discipline.

AMATEUR radio is a hobby, not a national service, not an arm of the
United States Navy or the rest of the military, and not a public safety
organization. Just a hobby involving radio.


It can be a service, and many actually do dedicate themselves to that
service. They train and practice, take turns at being NCS, and
affiliate with county emergency offices and the American Red Cross.


Of course. Most of those aren't in here, though. :-)

But there is a large contingent that brags about copying an ARRL
message before field day starts, how they can send code so poorly that
a NCT with an electronic reader cannot copy, etc, etc, etc. Shining
examples of service.


Heh. Service for four. On sale now at $24.95 till Monday.

AMATEUR radio long ago CEASED to be a "pool of experienced morse
operators" for any national need. The nation does NOT need morse
operators, haven't for a long time.


But when the aliens arrive and don't know the code... they'll be in
for a rude awakening. We'll have 'em right where we want 'em!


Only if the aliens land in Hollywood near a major studio. :-)

Most rewards in the real world have little relationship to the work
requested.


More spin crappola. The influential morsemen at the League
managed to carve out a separate little morse playground for
themselves with all sorts of fatuous phrases of "national need" and
"importance of a pool of trained operators" and the FCC caved in
to their demands.


I think it's just a legacy carry-over from a time when it was
necessary and useful. Those days are long past being necessary.


True enough. Problem is that so many of the olde tyme hammes
think they are still living in those olde tymes.

You see it in the home too. Kid asks, "Dad can I borrow the
car?" Parent replies, "After you mow the front & back lawn and run the
edger." There is absolutely no relationship between the two activities.
The kid gets a highly desired reward for work that he/she probably doesn't
care to do but does it anyway to get the reward.


So, the League is a surrogate parent?!? I don't think so.


Maybe the FCC? Some here obviously need a little extra parenting.


...and some are well beyond that into delusional psychosis that no
parent could possibly handle.

Like Old Yeller and Old Yeller Teeth Kelly.


Careful or they will gum you to death... :-)

Are all the Amateur Extras surrogate parents now? I don't think so.


I hope not.


If it were, it would be a classic dysfunctional family affair. :-)

Dee, quit this infernal nattering about "parentage" and ham radio.


Kind of irritating, huh?


Like the world's worst Jewish mother-in-law. :-)

Mel Lazarus should read this one. He could use it in his strip.

Quit trying to sound off like you've got an influential pair.


Maybe somehow she got hold of 146.34/94.


Is that the new measurement system? :-)

You aren't
a radioactive au pair and this ain't the Children's Hour (even is some of
the other extras act like children).


Sherry and Lambchop?


Charley Horse. :-)

Or Kukla, Fran, and Ollie. [for you olde tyme hammes]

Just face the reality of the matter. Morsemen got their little CW
playground and should be happy. Professional communicators they
ain't, even if they want, desperately, to be oh, so very pro.


They're always welcome to pay some COLEM $90 for random groups of
five.


There ya go! Excellent suggestion! "Officially tested" by an agency
of the federal government!

Well, not an "agency," but a pseudo-representative like thing. :-)

It WOULD be most "official" though!

LHA / WMD

Steve Robeson K4CAP July 16th 04 10:56 AM

Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM
From: (Len Over 21)
Date: 7/15/2004 8:41 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In article ,

(Stevie
Stalker, Ethnic Cleanser of Olde Tyme Hamme Raddio) writes:

A nickle says Lennie the Lame found yet another anonymous server to

hide
behind.

If not, it's someone he's slept with.


Poor Stalker making LIES again. Tsk, tsk.


Not a lie, Lennie...A bet.

Poor boy just doesn't know when to quit with that terrible hate
psychosis. Can't realize that his fantastic thoughts just aren't
liked by others. That's how it is with the mentally disturbed...


There's no "hate psychosis" here.

(A bit of impatience wating on your credentials in mental health
disciplines, however...you continue to make "diagnosis" without a license to
practice medicine OR psychiatry...)

No problem here on walking or leg useage, working fine. No
"lameness." However, poor Stalker must have stepped in
something long ago...probably his first set of LIES in here.


You have the ultimate lameness, Lennie.

You have a hole the size of Lake Erie in your character. That's
documented. If you put as much time into fixing it as you did night school,
you might actaully be a man someday.

No need to hide identities here. I'm still at the same address
as given in those Ham Radio magazine articles. You can also
send e-mail to the following very valid e-address:


I have no doubt you're at the same address.

I am sure your IEEE address is valid.

I am also sure that a number of "anonymous" posts that pop in here from
time to time are your doing, and that it is merely your "force multiplier".
You cannot garner any real "support" from people willing to put thier real
names to thier posts, so you make them up.

(Of course there's Vipul Shah, whose identity had to be drawn out, and
there's Brian Burke, whose own "honesty" and current use of a nomme-de-guerre
induces it's own confusion...these guys are who you want "rooting" for
you...?!?!)

I'd expect nothing less from you. You've set your own standard, as low as
it is. Please don't whine and snivvel when it's fed back to you, Lennie.
You're a victim of your own misconduct.

Steve, K4YZ






N2EY July 16th 04 10:57 AM

In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes:

In article ,
PAMNO
(N2EY) writes:

In article ,

(Len Over 21) writes:

In article ,


(N2EY) writes:

In article , Robert Casey
writes:

Hams - old and new - didn't change the exam procedures. Neither did
ARRL, NCI, NCVEC or any other ham group. FCC did, because it saved
them resources.

We aren't going to a system other than multiple-choice
published-Q&A-pool exams in the foreseeable future. Just not gonna
happen.

ANd then there's the question of what knowledge should be expected from
applicants anyway. Does it really require more knowledge and skill to
operate on 14.167 vs 14.344?

More spectrum is simply the reward system in use. It was chosen in large
part
because it's easy to enforce.

Nonsense for the new millennium.


That's what you're giving us, Len!


Now, now Rev. Jim. You're off on an evangelical Sermon on the
Antenna Mount again!


Who is this "Rev. Jim" person you keep mentioing, Len?

You just didn't answer the question I posed about "enforcement
ease." Tsk. tsk. tsk.


Yes, I did, Len.

Tell us how morse signals are "easier to enforce" than voice
signals. Try a few details of how that is done.


Why?

The separate, elite morsemen-only portions of the ham bands were
put there by old morsemen who were able to influence League
lobbying.


Len, what are "morsemen"?


An elite band of beepers stuck in a time warp of yesteryear.

Amateurs, of course.


So all radio amateurs are morsemen?

The rest of the radio world has given up morse code modes for any
primary communications. Most other radio services never even
considered it!


So you think radio amateurs should stop using Morse code?

And if you're talking about how the bands got carved up into Extra-only,
Advanced-and-Extra-only, and General-and-above subbands, that wasn't an
ARRL idea at all. It came from elsewhere.

What is this "easy to enforce" nonsense?


It's not nonsense at all, Len.


So...answer how it is "easy."


I'll explain it again.

If a ham tries to exceed license privileges by operating on frequencies not
licensed to that ham, all that has to be done is measure the operating
frequency and identify the source.

The FCC reads morse
easier than it can voice? [I don't think so] Can the FCC DF on
OOK-CW signals "easier" than voice signals? [I don't think so]

The easy to enforce *fact* is that it's simple to check the frequency of a
signal against the license class. It's not nearly so easy to verify things
like power level.


Oh, yeah, the Magick of Morse!


Applies to all modes.

All morsemen are superbly honest and without fault...would not
dream of falsifying anything, would they?


How could they?

When was the last time FCC had to do some enforcement on a ham using Morse
code?

Hello? Ever hear of audio recorders? Those have been around
since WW2. Really. More modern stuff than wire recorders
nowadays, old timer. Combine that with modern DF techniques
(no rotating loop antennas required) and modern data recorders
and ANY signal can be found out.


An audio recorder doesn't tell what radio frequency is being used.

All of the morsemen's propaganda is just spin to keep their little
morse playground. No more, no less.


What are you talking about, Len?


YOUR spin on morse code. And the Belief System of the Church
of St. Hiram.


What *are* you talking about, Len?

The only Morse-code-only segments of US amateur radio are the lowest 100 kHz
of 6 and 2 meters. Open to all hams except Novices.


WE weren't talking about "morse code only" stuff, Rev. Jim.


Who is "we", Len?

[got some bad peyote again? tsk]


Never touched the stuff. You sound like ol' Carlos, though.

You will be angry and disturbed at such direct language, but, like
Ernestine's creator put it..."plbthththt...and that's the absolute
truth." :-)


And it's as true as what Ernestine says. IOW, what you wrote is absolute
nonsense, Len, and the historical records prove it.


Yah, yu be all hot and bothered! :-)


Not me.

SPIN doctoring you do, Rev. Jim, and you don't have the license
to practice doctoring. Tsk, tsk.


What spin, Len?

Besides, why do you want to live in the past so much?


Moi? HAH!


Yes, you.

Who was talking up "T.O.M." olde tymer? YOU were.

EIGHTY YEARS AGO.

Tsk, tsk, tsk.


Still accurate.

Since 1990 it has been
possible to get any class of US ham license with just a 5 wpm code test and

a
medical waiver. Since 2000, the only Morse code test left has been the 5 wpm
test.


So?

The morse code test is STILL THERE, isn't it?


Sure. Even though the treaty changed over a year ago, and there have been a
half-dozen or more petitions asking to drop the code test, FCC hasn't changed
anything about it.

Why don't you confront Chairman Powell on his blog and ask him why not? Maybe
you could call him "Mikey" and tell him how unqualified he is. You could use
the same sort of style there as you use here, Len.

All U.S. amateur radio licenses with below-30-MHz privileges
require passing that morse code test. NOW. Not 14 years ago,
not 80 years ago. NOW.


We all know that, Len. Why do you repeat the obvious?

WHY?


Because the FCC says so.

Here's a challenge for ya, Len:


Lissen up, peyote breath.


I guess you can't rise to the challenge, then. You're just here to spout
nonsense and abuse.

Here's YOUR challenge:

Try to go a whole 48 hours of NOT accessing the newsgroup and
telling everyone a sermon or preaching that Code Is Good, the Best.


Why?

Bet you can't do it. :-)

Sure I can. In fact I was gone for a lot longer than 48 hours back in April.

You can't.


Sure I can. But why should I? Just to make you happy?

What you want is for opposing opinions to simply shut up. You can't tolerate
anyone who disagrees with your cherished beliefs. Even worse for you is when
someone proves you are simply wrong about something.

You are fixated on Being Here, the Voice of "Truth"
about olde-tyme hamme raddio, telling all heretics to your
Belief System that they are "wrong," "incorrect," and other
indelicate nasties when they don't like Mighty Macho Morse.



"Same old, same old crap on the newsgroups
when some schmuck can't reply on a subject - just heap
abuse on the person doing the replying."

"The only variety is the KIND of abuse they use."

- From:
(Len Over 21)
Date: 13 Jul 2004 23:35:34 GMT



Steve Robeson K4CAP July 16th 04 10:58 AM

Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM
From: (Len Over 21)
Date: 7/15/2004 8:41 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In article ,

(Stevie
Stalker, Mighty Macho Morseman Ethnic Cleanser of Olde Tyme
Hamme Raddio using a Fleet Kit) writes:


"I am only here to civilly debate the Morse Code test issue"

The lies of Lennie Anderson continue.

Steve, K4YZ






Steve Robeson K4CAP July 16th 04 11:22 AM

Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM
From: (Len Over 21)
Date: 7/15/2004 8:41 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In article ,

(Stevie
Stalker, Hamme Raddio Ethnic Cleanser with his Fleet Kit) writes:

Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM
From:
(Geoffrey S. Mendelson)
Date: 7/15/2004 10:16 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In article , Len Over 21

wrote:

AMATEUR radio long ago CEASED to be a "pool of experienced morse
operators" for any national need. The nation does NOT need morse
operators, haven't for a long time.

That's an intresting point. 9/11 showed the need still exists for
experienced radio operators who can communicate under pressure.
Morde code is no longer necessary, but a clear voice, understanding
a phonetic alphabet, etc is.


Geoffrey, you'll notice Lennie interjected "morse" operators, although

he
does take great liberties with trying to discredit Amatueur Radio at any
opportunity.


Poor Stalker, still deep in delusional psychosis thinking that all who
disagree with Him are "discrediting amateur radio"


You did take editorial liberty with the post to add your anti-Amateur
spin, Lennie.

No other radio service in the USA uses morse code for ANY
emergency communications, nor do they do that for primary
radio communications purposes. No Public Safety Radio group
needs any morse qualifications to do their work.


This is NOT any other radio group, Lennie.

It's not the Armed Forces.

It's not PLMRS.

It is not SINCGARS or 1950's Army message centers.

Additionally he was in error that stating that "Amateur radio long ago
ceased to be a "pool of experienced morse operators" for any national need."


No "error." REALITY.

Stevie Stalker LIES again, but doesn't understand he does. Tsk.

He confuses his fantasy with reality. Bad scene. He need mental
help.


And conce again we have a non-licensed...in this case mental healtcare
provider...rendering yet another unqualified opinion.

No fantasy.

Amateur Radio remains the most significant "pool" of "trained operators" in
the United States, save for the Armed Forces. That includes Morse Code trained
persons.

Indeed Amateur Radio is the ONLY pool of Morse capable radio operators
remaining, the very small contingent of military and SIGINT operators not
withstanding.


VERY small. The Military Intelligence Center at Fort Huachuca
trains signal intercept operators. A few of the MOSs in that school
learn International Morse Code from computer programs. Those same
trainees also learn to operate a variety of recorders to record those
intercepts for later analysis. Just one small facet of MI training.


Morse Code will continue for some time to be a necessary skill.

Thankfully some in the Armed Forces have been able to recognize that while
we've buried ourselves under burdonsome technology, some of our adversaries
have quietly gone about keeping things in the KISS mode...And THEY have done
thier best to make sure we can have at least some reserve pool of AD personnel
who can be called upon to intercept it.

On-off keying morse code is falling in the rest of the world. Eventually
even they (the U.S. military) will drop that training. They have the
recorders and the recorded intercepts if some idiot foreign force wants
to use morse...and thus be open to signals attack by just about
anyone.


Open to attack by just about anyone?

It's not the manual OOK that is important, Lennie...It's the message being
sent. The Germans used OOK from thier subs, and until we came into possession
of an Enigma machine and the requisite code books, their transmissions were
just as "secret" as they woul;d have been using any other mode today.

AJKKL CDPMQ GCMMN ADAZP DDSZX WTUPA ZPZQY

Now...if I transmit those code groups via manual Morse, PSK, encrypted
vocie satellite, etc, of what use are they without the code book?

And if I can send those code groups to my "agents" with a transmitter
hacked together with $50 worth of parts rather than a $3000 manpack that
requires an orbiting asset to realy it,

And as much as being able to pull "the weak ones" out is a plus,

ACCURACY
is more important...That's why contests ding you if you miscopy an exchange.


Those skills are collateral benefits to emergency communications...Lennie's
uninformed opinion and ranting to the contrary.


Poor delusional Stalker, still mixing up his hate-filled dystemper of a
fantasyland continuum with reality. Tsk. He needs mental help.


No, I don't.

What I need is to get YOU some help, Lennie.

If what Lennie is is being "pro", then I dare say we should take some
EXTRA pride in NOT being "pro" ! ! ! !


More delusional Stalker fantasyland hate.


Not hate, Lennie.

Pity.

There are NO Public Safety Radio Services now using morse code
in any form for public safety communications. None.


And this is NOT a Public Safety Radio Service, now is it?

THIS is YOUR "fantasyland", Lennie. You keep trying to make Amateur Radio
your puching bag for your own inadequacies and we won't go with the program.

So sorry for you.

Len Anderson has absolutely ZERO experience in emergency

communications,
save for what he cuts-and-pastes about CA's ACS system and MARS.


Untrue, but trying to convince a delusional psychotic with a gigantic
hate complex living in his fantasyland is a non-starter.

Poor Stalker needs mental therapy.


Not untrue.

By your own admission (unless you were lying about that too) you are not
involved in any emergency communications program except as an observer.

From your posts here it is pretty clear you that you are indeed NOT
involved in any program at any level.

No experience
as an Amateur operator, none in any capacity with any civil or federal

program.

Untrue. But Stalker will insist that I have none until the last psychotic
delusion is ripped from his hate-filled little mind...


Oh?

WHAT Amateur license HAVE you held, Lennie...?!?!

He is not a licensed Amateur, nor is he in any other program affilitated

with
emergency communications, MARS included.


"Sorry, Hans, MARS IS amateur radio!" Hi hi ho ho.

Department of Defense Directive 4650.2, effective November 2003
says otherwise.

Amateur licensee Stalker says MARS is amateur radio.

Just who is the LIE spreader there?


You, Leonard...You are.

Hint. It isn't DoD. :-)

I never thought I'd say that about myself, but unfortuntely it is true.
I've tried to get my speed back up to something reasonable and expect
that it would take an hour a day for at least a month.


In regards to emergency uses, Geoffrey, it's irrelevent. It's nice to
have, especially for health and welfare trafficing, but otherwise not
necessary.


RED ALERT! ALL HANDS TO BATTLE STATIONS!

REALITY BROKE OUT!


It's been here all along, Lennie.

But while you've been so anxious to take each and every opportunity to
naysay anything anyone has said that even remotely favors Amateur Radio, you
haven't been paying attention to what's being said.

There's a psychotic in this forum, Lennie...But it's not me.

People who work 9-5 5 days a week may actually be able to do it. I don't
(more like noon (or eariler) to 3am).


Sure you can! Just one or two QSO's a day will get your speed up in no
time, regadless of when you work! I work 7P to 7A three to five days a

week,
and I am able to KEEP my speed above 20WPM with little effort.


There ya go, Stalker. You just keep on beepin...and imagining
yourself a big fat Hero of the Homeland for beeping fast.

So long, Reality again. Hello fantasy!


If what you are is "reality", Lennie, then I would do well to stay in what
YOU call "fantasy"

Sucks to be you, Putz.

Steve, K4YZ






Steve Robeson K4CAP July 16th 04 11:42 AM

Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM
From: (Len Over 21)
Date: 7/15/2004 8:41 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In article ,

(Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes:

Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM
From:
PAMNO (N2EY)
Date: 7/15/2004 11:44 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In article ,


(Len Over 21) writes:


Nonsense for the new millennium.

That's what you're giving us, Len!


Of course it is.

Without any practical experience in Amatuer Radio, how could he render

an
INFORMED opinon on ANYthing having to do with Amateur Radio...???


Riiiiiiight, Stalker. How can ANYONE possibly know anything
about anything without being federally licensed in it?


I didn't say "licensed", Lennie...I said "experienced".

Gosh, in your psychotic fantasyland, amateur radio must be a
classified, sensitive, deep dark secret, revealed only to those "eyes
only" folks who have been background-checked, right?

NOBODY unlicense can possibly know anything at all!


Sure they can...if they ahve some sort of practical experience in it...

You are neither licensed OR experienced. Not in AMATEUR RADIO.

Len, what are "morsemen"?


Anything and everything he's not.


I'm a retired electronics engineer with a good retirement income.


You are an ALLEGED electronics engineer.

Some in a position to know your "professional" services directly quantify
your skills as "mediocre, at best..."

That means a professional. Sunnuvagun!


Sure...In the strictest dictionary definition of it.

I measure "professionalism" by the opinions of one's peers.

You collected a wage. Invested it wisely. Good for you.

But you did NOTHING to contibute to "radio".

Stalker Stevie a pro? Stalker have a pro kit?

Stalker do good yell-yell-murine imitation. Did "seven hostile
actions." Never explained that. Might have been done in hum
raddio "actions?"

Stalker did "combat trianing" in Barstow, CA, murine warehouse
and supply depot? Tough duty. Very hostile. Action?


Sorry, Lennie.

Where did you get "Barstow" from? Barstow and 29Palms are NOT the same
facility.

The propaganda is coming from the Loser on Lanark.


Poor delusional, hate-filled psychotic now wants to go geographic.

Tsk.

10048 Lanark Street, Sun Valley, CA. Nice neighborhood.
Upscale. Mortgage got paid off fully years ago. Adjoining
walled community of 44 homes, one going for $860,000.


Adjoining...But not IN...

I am sure it is yet one more example of you being on the outside looking
in as I am sure you have spent your whole life being "just this side" of where
you THINK you belong.

I am sure you belong IN a "walled community", but I am sure not the one
you think you belong in.

And as for that $860K, it gets you a subdivision-sized lot in an HOA
controlled enviroment. It gets you a chance to pay taxes in one of the highest
taxed states of the Union, along with the highest crime per-capita and

Look it up on MapQuest.

Know how? [no license required to use MapQuest...]


Do some looking of your own...But use Coldwell Banker or Century21...See
what that same money will get you outside of Kalifornication.

My bet's on the nonsense. That's all he's produced here.


Sorry, can't venture into your psychotic fantasyland. Too weird
in there. It isn't reality. It is the Twilight Zone pesonified.


You've already BEEN in a "psychotic fantasyland".

It's called your mind, Lennie.

You can't/won't tell the truth and don't live up to your own rhetoric.
For YEARS now.

Try a different mix of pilfered drugs from the "ER" medicine room
next time.


And now accusations of theft in order to make yor position even more
untenable than it was.

Ahhhh, Lennie...What would your $860K gated community neighbors think of
you if they could see all of your online misdeeds and misrepresentations...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ






N2EY July 16th 04 12:07 PM

In article , Mike Coslo writes:

More spectrum is simply the reward system in use. It was chosen in large
part because it's easy to enforce.



Another thought is that at HF frequencies, a inexperienced or poor
operator can propagate their signal over the whole world.


Under the right conditions, yes.

If I were to
be making a training ground for amateurs, it would be using line of
sight type signals


I disagree!

The greatest sustained period of growth in US amateur history was from the end
of WW2 until the mid-to-late 1980s. From 60,000 hams on VJ day to about 600,000
40 or so years later. And this included a period of almost no growth in the mid
1960s. Through most of that time, the training ground for new US amateurs was
predominantly HF.

73 de Jim, N2EY


N2EY July 16th 04 12:07 PM

In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes:

In article , "Dee D. Flint" Mama Dee
speaking to her children writes:

"N2EY" wrote in message
...
In article , Robert Casey
writes:

Hams - old and new - didn't change the exam procedures. Neither did
ARRL, NCI, NCVEC or any other ham group. FCC did, because it saved
them resources.

We aren't going to a system other than multiple-choice
published-Q&A-pool exams in the foreseeable future. Just not gonna
happen.

ANd then there's the question of what knowledge should be expected from
applicants anyway. Does it really require more knowledge and skill to
operate on 14.167 vs 14.344?

More spectrum is simply the reward system in use. It was chosen in large

part
because it's easy to enforce.


Not only was it easy to enforce but it was selected because it was a
desireable enough reward that people would put in the training to get it.


Utter nonsense, Mama Dee. Spin-like rationalization.


That's a good description of what you post here, Len ;-) ;-) ;-)

AMATEUR radio is a hobby, not a national service, not an arm of the
United States Navy or the rest of the military, and not a public safety
organization. Just a hobby involving radio.


It's not "just a hobby".

But even if it were, what's the difference? If something is "just a hobby",
does that mean there should be no standards, no training, no rules?

AMATEUR radio long ago CEASED to be a "pool of experienced morse
operators" for any national need.


When did it cease, Len?

And here's a fun fact: The Basis and Purpose never used the phrase "experienced
morse operators". Just "experienced operators" - no mention of modes.

The nation does NOT need morse operators, haven't for a long time.


How long?

Most rewards in the real world have little relationship to the work
requested.


More spin crappola.


Well, at least you're honest about your content ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-)


The influential morsemen at the League
managed to carve out a separate little morse playground for
themselves with all sorts of fatuous phrases of "national need" and
"importance of a pool of trained operators" and the FCC caved in
to their demands.


When was this? And in what alternate universe?

The "pool of trained operators" thing came from FCC, not ARRL.

You see it in the home too. Kid asks, "Dad can I borrow the
car?" Parent replies, "After you mow the front & back lawn and run the
edger." There is absolutely no relationship between the two activities.
The kid gets a highly desired reward for work that he/she probably doesn't
care to do but does it anyway to get the reward.


So, the League is a surrogate parent?!? I don't think so.


How many kids have you raised, Len?

Are all the Amateur Extras surrogate parents now? I don't think so.


You aren't.

Dee, quit this infernal nattering about "parentage" and ham radio.


Why, Len? Because it's really quite an accurate analogy?

Quit trying to sound off like you've got an influential pair.


Pair of what, Len?

You aren't
a radioactive au pair and this ain't the Children's Hour (even is some of
the other extras act like children).


The most childish performance I see here is yours, Len.

Just face the reality of the matter. Morsemen got their little CW
playground and should be happy.


What *are* you talking about, Len?

Professional communicators they
ain't, even if they want, desperately, to be oh, so very pro.

If you're an example of "professional communicator", than I'm glad to be an
amateur.


N2EY July 16th 04 12:07 PM

In article ,
(Hans K0HB) writes:

(N2EY) wrote

It does make sense that copying code groups eliminates
the need for one skill: figuring out word spaces. You
*know* that each group is 5 characters long.


That's one factor, but a more important one is that the operator
copying coded groups has no temptation to 'understand' the message
being copied.


Rewrite my previous statement to read: "Eliminates the need for two skills:
figuring out word spaces, and copying what was actually sent, not what was
anticipated"

This has two implications ---

1) The operator will not (consciously or unconsciously) attempt to
anticipate the word being sent, thus will not get 'flummoxed' when the
expected word is incorrect (for example hearing 't h e s' he might
expect the word to be "these" and transcribe it that way, only to have
it turn out to be "thespian", causing him to drop out of his "zone" to
fix the error, perhaps missing the following word.


Yep.

2) If the operator is not trying to 'understand' the message being
copied, the mechanics of copying become more 'automatic' with (as one
old telegrapher described to me) a mode in which "the message follows
a short circuit between the eardrum and the fingertips without passing
through the brain". From this mode come the (true) tales of operators
who could seemingly "multi-task" copying Morse at a subcounscious
level, and carry on other activitives like carry on a conversation,
retune the receiver, or read a book at the same time.

Yep again. Having seen that sort of thing done, and having done it myself to a
small degree, it makes perfect sense.

Thanks Hans.

73 de Jim, N2EY



William July 16th 04 01:22 PM

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article ,
PAMNO
(N2EY) writes:

In article ,

(Len Over 21) writes:

In article ,

PAMNO
(N2EY) writes:


More spectrum is simply the reward system in use. It was chosen in large

part
because it's easy to enforce.

Nonsense for the new millennium.


That's what you're giving us, Len!


Now, now Rev. Jim. You're off on an evangelical Sermon on the
Antenna Mount again!

You just didn't answer the question I posed about "enforcement
ease." Tsk. tsk. tsk.

Tell us how morse signals are "easier to enforce" than voice
signals. Try a few details of how that is done.


That's going to be a problem for Jimmy Who. His claim is illogical.

Anyway, I'll be standing by waiting for his answer. BTW, I heard the
temperature in hell is falling rapidly.

Steve Robeson K4CAP July 16th 04 03:24 PM

Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM
From: PAMNO (N2EY)
Date: 7/16/2004 6:07 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In article ,

(Len Over 21) writes:


AMATEUR radio is a hobby, not a national service, not an arm of the
United States Navy or the rest of the military, and not a public safety
organization. Just a hobby involving radio.


It's not "just a hobby".


Unfortuantely for Lennie the FACTS are that Amateur Radio DOES provide a
service to the nation, that service does, incidentally, benefit the Armed
Forces, and is an ever-increasing presence in public service plans at all
levels, local to federal.

But even if it were, what's the difference? If something is "just a hobby",
does that mean there should be no standards, no training, no rules?


Only if you're a night-school trained ex radio technician on a mission to
berate anyone else who even hints at an interest in radio you deem inferior to
your own.

AMATEUR radio long ago CEASED to be a "pool of experienced morse
operators" for any national need.


When did it cease, Len?


There's a dozen of us in this forum alone who hold current licensure and
who are proficient in Morse Code.

Seems like it "ain't over yet" to me...

And here's a fun fact: The Basis and Purpose never used the phrase
"experienced
morse operators". Just "experienced operators" - no mention of modes.


That's a LennieRant issue, Jim. Even when the current context DOESN'T
include Morse Code, he'll interject it and then claim we (licensees) are the
ones obsessed with it.

The nation does NOT need morse operators, haven't for a long time.


How long?


And who said?

Was there a Presidential Executive Order? Did Congress ammend the
Constitution? Did the FCC and NTIA prohibit the use of Morse Code for thier
respective services?

Most rewards in the real world have little relationship to the work
requested.


More spin crappola.


Well, at least you're honest about your content ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-)


I get the feeling there's a LOT of crappola in the Anderson residence.

The influential morsemen at the League
managed to carve out a separate little morse playground for
themselves with all sorts of fatuous phrases of "national need" and
"importance of a pool of trained operators" and the FCC caved in
to their demands.


When was this? And in what alternate universe?


"Morse playground"...?!?!

There's only two slices of Morse-only spectrum, both are in the VHF range,
and were lobbied for by weak signal operators anxious to see a part of the
spectrum protected for thier work...Mostly EME and meteor scatter techniques,
but the sues are growing.

The "pool of trained operators" thing came from FCC, not ARRL.


You see it in the home too. Kid asks, "Dad can I borrow the
car?" Parent replies, "After you mow the front & back lawn and run the
edger." There is absolutely no relationship between the two activities.
The kid gets a highly desired reward for work that he/she probably doesn't
care to do but does it anyway to get the reward.


So, the League is a surrogate parent?!? I don't think so.


How many kids have you raised, Len?


Including himself?

Are all the Amateur Extras surrogate parents now? I don't think so.


You aren't.


But that's what he perceives himself as...

Dee, quit this infernal nattering about "parentage" and ham radio.


Why, Len? Because it's really quite an accurate analogy?


It makes Lennie nervous.

He shot blanks all his life, and now any discussion of kids get's him
wound up. That's why he wanted to exert some "parental control" over younger
licensees with that age limit crap.

Quit trying to sound off like you've got an influential pair.


Pair of what, Len?


What ever they are, I bet Lennie doesn't have a pair of them...Maybe a
pair of slippers or glasses...Nothing else.

You aren't
a radioactive au pair and this ain't the Children's Hour (even is some of
the other extras act like children).


The most childish performance I see here is yours, Len.

Just face the reality of the matter. Morsemen got their little CW
playground and should be happy.


What *are* you talking about, Len?

Professional communicators they
ain't, even if they want, desperately, to be oh, so very pro.

If you're an example of "professional communicator", than I'm glad to be an
amateur.


So V E R Y glad!

73

Steve, K4YZ






Len Over 21 July 16th 04 11:02 PM

In article ,
(William) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,


(N2EY) writes:

In article ,


(Len Over 21) writes:

In article ,

PAMNO
(N2EY) writes:


More spectrum is simply the reward system in use. It was chosen in large

part
because it's easy to enforce.

Nonsense for the new millennium.

That's what you're giving us, Len!


Now, now Rev. Jim. You're off on an evangelical Sermon on the
Antenna Mount again!

You just didn't answer the question I posed about "enforcement
ease." Tsk. tsk. tsk.

Tell us how morse signals are "easier to enforce" than voice
signals. Try a few details of how that is done.


That's going to be a problem for Jimmy Who. His claim is illogical.

Anyway, I'll be standing by waiting for his answer. BTW, I heard the
temperature in hell is falling rapidly.


Don't expect miracles. Not in the answer or the environment of hell.

LHA / WMD



Len Over 21 July 16th 04 11:02 PM

In article , (Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes:

Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM
From:
PAMNO (N2EY)
Date: 7/16/2004 6:07 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In article ,

(Len Over 21) writes:


AMATEUR radio is a hobby, not a national service, not an arm of the
United States Navy or the rest of the military, and not a public safety
organization. Just a hobby involving radio.


It's not "just a hobby".


Unfortuantely for Lennie the FACTS are that Amateur Radio DOES provide a
service to the nation, that service does, incidentally, benefit the Armed
Forces, and is an ever-increasing presence in public service plans at all
levels, local to federal.


Wow! Da gunnery nurse DID put on his best Class As and pose
for another recruiting poster!

"The Amateur Corps wants YOU! unca sam pointing finger "

"The Few, the Very Proud, the United States Amateur Corps!"

Riiiiight. All over America the recruiters are attending ham club
meetings, shaking hands with members and urging them to fill a
vital need in their military branches with Mighty Macho Morsemen
from the 5th service branch, hum raddio. Salute!

But even if it were, what's the difference? If something is "just a hobby",
does that mean there should be no standards, no training, no rules?


Only if you're a night-school trained ex radio technician on a mission to
berate anyone else who even hints at an interest in radio you deem inferior to
your own.


Tsk, tsk, tsk. Da gunnery nurse is spitting and spluttering again.

Foam at the mouth. Seizures next? Not a pretty sight.

AMATEUR radio long ago CEASED to be a "pool of experienced morse
operators" for any national need.


When did it cease, Len?


There's a dozen of us in this forum alone who hold current licensure and
who are proficient in Morse Code.


Wow! I'll bet NO ONE has as pretty a set of dress blues as da
gunnery nurse dill sergeant of the Amateur Corps!

Must wear white gloves when busy beeping.

Seems like it "ain't over yet" to me...


Any time now... :-)

And here's a fun fact: The Basis and Purpose never used the phrase

"experienced
morse operators". Just "experienced operators" - no mention of modes.


That's a LennieRant issue, Jim. Even when the current context DOESN'T
include Morse Code, he'll interject it and then claim we (licensees) are the
ones obsessed with it.


You are. QED. :-)

The nation does NOT need morse operators, haven't for a long time.


How long?


And who said?

Was there a Presidential Executive Order? Did Congress ammend the
Constitution? Did the FCC and NTIA prohibit the use of Morse Code for thier
respective services?


Poor nursie still living in his fantasy world. Tsk, tsk.

He doesn't get out beyond checking out "paid services," I guess.

Even maritime radio has gone over to SSB voice and data modes for
open-ocean communications. That and satellite relay.

NO other radio service besides amateur radio uses any morse code
modes for communications.

Most rewards in the real world have little relationship to the work
requested.

More spin crappola.


Well, at least you're honest about your content ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-)


I get the feeling there's a LOT of crappola in the Anderson residence.


Which residence? :-)

The influential morsemen at the League
managed to carve out a separate little morse playground for
themselves with all sorts of fatuous phrases of "national need" and
"importance of a pool of trained operators" and the FCC caved in
to their demands.


When was this? And in what alternate universe?


"Morse playground"...?!?!

There's only two slices of Morse-only spectrum, both are in the VHF

range,
and were lobbied for by weak signal operators anxious to see a part of the
spectrum protected for thier work...Mostly EME and meteor scatter techniques,
but the sues are growing.


"Sues?" There's litigation about VHF and up?

Oh, my! Those lawyers are into everything, aren't they?


So, the League is a surrogate parent?!? I don't think so.


How many kids have you raised, Len?


Including himself?


Ham radio is all about raising children? Good heavens, I thought
ham radio was all about preserving the morse modes forever and
ever!

One learns something every day!

Ham radio is all about Raising Children!

Are all the Amateur Extras surrogate parents now? I don't think so.


You aren't.


But that's what he perceives himself as...

Dee, quit this infernal nattering about "parentage" and ham radio.


Why, Len? Because it's really quite an accurate analogy?


It makes Lennie nervous.

He shot blanks all his life, and now any discussion of kids get's him
wound up. That's why he wanted to exert some "parental control" over younger
licensees with that age limit crap.


Tsk, tsk, tsk. I didn't "shoot blanks all my life."

My children are not a subject of discussion in here. They are all
physically and mentally normal.

Quit trying to sound off like you've got an influential pair.


Pair of what, Len?


What ever they are, I bet Lennie doesn't have a pair of them...Maybe a
pair of slippers or glasses...Nothing else.


Tsk, tsk. No humor among the PCTA.

[cut to scene of military post and assembly after reveille...female first-
soldier starts calling roll, shouts "sound off like you got a pair!"]

Nursie thinks licentiousness (not licensure) is an okay side for hams.
[see other posting of his, the one where he gets angry about "Neil"
and Dubya]


If you're an example of "professional communicator", than I'm glad to be an
amateur.


So V E R Y glad!


Tsk. The less-than-half-a-year "electronics purchasing agent" couldn't
cut it. Only civilian "electronics job" he ever had. Poor guy.

Well, there's always night school for nursie. :-)

LHA / WMD

Len Over 21 July 16th 04 11:02 PM

In article , PAMNO
(N2EY) writes:

In article ,

(Len Over 21) writes:

In article , "Dee D. Flint" Mama Dee
speaking to her children writes:

"N2EY" wrote in message
...
In article , Robert Casey
writes:

Hams - old and new - didn't change the exam procedures. Neither did
ARRL, NCI, NCVEC or any other ham group. FCC did, because it saved
them resources.

We aren't going to a system other than multiple-choice
published-Q&A-pool exams in the foreseeable future. Just not gonna
happen.

ANd then there's the question of what knowledge should be expected from
applicants anyway. Does it really require more knowledge and skill to
operate on 14.167 vs 14.344?

More spectrum is simply the reward system in use. It was chosen in large

part
because it's easy to enforce.

Not only was it easy to enforce but it was selected because it was a
desireable enough reward that people would put in the training to get it.


Utter nonsense, Mama Dee. Spin-like rationalization.


That's a good description of what you post here, Len ;-) ;-) ;-)


Only to the PCTA.

The PCTA live for such spin. They try to literally live it.

AMATEUR radio is a hobby, not a national service, not an arm of the
United States Navy or the rest of the military, and not a public safety
organization. Just a hobby involving radio.


It's not "just a hobby".


For some it IS a lifestyle. Their problem, not the governments.

So, amateur radio is NOT a hobby?

Prove its vital need to the nation as a national service or an arm of
the military or a public safety organization.

The FCC hasn't proved that. Only the ham-lifestylers try to prove
that. They NEED the rationalization.

But even if it were, what's the difference? If something is "just a hobby",
does that mean there should be no standards, no training, no rules?


Tsk, tsk. Arguing to extemes again?

The FCC isn't chartered to do "training" for radio hams.

The FCC doesn't really "set standards," only sets regulations.

AMATEUR radio long ago CEASED to be a "pool of experienced morse
operators" for any national need.


When did it cease, Len?


Long ago. :-)

Find all the military morsemen "needs" you can. That be easy, as
there are no such needs.

Find all the commercial communications services you can, count
the "needs" for morsemen. Very few and those be on the Great
Lakes shipping.

And here's a fun fact: The Basis and Purpose never used the phrase
"experienced
morse operators". Just "experienced operators" - no mention of modes.

The nation does NOT need morse operators, haven't for a long time.


How long?


Long time. :-)

Most rewards in the real world have little relationship to the work
requested.


More spin crappola.


Well, at least you're honest about your content ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-)


Tsk, tsk. Not nice. Rather nasty comment for a portentious
revered one of the Great Gurus of the newsgrope.

The influential morsemen at the League
managed to carve out a separate little morse playground for
themselves with all sorts of fatuous phrases of "national need" and
"importance of a pool of trained operators" and the FCC caved in
to their demands.


When was this? And in what alternate universe?


In the present universe.

Those who are busy spinning can't believe it.

The "pool of trained operators" thing came from FCC, not ARRL.


No kidding? I thought you thought the ARRL regulated all
things in ham radio.

Learn somethin' every day! Sunnuvagun!

You see it in the home too. Kid asks, "Dad can I borrow the
car?" Parent replies, "After you mow the front & back lawn and run the
edger." There is absolutely no relationship between the two activities.
The kid gets a highly desired reward for work that he/she probably doesn't
care to do but does it anyway to get the reward.


So, the League is a surrogate parent?!? I don't think so.


How many kids have you raised, Len?


On July 4th, two of them. :-)

What? Everyone applying for a ham license nowadays have to
bring a medical certificate for a sperm count?!?

Do they have to show birth certificates of their offspring too?

My word, the rules have really become tuff!

Are all the Amateur Extras surrogate parents now? I don't think so.


You aren't.


Haven't pretended to be, Rev. Jim.

You ARE going to misdirect into some "parenting" argument, aren't
you? [your sort of newsgrope tactic]

Dee, quit this infernal nattering about "parentage" and ham radio.


Why, Len? Because it's really quite an accurate analogy?


Who said it is "accurate?"

You ham lifestylers really get too, too deep into it.

Quit trying to sound off like you've got an influential pair.


Pair of what, Len?


Brain halves.

You aren't
a radioactive au pair and this ain't the Children's Hour (even is some of
the other extras act like children).


The most childish performance I see here is yours, Len.


Then you don't see at all well. Visit an eye doctor for a checkup.

Poor baby. I upset your little session with butt-in buddy, the
Stalker?

Just face the reality of the matter. Morsemen got their little CW
playground and should be happy.


What *are* you talking about, Len?


The LOWER parts of the HF bands.

Professional communicators they
ain't, even if they want, desperately, to be oh, so very pro.

If you're an example of "professional communicator", than I'm glad to be an
amateur.


You are NOT a professional communicator.

LHA / WMD

Len Over 21 July 16th 04 11:02 PM

In article , (Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes:

Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM
From:
(Len Over 21)
Date: 7/15/2004 8:41 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In article ,

(Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes:

Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM
From:
PAMNO (N2EY)
Date: 7/15/2004 11:44 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In article ,


(Len Over 21) writes:

Nonsense for the new millennium.

That's what you're giving us, Len!

Of course it is.

Without any practical experience in Amatuer Radio, how could he render

an
INFORMED opinon on ANYthing having to do with Amateur Radio...???


Riiiiiiight, Stalker. How can ANYONE possibly know anything
about anything without being federally licensed in it?


I didn't say "licensed", Lennie...I said "experienced".

Gosh, in your psychotic fantasyland, amateur radio must be a
classified, sensitive, deep dark secret, revealed only to those "eyes
only" folks who have been background-checked, right?

NOBODY unlicense can possibly know anything at all!


Sure they can...if they ahve some sort of practical experience in it...


Illogical. To have "practical experience" in amateur radio
REQUIRES an amateur license. Those without that magick license
"cannot have any practical experience in it." [Stalker stated that]

Bottom line is that Stalker doesn't know what the hell he is talking
about.

U.S. amateur radio is open for observation to anyone...on the air,
in print, in person to the public.

Stalker is trying vainly to prove that those without licenses cannot
know anything at all about radio. That's absolutely false, a LIE of
bright magnitude, but he can't stop. Tsk.

You are neither licensed OR experienced. Not in AMATEUR RADIO.

Len, what are "morsemen"?

Anything and everything he's not.


I'm a retired electronics engineer with a good retirement income.


You are an ALLEGED electronics engineer.


Sigh. Poor nursie can't help herself with all the insults. :-)

Riiiiiight...I have alleged resumes, alleged history in the alleged
industry, an alleged patent, alleged schooling with alleged skin from
an alleged sheep, know alleged hams who have alleged ham licenses
longer than nursie has allegedly lived. Not only that, the alleged IRS
and alleged tax board and alleged government agencies all allegedly
believe I allegedly did all that. The alleged bank keeps track of all
the alleged income I allegedly made, taking in the alleged social
security check allegely electornically.

Not only that, I was once a long-time member of Joe Sheppard's
The Ledge BBS!

Some in a position to know your "professional" services directly quantify
your skills as "mediocre, at best..."


A LIE, nursie. Bald-faced, out and out LIE.

You don't know squat about the electronics industry or military
electronics or civilian electronics other than reading about ham
radio in QST. YOU DON'T KNOW.

Now YOU produce those NAMES of the "some" you ALLEGE
"know."

You can't because they DON'T EXIST. They are a fermentation of
your hate-filled obsessional, delusional psychosis in here.

Get some mental therapy. From a real shrink.

It will help everyone, even yourself.

Pbththththth.

LHA / WMD


Len Over 21 July 16th 04 11:02 PM

In article , (Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes:

Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM
From:
(Len Over 21)
Date: 7/15/2004 8:41 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In article ,

(Stevie
Stalker, Hamme Raddio Ethnic Cleanser with his Fleet Kit) writes:

Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM
From:
(Geoffrey S. Mendelson)
Date: 7/15/2004 10:16 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In article , Len Over 21
wrote:

AMATEUR radio long ago CEASED to be a "pool of experienced morse
operators" for any national need. The nation does NOT need morse
operators, haven't for a long time.

That's an intresting point. 9/11 showed the need still exists for
experienced radio operators who can communicate under pressure.
Morde code is no longer necessary, but a clear voice, understanding
a phonetic alphabet, etc is.

Geoffrey, you'll notice Lennie interjected "morse" operators, although

he
does take great liberties with trying to discredit Amatueur Radio at any
opportunity.


Poor Stalker, still deep in delusional psychosis thinking that all who
disagree with Him are "discrediting amateur radio"


You did take editorial liberty with the post to add your anti-Amateur
spin, Lennie.


No "spin." A direct reply to a hate-filled delusional psychotic obsessed
with
trying to "get" certain others is NOT an indictment against all amateurs.

No other radio service in the USA uses morse code for ANY
emergency communications, nor do they do that for primary
radio communications purposes. No Public Safety Radio group
needs any morse qualifications to do their work.


This is NOT any other radio group, Lennie.

It's not the Armed Forces.

It's not PLMRS.

It is not SINCGARS or 1950's Army message centers.


Neither is this "group" qualified about national politics or space travel or
exploration (except me)...but that doesn't stop the fantasyland Stalker
from making words about those things.

You know nothing about armed forces radio communications.

You know nothing about Private Land Mobile Radio Service.

You know nothing about SINCGARS or any Army communications
facilities of the 1950s.

You MUST mention all of those to avoid being reminded that you know
so little of anything beyond amateurism.

Additionally he was in error that stating that "Amateur radio long ago
ceased to be a "pool of experienced morse operators" for any national

need."

No "error." REALITY.

Stevie Stalker LIES again, but doesn't understand he does. Tsk.

He confuses his fantasy with reality. Bad scene. He need mental
help.


And conce again we have a non-licensed...in this case mental healtcare
provider...rendering yet another unqualified opinion.


NOBODY needs "qualification certificates" to see your obsession and
stalking with all the mouthing off of snit against those you don't like.

You're nuts. Aberrant. Whacko.

No fantasy.


Right. Real life. Right here. You're nuts with obsessional hate.


VERY small. The Military Intelligence Center at Fort Huachuca
trains signal intercept operators. A few of the MOSs in that school
learn International Morse Code from computer programs. Those same
trainees also learn to operate a variety of recorders to record those
intercepts for later analysis. Just one small facet of MI training.


Morse Code will continue for some time to be a necessary skill.


Only in your fantasyland dreaming.

Thankfully some in the Armed Forces have been able to recognize that

while
we've buried ourselves under burdonsome technology, some of our adversaries
have quietly gone about keeping things in the KISS mode...And THEY have done
thier best to make sure we can have at least some reserve pool of AD personnel
who can be called upon to intercept it.


More imaginary bull****.

Again, you don't name names and talk only in generalities. That's because
you have NO experience in military electronics R&D or contracts
administration nor in planning...not in the labs, not in the field, not even
in the history of military radio.

Huachuca trains intercept operators on whatever is needed. Computer
programs for teaching morse code cognition don't depend on human
morsemen to "teach" anything.

On-off keying morse code is falling in the rest of the world. Eventually
even they (the U.S. military) will drop that training. They have the
recorders and the recorded intercepts if some idiot foreign force wants
to use morse...and thus be open to signals attack by just about
anyone.


Open to attack by just about anyone?


The term "attack" in cryptography means to begin decipherment or
the act of decipherment. Word has been around a long time.

It's not the manual OOK that is important, Lennie...It's the message

being
sent. The Germans used OOK from thier subs, and until we came into possession
of an Enigma machine and the requisite code books, their transmissions were
just as "secret" as they woul;d have been using any other mode today.


More bull**** from the very UNqualified "military communications" non-
guru. Quit cutting and pasting from old WW2 stories.

The Brits broke Enigma early in WW2. NOBODY broke the U.S.
rotor system implemented in the "Sigaba" teleprinters.

NOBODY worthwhile is using "code books" in this day and age.
At best, they might use "one-time pads." Nobody HAS to. The
encryption-decryption can be done in firmware, in a microcontroller.
It's done daily in millions of cell phones.

"Burdensome technology?!?" For a single IC stuck on a PC board?
Produces and deciphers to a very long key and is essentially very
hard to break.

128-bit encryption-decryption is regularly done in Internet browser
software. For all intents and purposes it is as secure as needs be.

On-line cryptography is NOT "burdensome" today. It occurs millions
of times a day around the world. Only the severe paranoiacs go
berserk at the thought of it. It is secure enough for its purpose.

AJKKL CDPMQ GCMMN ADAZP DDSZX WTUPA ZPZQY

Now...if I transmit those code groups via manual Morse, PSK, encrypted
vocie satellite, etc, of what use are they without the code book?


"Vocie?" [a new mode? :-) ]

Of what use is that "code book?" About the LAST time the U.S.
military used "code books" was in North Africa around 1942-1943.
A State Department code book, used by an Army major who knew
military tactics but nothing about cryptography. German field
cryptologists routinely broke his reports. He never knew.

And if I can send those code groups to my "agents" with a transmitter
hacked together with $50 worth of parts rather than a $3000 manpack that
requires an orbiting asset to realy it,


Riiiiight...you've been reading too many morse romance novels again,
haven't you? :-)

Riiiiiight...."hacking together" a super-secret raddio for HF that uses
"unbreakable" morse code. :-) For only $50 worth of parts. Right.

In your dreams, delusional one.

All that kind of nonsense ended with WW2.

No wonder you never got any real military commo experience.
Not even when you learned to stencil those boxes correctly.


By your own admission (unless you were lying about that too) you are not
involved in any emergency communications program except as an observer.


Incorrect. Try 1994. January.

From your posts here it is pretty clear you that you are indeed NOT
involved in any program at any level.


Right. All our phones here have 911 capability. :-)

What is the Stalker going to do? "Airborne his CAP asset" and relay
super-secret HF morse from his "agents?!?"



But while you've been so anxious to take each and every opportunity to
naysay anything anyone has said that even remotely favors Amateur Radio, you
haven't been paying attention to what's being said.

There's a psychotic in this forum, Lennie...But it's not me.


Crazy folks won't admit they are crazy. :-)

Basic rule found in any undergraduate psychology course.


There ya go, Stalker. You just keep on beepin...and imagining
yourself a big fat Hero of the Homeland for beeping fast.

So long, Reality again. Hello fantasy!


If what you are is "reality", Lennie, then I would do well to stay in

what
YOU call "fantasy"

Sucks to be you, Putz.


Tsk. The Stalker put away is Amateur Corps Class A uniform and the
recruiting posters for the United States Amateur Corps ("A few good men...")
and lapsed into his hate-filled snarliness mode.

Well, Stalker IS a representative of top-of-the-line amateur radio licensee.

All the PCTA love him. He be Tuff and Loud. Yell-Yell alla time.

LHA / WMD

Len Over 21 July 16th 04 11:02 PM

In article , (Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes:

Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM
From:
(Len Over 21)
Date: 7/15/2004 8:41 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In article ,

(Stevie
Stalker, Mighty Macho Morseman Ethnic Cleanser of Olde Tyme
Hamme Raddio using a Fleet Kit) writes:


"I am only here to civilly debate the Morse Code test issue"

The lies of Lennie Anderson continue.


"Lies" only in nursie's fantasyland.

Poor nursie.

LHA / WMD



Len Over 21 July 16th 04 11:02 PM

In article , (Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes:

Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM
From:
(Len Over 21)
Date: 7/15/2004 8:41 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In article ,

(Stevie
Stalker, Ethnic Cleanser of Olde Tyme Hamme Raddio) writes:

A nickle says Lennie the Lame found yet another anonymous server to

hide
behind.

If not, it's someone he's slept with.


Poor Stalker making LIES again. Tsk, tsk.


Not a lie, Lennie...A bet.


With whom? One of your other personalities?

Poor obsessed, delusional nursie. Can't imagine that anyone
else doesn't like the Stalking Mighty Macho Morseman. Thinks
all who say negative to nursie are all pseudonyms of me.

That's nutso-ville. Aberrant delusional psychosis. Whacko-land.

Poor nursie would snit iffen he ever discovered there's NO Internet
out there...his computer is making all this up!!! :-)

Beep, beep.

LHA / WMD




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com