Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 02:46:04 GMT, Robert Casey wrote:
Selling BPL is not a technical problem, it's a political problem. BULL****! [ Ignore the little man behind the curtain ] I think what Phil is saying that BPL has fatal technical problems, but the politicians can be convinced to allow it to happen anyway... What I am saying is that the pushers of BPL are not dealing with any of its technical plusses or minuses, but are dealing wholly within the political arena. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Phil Kane" wrote in message et... On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 02:46:04 GMT, Robert Casey wrote: What I am saying is that the pushers of BPL are not dealing with any of its technical plusses or minuses, but are dealing wholly within the political arena. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane Lots of people and organizations will suffer when BPL takes over the 1.7-80 MHz frequency range in order to help the monopolistic power companies expand their kingdoms. The amateur radio sections of the HF spectrum will be the least likely protected sections. The NTIA report on the subject is cumbersome, but spells out quite well who will suffer when BPL takes over. All for a few dollars. I wonder if Ralph Nader has taken a look at this issue? It's big business running our government for their own profit. Should be one of his issues. ak http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fcc...s_06042004.doc The BPL Phase 1 Report (NTIA Report 04-413) is split into two volumes. Volume I is the main report, and Volume II is comprised of all of the appendices. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fcc...rtWord/VolumeI I/APPC.DOC 1.7-80 MHz frequency range hosts a number of radio services and supports well over one-hundred-thousand Federal Government RF systems. Frequencies in this range are intensively used on the bases of time-and geographic-sharing by several radio systems. This appendix provides a more detailed discussion on federal spectrum usage and operations under each radio service. In addition, this appendix provides a general characterization of Federal Government RF systems that includes presentation of representative federal systems and typical system parameters. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fcc...rtWord/VolumeI /EXECSUMMARY.DOC NTIA summarized technical and operating parameters of over fifty-nine-thousand (59,000) Federal Government frequency assignments in the 1.7-80 MHz frequency range. This information may help operators of BPL systems in development of BPL frequency plans. NTIA then defined representative radio systems for consideration in interference analyses: (1) a land vehicular receiver; (2) a shipborne receiver; (3) a receiver using a rooftop antenna (e.g., a base or fixed-service station); and (4) an aircraft receiver in flight. Federal communications require exceptional protection on frequencies amounting to about 5.4% of the 1.7-80 MHz frequency range. NEEDLESS TO SAY, AMATEUR RADIO WAS NOT LISTED IN THE FREQUENCY MITIGATION SUGGESTIONS, BUT DID GET MENTIONED ON PAGE C19: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fcc...rtWord/VolumeI I/APPC.DOC: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fcc...rtWord/VolumeI /SECT9.DOC In light of the above considerations and the high perceived interference risks, NTIA recommends that the FCC not relax field strength limits for BPL systems and that measurement procedures be refined and clarified to better ensure compliance. These recommendations should be effected as quickly as possible in order to better protect radio communications. Specifically, NTIA recommends the following BPL compliance measurement provisions. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Kenwood two-way "LMR" Dealer in Northern California | Homebrew | |||
Kenwood two-way "LMR" Dealer in Northern California | Homebrew | |||
HFpack Events Pacificon 18 Oct (Shootout, Forum) California | Antenna | |||
OT's Was ( Memo Reveals California Recall as Bush Strategy) | General | |||
Ham Radio Rescue in California Press | Policy |