RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/27662-arrl-propose-subband-bandwidth-regulation.html)

Len Over 21 August 25th 04 11:52 PM

In article ,
(Brian) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message
...


SOMEONE DIAL 9-1-1 IN PICKERINGTON OHIO AND FIND OUT WHO KIDNAPPED

BRIAN
BURKE! ! ! ! ! ! !

Len, that would be just like crazy Steve to try to get someone else to
make a false distress call. Maybe that's how they train them in the
CAP?


Gunnery nurse Yellyell wants to "make calls." He threatened!

Obey him or get committed! He has the Power!

Must be the corps trains them that way.

Ptui.

LHA / WMD


Since we know he not brave enough to do hisself, he want other to do
what he chiken to do. He like Lex Luther on Superman cartoon,
"Greatest Criminal Mastermind!" Hi, hi!


Ho ho! ...still waiting for those "authorities" to come pick me
up on the basis of a single telephone call from a NURSE!

Now I'm waiting for the same thing from ANYONE's phone call.

I have a Lonnnnnnnnnnng time to wait...won't bother.

Nobody wants to talk about ARRL sub-band proposals. Ever-
body jes wanna fight, fight, fight personalities in here...

Steve Robeson K4CAP August 26th 04 09:49 AM

Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
From: (Brian)
Date: 8/25/2004 3:10 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(N2EY) wrote in message
...

But for me the important question is: Should there be CW-only subbands? I

say
yes - about the lowest 15-20% of each HF/MF hamband. Including 160.

Why not? Would it really bother anyone if 3500-3575 and 7000-7050 were CW

only?

Only if it were to include all other "digital" (hi,hi) modes...

As it is, CW is allowed in ALL MF/HF -amateur- spectrum.


As it is, Brian, do you understand WHY it's allowed?

73

Steve, K4YZ






Steve Robeson K4CAP August 26th 04 09:50 AM

Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
From: (Brian)
Date: 8/25/2004 3:15 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message
...


SOMEONE DIAL 9-1-1 IN PICKERINGTON OHIO AND FIND OUT WHO KIDNAPPED

BRIAN
BURKE! ! ! ! ! ! !

Len, that would be just like crazy Steve to try to get someone else to
make a false distress call. Maybe that's how they train them in the
CAP?


Gunnery nurse Yellyell wants to "make calls." He threatened!

Obey him or get committed! He has the Power!

Must be the corps trains them that way.

Ptui.

LHA / WMD


Since we know he not brave enough to do hisself, he want other to do
what he chiken to do. He like Lex Luther on Superman cartoon,
"Greatest Criminal Mastermind!"


Baby banter, Brian...

Are you really not better than that?

I think you are.

73

Steve, K4YZ






Len Over 21 August 26th 04 09:01 PM

In article ,
(gunnery nurse Yell-yell, shouting from an emotional high) writes:

Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
From:
(Brian)
Date: 8/25/2004 3:10 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(N2EY) wrote in message
...

But for me the important question is: Should there be CW-only subbands? I

say
yes - about the lowest 15-20% of each HF/MF hamband. Including 160.

Why not? Would it really bother anyone if 3500-3575 and 7000-7050 were CW

only?

Only if it were to include all other "digital" (hi,hi) modes...

As it is, CW is allowed in ALL MF/HF -amateur- spectrum.


As it is, Brian, do you understand WHY it's allowed?


NURSIE ask a no-brainer question.

Easy answer: Olde-Tyme Hammes at ARRL lobby for morsemanship,
get it. FCC not care much, takes easy way out and gives in to ARRL.

That was in the past (where "Quitefine" hangs out...).

Things are changing with more and more citizens able to lobby the
FCC without having to join special interest groups. Changes are
coming....

Will NURSIE be able to change with the times?

Will NURSIE be able to change anything...including uniforms? :-)

Will NURSIE ever get proper credentials as a homo sapiens?



Len Over 21 August 26th 04 09:01 PM

In article , (Simple
Steve at da gunnery nurse barracks) writes:

Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
From:
(Brian)
Date: 8/25/2004 3:15 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message
...


SOMEONE DIAL 9-1-1 IN PICKERINGTON OHIO AND FIND OUT WHO KIDNAPPED
BRIAN
BURKE! ! ! ! ! ! !

Len, that would be just like crazy Steve to try to get someone else to
make a false distress call. Maybe that's how they train them in the
CAP?

Gunnery nurse Yellyell wants to "make calls." He threatened!

Obey him or get committed! He has the Power!

Must be the corps trains them that way.

Ptui.

LHA / WMD


Since we know he not brave enough to do hisself, he want other to do
what he chiken to do. He like Lex Luther on Superman cartoon,
"Greatest Criminal Mastermind!"


Baby banter, Brian...

Are you really not better than that?

I think you are.


Good thinking. Of course we are.

NURSIE not realize we use "simple spoken English" so that NURSIE
can understand words, not have to look up so many in dictionary...or
in federal regulations such as Department of Defense directives. :-)

We have to try to fit in to flow of conversation of some in here...
baby talk for baby minds.

Was that a good pacifier for you, NURSIE?



William August 27th 04 01:14 AM

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...

Baby banter, Brian...

Are you really not better than that?

I think you are.

73

Steve, K4YZ


You rasis! You stop make fun my Hop Sing mask. Go pik on Qitefeind
if you got big enoff chopstik.

William August 27th 04 01:16 AM

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
From:
(Brian)
Date: 8/25/2004 3:10 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(N2EY) wrote in message
...

But for me the important question is: Should there be CW-only subbands? I

say
yes - about the lowest 15-20% of each HF/MF hamband. Including 160.

Why not? Would it really bother anyone if 3500-3575 and 7000-7050 were CW

only?

Only if it were to include all other "digital" (hi,hi) modes...

As it is, CW is allowed in ALL MF/HF -amateur- spectrum.


As it is, Brian, do you understand WHY it's allowed?

73

Steve, K4YZ



It legasee mode frum when only mode was CW. Dey outlaw sparc. Member?

Mike Coslo August 27th 04 01:54 AM



William wrote:

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...

Baby banter, Brian...

Are you really not better than that?

I think you are.

73

Steve, K4YZ



You rasis!


I just hafta ask, Brian. What on earth is a rasis?




You stop make fun my Hop Sing mask. Go pik on Qitefeind
if you got big enoff chopstik.


- Mike KB3EIA -


Dave Heil August 27th 04 05:20 AM

Len Over 21 wrote:

Things are changing with more and more citizens able to lobby the
FCC without having to join special interest groups. Changes are
coming....


You've lobbied. I don't see any changes in your status vis a vis amateur
radio. You're still not a participant after decades of self-declared
interest. You're still not involved despite a boast of getting an
"Extra right out of the box" years back. Some changes must come very
slowly.

Dave K8MN

John Kasupski August 27th 04 09:18 PM

On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 20:54:19 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:

I just hafta ask, Brian. What on earth is a rasis?


It's the female sibling of a raisin.

John Kasupski, Tonawanda, New York
Amateur Radio (KC2HMZ), SWL/Scanner Monitoring (KNY2VS)
Member of ARES/RACES, ARATS, WUN, ARRL
http://www.qsl.net/kc2fng
E-Mails Ignored, Please Post Replies In This Newsgroup



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com