Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 31st 04, 04:39 PM
William
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(William) writes:

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message
...
Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
From:
(William)
Date: 8/28/2004 7:47 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message
...


I dare say I know more about the USAF, past and present, than you

ever
did
while in it, Brain.

Whaaa, whaaa, whaaa!

Simply impossible!!! You are an OUTSIDER looking in.

Nope.


Yep.

Apparently, physics are different inside the U.S.A.F.

Nope.


You're getting warmer.

Too bad for you.

Nope.


Yep.

Sorry.

Yes, you are VERY sorry.

Yet I was amember of the U.S.A.F.; an INSIDER!

So have I been, Brain.


No, you have not.


Nursie thinks so. That is sufficient for her version of "truth."


Maybe he can get together with Kelly and compare "real Air Force"
experience!

Hi, hi!

Not only as a member of CAP,


Don't make me laff you little jelly belly imposter.

but as a member of the USMC attached to the
USAF at one time.


I was attached to the US Army in the ROK. I was not in the Army.

I was attached to the US Navy in the Pacific. I was not in the Navy.

And you have never been in the US Air Force.


But...but...nursie has been a PILOT IN COMMAND!!!

[of a two-seater, single engine light general av aircraft...]

Oddly enough, for all that claimed PILOT IN COMMAND
experience, nursie never was a pilot in command in USMC.
Not in 18 years or whatever it was for the military "career."


He only does great things outside of his occupation. Hmmmm?

(Before you go off on a tirade about how the CAP is not "part of the
USAF", you'd better read CAP's Constitutional Charter and see waht SecAF

has to
say about it...)


Too bad.


Tsk. In nursies mind is the equation: CAP.GT.USAF

[CAP greater than USAF]

Ergo, the CAP is far more important to the National Defense than USAF
ever was. In her mind.


Apparently he didn't read those 1950's "This is the Air Force"
phamplets during CAP training.

Hi, hi!

Sucks to be you, Brain.

Yet, I am not Brain. Must suck to not be able to spell.

Oh, you are NOT "A" Brain to be sure.


Hi, hi!

But I "spell" just fine. I get my point across. Without yelling,

even.

Nefarious Yell DMC is notorious for yelling.


...and lying. Gunnery nurse consistently makes typos.

He make more spells than a coven of witches.

Amateur ones.

But he does keep the cauldron (the pot) boiling... :-)


Maybe he should lance it.

Wanna try for another 12 hours of being a man again, or did the

other
day
scare you off?

Steve, I've been a man all of my adult life.

No, you've been a MALE all of your adult life.


Your fixation on my genatalia is noted. Again and again.


It's the Macho in the Mighty Macho Morsemen.

Too much "test" in the CW "test-osterone." Overdose.


I've noticed a drastic reduction in his use of the Yiddish word for
penis.

Jimmy Who must have faxed out a white paper on it.

The question is, "Can Jimmy Who control Nefarious Yell DMC?"

The societal obligations of "being a man" require one to be truthful,
trustworty and honest.


That would make you a woman.

Your conduct herein has been far from that.


A crazy woman at that.


Witch?


What?

You unwillingness to act like one even furhter distances you from the
crowd.


You just keep your distance from me.


[I wonder how far a "fuhrter" distance is?]

He say he spell real fine. ?


It's about the distance of a "frank fuhrter."

You are a mere shell of a man. Between your seven hostile actions and
personal tragedy, you are barely recognizable as human.

Uh huh. Right.


Good. Recognizing that you have a problem is the first step.


That's about as far as it gets...


Yep - force field keeping him back. The force of light and goodness.

Go get yourself fixed.

Really irks you to keep getting backed into the corner with your own
newsgroup cowpies, doesn't it, Brain?


You try to Cow everyone into believing your lies.


He try for "bull-y" but is an udder failure.


Back up to his definition of being a man.

Maybe if you stopped dropping them, you'd stop stepping in them...

Steve, K4YZ


I've neither dropped them nor stepped in them.

Just more of your lies.

Does it ever stop?


Seemingly, not.

Nursie fantasyland social mores are quite different than in reality.

Despite an issue worth discussing ("ARRL to propose subband-by-
bandwidth regulation"), everything seems to wind up with nursie
insulting everyone she doesn't agree with. Nearly every thread gets
like that.

No wonder Robert Casey, among others, is irritated.



I would like to oblige Robert Casey. Steve should leave this group.
  #2   Report Post  
Old August 31st 04, 10:12 PM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
(William) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message
...
Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
From:
(William)
Date: 8/28/2004 7:47 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message
...


I dare say I know more about the USAF, past and present, than

you
ever
did
while in it, Brain.

Whaaa, whaaa, whaaa!

Simply impossible!!! You are an OUTSIDER looking in.

Nope.

Yep.

Apparently, physics are different inside the U.S.A.F.

Nope.

You're getting warmer.

Too bad for you.

Nope.

Yep.

Sorry.

Yes, you are VERY sorry.

Yet I was amember of the U.S.A.F.; an INSIDER!

So have I been, Brain.

No, you have not.


Nursie thinks so. That is sufficient for her version of "truth."


Maybe he can get together with Kelly and compare "real Air Force"
experience!

Hi, hi!


Katapult King Kellie was doing intel photo work for the USN, not
the USAF...and dining with the Captain, leaving all the "drudge"
work to the enlisted folk.

Nursie really needs to consult with Rev. Jim since Jimmie read
all the "Jane's" books on military things and probably is as
"renowned" on that history as he is on all of radio. That's a
natural since Jimmie had all this military service experience,
worked military comms, even became an expert gury on Space
from his years in aerospace!

Error! Error! Jimmie did not. No matter, Jimmie will say anyone
talking against him is in "error" anyway... :-)

Not only as a member of CAP,

Don't make me laff you little jelly belly imposter.

but as a member of the USMC attached to the
USAF at one time.

I was attached to the US Army in the ROK. I was not in the Army.

I was attached to the US Navy in the Pacific. I was not in the Navy.

And you have never been in the US Air Force.


But...but...nursie has been a PILOT IN COMMAND!!!

[of a two-seater, single engine light general av aircraft...]

Oddly enough, for all that claimed PILOT IN COMMAND
experience, nursie never was a pilot in command in USMC.
Not in 18 years or whatever it was for the military "career."


He only does great things outside of his occupation. Hmmmm?


Whatever nursie does is "great!" :-)

Remember, he became a PILOT IN COMMAND as a civilian!

Probably got a set of wings with the laurel wreath around the
star above the shield to denote "COMMAND PILOT!" :-)

Somehow that (in his imagining) makes him an ichiban Hero
in ham radio? Hai, hai! :-)

(Before you go off on a tirade about how the CAP is not "part of

the
USAF", you'd better read CAP's Constitutional Charter and see waht SecAF

has to
say about it...)

Too bad.


Tsk. In nursies mind is the equation: CAP.GT.USAF

[CAP greater than USAF]

Ergo, the CAP is far more important to the National Defense than USAF
ever was. In her mind.


Apparently he didn't read those 1950's "This is the Air Force"
phamplets during CAP training.

Hi, hi!


The ink on the pamphlets might have faded in a quarter century
before he had someone read them to him. Long time to sit around
waiting for a PILOT IN COMMAND to get them. :-)

Sucks to be you, Brain.

Yet, I am not Brain. Must suck to not be able to spell.

Oh, you are NOT "A" Brain to be sure.

Hi, hi!

But I "spell" just fine. I get my point across. Without yelling,
even.

Nefarious Yell DMC is notorious for yelling.


...and lying. Gunnery nurse consistently makes typos.

He make more spells than a coven of witches.

Amateur ones.

But he does keep the cauldron (the pot) boiling... :-)


Maybe he should lance it.


Would that make him the "little lance corporal?" :-)


Wanna try for another 12 hours of being a man again, or did the

other
day
scare you off?

Steve, I've been a man all of my adult life.

No, you've been a MALE all of your adult life.

Your fixation on my genatalia is noted. Again and again.


It's the Macho in the Mighty Macho Morsemen.

Too much "test" in the CW "test-osterone." Overdose.


I've noticed a drastic reduction in his use of the Yiddish word for
penis.


Nursie seems adamant on requiring all entering ham radio to get
a sperm count and have that passed in order to complete a license
application. Nursie is always into matters of SEX. Strange.

Jimmy Who must have faxed out a white paper on it.


Jimmie "sned" him a copy...

The question is, "Can Jimmy Who control Nefarious Yell DMC?"


Impossible!

Jimmie heartily approves of such behavior as done by nursie.

Saves him having to step down from posing as Mother Superior
in here under his real callsign. Doesn't stop him from joining in
as an anonymousie with haiku-like spacing...that anonymousie
approves of gunnery nurse Yell-yell's behavior and gives him high-
fives verbally. Hypocritical, but such is life in the newsgroup.

The societal obligations of "being a man" require one to be

truthful,
trustworty and honest.

That would make you a woman.

Your conduct herein has been far from that.

A crazy woman at that.


Witch?


What?


Who?

You unwillingness to act like one even furhter distances you from

the
crowd.

You just keep your distance from me.


[I wonder how far a "fuhrter" distance is?]

He say he spell real fine. ?


It's about the distance of a "frank fuhrter."


He wasn't "frank" about it...

You are a mere shell of a man. Between your seven hostile actions and
personal tragedy, you are barely recognizable as human.

Uh huh. Right.

Good. Recognizing that you have a problem is the first step.


That's about as far as it gets...


Yep - force field keeping him back. The force of light and goodness.


That force didn't come from his family joules...

[Erg! such a bad pun... :-) ]


Go get yourself fixed.

Really irks you to keep getting backed into the corner with your

own
newsgroup cowpies, doesn't it, Brain?

You try to Cow everyone into believing your lies.


He try for "bull-y" but is an udder failure.


Back up to his definition of being a man.


He didn't make one. Leastways, he doesn't act like those words.

Maybe if you stopped dropping them, you'd stop stepping in them...

Steve, K4YZ

I've neither dropped them nor stepped in them.

Just more of your lies.

Does it ever stop?


Seemingly, not.

Nursie fantasyland social mores are quite different than in reality.

Despite an issue worth discussing ("ARRL to propose subband-by-
bandwidth regulation"), everything seems to wind up with nursie
insulting everyone she doesn't agree with. Nearly every thread gets
like that.

No wonder Robert Casey, among others, is irritated.



I would like to oblige Robert Casey. Steve should leave this group.


I'll second that. Nursie just doesn't present a good image for
U.S. amateur radio of today.

Amateur radio can be a fun hobby and enjoyed by thousands. But,
unlike what the PCTA extras contend, it is not a job, not a profession,
not a guild, not a craft, not a union, and certainly not some kind of
boot camp or basic training. Amateur radio is a civilian hobby, not a
military one.

U.S. amateur radio does not require anyone to be employed as a
nurse. U.S. amateur radio does not require anyone to have a pilot's
license (with or without being a "pilot in command").

U.S. amateur radio operates by the very same physical laws as do
all othe radio services. Prior experience in other radio services is
helpful in understanding that physical law and theory but no more
essential to the hobby than nursing as a profession or having civilian
pilot licenses.

U.S. amateur radio is regulated by the FCC, an agency chartered to
regulate all U.S. civil radio. Absolutely no FCC commissioner or
staffer is required to hold any amateur radio license in order to regulate
U.S. amateur radio.

Morse code proficiency is NO LONGER any indicator of "qualification"
to operate on any HF bands. For most radio services it was NEVER
a requirement. While that is heretical in terms of worship of the Church
of St. Hiram, it is nevertheless true.

Having a valid U.S. amateur radio license does NOT automatically
make anyone any kind of "expert" on any subject outside of U.S.
amateur radio. In fact, it is not a guarantor of expertise within U.S.
amateur radio.


  #3   Report Post  
Old September 1st 04, 03:21 PM
William
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...

In article ,
(William) writes:

I would like to oblige Robert Casey. Steve should leave this group.


I'll second that. Nursie just doesn't present a good image for
U.S. amateur radio of today.

Amateur radio can be a fun hobby and enjoyed by thousands. But,
unlike what the PCTA extras contend, it is not a job, not a profession,
not a guild, not a craft, not a union, and certainly not some kind of
boot camp or basic training. Amateur radio is a civilian hobby, not a
military one.

U.S. amateur radio does not require anyone to be employed as a
nurse. U.S. amateur radio does not require anyone to have a pilot's
license (with or without being a "pilot in command").

U.S. amateur radio operates by the very same physical laws as do
all othe radio services. Prior experience in other radio services is
helpful in understanding that physical law and theory but no more
essential to the hobby than nursing as a profession or having civilian
pilot licenses.

U.S. amateur radio is regulated by the FCC, an agency chartered to
regulate all U.S. civil radio. Absolutely no FCC commissioner or
staffer is required to hold any amateur radio license in order to regulate
U.S. amateur radio.

Morse code proficiency is NO LONGER any indicator of "qualification"
to operate on any HF bands. For most radio services it was NEVER
a requirement. While that is heretical in terms of worship of the Church
of St. Hiram, it is nevertheless true.

Having a valid U.S. amateur radio license does NOT automatically
make anyone any kind of "expert" on any subject outside of U.S.
amateur radio. In fact, it is not a guarantor of expertise within U.S.
amateur radio.



Agree on all points. Steve is a bad ambasador for the world's best hobby.

When will Steve be daparting?

I would like to get a "farewell and good luck" card and have everyone sign it.

bb
  #4   Report Post  
Old September 1st 04, 09:09 PM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
(William) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...

In article ,
(William) writes:

I would like to oblige Robert Casey. Steve should leave this group.


I'll second that. Nursie just doesn't present a good image for
U.S. amateur radio of today.

Amateur radio can be a fun hobby and enjoyed by thousands. But,
unlike what the PCTA extras contend, it is not a job, not a profession,
not a guild, not a craft, not a union, and certainly not some kind of
boot camp or basic training. Amateur radio is a civilian hobby, not a
military one.

U.S. amateur radio does not require anyone to be employed as a
nurse. U.S. amateur radio does not require anyone to have a pilot's
license (with or without being a "pilot in command").

U.S. amateur radio operates by the very same physical laws as do
all othe radio services. Prior experience in other radio services is
helpful in understanding that physical law and theory but no more
essential to the hobby than nursing as a profession or having civilian
pilot licenses.

U.S. amateur radio is regulated by the FCC, an agency chartered to
regulate all U.S. civil radio. Absolutely no FCC commissioner or
staffer is required to hold any amateur radio license in order to

regulate
U.S. amateur radio.

Morse code proficiency is NO LONGER any indicator of "qualification"
to operate on any HF bands. For most radio services it was NEVER
a requirement. While that is heretical in terms of worship of the

Church
of St. Hiram, it is nevertheless true.

Having a valid U.S. amateur radio license does NOT automatically
make anyone any kind of "expert" on any subject outside of U.S.
amateur radio. In fact, it is not a guarantor of expertise within U.S.
amateur radio.



Agree on all points. Steve is a bad ambasador for the world's best hobby.

When will Steve be daparting?

I would like to get a "farewell and good luck" card and have everyone sign
it.


For what he's said about my wife...and your wife and family...I'd
never sign it. Spit on it, maybe.

LHA
  #5   Report Post  
Old September 2nd 04, 11:53 AM
William
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(William) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...

In article ,
(William) writes:

I would like to oblige Robert Casey. Steve should leave this group.

I'll second that. Nursie just doesn't present a good image for
U.S. amateur radio of today.

Amateur radio can be a fun hobby and enjoyed by thousands. But,
unlike what the PCTA extras contend, it is not a job, not a profession,
not a guild, not a craft, not a union, and certainly not some kind of
boot camp or basic training. Amateur radio is a civilian hobby, not a
military one.

U.S. amateur radio does not require anyone to be employed as a
nurse. U.S. amateur radio does not require anyone to have a pilot's
license (with or without being a "pilot in command").

U.S. amateur radio operates by the very same physical laws as do
all othe radio services. Prior experience in other radio services is
helpful in understanding that physical law and theory but no more
essential to the hobby than nursing as a profession or having civilian
pilot licenses.

U.S. amateur radio is regulated by the FCC, an agency chartered to
regulate all U.S. civil radio. Absolutely no FCC commissioner or
staffer is required to hold any amateur radio license in order to

regulate
U.S. amateur radio.

Morse code proficiency is NO LONGER any indicator of "qualification"
to operate on any HF bands. For most radio services it was NEVER
a requirement. While that is heretical in terms of worship of the

Church
of St. Hiram, it is nevertheless true.

Having a valid U.S. amateur radio license does NOT automatically
make anyone any kind of "expert" on any subject outside of U.S.
amateur radio. In fact, it is not a guarantor of expertise within U.S.
amateur radio.



Agree on all points. Steve is a bad ambasador for the world's best hobby.

When will Steve be daparting?

I would like to get a "farewell and good luck" card and have everyone sign
it.


For what he's said about my wife...and your wife and family...I'd
never sign it. Spit on it, maybe.

LHA


You've got a good point. He deserves no fond farewells.

But I'd buy the card, sign it, put postage on it, and maybe even
include a box of fine chocolates just to get rid of that crazy
*******.

But would he stay away?


  #6   Report Post  
Old September 2nd 04, 07:29 PM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
(William) writes:

You've got a good point. He deserves no fond farewells.

But I'd buy the card, sign it, put postage on it, and maybe even
include a box of fine chocolates just to get rid of that crazy
*******.

But would he stay away?


The great unknown.

This newsgroup essentially ceased to become any sort of discussion
forum quite some while ago. Certain individuals asserted (and
inserted) themselves as "leaders" and "knew what was good for
everything" (defining that whatever They did was "good" and what
They didn't like was "bad").

This newsgroup was created some years back to catch the
"discussions" on the Morse Code Test Issue, transferring it from
rec.radio.amateur.miscellaneous. Personal denigrations of those
against retaining the code test were numerous and rather ripe with
invective and insulting inuendo from those that championed the
mighty morse modes. That was long ago when the mighty morse
ruled the rank, status, privelege "qualifications" of amateurs in
that incredible multi-tiered license structure of pre-restructuring
circa 1997. No less than six classes of license for a hobby
activity...greater than the number of classes for commercial radio
operator licenses.

Those that had Made It Through all the tests and "qualifications"
entrenched themselves behind the "safety" of their mental
barricades and mighty accomplishments (greater than anyone
could possibly be in non-amateur radio). They claimed "turf" and
bragging rights and "ownership" of What All Good Hams Must Do.

Those "masters" were aided by the self-promoting prose of the
ARRL (which had yet to get as many as a quarter of all U.S.
hams in membership). ARRL stressed morse as the epitome of
ham-ness as it had ever since Hiram had been elected president-
for-life. It was a continuation of the equation ham = morseman,
the unstated but constantly implied ultimate goal that "should" be
a part of amateur life.

In other words, the ARRL continued on the ultra-conservative path
of keeping the past as present...and naturally promoting themselves
as "leadership" for all "right-thinking hams" who should join ARRL.
That's just a natural survival tactic of any fraternal order...to survive
they need membership and attraction to the league "product" is to
tell others what those others what the league leadership thinks
they want newcomers to hear. ARRL went a bit too far.

The no-code-test Technician license class never really stopped
growing since 1991. That class has become the Majority of all U.S.
amateur licensees...regardless of the rationalizations of the pro-
coders trying to play numbers games after the Restructuring.

Pro-coders just couldn't believe the reality. "No-code" went against
their religious concepts, personified by the equation ham=morseman!
All "real" hams knew, loved, had tested for "code" so that was a
universal, divine thing they seemed to think. An amazing aberration
of theirs, clinging to past standards and practices as if to life itself.

Meanwhile, the rest of the radio world, every other radio service,
either never adopted any morse modes or just quit using morse for
communications. The Maritime radio community itself voted in the
new GMDSS to replace the old, dramatic, fabled-in-story 500 KHz
morse distress frequency. When that was done there was no real
need for morsemanship anywhere...except in the religious beliefs
of the mighty macho morsemen, themselves angry and distressed
that their Nobel-grade accomplishments were not revered. Some
became outraged and vented on all "no-coders" in barrages of
invective. Pro-coders relieved themselves in public in disregard of
all, blessed by Those Of Their Kind.

The tombstone of morse code testing was put in place at WRC-03
when most of S25 was revised. Internationally. R.I.P. code testing.

Except, like some undead ghoul of the air, the pro-coder zombies
continue to haunt, to try to keep alive that equally-dead equation
ham=morseman. They vow revenge and retribution for themselves
not understanding that their anger is about their own False Beliefs.
They continue to take out that anger, relieving themselves by
denigrations of all who are "no-code." We are awash in their "relief"
to this day. No relief tube in sight.

Amateur radio is essentially a hobby, a pleasureable activity involving
radio communications arts done for personal enjoyment. Licensing
and regulations thereof are a result of the physics of all radio, to keep
order in what would (and was) an EM chaos. Licensing regulations,
like all laws, were never fixed, immuteable, imposed by a divinity.
Regulations must remain open to change just like all laws must
remain open for change.

Pro-coders are resistant to change. They want to fight to the death
for their "principles" (false religious beliefs) of having all desiring to
be involved in a radio hobby to be licensed like the pro-coders were
licensed. No less. They were "champions" of their day and want to
keep their self-perceived crowns. They are mighty...hear them roar!

Will that stop any pro-coder from relieving themselves in public?
I doubt it. Their code keys will have to be pried from cold, dead
fingers.

Will that stop any olde-tyme hamme from relieving themselves in
public? I doubt that, too. They have proclaimed Themselves as
"masters," a kind of royalty that will never, ever abdicate their
thrones. They Know What Is Good For All...Believe in what They
Believe. They are the Elite. Their blood is blue...cyanotic.

Independence of thought is a no-no, unthinkable. There is only
One Belief. That of a minority within another minority of hobbyists
headquartered in a small New England town. They lead. All
other hobbyists must follow. They say so. Only They Know What
Is Good For All. So be it.


  #7   Report Post  
Old September 2nd 04, 08:16 PM
Steve Robeson K4CAP
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
From: (Len Over 21)
Date: 9/2/2004 1:29 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

In article ,
(William) writes:

You've got a good point. He deserves no fond farewells.

But I'd buy the card, sign it, put postage on it, and maybe even
include a box of fine chocolates just to get rid of that crazy
*******.

But would he stay away?


The great unknown.

This newsgroup essentially ceased to become any sort of discussion
forum quite some while ago. Certain individuals asserted (and
inserted) themselves as "leaders" and "knew what was good for
everything" (defining that whatever They did was "good" and what
They didn't like was "bad").


Perhaps that was due to a determined effort by a certain unlicensed
individual to berate, antagonize, humiliate and otherwise manipulate the
newsgroup in a further effort to position himself a Lord, King and God or All
Radio Knowledge.

This newsgroup was created some years back to catch the
"discussions" on the Morse Code Test Issue, transferring it from
rec.radio.amateur.miscellaneous.


And of course any attempt to let IT evolve to anything ELSE is criminal.

Oh...wait...LENNIE is the one accusing AMATEURS of not evolving with
changes in technology and practice...but it's OK for HIM to insist that RRAP
not be used for any other purpsoe save one....

Well..ain't THAT a switch...?!?! (Not really...Lennie's as two-faced as
anyone can be...)

Personal denigrations of those
against retaining the code test were numerous and rather ripe with
invective and insulting inuendo from those that championed the
mighty morse modes.


As were personal denigrations uttered by those who champion the removal of
Morse Code testing.

That was long ago when the mighty morse
ruled the rank, status, privelege "qualifications" of amateurs in
that incredible multi-tiered license structure of pre-restructuring
circa 1997.


Whooooops. There goes Lennie's "I Hate Amateur Radio Rank, Status and
Priviledge Because It Diminishes My Commercial Rank, Status and Priviledge"
rant.

No less than six classes of license for a hobby
activity...greater than the number of classes for commercial radio
operator licenses.


And now there's only three.

Three more than YOU have, Lennie.

Those that had Made It Through all the tests and "qualifications"
entrenched themselves behind the "safety" of their mental
barricades and mighty accomplishments (greater than anyone
could possibly be in non-amateur radio). They claimed "turf" and
bragging rights and "ownership" of What All Good Hams Must Do.


Of course YOU would have us all spending 14 years in night school with and
a GROL to BE "qualified".

Not necessary. Just $10 and an hour ata a VE session.

Those "masters" were aided by the self-promoting prose of the
ARRL (which had yet to get as many as a quarter of all U.S.
hams in membership). ARRL stressed morse as the epitome of
ham-ness as it had ever since Hiram had been elected president-
for-life. It was a continuation of the equation ham = morseman,
the unstated but constantly implied ultimate goal that "should" be
a part of amateur life.


The only "prose" in Amateur Radio passed away a while back. was great on
a keyer, even in his late years.

In other words, the ARRL continued on the ultra-conservative path
of keeping the past as present...and naturally promoting themselves
as "leadership" for all "right-thinking hams" who should join ARRL.


FCC records on such things prove otherwise, but of course Lennie tends to
ignore things archived in federal documents.

That's just a natural survival tactic of any fraternal order...to survive
they need membership and attraction to the league "product" is to
tell others what those others what the league leadership thinks
they want newcomers to hear. ARRL went a bit too far.


If this were true, the ARRL could have taken the "sure-bet" path years
ago and pandered to the lowest common denominator.

Other Amateur Radio organizations and periodicals have tried that and
suffered for it. "Ham Radio", "Ham Radio Horizons", "73", et al.

League membership is around 170K.

Thier next closer competitor is "CQ" magazine, known for it's more "center
of the road" positionings, yet they only report a TOTAL printing of about 44K,
not even a third of the League's membership (of which we assume a magazine
"subscription" for each)

The no-code-test Technician license class never really stopped
growing since 1991. That class has become the Majority of all U.S.
amateur licensees...regardless of the rationalizations of the pro-
coders trying to play numbers games after the Restructuring.


The "rationalizations" are bilateral, Your Putziness. You are evidence of
that.

Pro-coders just couldn't believe the reality. "No-code" went against
their religious concepts, personified by the equation ham=morseman!
All "real" hams knew, loved, had tested for "code" so that was a
universal, divine thing they seemed to think. An amazing aberration
of theirs, clinging to past standards and practices as if to life itself.


Nothing about Amateur Radio has remaind unchanged, Lennie, except for the
term "Amateur Radio" or "Ham".

The rest has been an almost 90 year history of fluidity.

Meanwhile, the rest of the radio world, every other radio service,
either never adopted any morse modes or just quit using morse for
communications.


This forum is about AMATUER RADIO...not the LEMMING Radio service.

Factors exist in the AMATEUR RADIO service that lend itself to the
continued testing for and implementation of Morse Code.

The Maritime radio community itself voted in the
new GMDSS to replace the old, dramatic, fabled-in-story 500 KHz
morse distress frequency. When that was done there was no real
need for morsemanship anywhere...except in the religious beliefs
of the mighty macho morsemen, themselves angry and distressed
that their Nobel-grade accomplishments were not revered. Some
became outraged and vented on all "no-coders" in barrages of
invective. Pro-coders relieved themselves in public in disregard of
all, blessed by Those Of Their Kind.


Of course pointing out that the retention of Morse Code testing was
mandated by international treaty, of which the United States was signatory.

That law has been changed and the US Government has it's regulatory wheels
churning to determine how to accomodate that.

Again, yet another fact you refuse to acknowledge.

The tombstone of morse code testing was put in place at WRC-03
when most of S25 was revised. Internationally. R.I.P. code testing.


When will be see "RIP Lennie Anderson"...?!?!

That would do more to promote the appeal of ANY radio participation.

Except, like some undead ghoul of the air, the pro-coder zombies
continue to haunt, to try to keep alive that equally-dead equation
ham=morseman. They vow revenge and retribution for themselves
not understanding that their anger is about their own False Beliefs.
They continue to take out that anger, relieving themselves by
denigrations of all who are "no-code." We are awash in their "relief"
to this day. No relief tube in sight.


You're the one trying to use the relief tube Lennie...in the same way
1930's fighter pilots used to communicate between the cockpits.

Amateur radio is essentially a hobby, a pleasureable activity involving
radio communications arts done for personal enjoyment.


Wondering where you got that from, Lennie, in as much as you are not a
part of it.

Licensing
and regulations thereof are a result of the physics of all radio, to keep
order in what would (and was) an EM chaos. Licensing regulations,
like all laws, were never fixed, immuteable, imposed by a divinity.
Regulations must remain open to change just like all laws must
remain open for change.

Pro-coders are resistant to change. They want to fight to the death
for their "principles" (false religious beliefs) of having all desiring to
be involved in a radio hobby to be licensed like the pro-coders were
licensed. No less. They were "champions" of their day and want to
keep their self-perceived crowns. They are mighty...hear them roar!


You can hear them "roar" on the bottom ends of the more popular HF bands.

Will that stop any pro-coder from relieving themselves in public?
I doubt it. Their code keys will have to be pried from cold, dead
fingers.


As will be your keyboard, no doubt.

Will that stop any olde-tyme hamme from relieving themselves in
public? I doubt that, too. They have proclaimed Themselves as
"masters," a kind of royalty that will never, ever abdicate their
thrones. They Know What Is Good For All...Believe in what They
Believe. They are the Elite. Their blood is blue...cyanotic.


I just KNOW you can provide SOME reference to where this proclamation was
made.

Independence of thought is a no-no, unthinkable.


Only on 10048 Lanark, Sun valley, CA...and in most Islamic nations.

There is only
One Belief. That of a minority within another minority of hobbyists
headquartered in a small New England town. They lead. All
other hobbyists must follow. They say so. Only They Know What
Is Good For All. So be it.


Regardless of the "minority within a minority", it will always be a
MAJORITY compared to the Leonard H. Anderson's licensed AND experienced in the
Amateur Radio Service.

And we are still waiting for Lennie to provide the NG some links to the
posts where the alleged "proclaimations" have been made.

(Hint: They don't exist...except in the flailing, failing mind of a very
lonely, very angry old man in Sun Valley, CA.......)

Steve, K4YZ





  #8   Report Post  
Old September 3rd 04, 05:06 PM
Dave Heil
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Len Over 21 wrote:

This newsgroup essentially ceased to become any sort of discussion
forum quite some while ago. Certain individuals asserted (and
inserted) themselves as "leaders" and "knew what was good for
everything" (defining that whatever They did was "good" and what
They didn't like was "bad").


One of those individuals, a Leonard H. Anderson of California has no
stake whatever in amateur radio. Somehow, this total non-participant
has appointed himself "advocate" for change within amateur radio. He
purports to know how amateur radio should best be regulated. Whatever
he says is "good" and whatever those who disagree with him say is "bad".

This newsgroup was created some years back to catch the
"discussions" on the Morse Code Test Issue, transferring it from
rec.radio.amateur.miscellaneous.


You have as much to do with one as the other.

Personal denigrations of those
against retaining the code test were numerous and rather ripe with
invective and insulting inuendo from those that championed the
mighty morse modes.


It is funny that your own personal denigrations of those for retention
of a morse test go unmentioned. What of your invective and insulting
inuendo directed at them?

That was long ago when the mighty morse
ruled the rank, status, privelege "qualifications" of amateurs in
that incredible multi-tiered license structure of pre-restructuring
circa 1997.


What do you know of it? You haven't an amateur radio license of any
class. That'd include license classes requiring 20 wpm, 13 wpm, 5 wpm
and even no morse exams.

No less than six classes of license for a hobby
activity...greater than the number of classes for commercial radio
operator licenses.


How are you involved and why does the number of license classes bother
you?

Those that had Made It Through all the tests and "qualifications"
entrenched themselves behind the "safety" of their mental
barricades and mighty accomplishments (greater than anyone
could possibly be in non-amateur radio). They claimed "turf" and
bragging rights and "ownership" of What All Good Hams Must Do.


You aren't a ham. Why get all upset?

Those "masters" were aided by the self-promoting prose of the
ARRL (which had yet to get as many as a quarter of all U.S.
hams in membership).


Why worry about the ARRL. You aren't a member.

ARRL stressed morse as the epitome of
ham-ness as it had ever since Hiram had been elected president-
for-life.


Your statement cannot be backed up with evidence.

The no-code-test Technician license class never really stopped
growing since 1991.


Why would it? It appears that the Amateur Extra never stopped growing
either.

That class has become the Majority of all U.S.
amateur licensees...regardless of the rationalizations of the pro-
coders trying to play numbers games after the Restructuring.


It only makes sense. It is the easiest to obtain.

Pro-coders just couldn't believe the reality.


I believe the reality. A no-code Tech is the path of least resistance.

"No-code" went against
their religious concepts, personified by the equation ham=morseman!


My religion and amateur radio are two very distinct things.

All "real" hams knew, loved, had tested for "code" so that was a
universal, divine thing they seemed to think.


Is that why you have a problem? You aren't a ham.

An amazing aberration
of theirs, clinging to past standards and practices as if to life itself.


Tell you what, Len. I'll cling to standards. You cling to life itself.

Meanwhile, the rest of the radio world, every other radio service,
either never adopted any morse modes or just quit using morse for
communications. The Maritime radio community itself voted in the
new GMDSS to replace the old, dramatic, fabled-in-story 500 KHz
morse distress frequency.


So what?

When that was done there was no real
need for morsemanship anywhere...except in the religious beliefs
of the mighty macho morsemen, themselves angry and distressed
that their Nobel-grade accomplishments were not revered.


You needn't worry about it. You're fertile imagination has manufactured
a world of angry and distressed, code-tested hams. You've even added
"Nobel-graded" accomplishments. It just seems that way to you as one
on the outside looking in.

Some
became outraged and vented on all "no-coders" in barrages of
invective.


While you are a "no-coder", you aren't a radio amateur.

Pro-coders relieved themselves in public in disregard of
all, blessed by Those Of Their Kind.


They did what?

The tombstone of morse code testing was put in place at WRC-03
when most of S25 was revised. Internationally. R.I.P. code testing.


Well. It would. Appear that. Your facts are as. Dubious as your.
Sentence structure.

Except, like some undead ghoul of the air, the pro-coder zombies
continue to haunt, to try to keep alive that equally-dead equation
ham=morseman.


Come now, Leonard. That isn't quite as scary as Len Anderson=radio
amateur.

They vow revenge and retribution for themselves
not understanding that their anger is about their own False Beliefs.


Is that what drives your anger, Len? Your own False Beliefs?


They continue to take out that anger, relieving themselves by
denigrations of all who are "no-code."


Is that why you believe you are the object of denigration by others?

We are awash in their "relief"
to this day. No relief tube in sight.


"We"? How are you involved?

Amateur radio is essentially a hobby, a pleasureable activity involving
radio communications arts done for personal enjoyment.


....or so you've been told.

Licensing
and regulations thereof are a result of the physics of all radio, to keep
order in what would (and was) an EM chaos.


The physics of radio are certainly a part of the regulations. They, by
themselves, are not the sum total of material making up amateur radio
regulations.

Licensing regulations,
like all laws, were never fixed, immuteable, imposed by a divinity.
Regulations must remain open to change just like all laws must
remain open for change.


The regs have changed for as long as I've been a ham.

Pro-coders are resistant to change.


....and you are for change for the sake of change. You have no stake in
amateur radio.


They want to fight to the death
for their "principles" (false religious beliefs) of having all desiring to
be involved in a radio hobby to be licensed like the pro-coders were
licensed. No less. They were "champions" of their day and want to
keep their self-perceived crowns. They are mighty...hear them roar!



Do you want to fight to the death championing your ideas of amateur
radio regulation? Be my guest. Follow the false religious beliefs of a
non-participant. I hear you roar. I don't perceive you as mighty.

Dave K8MN
  #9   Report Post  
Old September 2nd 04, 04:51 AM
Dave Heil
 
Posts: n/a
Default

William wrote:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...

In article ,
(William) writes:

I would like to oblige Robert Casey. Steve should leave this group.


I'll second that. Nursie just doesn't present a good image for
U.S. amateur radio of today.

Amateur radio can be a fun hobby and enjoyed by thousands. But,
unlike what the PCTA extras contend, it is not a job, not a profession,
not a guild, not a craft, not a union, and certainly not some kind of
boot camp or basic training. Amateur radio is a civilian hobby, not a
military one.

U.S. amateur radio does not require anyone to be employed as a
nurse. U.S. amateur radio does not require anyone to have a pilot's
license (with or without being a "pilot in command").

U.S. amateur radio operates by the very same physical laws as do
all othe radio services. Prior experience in other radio services is
helpful in understanding that physical law and theory but no more
essential to the hobby than nursing as a profession or having civilian
pilot licenses.

U.S. amateur radio is regulated by the FCC, an agency chartered to
regulate all U.S. civil radio. Absolutely no FCC commissioner or
staffer is required to hold any amateur radio license in order to regulate
U.S. amateur radio.

Morse code proficiency is NO LONGER any indicator of "qualification"
to operate on any HF bands. For most radio services it was NEVER
a requirement. While that is heretical in terms of worship of the Church
of St. Hiram, it is nevertheless true.

Having a valid U.S. amateur radio license does NOT automatically
make anyone any kind of "expert" on any subject outside of U.S.
amateur radio. In fact, it is not a guarantor of expertise within U.S.
amateur radio.



Agree on all points.


Of course you do, "Bill". You've become a yes man for Leonard, the
non-ham.

Steve is a bad ambasador for the world's best hobby.


I don't think Steve has ever campaigned for, nor has he been appointed
an ambassador for amateur radio.

When will Steve be daparting?


For where? Are you sending him on a trip?

I would like to get a "farewell and good luck" card and have everyone sign it.


That's awfully sweet of you. It is a wonderful gesture.

Dave K8MN
  #10   Report Post  
Old September 2nd 04, 06:50 AM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Dave Heil
writes:

William wrote:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message

...

In article ,
(William) writes:

I would like to oblige Robert Casey. Steve should leave this group.

I'll second that. Nursie just doesn't present a good image for
U.S. amateur radio of today.

Amateur radio can be a fun hobby and enjoyed by thousands. But,
unlike what the PCTA extras contend, it is not a job, not a

profession,
not a guild, not a craft, not a union, and certainly not some kind of
boot camp or basic training. Amateur radio is a civilian hobby, not a
military one.

U.S. amateur radio does not require anyone to be employed as a
nurse. U.S. amateur radio does not require anyone to have a pilot's
license (with or without being a "pilot in command").

U.S. amateur radio operates by the very same physical laws as do
all othe radio services. Prior experience in other radio services is
helpful in understanding that physical law and theory but no more
essential to the hobby than nursing as a profession or having civilian
pilot licenses.

U.S. amateur radio is regulated by the FCC, an agency chartered to
regulate all U.S. civil radio. Absolutely no FCC commissioner or
staffer is required to hold any amateur radio license in order to

regulate
U.S. amateur radio.

Morse code proficiency is NO LONGER any indicator of "qualification"
to operate on any HF bands. For most radio services it was NEVER
a requirement. While that is heretical in terms of worship of the

Church
of St. Hiram, it is nevertheless true.

Having a valid U.S. amateur radio license does NOT automatically
make anyone any kind of "expert" on any subject outside of U.S.
amateur radio. In fact, it is not a guarantor of expertise within

U.S.
amateur radio.



Agree on all points.


Of course you do, "Bill". You've become a yes man for Leonard, the
non-ham.

Steve is a bad ambasador for the world's best hobby.


I don't think Steve has ever campaigned for, nor has he been appointed
an ambassador for amateur radio.


Count your blessings...


When will Steve be daparting?


For where? Are you sending him on a trip?

I would like to get a "farewell and good luck" card and have everyone sign

it.

That's awfully sweet of you. It is a wonderful gesture.


"No matter what job, educational level, employer, or
government/military service that anyone has, if said anyone
opposes Heil's views, he/she will be the target of Heil's insults,
ridicule, name-calling, factual errors, ethnic slurs, total lack of
emoticons and social-interaction graces, acting in an arrogant,
elitist manner...for years" :-)




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access Lloyd Mitchell Antenna 43 October 26th 04 01:37 AM
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions Louis C. LeVine Dx 36 September 9th 04 09:30 AM
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions Louis C. LeVine General 8 September 8th 04 12:14 PM
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions Louis C. LeVine Dx 0 September 5th 04 08:30 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017