| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
September 6th 04, 05:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , (Mighty Macho Morseman and Pilot In Command gunnery nurse) writes: Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation From: (Len Over 21) Date: 9/2/2004 1:29 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: In article , (William) writes: Tsk. I have no need for titles, rank, status. I am secure in what I can do...from practical experience doing it...successfully. Izzat why you use the ieee.org sig line, remind us periodically of your membership and bring up your "name on the masthead" of 'Ham Radio' magazine from time to time? How does your history as a PROFESSIONAL appear so often? Amateur radio is a HOBBY. It isn't a job. It isn't a union. It isn't a guild. It isn't a craft. It is a hobby. ....one in which you are not involved. Tsk. Irrelevant what I "have" or "don't have." Actually, in a newsgroup dealing with amateur radio, it would seem quite relevant that you are not a licensed radio amateur. If all nursie can argue is about pieces of paper (suitable for framing), then she is very shallow indeed. One of those pieces of paper would make you a radio amateur. You haven't passed any exam which would provide one of those pieces of paper. There was NO "GROL" when I took and passed my one test for a First Class Radiotelephone (Commercial) Operator's license in 1956. Poor nursie just can't stand that someone did something better than she did long ago. :-) Better? Naw, just different. Your First Class Radiotelephone ticket does nothing for you on the ham bands. For a guy who has no need of status, you certainly bring up your "better than" First Phone often enough. Nursie got in. That should say it all... :-) You didn't get in. That says much more. :-) League membership is around 170K. Still? Tsk. Less than a quarter of all licensed U.S. amateurs! Coincidentally, the membership of the Academy of Model Aeronautics is also about 170 thousand members. Isn't that wonderful! Academy members mostly fly radio-controlled model aircraft. They lobbied for and got a whole band of VHF frequencies for such a fun hobby. AMA even has insurance for members and clubs, sponsors all sorts of competitive meets of flyers. Wow! Another coincidence! ARRL has insurance for members and sponsors all sorts of competitive events. You can hear them "roar" on the bottom ends of the more popular HF bands. NOT on the 6, 9, 11, and 15 MHz bands. :-) Those are "shortwave broadcast" bands...and are the "most popular." Good listening, kindly old SWL. Dave K8MN |
|
#2
September 6th 04, 03:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
From: Dave Heil Date: 9/5/2004 11:13 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Len Over 21 wrote: In article , (Mighty Macho Morseman and Pilot In Command gunnery nurse) writes: Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation From: (Len Over 21) Date: 9/2/2004 1:29 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: In article , (William) writes: Tsk. I have no need for titles, rank, status. I am secure in what I can do...from practical experience doing it...successfully. Izzat why you use the ieee.org sig line, remind us periodically of your membership and bring up your "name on the masthead" of 'Ham Radio' magazine from time to time? How does your history as a PROFESSIONAL appear so often? And let us not forget Lennie's frequent appending of his former US Army service number to the end of his posts...As if anyone care or if it mattered... Amateur radio is a HOBBY. It isn't a job. It isn't a union. It isn't a guild. It isn't a craft. It is a hobby. ...one in which you are not involved. Thank God...Maybe we can keep the scum in one puddle. Tsk. Irrelevant what I "have" or "don't have." Actually, in a newsgroup dealing with amateur radio, it would seem quite relevant that you are not a licensed radio amateur. Now DAVE! Why should we assume he'd have any relevent experience or participation? He's got a big mouth, a bad attitude, and the idea that the Constitutions guarantees somehow mean it's OK to be an antagonistic twerp. One day, someone will throw a brick through his windows or flatten his tires, and "all of a sudden" he will realize that there ARE penalties for running your mouth off. If all nursie can argue is about pieces of paper (suitable for framing), then she is very shallow indeed. One of those pieces of paper would make you a radio amateur. You haven't passed any exam which would provide one of those pieces of paper. The shallow one is the twit that suggested that framable certificates were "all (I) can argue". There was NO "GROL" when I took and passed my one test for a First Class Radiotelephone (Commercial) Operator's license in 1956. Poor nursie just can't stand that someone did something better than she did long ago. :-) Better? Naw, just different. Your First Class Radiotelephone ticket does nothing for you on the ham bands. For a guy who has no need of status, you certainly bring up your "better than" First Phone often enough. It's not "better than" anything now. One can have a complete and fulfilling career in radiocommunications WITHOUT an FCC license anymore. And Lennie's GROL (nee First Phone) is useless even to him unless he's operating under the auspices of somone else's STATION license. Nursie got in. That should say it all... You didn't get in. That says much more. League membership is around 170K. Still? Tsk. Less than a quarter of all licensed U.S. amateurs! Coincidentally, the membership of the Academy of Model Aeronautics is also about 170 thousand members. Isn't that wonderful! With even MORE potential members to draw from, that places AMA's membership at even LESS as a total percentage than ARRL's membership represents. Academy members mostly fly radio-controlled model aircraft. They lobbied for and got a whole band of VHF frequencies for such a fun hobby. Ooooooohhhhh...... Aaaaaaaaaahhhhhh...... 55 DISCREET CHANNELS at 72Mhz and 30 at 75Mhz. Let's not forget the SIX channels in the 11 meter CB band. That's 91 channels. Ooooooooooohhhhhhhhh. Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. You can hear them "roar" on the bottom ends of the more popular HF bands. NOT on the 6, 9, 11, and 15 MHz bands. :-) Those are "shortwave broadcast" bands...and are the "most popular." They are the "most popular" where there is no cable or DISH-TV. Good listening, kindly old SWL. Listening, and nothing more...Except for Part 95 and Part 15 and his TV and garage door remotes. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
|
#3
September 9th 04, 01:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#5
September 10th 04, 06:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
(Foul-mouthed Role Model of a Modern Ham Extra) writes: Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation From: (William) Date: 9/8/2004 7:20 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Thank God...Maybe we can keep the scum in one puddle. Now DAVE! Why should we assume he'd have any relevent experience or participation? He's got a big mouth, a bad attitude, and the idea that the Constitutions guarantees somehow mean it's OK to be an antagonistic twerp. One day, someone will throw a brick through his windows or flatten his tires, and "all of a sudden" he will realize that there ARE penalties for running your mouth off. So much for "civil discourse." You're simply incapable of it. Best of Luck. There's nothing of what I said that's "uncivil", Brain. Nearly ALL of nursie's output is uncivil. Lennie's spent a long time building his foundation of hatred. No "foundation of hatred" here. That's all in nursie's disordered imagination and psychosis. One of these days someone is likely to react. It happens everyday. Read the papers. In the Podunk Valley, TN, weekly newspeper? More likely in this newsgroup. Nursie REACTS like a CB-plusser. The ones I feel sorry for are Mrs Lennie and thier cats. I doubt she has a clue as to how he acts in this open, public fourm. She will be the one terrorized as a result of HIS actions. Anyone attempting to "terrorize" my wife, me, or this household will be in for a rude, painful surprise. Google will, of course, archive this message made in a public venue. The LAPD can access that. So can the telephone company security people. So can AOL. Intimidation "threats" made over a newsgroup are puerile rantings of a deranged mind. No degrees or certificates needed to verify that. Oh well. Nursie is IN a well...one that is of despair, deep, cold and was dug by herself in the unfertile imagination of her own mind. It has no water and the bucket is filled with unmentionable waste... Get help for yourself, nursie. |
|
#6
September 11th 04, 02:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (Foul-mouthed Role Model of a Modern Ham Extra) writes: The ones I feel sorry for are Mrs Lennie and thier cats. I doubt she has a clue as to how he acts in this open, public fourm. She will be the one terrorized as a result of HIS actions. Anyone attempting to "terrorize" my wife, me, or this household will be in for a rude, painful surprise. Google will, of course, archive this message made in a public venue. The LAPD can access that. So can the telephone company security people. So can AOL. Intimidation "threats" made over a newsgroup are puerile rantings of a deranged mind. No degrees or certificates needed to verify that. Creepy! |
|
#7
September 11th 04, 08:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
(William) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , (Foul-mouthed Role Model of a Modern Ham Extra) writes: The ones I feel sorry for are Mrs Lennie and thier cats. I doubt she has a clue as to how he acts in this open, public fourm. She will be the one terrorized as a result of HIS actions. Anyone attempting to "terrorize" my wife, me, or this household will be in for a rude, painful surprise. Google will, of course, archive this message made in a public venue. The LAPD can access that. So can the telephone company security people. So can AOL. Intimidation "threats" made over a newsgroup are puerile rantings of a deranged mind. No degrees or certificates needed to verify that. Creepy! Nah. Only one who is emotionally disturbed, like nursie gets at times. He once got into a habit of "signing" his posts "Steve and the Boys." [as if he had a 'hood gang here gonna do bad tings to me...] :-) Then too was the other veiled threat of "it takes a few ounces of pressure [on a trigger]" to silence someone. :-) Another PCTA Role Model of a modern mad extra for all newbies to emulate. Nice image of U.S. amateur radio? I don't think so. The other PCTA extras condone, even encourage him to keep doing that. Modern amateur spirit? I comment to the other radio amateurs in here, not you, Brian. |
|
#8
September 10th 04, 11:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation From: (William) Date: 9/8/2004 7:20 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Thank God...Maybe we can keep the scum in one puddle. Now DAVE! Why should we assume he'd have any relevent experience or participation? He's got a big mouth, a bad attitude, and the idea that the Constitutions guarantees somehow mean it's OK to be an antagonistic twerp. One day, someone will throw a brick through his windows or flatten his tires, and "all of a sudden" he will realize that there ARE penalties for running your mouth off. So much for "civil discourse." You're simply incapable of it. Best of Luck. There's nothing of what I said that's "uncivil", Brain. Bricks through windows and slashed tires is acceptable in your neighborhood? Lennie's spent a long time building his foundation of hatred. You have credentials to be making such judgements? One of these days someone is likely to react. It happens everyday. Read the papers. I see a threat in your remarks. A violent threat. Thrown bricks and slashed tires. The ones I feel sorry for are Mrs Lennie and thier cats. I doubt she has a clue as to how he acts in this open, public fourm. She will be the one terrorized as a result of HIS actions. Now threats of terrorism to his spouse, and unspeakable acts to "thier" cats. Oh well. Steve, K4YZ Yeh, oh well. So much for your civil discourse - you're simply incapable of it. |
|
#9
September 10th 04, 11:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
From: (William) Date: 9/10/2004 5:17 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation From: (William) Date: 9/8/2004 7:20 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Thank God...Maybe we can keep the scum in one puddle. Now DAVE! Why should we assume he'd have any relevent experience or participation? He's got a big mouth, a bad attitude, and the idea that the Constitutions guarantees somehow mean it's OK to be an antagonistic twerp. One day, someone will throw a brick through his windows or flatten his tires, and "all of a sudden" he will realize that there ARE penalties for running your mouth off. So much for "civil discourse." You're simply incapable of it. Best of Luck. There's nothing of what I said that's "uncivil", Brain. Bricks through windows and slashed tires is acceptable in your neighborhood? Absolutely not. Nor did I say I suggested someone DO it, Brain. What I SAID was that Lennie makes it a habit of making enemies with his insults and arrogant behaviour. I would not be surprised if it DID happen, knowing the part of the United States he lives in. Please read what I wrote...Not interject what you want. Lennie's spent a long time building his foundation of hatred. You have credentials to be making such judgements? Yep. It's called an "archive". It's right here in front of you, Brain. One of these days someone is likely to react. It happens everyday. Read the papers. I see a threat in your remarks. A violent threat. Thrown bricks and slashed tires. It IS ugly, Brain. And the thought of what pushes people to DO ugly things is almost as ugly. I reiterate...I do not suggest nor condone such behaviour. That YOU see a "threat" there is soley based upon guilty concious. The ones I feel sorry for are Mrs Lennie and thier cats. I doubt she has a clue as to how he acts in this open, public fourm. She will be the one terrorized as a result of HIS actions. Now threats of terrorism to his spouse, and unspeakable acts to "thier" cats. Oh well. Steve, K4YZ Yeh, oh well. So much for your civil discourse - you're simply incapable of it. It's still not uncivil, Brain. I stated that one day he's likely to push the wrong buttons and infuriate the wrong people.. Knowing him from this forum plus what has been told to me by persons who knew him, albeit many years ago, Lennie lends himself to such reactions. Get a grip, Burke, and please try to just read the words, NOT read INTO them. Steve, K4YZ |
|
#10
September 11th 04, 01:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation From: (William) Date: 9/10/2004 5:17 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation From: (William) Date: 9/8/2004 7:20 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Thank God...Maybe we can keep the scum in one puddle. Now DAVE! Why should we assume he'd have any relevent experience or participation? He's got a big mouth, a bad attitude, and the idea that the Constitutions guarantees somehow mean it's OK to be an antagonistic twerp. One day, someone will throw a brick through his windows or flatten his tires, and "all of a sudden" he will realize that there ARE penalties for running your mouth off. So much for "civil discourse." You're simply incapable of it. Best of Luck. There's nothing of what I said that's "uncivil", Brain. Bricks through windows and slashed tires is acceptable in your neighborhood? Absolutely not. Nor did I say I suggested someone DO it, Brain. Were you thinking about doing it yourself? What I SAID was that Lennie makes it a habit of making enemies with his insults and arrogant behaviour. You should examine your own behavior. I would not be surprised if it DID happen, knowing the part of the United States he lives in. You realize that if a brick were found through his window that you would be implicated? Please read what I wrote...Not interject what you want. You're a creepy guy. You got the reaction that you were looking for. Lennie's spent a long time building his foundation of hatred. You have credentials to be making such judgements? Yep. It's called an "archive". It's right here in front of you, Brain. As are numerous "veiled" threats by you. One of these days someone is likely to react. It happens everyday. Read the papers. I see a threat in your remarks. A violent threat. Thrown bricks and slashed tires. It IS ugly, Brain. And the thought of what pushes people to DO ugly things is almost as ugly. I reiterate...I do not suggest nor condone such behaviour. You've already suggested it. Now you're in the CYA mode. You better hope that a brick isn't found thrown through his window. That YOU see a "threat" there is soley based upon guilty concious. You're a creepy guy. You got the reaction that you were looking for. The ones I feel sorry for are Mrs Lennie and thier cats. I doubt she has a clue as to how he acts in this open, public fourm. She will be the one terrorized as a result of HIS actions. Now threats of terrorism to his spouse, and unspeakable acts to "thier" cats. No comment indeed. That is for the best. Oh well. Steve, K4YZ Yeh, oh well. So much for your civil discourse - you're simply incapable of it. It's still not uncivil, Brain. I stated that one day he's likely to push the wrong buttons and infuriate the wrong people.. Knowing him from this forum plus what has been told to me by persons who knew him, albeit many years ago, Lennie lends himself to such reactions. You're a creepy guy. You got the reaction that you were looking for. Get a grip, Burke, and please try to just read the words, NOT read INTO them. Steve, K4YZ You're a creepy guy. You got the reaction that you were looking for. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | General | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
Hybrid Mode
