Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Eric" wrote in message ...
Hi, I should begin by stating that I'm not an amateur radio operator, however I have been putting some serious consideration into taking up the hobby. There are two groups in my area, one at the University that I attend - the other a city group, and I have collected various information from their respected web sites. I plan on attending some upcoming events to see what its all about, get a feel for the community, and then hopefully become involved. Try these: http://www.arrl.org/hamradio.html http://www.arrl.org/ http://www.ac6v.com/ I do have some background in RF, however. I was in the military and worked with microwave (SHF) satellite and troposcatter terminals. I'm familiar with basic component electronics, multiplexing techniques, modulation/demodulation techniques, up/down conversion, signal amplication, antenna gain (at least for parabolics), bulk encryption techniques, test equipment (made much use out of signal generators, spectrum analyzers, o-scopes, multimeters, attenuators, etc). Basically, I have familiarity with everything that was required to bring up the systems I used and keep them running. I'm more familiar with the properties of SHF than HF though. We had HF equipment as well, but they were worked by people who had training for HF equipment specifically. Some of the properties of HF came across to me as being almost "black magic", since I didn't have familiarity with it. The HF guys regarded HF as much of an art as a science. :^) They're absolutely right! "Voodoo Radio". In the 1980's, while I was young, I had some introduction to amateur radio. My neighbor was a big ham and, since I was a little Tandy/Commodore computer geek at the time, he showed his radio equipment. At the time, I guess, packet radio was the new emerging thing? I was really impressed and thought packet radio was really neat. I knew then that I wanted to eventually get involved. (He was majorly involved with ham. He was one of the main FidoNet hubs for local BBS's in the area and brought the feeds in through his equipment.) I was just doing some reading and came across an article about BPL, which of course I found to very alarming. Naturally, I take the amateur radio side on the BPL issue. From what I have read so far, the power companies have been able to use strong arm tactics to try to get BPL to go forward with inadequate testing. The very arrogant comment made by the United Power Line Council describing ham operators as "armchair amateurs who still use vacuum tubes" speaks volumes for their professionalism (none). I'm inclined to believe that the knowledge and professionalism of the ham community outweighs the power utilities by an unmeasurable factor. I really do want to become involved in the hobby and hate to ask this question, but does BPL really have the potential of "destroying" HF amateur radio? As someone that is just entering the hobby, should I put consideration in changes that may be occuring in the near future when I do start purchasing equipment. (I'm sure I'll learn all this as I attend meetings, begin studying for licensing, etc, but was curious for now.) *IF* BPL is widely implemented as proposed by the industry and the FCC HF ham radio could be in for some difficult times but the final outcome is far from clear at this point. As the weeks and months roll on in the ham radio battle against BPL it's looking more and more like BPL is an idea whose time will never come. I'm certainly not abandoning my ham license or my interest in HF radio just because this BPL bogeyman has popped up. If you find you're really interested in HF ham radio I say go for it, getting a license is just a matter of passing another test, you really don't have much to lose one way or another. Also, I was thinking (I'm not familiar with FCC regulations yet), but if the power companies are modulating an intelligence (internet), putting it on a carrier, putting that signal on unshielded power lines (which, in essense, become antennas), then that sounds like "radio" to me? Shouldn't the power companies be required to have a radio license to do BPL? I plan on becoming actively involved on the BPL issue, once I become more knowledgable. If the BPL threat is as serious as I have been reading, the people making decisions on allowing it to go forward need to seriously give it more consideration. Of course, its all about $$. Here's a site which gets into BPL from the ham radio perspective and the fight against BPL which includes a pile of links to the info you would find useful: http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/plc/ Thanks! -Eric Brian w3rv |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Newbie, UHF antenna for TV questions | Antenna | |||
A newbie with a couple of questions. | Antenna | |||
Newbie Questions | General | |||
Newbie Questions | General | |||
Newbie questions about rf transceivers | Homebrew |