Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 25th 04, 08:46 PM
Brian
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(William) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,

(Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes:

And this was not about you. It was about Brian P Burke

misrepresenting
his identity and not being man enough or having the conviction to stand
behind his opinions.

More transference. NURSIE doesn't pay much attention to his
emotional outbursts in here...says he "never said such a thing"
after he said it. Strange.


Of course; he lies. But since he's nuts he's not responsible for his
actions.


Yell-yell will rationalize anything...

Maybe he was battered as a child?


Tempura best. Corn flour second best. He rolled in tar den fethers.

Teribull batter.

Because I do have convictions I receive a lot of flack from Yell DMC.


Yell-yell be da dill sergeant still. He obsessed wid it.


He stoopid jerk. It OK. He not sponsible for he actions.

For instance, when Part 97 says you cannot take compensation for
amateur radio, then a repeater owner charges dues....


Mama Dee say dat okay.


Dee say many thing. Sumptin she right, sumptin she wong.

Of course we gots da HRO stores making profit from ham radio...


But dey not get paid for transmitting. Control Op/rpeeter owner do.

For instance, when Part 97 specifies only a Morse Code exam can
satisfy element 1, and the VEC's administer Farnsworth exams....


Mama Dee say dat ok too. She say Part 97 doesn't describe
hamexaminations. She wrongo. We spank Mama for boo-boo?


No spankin Dee. Mite make joy.

For instance, when a poster states, "Sorry Hans, MARS IS Amateur
Radio!"


DoD ought to spank Yell-yell. :-)


Ott do more work rebiltating stoopid jerk.

For instance, when a poster behaves insanely, I call him nuts.


...or irrational...or whacko...or crazy...or an extra? :-)

LHA / WMD


Fruitcake.
  #2   Report Post  
Old August 25th 04, 11:52 PM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
(Brian) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,

(Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes:

And this was not about you. It was about Brian P Burke

misrepresenting
his identity and not being man enough or having the conviction to stand
behind his opinions.

More transference. NURSIE doesn't pay much attention to his
emotional outbursts in here...says he "never said such a thing"
after he said it. Strange.

Of course; he lies. But since he's nuts he's not responsible for his
actions.


Yell-yell will rationalize anything...

Maybe he was battered as a child?


Tempura best. Corn flour second best. He rolled in tar den fethers.

Teribull batter.


True. Maybe he was the subject of a new fast-food culinary
delight called "horn dog on a stick?" :-)

Because I do have convictions I receive a lot of flack from Yell DMC.


Yell-yell be da dill sergeant still. He obsessed wid it.


He stoopid jerk. It OK. He not sponsible for he actions.


I tink dat why he not in da murines no mo'

For instance, when Part 97 says you cannot take compensation for
amateur radio, then a repeater owner charges dues....


Mama Dee say dat okay.


Dee say many thing. Sumptin she right, sumptin she wong.


Noo noo. Always RIGHT, always right!

Of course we gots da HRO stores making profit from ham radio...


But dey not get paid for transmitting. Control Op/rpeeter owner do.


In dat case, at least one HRO store guilty... :-)

[that's the one that nursie went to but doesn't remember where
it is in any detail...:-) ]

For instance, when Part 97 specifies only a Morse Code exam can
satisfy element 1, and the VEC's administer Farnsworth exams....


Mama Dee say dat ok too. She say Part 97 doesn't describe
hamexaminations. She wrongo. We spank Mama for boo-boo?


No spankin Dee. Mite make joy.


Ah so! :-)

For instance, when a poster states, "Sorry Hans, MARS IS Amateur
Radio!"


DoD ought to spank Yell-yell. :-)


Ott do more work rebiltating stoopid jerk.


Donny R. otta writ a letter to VA.

For instance, when a poster behaves insanely, I call him nuts.


...or irrational...or whacko...or crazy...or an extra? :-)

LHA / WMD


Fruitcake.


From 1957 holiday season...
  #5   Report Post  
Old August 24th 04, 11:35 AM
Steve Robeson, K4CAP
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article ,


More than you. By a mile. You were nothing more than a radio mechanic.

That's ALL the evidence you have ever provided this forum. YOU were NEVER a
"military radio operator".


NOT "mechanic," Diminutive Man.

Fixed station operations and maintenance supervisor.


But never a radio OPERATOR.

HF transmitter with 1 KW or more, dozens of them.


But never a radio OPERATOR.

Microwave radio relay operations and maintenance supervisor.


But never a radio OPERATOR.

Twenty-four voice channel 1.8 GHz terminals made by GE.


Who cares if they were made by The Hand of God?

You were never a radio OPERATOR.

I didn't work for a "set top box maker", Lennie. The "company" I worked
for was a subsidiary. I was not an employee of ANTEC. You were told this
before, but still try to use it as a diminuitive.


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Antec makes "set-top boxes." They say so, show so.

What, NURSIE do "volunteer work" for good of company?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I wasn't an ANTEC employeee, Lennie. I worked for a subsidiary.

Sorry you have a problem with that, but have a good laugh...it IS
at your own expense.

NURSIE want to make "LIARS" out of Department of Defense, United
States Army, National Archives and Records Administration, and the
Pacific edition of Stars and Stripes military newspaper!

NURSIE also want to make a "LIAR" out of the private Korean War
website...and anyone else who can truthfully prove things.

NURSIE need to talk to the Barkers and tell them, in no uncertain
terms, that ANY honoring of Korean War dead is "dishonorable!"


But you don't honor them, Lennie.

You try to USE thier sacrifices in order to make yourself look
better in THIS forum.

It's got nothing to do with the Department of Defense.

It's got nothing to do with the Pacific Stars and Stripes or any
other veteran's organizations or websites.

It's about Leonard H. Anderson trying to use the sacrifices of
Soldiers who died in combat three years before he was even inducted in
order to somehow glorify his otherwise lackluster Army service in an
Amateur Radio newsgroup.

That in and of itself makes you a creep of unfathomable depth.


Psychological transference again. NURSIE look in mirror, try to
call others what she see in mirror. Tsk.

It's all on documents at NARA in St. Louis.


Not the parts you tried to push off on us here.


NARA has all my military experience documentation.


It's not about what was documented 50 years ago Lennie.

It's about your misdeeds in THIS forum.

I am sure you are sorry you got caught doing it, but you did.


"Sorry?"

I'm rather sorry to encounter such a nutso as yourself...but life
is like that.


I am sure you ARE sorry to have encountered me.

Really sucks to try and pull off the silly stuf you do in here
only to have someone who KNOWS BETTER to derail it for ya...

It's in the experiences of other hams such as Gene, N2JTV, who served
WITH me at the same time.


Too bad Gene didn't get a chance to read some of the cowardly crap you
pulled in here.


He still can if he bothers to look in from home in Long Island. :-)

I don't know why he would. Although he's been a REAL extra for a
long time, this forum's basic content is NURSIE shouting, hollering,
and yell-yelling at everyone else! As well as talking NATIONAL
POLITICS, THE ECONOMY, SPACE BUSINESS, and other
wonderful subjects where the "qualifications" require high-rate
morsemanship.


A "real" Extra?

Sheesh, Lennie, I've had mine for almost 24 years now. Doesn't
get much more real than that.

Your friend couldn't have had his any sooner than 1982 or 83,
judging by the callsign. His is not a vanity callsign, so it was
issued sequentially. The sequential system was introduced in 1978. I
have no idea how quickly the 1x3 block in 2-land filled up, but I
think its safe to say that N2JTV wasn't issued before 1983 or later.

It's even in the Pacific edition of the military newspaper Stars and
Stripes, in their 10 November 2002 edition...including six photos
that I took.


Whoopie doo.

Two pictures I took wound up in Naval Air News and that has a far wider
distribution that PacS&S. So give me a Pulitzer.


You keep giving your opponents a "Putziler."


You deserve it. You earned it. It fits.

Rest of LennieRant snipped. SOS.

Steve, K4YZ


  #6   Report Post  
Old August 24th 04, 10:38 PM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,


More than you. By a mile. You were nothing more than a radio

mechanic.

That's ALL the evidence you have ever provided this forum. YOU were NEVER

a
"military radio operator".


NOT "mechanic," Diminutive Man.

Fixed station operations and maintenance supervisor.


But never a radio OPERATOR.


Yes, I was. QSYing a transmitter and making sure it stays on
frequency is OPERATING.

HF comms across Pacific would routinely do about 3 QSYs per
24 hour period. With at least 30 transmitters on-circuit 24/7 that
meant at least 10 QSYs per shift.

QSYs had to be fast to minimize circuit out time, were done in
under 3 minutes...more than half of which required frequency
standards at receiver site to confirm mark and space frequencies
for RTTY circuits.

Down-time reduction was important when monthly throughput of
messages averaged 220 thousand (1955).

HF transmitter with 1 KW or more, dozens of them.


But never a radio OPERATOR.


Yell-yell WRONGO again. See above.

Yell-yell not able to change final links on 15 KW Press Wireless
transmitter in time required. :-)

Microwave radio relay operations and maintenance supervisor.


But never a radio OPERATOR.


Not as AMATEUR operator, Yell-yell. Try to understand that 24/7
operations is NOT the same as AMATEUR fun and games. Serious
business to maximize up-time on circuits.

Twenty-four voice channel 1.8 GHz terminals made by GE.


Who cares if they were made by The Hand of God?


GE (General Electric Company) is NOT that religious...they just
made good radio and electronics equipment.

You were never a radio OPERATOR.


WRONGO again. Using an AN/PRC-6 HT or the manpack (we
called it "backpack" then) AN/PRC-8 most definitely involved
OPERATING...as close to the amateur idea of OPERATING but
without all the QSLs or the fish stories of DXCC awards. :-)


I wasn't an ANTEC employeee, Lennie. I worked for a subsidiary.

Sorry you have a problem with that, but have a good laugh...it IS
at your own expense.


Tsk, tsk, TSK! I never mentioned "ANTEC."

Doesn't matter...all you were was a purchasing agent, and for less
than half a year. NO work IN engineering, doing design or test.


NURSIE need to talk to the Barkers and tell them, in no uncertain
terms, that ANY honoring of Korean War dead is "dishonorable!"


But you don't honor them, Lennie.


Poor NURSIE, got the differences of HONOR and DISHONOR all
mixed up.

You try to USE thier sacrifices in order to make yourself look
better in THIS forum.


? NURSIE MANUFACTURED "dishonor."

It's got nothing to do with the Department of Defense.


Yes it does. U.S. Army part of Department of Defense. 71st
Signal Service Battalion was part of U.S. Army. I was in the 71st
as well as all those other soldiers of the 71st.

It's got nothing to do with the Pacific Stars and Stripes or any
other veteran's organizations or websites.


Tell that to all the military members and their dependents then.
Stars & Stripes military newspaper is published worldwide FOR
them.

Tell that to Hal and Ted Barker of the Korean War Project.

Tell them that they "dishonor" the Korean veterans by having that
website.

"Tell it to the Marines." :-)

It's about Leonard H. Anderson trying to use the sacrifices of
Soldiers who died in combat three years before he was even inducted in
order to somehow glorify his otherwise lackluster Army service in an
Amateur Radio newsgroup.


WRONGO again. Tsk. I wasn't "inducted." I was a volunteer.
That showed up on my Army Serial Number as the "RA" prefix.
Inductees got a "US" prefix on that ASN.

"Lackluster career?" I was assigned in a "rear area." Most battalions
serving an area command ARE in rear areas. Very few got a chance
to pick where they were going to be.

I never intended to make a "career" in the military. I would be drafted
soon anyway and took a personal step to volunteer. No problem.

"Lackluster?" Tsk, tsk. It was the opportunity for the radio-interested
to begin in BIG TIME communications. ACAN (Army Command and
Administrative Network) was worldwide, thousands of circuits, all
in operation 24/7. No hobby that, was military Big Business sort of
operations.


It's about your misdeeds in THIS forum.


Tsk, tsk. In Stevieland of Fantasy, a "misdeed" is TALKING BACK
to the gunnery nurse! :-)

Poor NURSIE, still smarting about being talked-back to! Tsk.

I am sure you ARE sorry to have encountered me.


Nah.

NURSIE just like all the other ego-boosting self-important
ignoramuses waving credientials and claiming smarts and self-
importance. Seen dozens just like her.

Really sucks to try and pull off the silly stuf you do in here
only to have someone who KNOWS BETTER to derail it for ya...


Okay, when I find one of those, I'll tell everyone who it is...

So far, I haven't found any that "knows better."

Hi hi and a Ho ho! :-)



  #8   Report Post  
Old August 25th 04, 11:07 PM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,

(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,


More than you. By a mile. You were nothing more than a radio

mechanic.

That's ALL the evidence you have ever provided this forum. YOU were

NEVER
a
"military radio operator".

NOT "mechanic," Diminutive Man.

Fixed station operations and maintenance supervisor.

But never a radio OPERATOR.


Yes, I was. QSYing a transmitter and making sure it stays on
frequency is OPERATING.


Oh, Cool.

You reached up and changed the channel.


WRONG!

Frequency synthesizers enabling channel-changing with ease did
not appear until the 1960s. [the first of which were the stepped
two-crystal-oscillator-bank mixed types for civil aviation] The
exact-frequency synthesizers for fixed-point HF broadcast did not
appear until about 1964.

A QSY at any ACAN station of the 1950s would involve at least 3
persons, two at a transmitter site, one at a receiver site using a
General Radio LF to HF precision frequency measuring instrument.
At ADA, Control at Chuo Kogyo (just outside of Camp Drake) would
issue the QSY order over the TTY order wire; both transmitters and
frequency standards at Receivers were on that loop. Receivers
"freq standards" would begin setting up for the new carrier frequency.

At transmitters, one operator disable the appropriate exciter, then
would go behind the many racks of exciters (O-5s at that time) and
get a crystal from the heated crystal cabinet (6 foot high, glass doors),
change the crystal in the exciter from the back. ADA did their own
crystal finishing. Frequencies were all given code names, for
nemonic convenience not secrecy...avoided accidental transposition
of numbers. Korean circuit frequency names were all given beer
brands...:-)

The other person at transmitters (if only for a 1 KW Tx, the big
PW-15s usually took two operators for safety) would key off the
separate transmitter, reset the adjustments to a chart (prepared by
maintenance specialists on the team), wait for the exciter man to
finish with his task. When RF was getting to the Tx, the Tx man
would tweak-tune the settings, paying close attention to neutralizing
the final (BC-339s had push-pull triode 833s in PA) in addition to
making sure the loading was good.

By that time, freq standards was set up and their freq meter's audio
would be fed into a reserved telephone circuit pair to transmitters.
We could hear it on the speakers. The trick chief would ask Control
for "fox test" on the TTY circuit ("The quick brown fox...etc." from one
of three such automatic cam-driven generators at Carriers in Chuo
Kogyo. Exciter man would zero beat on the Mark, engage keying
and set the "spread" (shift) in a double heterodyne of comparing the
850 cycle tone from Stds with a transmitter tone generator fixed at
850 cycles. Once that was set (all around the console could hear it)
the trick chief signalled over the order wire for Stds to check it.

Frequency Standards would do their final measure and report the
Mark and Space frequencies (if within tolerance) on the order wire
TTY. If something was drifting or the measures were out of tolerance,
Stds reported that, too, and we would have to tweak the exciter all
over again. [accepted RTTY spread back then was 850 Hz]

Maximum time to QSY for RF out at transmitters was under 2 minutes.
Total QSY time, including the Stds measurement and reporting, was
under 3 minutes. That included the large PW-15s (15 KW conservative
output) that had two 3-foot long copper segmented shorting bars (with
two long tightening screws) which "tapped" the huge final tank coil
windings.

The old pre-WW2 Western Electric SSB (12 KHz wide in the
"commercial" sideband arrangement containing four 3 KHz voice
bandwidth channels) was quite fussy and might take an extra
minute or two, including extra time at Stds to confirm frequencies.
The new Western Electric LD-T2 SSB was much better (one in
1953, four more arrived in 1955) in that 12 tuned circuits were all
servo-motor controlled from a bank of 120 potentiometers inside
that were preset to 10 "channels" or authorized carrier frequencies.
The LD-T2 was QSYed by walking up to it, operating two key
switches to disable output and modulation, pushing a "channel"
selector button, then waiting until the indicator light showed auto-
tuning was correct. Then the two key switches were returned to
normal transmit and the RF current meter on the antenna lines
checked. Took less than a minute to do that, took Stds a bit
longer to confirm the correct carrier frequency (pilot carrier in
mid-sideband).

THAT took skill.


It did for the SSB transmitters, including the LD-T2. Maintenance
on the teams had to reset the preset pots if a new frequency was
authorized. That required the same tuning-up was with a manual-
control Tx. The difference between that and the RTTY transmitters
was the requirement to check the audio quality for both level and
distortion.

The objective was MINIMUM DOWN TIME so as to keep the up-time
for actual message transmissions maximum. A typical SSB radio
circuit carried a voice order-wire channel, an overseas radiotelephone
voice channel, and 8 to 12 TTY channels, all on the same transmitter.
At least four of the RTTY radio circuits had time-multiplexed TTY to
carry up to four TTY channels; outage on one of those circuits was
multiplied four time.

HF comms across Pacific would routinely do about 3 QSYs per
24 hour period. With at least 30 transmitters on-circuit 24/7 that
meant at least 10 QSYs per shift.


Ahhhhh...You changed the channel three times a day.


WRONG. I wrote TEN times per shift...on the average. We would
do at least 8 on a calm-ionosphere work shift but could do as many
as 18 QSYs if the ionosphere was doing nonsense.

At the old transmitter site on Tsukushima, commercial Japanese
power was primary. That power was not consistent and any shift
might have to do a full recheck after cutting over to standby
generators (400 KWe minimum out of six motor-generator sets).
That meant EVERYTHING that was on-circuit had to be checked,
including poor Frequency Standards having to juggle their General
Radio instrument controls for every single radio circuit and reporting
it on the order-wire. The new site at Kashiwa (later renamed Camp
Tomlinson) had 600 KWe 24/7 motor-generators and did not rely on
Japanese electric power.

Oooooooohhhhhhhh...NOW I am IMPRESSED!


You should be, but then you've never been tasked with that sort of
job. It's easy for you push-button black-box changers to make fun
of manual control over nearly everything.

ADA did have "VFO" control through a couple of Northern Electric
tunable exciters, but nearly all the HF radios were crystal controlled,
TTY through SSB. The microwave radio relay terminals (arriving late
1954) were all crystal controlled at 1.8 GHz (!). Predecessors to the
uWave were TRC-1 VHF radio relay (FM, both Rx and Tx crystalled)
and TRC-8 UHF radio relay (FM, Tx crystal, Rx manually tuned).

Land forces HT radio, PRC-6, was crystal-controlled, no channel
changing possible. The backpack PRC-8 through -10, was actually
"VFO" on low VHF, manually tuned via a built-in crystal harmonic
calibrator. Surprisingly, the "PRC-8 family" was stable as well as
rugged, holding its locked manually-tuned frequency within spec.

But never a radio OPERATOR.


Yell-yell WRONGO again. See above.


Uh huh...So impressive...Changed the channel on the presets.


Only on the single WE LD-T2...but then I had to set up those presets
from the beginning. :-) The other 35 transmitters (besides the 8 that
were installed later, the new LD-T2 and the 40 KW Collins linear
amplifiers, all preset pretuned) were MANUAL tuning 7-foot high
transmitters.

A single Collins 1 KW Autotune transmitter was there for about a half
year, but used only for the FEC Commander's aircraft. That was
"traded" (?) with the USAF for a couple Wilcox HF transmitters with
the old brute-force AM power amps. The Wilcox Tx was interesting
in that it had 3 separate HF boxes, selectable by a switch. While
that might be taken as "channelization" those were fussy beasts and
had to be constantly checked if up; ADA later sent the RF part back
to the depot, keeping the big AM power amp and supply, marrying it
with a 1 KW BC-339 CW transmitter now becoming a 1 KW AM
radio circuit. That worked just fine and could also (like the lower
power truck mounted HF field radio) carry simultaneous TTY via
an FSK exciter.

Except for the post-WW2 WE Tx, GE microwave terminals, and
Northern Electric exciters, almost all of the equipment we used at
ADA was made on contract during WW2. That includes the VHF
and UHF radio relay equipment used when phone cables went
down. The two ancient WE SSB transmitters were built prior to
WW2. All tubes, nearly all manually operated.

Try again, Sir Putzy.

Rest of usual muck and mayhem deleted. You started off stupid
and got worse (if that's possible)


Tsk, tsk, tsk. I see that there's no possibily of your replying in a
"civil discourse" manner.

You continue to make fun of something you know absolutely nothing
of and won't take the trouble to find out. Not good.

NURSIE is SPOILED by modern, solid-state, frequency-synthesized
tune to any frequency with crystal stability ham equipment...and fine
military airborne equipment she never once had any responsibility for
designing or proving. Tsk.


  #10   Report Post  
Old August 30th 04, 11:44 AM
Steve Robeson, K4CAP
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...

It's in the experiences of other hams such as Gene, N2JTV, who served
WITH me at the same time.

Too bad Gene didn't get a chance to read some of the cowardly crap you
pulled in here.


He still can if he bothers to look in from home in Long Island. :-)

I don't know why he would. Although he's been a REAL extra for a
long time, this forum's basic content is NURSIE shouting, hollering,
and yell-yelling at everyone else! As well as talking NATIONAL
POLITICS, THE ECONOMY, SPACE BUSINESS, and other
wonderful subjects where the "qualifications" require high-rate
morsemanship.


A "real" Extra?

Sheesh, Lennie, I've had mine for almost 24 years now. Doesn't
get much more real than that.

Your friend couldn't have had his any sooner than 1982 or 83,
judging by the callsign. His is not a vanity callsign, so it was
issued sequentially. The sequential system was introduced in 1978. I
have no idea how quickly the 1x3 block in 2-land filled up, but I
think its safe to say that N2JTV wasn't issued before 1983 or later.


What happened Lennie?

Trip and stub your toe after this?

Tried to pull yet another fast one and got tripped up over that
"LACK OF PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE" thing...Of course it's been discussed
in here on more than one occassion, and HAD you been paying atention,
you MIGHT have clued yourself in.

You have yet to explain how your friend's Extra Class license is
any more "real" than anyone elses. I checked Part 97, and I didn't
find one single sentence that suggests that his license has so much as
one cycle more of "realness" than mine or anyone elses.

Of course compared to YOUR Amateur license, his IS more "real"...

Steve, K4YZ


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
trying to get back on packet using my old equipment larry Digital 1 January 15th 05 07:47 AM
BPL - UPLC ->Repeat the lie three times and claim it for truth King Zulu Policy 213 July 16th 04 11:31 PM
The Game's Afoot! Len Over 21 Policy 165 July 3rd 04 01:51 PM
Do Hams get 11 Meters Back No Code, No Ham General 74 December 11th 03 09:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017