In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes:

Any Canadian radio amateurs care to comment on that?

Why do you specify only
"Canadian radio amateurs"?

What about Canadians who
are not radio amateurs?

(Quitefine) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes:

Any Canadian radio amateurs care to comment on that?

Why do you specify only
"Canadian radio amateurs"?

What about Canadians who
are not radio amateurs?

I beleive that the same rules apply as in the USA. Non-amateur may
have an opinion, but that opinion is uninformed and is readily
discarded by the amateur elite.

Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open For Comment
From: (William)
Date: 9/7/2004 8:33 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(Quitefine) wrote in message
...
In article ,

(Len Over 21) writes:

Any Canadian radio amateurs care to comment on that?

Why do you specify only
"Canadian radio amateurs"?

What about Canadians who
are not radio amateurs?

I beleive that the same rules apply as in the USA. Non-amateur may
have an opinion, but that opinion is uninformed and is readily
discarded by the amateur elite.

There is no "amateur elite", unless, of course, you refer to folks like
W1RFI, K1EA, etc etc.

And NO opinons are "readily discarded", Brain...even yours.

But antagaonistic, spiteful insults are.

Your bunk buddy had to push a lot of buttons and hurl a lot of insults to
get himself to where he is today...scorned and dismissed by anyone who has even
the least amount of awareness of the factual circumstances of what the Amateur
Radio service is, what it has accomplished in the past and where it's going in
the future.

You're not far behind, but I think folks view you more as the Organ
Grinder's monkey...jumping when you hear your master's music play.

Steve, K4YZ

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open For Comment
From: (William)
Date: 9/7/2004 8:33 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(Quitefine) wrote in message
...
In article ,

(Len Over 21) writes:

Any Canadian radio amateurs care to comment on that?

Why do you specify only
"Canadian radio amateurs"?

What about Canadians who
are not radio amateurs?

I beleive that the same rules apply as in the USA. Non-amateur may
have an opinion, but that opinion is uninformed and is readily
discarded by the amateur elite.

There is no "amateur elite",

You are right. But there are those who think they are elite.

unless, of course, you refer to folks like
W1RFI, K1EA, etc etc.

And there are those who think others are elite.

And NO opinons are "readily discarded", Brain...even yours.

You trample them first.

But antagaonistic, spiteful insults are.

You are preaching about antag[a]onistic and spiteful remarks?

Antag[a]onistic and spiteful remarks define your RRAP career,
sprinkled with a large dose of insanity.

Your bunk buddy

I have no bunk buddy.

had to push a lot of buttons and hurl a lot of insults to
get himself to where he is today...scorned and dismissed by anyone who has even
the least amount of awareness of the factual circumstances of what the Amateur
Radio service is, what it has accomplished in the past and where it's going in
the future.

Factual circumstances like, "Sorry Hans, MARS IS Amateur Radio!"

Hi, Hi!

You're not far behind, but I think folks view you more as the Organ
Grinder's monkey...jumping when you hear your master's music play.

Steve, K4YZ

You are certainly no one's master, not even of yourself. Best of
Luck.

In article ,
(William) writes:

(Quitefine) wrote in message
...
In article ,

(Len Over 21) writes:

Any Canadian radio amateurs care to comment on that?

Why do you specify only
"Canadian radio amateurs"?

What about Canadians who
are not radio amateurs?

I beleive that the same rules apply as in the USA. Non-amateur may
have an opinion, but that opinion is uninformed and is readily
discarded by the amateur elite.

Jimmie Who is trolling with that "message," Brian.

Canada is a nation of democratic principles. A good neighbor.
Their amateur radio is not "ruled" by straight-laced olde-tymers
of radiotelegraphy. That irks the very non-independent thinking
Believers who only venerate the past and vilify those harboring
heretical independent thought. shrug

In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes:

In article ,
(William) writes:

(Quitefine) wrote in message
...
In article ,

(Len Over 21) writes:

Any Canadian radio amateurs care to comment on that?

Why do you specify only
"Canadian radio amateurs"?

What about Canadians who
are not radio amateurs?

I beleive that the same rules apply as in the USA. Non-amateur may
have an opinion, but that opinion is uninformed and is readily
discarded by the amateur elite.

Jimmie Who is trolling with that "message," Brian.

There is no troll. We asked a
question.

You specified "Canadian radio amateurs"
Why?

Canada is a nation of democratic principles. A good neighbor.
Their amateur radio is not "ruled" by straight-laced olde-tymers
of radiotelegraphy. That irks the very non-independent thinking
Believers who only venerate the past and vilify those harboring
heretical independent thought. shrug

Of whom do you speak?

William wrote:

(Quitefine) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes:

Any Canadian radio amateurs care to comment on that?

Why do you specify only
"Canadian radio amateurs"?

What about Canadians who
are not radio amateurs?

I beleive that the same rules apply as in the USA. Non-amateur may
have an opinion, but that opinion is uninformed and is readily
discarded by the amateur elite.

It looks as if you're confused again, "William". Len not only isn't
part of the amateur elite, he isn't part of amateur radio in the U.S. or
Canada at all. Yet he has been quick to demand a say in how U.S.
amateur radio is regulated. Wouldn't he automatically be interested in
how non-radio amateurs in Canada think about their regulatory changes?

It looks like the old "William"/"Avery" double standard.

Dave K8MN

"Avery Hightower" wrote


Amateurs should address comments to Industry Canada as directed in the
Notice. RAC recommends that Canadian amateurs endorse this proposal.

Amateurs with questions for RAC should direct them to their regional
RAC
Director.

The Notice is available at:

http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/inter.../sf06456e.html


I'm not Canadian, nor do I play one on TV, but this is an interesting
proposal.

It proposes full access to HF without a Morse examination. I'm in
favor.

It proposes to enhance the technical qualifications of applicants. I'm
in favor.

It neatly avoids the "great giveaway" syndrome of the ARRL proposal.
I'm in favor.

Good job, RAC! ARRL, are you listening?

73, de Hans, K0HB

"KØHB" wrote in message .net...

Good job, RAC! ARRL, are you listening?

Good grief! Do you honestly believe the ARRL gives a rodents rectum
about amateur radio w/o the code???

Look at all of the NCT's they've attracted and held in the last dozen
years!

Like Jimmy Who, they've enabled all the jerks (K4YZ/CAP, K3LT,...) who
beat up on the cordless Techs.

Hi, hi!

William wrote:

...beat up on the cordless Techs.

Gotta love it. I guess that's what they mean by wireless.

Dave K8MN