Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Dave Heil das Oberst uff das
Amatur Schutz Staffell writes: William wrote: ...beat up on the cordless Techs. Gotta love it. I guess that's what they mean by wireless. Ah, you actually got a gig as an Otto Preminger imitator? Good for you. Feel free to make fun of everybody's postings by writing more of such "comments" in here...especially those whom you've been unable to get along with for years. Here's a nice little synopsis of the not-so-robust oberst: "No matter what job, educational level, employer, or government/military service that anyone has, if said anyone opposes Heil's views, he/she will be the target of Heil's insults, ridicule, name-calling, factual errors, ethnic slurs, total lack of emoticons and social-interaction graces, acting in an arrogant, elitist manner...for years" :-) Pbthththth... |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Avery Hightower" wrote in message link.net...
The Notice is available at: http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/inter.../sf06456e.html A very interesting proposal! What I find most interesting is that the proposal does *not* simply say "drop the code test and leave everything else alone" - as did the NCI proposal. Instead, it beefs up the written requirements by requiring a higher passing grade. It also proposes *adding* license classes.... (So much for simplifying the rules...) The analysis of the multiple-choice testing method and guessing is very interesting, showing how a limited knowledge of the material plus guessing can result in a passing grade. The 60% passing requirement seems low to me, but I suppose that our ~74% level would seem low to others. It's a refreshing change from the ARRL "Great Giveaway" proposal, and the much much worse NCVEC "Much Greater Giveaway" proposal. It will also be interesting to see how Canadians react to the proposal in their comments. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open For Comment From: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) Date: 9/16/2004 4:58 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open For Comment From: (William) Date: 9/16/2004 4:15 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: He's not "AUTHORIZED" to emit RF OUTSIDE the U. S. Amateur Bands K4CAP: What "other country", Brian? Whatever other country that Len might happen to be in. What "other country", Brian? Whatever other country that Len might happen to be in. I've not said a single word about another country's "rules and regs of amateurism". You said, "OUTSIDE the U. S. Amateur Bands" Len gets to decide what other countries. Then you have to provide the rules that deny him access. The context of the posts were directly related to your mentor's lack of legal authorization to emit RF inside or outside of the US Amateur Radio bands. (Certain FCC exceptions to authorized unlicensed operation not withstanding). (Such as the Part 15 and Part 95 devices that I rubbed your nose in, notwithstanding?) Waiting for you to show us where you got the "another country's" business from. I say you just shot your mouth off without thinking. Sound's like brick is coming my way. I'll make sure my wife is prepared for terrorism. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open for Comment
From: (William) Date: 9/18/2004 6:10 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open For Comment From: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) Date: 9/16/2004 4:58 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open For Comment From: (William) Date: 9/16/2004 4:15 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: He's not "AUTHORIZED" to emit RF OUTSIDE the U. S. Amateur Bands K4CAP: What "other country", Brian? Whatever other country that Len might happen to be in. What "other country", Brian? Whatever other country that Len might happen to be in. I've not said a single word about another country's "rules and regs of amateurism". You said, "OUTSIDE the U. S. Amateur Bands" Len gets to decide what other countries. Then you have to provide the rules that deny him access. The context of the posts were directly related to your mentor's lack of legal authorization to emit RF inside or outside of the US Amateur Radio bands. (Certain FCC exceptions to authorized unlicensed operation not withstanding). (Such as the Part 15 and Part 95 devices that I rubbed your nose in, notwithstanding?) Waiting for you to show us where you got the "another country's" business from. I say you just shot your mouth off without thinking. Sound's like brick is coming my way. The "brick" is your own stupid assertions, Brian. If you'd do a bit of thoughtful and careful THINKING before you hit the "SEND" key, you'd get far less stuff thrown back at you. I'll make sure my wife is prepared for terrorism. I am sure she's prepared every night that you're next to her, Brian. As for the rest of the post, you still aren't making sense (not that THAT is unusual). "Outside" the US Amateur Bands does not mean outside of the United States. And as of today, Lennie still does not have a license to operate INSIDE the Amateur Bands (of ANY country). Nor does he have a license to transmit OUTSIDE the US Amateur Bands without an FCC issued station license. (As a US Citizen, a foreign license of ANY nature is useless in the United States except as a keepsake for Lennie...) 73 Steve, K4YZ |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open for Comment From: (William) Date: 9/18/2004 6:10 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... I say you just shot your mouth off without thinking. Sound's like brick is coming my way. The "brick" is your own stupid assertions, Brian. If you'd do a bit of thoughtful and careful THINKING before you hit the "SEND" key, you'd get far less stuff thrown back at you. What are you talking about? So far I have no bricks through my window, no tires slashed, and my wife and kids have experienced no terrorism. You're the only one saying that I've "shot my mouth off." But you "predict" the bricks, etc, are coming. "Outside" the US Amateur Bands does not mean outside of the United States. Why not? Also, do radio waves respect international boundaries??? And as of today, Lennie still does not have a license to operate INSIDE the Amateur Bands (of ANY country). Nor does he have a license to transmit OUTSIDE the US Amateur Bands without an FCC issued station license. (As a US Citizen, a foreign license of ANY nature is useless in the United States except as a keepsake for Lennie...) 73 Steve, K4YZ There are lots and lots and lots of JA's with HK2 and KH6 licenses. Why is it not possible that Len has a Japanese or Mexican or UK license? Maybe he has a UK license and is licensed to operate in the MF bands where the U.S. Amateur Radio Service has no authorizations. You need to brush up on your foreign amateur radio rules before shooting off your mouth again. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open for Comment
From: (William) Date: 9/19/2004 2:07 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open for Comment From: (William) Date: 9/18/2004 6:10 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... I say you just shot your mouth off without thinking. Sound's like brick is coming my way. The "brick" is your own stupid assertions, Brian. If you'd do a bit of thoughtful and careful THINKING before you hit the "SEND" key, you'd get far less stuff thrown back at you. What are you talking about? So far I have no bricks through my window, no tires slashed, and my wife and kids have experienced no terrorism. You're the only one saying that I've "shot my mouth off." No, I'm not. You're not paying attention. But you "predict" the bricks, etc, are coming. Everytime you make stupid assertions and then have to eat them, Brian. "Outside" the US Amateur Bands does not mean outside of the United States. Why not? Also, do radio waves respect international boundaries??? If you're TRYING to look foolish, Brian, you've done a good job. And as of today, Lennie still does not have a license to operate INSIDE the Amateur Bands (of ANY country). Nor does he have a license to transmit OUTSIDE the US Amateur Bands without an FCC issued station license. (As a US Citizen, a foreign license of ANY nature is useless in the United States except as a keepsake for Lennie...) 73 Steve, K4YZ There are lots and lots and lots of JA's with HK2 and KH6 licenses. Why is it not possible that Len has a Japanese or Mexican or UK license? Maybe he has a UK license and is licensed to operate in the MF bands where the U.S. Amateur Radio Service has no authorizations. You need to brush up on your foreign amateur radio rules before shooting off your mouth again. You need to know AMERICAN law, Brian. We are, afterall, discussing an American citizen operating from American soil. Lennie may very well have one each of the licenses you cited. Who cares? They are as useful to him on US Amateur allocations as his GROL is. So Sayeth the FCC. Not a one of them is any good to him in the United States except as a keep sake...Just as I said before. So Sayeth the FCC. The "home" license of the nations you cited above are only good in the United States when used by the foreign operator, and only under specific limitations. And even when the foreign license is used for basis of reciprocal operating privileges, the foreign operator must obey American subbands. So Sayeth the FCC. If the foreign operator takes and passes an American license, s/he must comply with the limits of THAT license, even if it grants fewer priviledges than his/her original license. They cannot (legally) switch between "Kx6xxx" on one occasion then "K6/xx9xxx" in order to exceed the priviledges granted. So Sayeth the FCC. An American citizen with a foreign Amateur license cannot use that license on US soil or from US administered territories. So Sayeth the FCC. Now...try to stop being an idiot, Brian, and try to focus on reality. I know it will be tough, but I know you can do it...You've done it (however briefly) before. Steve, K4YZ |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(William) writes: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open for Comment From: (William) Date: 9/18/2004 6:10 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... I say you just shot your mouth off without thinking. Sound's like brick is coming my way. The "brick" is your own stupid assertions, Brian. If you'd do a bit of thoughtful and careful THINKING before you hit the "SEND" key, you'd get far less stuff thrown back at you. What are you talking about? So far I have no bricks through my window, no tires slashed, and my wife and kids have experienced no terrorism. You're the only one saying that I've "shot my mouth off." But you "predict" the bricks, etc, are coming. He's "predicted" that he has the "professional qualifications" to make one simple phone call to have "authorities come take us away." :-) I'm still waiting. Was gone over the weekend, but no "authorities'" notices were posted on the door... :-) I wonder if Amelia has had the same "predictions?" :-) "Outside" the US Amateur Bands does not mean outside of the United States. Why not? Also, do radio waves respect international boundaries??? The air ace and veteran of seven hostile actions doesn't know about radio waves and their lack of respect of human laws. Tsk. For someone who demands all that respect, you'd think he would get out of a radio hobby? :-) And as of today, Lennie still does not have a license to operate INSIDE the Amateur Bands (of ANY country). Nor does he have a license to transmit OUTSIDE the US Amateur Bands without an FCC issued station license. (As a US Citizen, a foreign license of ANY nature is useless in the United States except as a keepsake for Lennie...) 73 Steve, K4YZ Blabber, blabber by the gunnery nurse...who has NO AUTHORIZATION to "operate" OUTSIDE of the amateur bands. :-) Tsk, tsk. All that "authorization" rage! :-) There are lots and lots and lots of JA's with HK2 and KH6 licenses. Why is it not possible that Len has a Japanese or Mexican or UK license? No such possibility. Actually, the Canadian rules are much better towards the ham hobby, and look more attractive when compared to U.S. rules. Interesting. No offense to Leo, but Canada has something called "snow" and "rain" in the winter season. Not attractive to me. :-) Maybe he has a UK license and is licensed to operate in the MF bands where the U.S. Amateur Radio Service has no authorizations. There's no "maybes." My self-assigned task was simply to advocate the removal of the morse code test for any U.S. radio license. No more, no less, but a bunch of overly-prideful super radio extras think their Way of Life is threatened and must "do battle." :-) Removal of the code test would remove Life as They Know It in ham radio. No more brag claims about being the perfect morse operator, etc. That alone has struck terror into their individual psyches. Tsk. [in nursie's case, all his multiple personalities...] You need to brush up on your foreign amateur radio rules before shooting off your mouth again. So far he's been shooting blanks. Lots and lots of flash and bang but nothing lasting in the way of damage. I'll just have to keep waiting for the results of that "phone call." Hi hi. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(William) writes: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open For Comment From: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) Date: 9/16/2004 4:58 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open For Comment From: (William) Date: 9/16/2004 4:15 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: He's not "AUTHORIZED" to emit RF OUTSIDE the U. S. Amateur Bands K4CAP: What "other country", Brian? Whatever other country that Len might happen to be in. What "other country", Brian? Whatever other country that Len might happen to be in. I'm in the United States of America. Really. California is just one of the 50 states of the USA. :-) I've been into Mexico and Canada. Nice places. Good neighbors. I've not said a single word about another country's "rules and regs of amateurism". You said, "OUTSIDE the U. S. Amateur Bands" Len gets to decide what other countries. Then you have to provide the rules that deny him access. Nursie is a Gunnery Nurse! He is also a PCTA extra. He doesn't have to do a damn (excuse me, "darn") thing about what others demand! Says so in his Oath of Allegiance or something that he vowed when he joined the "service." [of amateur radio] He is a veteran of seven hostile actions...knows who runs MARS... and has the "professional qualifications" to make simple phone calls to "authorities" to have them pick me or you up. Not only that, we must wait in fear for bricks to come flying through our windows or our wives terrorized! Nursie has "threatened!" yawn The context of the posts were directly related to your mentor's lack of legal authorization to emit RF inside or outside of the US Amateur Radio bands. (Certain FCC exceptions to authorized unlicensed operation not withstanding). (Such as the Part 15 and Part 95 devices that I rubbed your nose in, notwithstanding?) Hmmm..."context of this thread" is all about "my having authorization inside or outside of the USA?" Could have sworn that the subject thread concerned "CANADIAN No Code Proposal" which was open for comment...by Canadians. Nursie stepped in and had to misdirect everything to his fabulous FIGHT with each and every person who disagrees with him. Tsk. Waiting for you to show us where you got the "another country's" business from. I say you just shot your mouth off without thinking. Sound's like brick is coming my way. I'll make sure my wife is prepared for terrorism. Yup. "Steve and the boys" will Come To Your House and show your family the Error of Your Ways! :-) [I'd yawn but it really is too funny... :-) ] |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
Comments to FCC on RM-10787 No Code Proposal | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |