RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   Canadian No Code Proposal Open For Comment (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/27687-canadian-no-code-proposal-open-comment.html)

Dave Heil September 13th 04 09:16 PM

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article ,
(William) writes:

Dave Heil wrote in message
...
William wrote:

Dave Heil wrote in message

...

Len may not operate radio equipment
under Part 97 of the FCC regs.

Len may operate -amateur- radio equipment while you are the control

operator.

Like hell he will with me as the control op.



There's the amateur spirit.


Another good example of olde-tyme hamme thinking. :-)


I don't know about the "old time ham" part. I can assure you that it is
good thinking.

Might be a "spirit" that comes out of a bottle...


Actually, I've already done that "operator" thing with a fully-licensed,
all-papers-open-for-inspection-for-any-A.S.S.-offizier as the "control
op." :-)


Bully for you. That does not make you a radio amateur.

Poor Dave. He's run out of valid replies and has to use the "I've-
been-licensed-forty-one-years-and-you've-not!" ploy. As an amateur.
shrug


"I've been licensed for six months and you are not" would work just as
well.

Tsk. I was first licensed as a "first" radio operator 48 years ago...
actually 48 1/2 years to get into his uber-nit-pickyness. :-)

Three years before that I started in operating high-power HF
transmitters without any license whatsoever, without any Signal
School training on HF transmitters, without any training whatsoever
in or about morse code. :-)


Bully for you. I keyed my first government transmitter 36 years ago at
age 19, well ahead of your schedule. It didn't make me a radio amateur.
Of course I was *already* a radio amateur...

Tsk. It gets worse for Dave. I've actually operated transmitters as
a civilian without once having to show or log my "first" license.


Bully for you, though I don't see how it is bad, much less "worse" for
me.
That has nothing to do with obtaining an amateur radio license. If
you're just out to trot out your tired, old brag, might I suggest
alt.radio.commercial.look.what.I.can.do.

All
perfectly legal, too. No need for most Department of Defense
contractors. [DoD isn't ruled by FCC or any "Riley"]


Nope, nuthin' here about amateur radio.

Dave ought to take up nursie's veiled threats of "using his professional
license to call the authorities to 'pick me up.'" This time on emitting
RF without having a valid amateur radio license!


As far as I'm concerned, you're right where you belong already. Just
continue to pad around in your small but paid for, expensive home.
Occasionally, you can look out the window and see some of the other
inmates.

Or, he might take to veiled threats against my wife (like nursie did)
or sign his name "Dave and the Boys" at the end of a posting. :-)


There's no need, Leonard. Your wife already has her cross to bear.

Or, he could become an anonymousie lurking in the baseboards
of newsgroups, afraid of the daylight, jumping out to bite at grown-
ups. Nah. Davie das uber-oberst thinks too much of himself to do
that...


Yes, I do think too much of myself to do that.

I wonder what the Canadians think about all this "show-your-papers!"
demanding? :-)


To you, "Len Anderson is not a radio amateur" equates to a demand.

Dave K8MN

William September 14th 04 02:13 AM

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open For Comment
From:
(William)
Date: 9/12/2004 6:14 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message
...
Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open For Comment
From:
(William)
Date: 9/11/2004 10:11 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message
...
Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open For Comment
From: Dave Heil

Date: 9/10/2004 11:48 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


Nor is Lennie AUTHORIZED to emit RF within any OTHER band, except

within
the limits of the STATION LICENSE of the person or entity who retains

his
services, and then ONLY when acting under the auspices of that license.

So sayeth the FCC.

What sayeth Part 15?

I believe I have repeatedly stated "...Part 15 and Part 95 operation
notwithstanding" as it pertains to Lennie's "HF" operating, Brain.


You may beleive that, but I don't. I guess you forgot to repeat it
this time.


There ya go with typos again after having "chastised" me on several
occassions for doing the same thing.


No typo. You consistently misspell "thier." Are you in a rage or are
you just ignorant?

More of that "NCTA Double Standard" stuff.

I DO believe it. I have said it. You may ask around the NG.

Your "mentor" insists that typos are evidence of anger and rage.


I've seen you propose the very same thing. Great minds think alike?

What are
you in an angry rage about, Brain?


I've been overly tormented by some jerk shooting off his mouth!

"Dialing..."

Hi, hi!

And Lennie STILL can't operate any radio station on HF without an FCC
issued station license, Part 15 and Part 95 notwithstanding...


Really?


Really. It's clearly stated on the back of his GROL.


What does your GROL say?

It's clearly stated
on the back of EVERY GROL ticket for that matter. Again, feel free to ask
around.


Well I'll be! There it is right on the back of my very own GROL.

Let me look at the back of my MARS license.

Well I'll be!!! It says, "MARS IS Amateur Radio!"

Hi, hi, hi, hi, hi!

No station license or grant from the FCC...No "operating".


At least not at Dave's tar paper shack! He'd be welcome here.

I wonder if he could operate on mil freqs?

BTW, Brain, Your Mentor spent some amount of time bragging about how

he
could/would get on "HF" per Part 15 within the Amateur Bands, however has

yet
to do it. Wonder what's keeping him...?!?!


How would you know? Do you think a 6-land station would make a DX
spot?


Does he have to?


Well how else?

All he has to do is say "I will be on 14.xxxMhz at xxxx Zulu in the xx
mode" in this forum.


I think G. Gordon Liddy said the very same thing after Watergate,
expecting to be assassinated. Though he wasn't assassinated, he never
did talk.

I am sure we'd be all ears,


Some would be all belly.

including several "regulars" of this forum who would actually be close enough to hear him.


But without a callsign, he could be any number of Extra's who fail to
ID regularly.

\ Wonder how long it takes a professional radio engineer to slap
together
enough 2n2222's to emit Part 15 level RF ...???


Ask Jim. He even knows how long it would take Bruce to ace the Extra
written w/o studying.


We're not talking about Bruce or Jim.


You said "professional radio engineer." Forgot that Bruce was a VCR
tech, and ... what does Jim do again? Oh, yeh, he builds radios from
kits. Or maybe you were referring to the guy with "real military
experience."

What an odd bunch.

Then there's that nut with seven hostile actions.

Sheeeesh.

Steve, K4YZ


Sheeeesh indeed.


You're looking idiotic again, Brain. Work your way out of it....


Looking???

You got a web cam or sumptin?

Nevermind - don't wanna know.

Steve, K4YZ


Best of Luck.

William September 14th 04 02:17 AM

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...

Ackshully, "Darth" Heil manages to entertain himself mightily.

That would make him his own "churl." :-)


Kind of like when Bernadette Peters sang, "Making Love Alone" on
Saturday Night Live.

William September 14th 04 02:22 AM

Dave Heil wrote in message ...

I don't think of Len as someone from the dark side. I think of him as a
flake.

Dave K8MN


Hey, I'm with you. The last geode my son and I split open had this
beautiful silver crystal flake inside. Just magnificent! Alas, it
has been a few years and the flake is now tarnished, but still
magnificent. With a 20X loupe, you could get lost just looking at it.

Speaking of getting lost, how have you been?

bb

William September 14th 04 02:24 AM

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(William) writes:

Dave Heil wrote in message
...
William wrote:

(Quitefine) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:

(Quitefine) wrote in message
...
In article ,


(Len Over 21) writes:


Every American should have an interest in increasing the number of
potential emergency radio operators.

A valid point.

However, Len does not
agree that amateur radio plays
any significant role in emergency
communications.

Must Len agree with everything?

Awwww, cut it out, "William"! My sides hurt from laughing.

Dave K8MN



Maybe it's bad branch water affecting your kidneys.


Think of it as a "do or die-uretic" he regularly uses... :-)



I think being denied amateur privs in Vietnam changed his whole outlook on life.

William September 14th 04 02:46 AM

(Quitefine) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(William) writes:

(Quitefine) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:

(Quitefine) wrote in message
...
In article ,


(Len Over 21) writes:

By the way, since your Lordship doesn't understand it, I'm NOT
itching to get that mighty Nobel-quality amateur license...I'm just
trying to argue for the elimination of the morse code test for any
radio operator license.

Why?

If you have no interest in
becoming a radio amateur,
why do you attempt to
change the rules?

Every American should have an interest in increasing the number of
potential emergency radio operators.

A valid point.

However, Len does not
agree that amateur radio plays
any significant role in emergency
communications.


Must Len agree with everything?


No.


No???

NO!!!

Then what must Len agree with?

However, logical consistency
requires that if someone is
going to {{{claim}}}} make the
emergency radio operator
argument, then they must also
agree that amateur radio plays
a significant role in emergency
communications.


Not everyone need make that argument.

Need everyone with an amateur license perform emergency comms?

Some only have a license so they can get cool personalized license
plates.

Of course, we have noted that
logical consistency is not one of
Len's strong points.


But it is. Yet logical consistency would demand that upright amateurs
disapprove of Steve Robeson/K4YZ/K4CAP's behavio[u]r.

But you don't.

Some people say that cellular
telephones have no significant role in emergency communications,


Those people are mistaken.


Well, well. If only Almostintimefine had chimed in six moths ago.

As it is, you've allowed the naysayers to think legitimate civilian
communication systems are to be shunned.

yet
about every footage of hurricane action film depicted an official with
a cellular telephone.


Of course.


Of course.

Some people say that amateur radio
has no significant role in emergency
communications, because of cellilar phones.


cellular.

They are mistaken, too.


Of course.

The valid point is that cellular phones
cannot
be absolutely relied upon for emergency
communications.


What can be absolutely relied upon for emergency communications?

You just never know when you
might need one,

If so, why have any tests at all?


Because we already have a radio service without tests which can be
used for emergency communications.


What radio service is that?


The services presently covered under Part 95.

How well does it function in emergencies?


Depends on how many trash mouths have emergency power, or how many
trash mouths in the unaffected area want to interfere in legitimate
emergency comms.

and Morse Code just isn't needed to be an effective
emergency radio operator.

Morse Code has had a role
in some emergency communications
recently. These are well documented
by people who participated.


Do tell.


Even today.


Citations?

However, to claim that every
radio amateur must be tested on Morse
Code because there might someday be
a need to use it in an emergency is quite
a stretch of credibility.


An incredible stretch.


Most incredible, to be quite accurate.


An impossible stretch, 1991. Now let's discuss HF.

It is clear that Len's interest goes far
beyond
eliminating the Morse Code test.\


He wants to eliminate the morse code test.


And much more.


I'm the one who wants one license. I don't recall him calling for any
particular license structure other than the elimination of a Morse
Code Exam for HF access.

If you have information that contradicts what I've just posted I'd
like to see it.

To quote a wise one:

"It is not the Morse, but the hatred"


I'm not familiar with that wise one. Who is it?

Blackguard Vox Deus


Ah, yes, Darkguard. I've heard him. He hails from the dark side.

He/she has demonstrated
wisdom here.


So has Jim but he is not revered.

Repeatedly.


Repeatedly.

But he has gone over to the dark side also.

He condones K4YZ behavio[u]r.

William September 14th 04 03:00 AM

(Blackguard) wrote in message . com...
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , Dave Heil das Oberst uff das
Amatur Schutz Staffell writes:

William wrote:

...beat up on the cordless Techs.

Gotta love it. I guess that's what they mean by wireless.


Ah, you actually got a gig as an Otto Preminger imitator?

Good for you.

Feel free to make fun of everybody's postings by writing more
of such "comments" in here...especially those whom you've
been unable to get along with for years.


You are posting to yourself again.


Odd that you say that. I see him posting to David.

I guess it's all a matter of relativity.

I stand out in the light, and can see clearly. You stand in the
dark...

Here's a nice little synopsis of the not-so-robust oberst:

"No matter what job, educational level, employer, or
government/military service that anyone has, if said anyone
opposes Heil's views, he/she will be the target of Heil's insults,
ridicule, name-calling, factual errors, ethnic slurs, total lack of
emoticons and social-interaction graces, acting in an arrogant,
elitist manner...for years" :-)


Again with the post containing much of the insulting behaviour you
profess to find in others.


It is not accurate?

The only thing I find inaccurate is the smiley emoticon at the very
end.

Do not be too cruel to these people you disdain. You need them much
more than they need you.


Dave refused to entertain the idea of Len operating from his shack.
Great posterboy for amateur mentorship (formerly known as "Elmer.").

Pbthththth...


Finally, you write something that makes sense.


Ptui!

But is the first part pronounced "pib" or "Pub" or "puhb"?


You say it makes sense, but you don't know what it is?

And yet you are acclaimed as the wise one?

I am
curious
but yet
still


in need of a vowel.

....Curi_us Ge_rge _f the Jungle?

Dave Heil September 14th 04 04:48 AM

William wrote:

Dave Heil wrote in message ...

I don't think of Len as someone from the dark side. I think of him as a
flake.


Hey, I'm with you. The last geode my son and I split open had this
beautiful silver crystal flake inside. Just magnificent! Alas, it
has been a few years and the flake is now tarnished, but still
magnificent. With a 20X loupe, you could get lost just looking at it.


Len's geode split open decades back and he's been sitting around a long
time. You can imagine how tarnished he is.

Speaking of getting lost, how have you been?


I've been fine. Then again, I'm not lost.

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil September 14th 04 04:50 AM

William wrote:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(William) writes:

Dave Heil wrote in message
...
William wrote:

(Quitefine) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:

(Quitefine) wrote in message
...
In article ,


(Len Over 21) writes:


Every American should have an interest in increasing the number of
potential emergency radio operators.

A valid point.

However, Len does not
agree that amateur radio plays
any significant role in emergency
communications.

Must Len agree with everything?

Awwww, cut it out, "William"! My sides hurt from laughing.

Dave K8MN


Maybe it's bad branch water affecting your kidneys.


Think of it as a "do or die-uretic" he regularly uses... :-)



I think being denied amateur privs in Vietnam changed his whole outlook on life.


It certainly did. I never worked for another outfit which had any say
in whether I could obtain an amateur radio license overseas.

Dave K8MN

KØHB September 14th 04 05:05 AM


"William" wrote

You consistently misspell "thier." Are you in a rage or are
you just ignorant?


And you just misspelled "their". You don't seem to be in a rage, so
I'll draw the obvious conclusion.

With all kind wishes,

de Hans, K0HB






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com