![]() |
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Mike Coslo writes: N2EY wrote: In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Subject: Who peed in the pool From: Mike Coslo Date: 9/17/2004 8:11 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote: Subject: Who peed in the pool From: Mike Coslo Date: 9/16/2004 6:49 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Len Over 21 wrote: His words have only as much power as you give them. Calling him "Anderscum" simply lowers you to his level. Can't you see that's what he wants? It isn't. But it IS the non-answer expected. PCTA just don't have much validity in their reasons of keeping the code test in regulations. Validity in their reasons? It could be said that reasons you've set forth for the elimination of morse testing don't have validity. They are all into the fantasy of "brotherhood" in the "fraternity." For the most part, the idea of "brotherhood" and "fraternity" are very much alive in amateur radio. Then again, you've never been involved so you might be excused for not knowing. And of "service to their country" by engaging in a hobby... Quite a number of radio amateurs are involved in service to country, to community and to amateur radio itself. Then again, you've never been involved so you might be excused for not knowing. ESPECIALLY when he is so blatantly wrong on so many occassions. Then point out the errors without the name calling. Absolutely. Show ALL NCTA the "Error of their Ways!" Hi hi. It isn't a bad idea, Leonard. You can be shown but you still might not understand. Everything about removing the morse code test is an "Error" as well as Heresy and an Abomination to the Ham Gods. Am I still a ham god or am I not a god of radio? Did the several of you inhabiting the body of leonard anderson ever come to an agreement? Len and over 700 other military personnel there at the time... Jimmie wasn't there. Jimmie wasn't ever in ANY military. But Jimmie Knows The Truth about Everything and won't hesitate to call any NCTA "in Error." Kellie was never in any military. Kellies also "knows truth." There are certainly records, Leonard, but you were there. If Jim's number of personnel present is incorrect, set the record straight. But that isn't the issue, is it? Dave K8MN |
William wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote in message ... "Jeff, you've never been under Incoming, have you? While trying to get return artillery support on a radio while your ears, your whole body is numbed by HE infall on your position? Most folks in that position don't wet their pants...every sphincter tightens up, ears go deaf, eyes close tight, and every breath may be the last." --Len Anderson, 2000 Hey guys, just as a general question, how many sphincters does a human have anyhow? I thought there was just one.... - Mike KB3EIA - I think there's one at each end of the stomach, and one at the end of the large intestine. ....and certainly one at each end of an NCTA parade. Dave K8MN |
(Brian Kelly) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com... (Brian Kelly) wrote in message . com... Wriggle, wriggle, squirm, squirm, post mindless circle-jerks with your Control Unit from here to infinity but when it's all said and done you've once again demonstrated that you're all keyboard and no RADIO. :: YAWN :: w3rv "Gets down to firmly establishing the fact that, with a few obvious exceptions, perceptions of the overall characters of RRAPers based only on what they post here can't be taken seriously." I can't take you seriously. Completely out of context as usual. Perfectly within context. Thanks for your input. Any port in a storm eh? I'm particular about my port. Like I said you can wriggle and you can squirm but in the end yer BS simply doesn't flush Burke. You can wriggle and squirm, but in the end you have no real military experience. Ask me about it sometime when your hemmoroids aren't on fire. I'll explain it to you. As usual. Yup. Cecil, the two Jims, Hans, etc. "took me seriously"back in 2001 and, well, you know the rest dontcha Burke? Don't forget the other Steve. He might have been impressed with with your seriousness. I wasn't. Just can't hack it can ya Burke? I chip. You hack. We'll just add your tall tales about your end-fed wire to the tall tales about your T5 operation to your list of "accomplishements" and and move along here. w3rv You joined the KMA club long ago. Knock yourself out. |
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: Radio Stories From: (William) Date: 9/23/2004 3:18 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message .com... (William) wrote in message . com... (N2EY) wrote in message . com... The point here is that, when directly asked, ol' Cecil made good. When directly asked, I also made good. You've been "directly asked" to "make good" on countless issues and have yet to come clean on a single one. My positions WRT amateur radio policy are crystal clear. That is why you attack me. I am not "attacking" you, Brian. Then why the homosexual and pedophilia inuendo? Any sane person would call them attacks. I challenge your assertions. Your assertions are squirelly. You prefer to make inuendo as well as bald faced lies. You continue to make assertions of fact about your experience and skills in Amateur Radio, yet never pony up any validation of them. Yet I remain a superior radio operator. Too bad for you. He said he was an antenna guru and "CW expert" (yes, he said he was a "CW expert") and that Morse was his "favorite fun mode". I said that I wanted to build an antenna, that I am not a cw expert, and that Morse is not my favorite mode. So when somebody asked for a sked, he was there. And I said "No." You said no because you're a coward. Or you lied about making the antenna...Or both. I have nothing to prove to you. Yesterday I had nothing to prove to you. Tomorrow I will have nothing to prove to you. I will not play your games. It's not my "games", Brian...They are yours. They are not. You are the one making assertions of skill, knowledge and experience. Nope, not me. Yet the fact remains that I am a superior operator when compared to you. However there is NOTHING to validate any of it. Doesn't need to be. I am sane. You are not. That makes all the difference. No excuses or shaggy-dog stories, he showed up with a good signal and worked everybody who could hear him. No excuses here, either. Yeah..."no excuses"..."no answers"..."no reasons"..."no validity"..."no facts"..."no common sense"... You attack me because my rationale is strong, and my will is strong. What "rationale"...?!?! My rationale. That which a crazy man cannot fathom. "I refuse to answer"...?!?!? BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! I detect a maniacal laugh. Indeed you are crazy. And "strong will"...?!?! The strongest. Your insane will cannot compare. You conduct yourself politely and reasonably when Len's out-of-pocket, and then when you "team up" with him, you parrot him down to the diminutives and insults. Yet you are Yell Dimuitive Man Complex (Yell DMC). Kind of like Napolean, only far less important, actually insignificant. You have no will but to get Lennie's nod-of-approval. Len is your shepard that you shall not want. You don't have enough say-so in your own behaviour as to decide which hand you'll wipe with. Odd you say that. Have you been examining my defecation habits with your remote viewing skills? That would be just like a creep like you. Stand-up guy. Thank you. Just like you, Burke, to take an accolade for another and bestowe it upon yourself. I have a box full of real medals that were really awarded to me. You have a box full of trinkets that you got at a garage sale. The difference, Brian, is that I ACKNOWLEDGE what I collect as opposed to what I earned. What you earned in seven hostile actions? Hi, hi! I get visions of John Kerry for some reason. Scan 'em and post 'em!!! Clear your "good" name. I have a "box full of real medals that were really awarded to me" too...And I am NOT speaking of my CAP awards, all of which were also earned too. Hi, hi! Must be a real nightmare earnign CAP medals. Kinda like Lennie's efforts to embellish his Army record with the sacrifices of men who died three years before he was in the Army. And you have been engaged in seven hostile actions! Yes, I was. Hi, hi! As predicted, Mr. Burke refuses your request, Why would I accept it? To prove some of your own boasts of proficiency in operating? I have nothing to prove to you. Go get a monkey to do your tricks. I don't need a monkey, Brian. Then you have no one but yourself. Get busy. I say you just can't do it. Not up to it and don't have the skills. And what you say matters? It obviously matters to you. You're spending a lot of time ttrying to get out from under it. And what you say matters? and tries to make it look like you are the bad guy. He can do that all by himself. You've been doing a pretty fair job of it lately. But no where NEAR your level, But you admit that he participates in it none-the-less. But you admit that he participates in it none-the-less??? Brian...Keep up the "good" work...You are your own best "ambassador"... Should I threaten bricks and slashes and terror? You take the low road, I take the high road. No, you don't. Yes. I do. You lie. You decieve. You dodge and hide. You one scarey little jelly belly dood. You are welcomed to repost the item wherein you think I "threaten(ed) bricks and slashes and terror". The WHOLE post, Brian...IN CONTEXT. Steve, K4YZ Google it up and set me straight. Hi, hi! Best of Luck! |
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (William) writes: The Cliff Notes version is that I'm not playing "thier" game. Never have, never will. Nor I...but it IS demanded that all capitulate to Them. Recapitulate. I need to apply for a new IAG. No capitulation and now you've been charged with spousal abuse by we-all-know-who. And the other PCTA extras do nothing about one who makes baseless charges. Tsk. Yep, they'll block us but chum up to the pro-code testers no matter what. That must be an indication of how hard-up they are for pro-coders. |
In article , Mike Coslo
writes: William wrote: PAMNO (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Subject: Who peed in the pool From: Mike Coslo Date: 9/17/2004 8:11 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote: Subject: Who peed in the pool From: Mike Coslo Date: 9/16/2004 6:49 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Len Over 21 wrote: Tsk, tsk. You want a meeting with charts and graphs and an experienced presenter to show you examples of the infamous Double Standard?!?!? hmm, maybe. *Your answer* is what needs explaining. If I don't care about your mode, nor Steve's mode of expression, and you two are on opposite sides of the discussion, I need an explanation of why that means that I have a double standard. Tsk. Still need an "explanation?" Not a good reply, Coslo. Nor a good explanation. Lennie doesn't HAVE a "Double Standard" that he can use as an example, Mike. That's why he dodged answering your post. Nope, I took the summer off to rest a torn meniscus. Takes longer to heal as time marches on. Who filled in under your name in here "all summer?" What are you talking about? You'll have to forgive Lennie...If you posted even once in that time period, he assumes that you anxiously devoured each and ever word he wrote as if there were no other nourishment to be had. Or you may be smoking some "good stuff" that Bob Casey said I was... :-) nahh. nothing stronger than the occasional beer for me. 3.2 stuff? :-) You smoke beer? How is that done? :-) So. you deliberately misunderstand me to serve as the content of your replies? noted! 8^) Of course. "The Dodge" (not the automobile). A typical Lenniesque diversion from having to acknowledge a comment which might embarrass him. Tsk. You should get a subscription to Psychology Today and fill yourself in on what "relationships" are. It is okay. This happens all over Netnews. Don't let it bother you too much. This is where Lennie gets most of his "education"...Periodicals that his wife subscribed to...Of course he'd have everyone here believe that it was HIS education that carried the day. If you know all this Steve, why bother with Len at all? Because Steve lies, and Steve has a mission, and Steve is nuts. Like the guy in the movie, Acropolis Now, he was lying on his back in a hoe house, the ceiling fan started to look like a rotary wing propellor, then he says, "I asked for a mission, and for my sins, they gave me one." No "hi, hi" on that one. Here's the question Steve. I think I know the answer already, but let's check it out. As long as Lenover21 continues to post in his present style, I assume that you are happy to post in retort to him. Yes? %#$%&**@!!! You actually asked such a question??? That was me that asked such a question. The answer is that, to some folks, it's OK if Len does it but not OK if anybody who disagrees with Len does it. If you'll take careful notice, Mike, with rare exception over the last few months, I rare reply directly to anything he says. Most of it (like the last couple with you here) have been as a result of someone else's posts echoing him. I'm pretty convinced that even though there are times you find him exasperating, it doesn't upset you to make the posts? What would upset me even more is letting a bully go unchallenged. A bully? Len only has as much power as you give him. Proof of the saying "He who angers me, controls me. " Len works jard to anger you, so you'll come off the handle, call him names, etc. Works EVERY time! Note how upset he gets when people *don't* react in kind. Note how he's trying to get mild-mannered Mike Coslo worked up so that Mike will reply in kind. Poor Mike. Supports Steve. Get's blasted. No poor Mike. Getting "blasted" by Lenover21 is just part of posting here. Unless you agree with Len on everything. Whatsa nice guy to do? "Steve's not such a bad sort, I mean he never called me kids..." Yaknow, with all due respect, Brian, if you believe that your family has been threatened, print out the offending email, and take it to your DA. If he or she finds it to be credible and have merit, then appropriate action will be taken. Or you could file papers that would prevent him from ever communicating with you in any form. Consider, though, some of Len's threats against others: 2003-10-06 I wrote: "Most American television and motion pictures are JUNK." Len replied: "Feel free to walk around this area shouting your "JUNK!" epithets. If you do, make sure you have life insurance... :-) " 2002-03-04 At the end of a long post about hams with 1x2 callsigns who homebrew and support Morse Code testing, Len wrote: "Some one-by-twos need a two-by-four harshly applied to them..." 2004-06-21 Len's response to a challenge for physical exercise by Steve, K4YZ: "Let's see...modern fighting tools (since at least 1700s) allow "just a few ounces of finger pressure" to allow reaching out and touching someone supersonically. No need for physical confrontation up close and personal." 2004-09-11 Len's response to W4NTI: "Danny boy, consider that you make a big target. Fills the sight picture very nicely. Just a few ounces of pressure..... [not talking about radio at all but then Danny boy wasn't doing that, either]" Looks like a pattern... But Mr. Coslo doesn't work that way. I suspect his time on the ice is one reason. (One trick in hockey is to do something when the ref isn't looking that elicits a violent reaction when the ref *is* looking. Result: Penalty box and your team is down a player for several minutes. Games are won and lost that way. So Mike stays cool and collected. And plays dirty? As a Captain, it is part of my job to stay cool. And if you don't have that ability, you aren't going to make it as one, because out on the ice, there are a lot of people who would like for you to freak out. A lot of them actually play and act in a style similar to Lenover21 and your own. (two different styles to be sure) I'll be called names, bumped, speared, whacked and punched. So Mike has no trouble dealing with the likes of Len. Without replying in kind. And I have helped other players to take penalties at critical stages of the game, simply by skating up to them during the play, and asking them how far they think they would fly if I checked them, or simply tap my hockey stick against their skates. Even the occasional skateing of a tight circle around someone. Sometimes I tell them I don't think they have the power to knock a big guy like me over. Those who are prone to flying off the handle will do it. I've picked myself up off the ice many times, to find my team up by a man in a crucial part of the game. And that is not playing dirty. Of course, I do play a physical game. Sometimes that player finds out how far he flies when I check them! ;^) Amateur Radio is something that has enrichened my life and has been a Godsend on more than one occassion. Same for me. I think my background in ham radio got me into engineering school and into a successful EE career. Holey Moley! You're a real engineer? Got any land surveying under your belt? Could you explain just what you mean by that? Jim is an EE, and not a surveyor. I don't get it. Me neither. Introduced me to a lot of good friends. Showed me a world many folks don't even know exists. Why should Len's words bother me? So much so that you kill file him? Can't imagine it! There's no reason for me to waste my time reading all of the nonsense Len and Brian Burke post here. Nor to waste my computer and online capacity downloading it. I see enough of it in others' replies to know I'm making the right choice. To allow a creep like Anderscum to trash it unabated would be unthinkable. His words have only as much power as you give them. Calling him "Anderscum" simply lowers you to his level. Absolutely. And Jim's "Dr. Fill" persona isn't nearly enough to work on Steve's psychophenomenon. Dr. Fill? Can't you see that's what he wants? Everyone but Steve sees it!!! Doesn't that clue you in the least??? Sorry Han's, Steve IS Controlled by Len! Hi, hi! The three of you control each other. All of you get what you are looking for. Exactly, Mike. ESPECIALLY when he is so blatantly wrong on so many occassions. Then point out the errors without the name calling. In-friggin-possible!!! I also believe that for good or bad, you enjoy it to a certain extent. Only that it lends some balance to his mistruthfulness and deceit. When you call him "Lennie" and "anderscum" and go off on his wife or whatever, it undermines *your* credibility. Which is just what he wants. Hellooooooooo????????? Steve's just lucky that Len doesn't pick up the phone!!! So you guys have a relationship. It's a pretty strange one, made easier by Netnews, but this sort of thing has existed for a long time. It's the old Winston Churchhill/Lady Astor thing. They traded barbs with each other, and I have to believe they enjoyed it. Was it Lady Astor who said to Sir Winston: "My good sir, I do believe you are drunk!" "Yes, m'lady, I am. And you are quite ugly. But tomorrow I will be sober...." That was mean. Wrong quote too! And wrong person Yep! I stand corrected. And Steve is crazy. Tomorrow, Steve will still be crazy, Lady Astor will still be ugly, and Len will still be laughing at you guys. Lady Astor was most certainly *not* ugly http://www.jssgallery.org/Paintings/Lady_Astor.htm Agreed! Thanks, Mike - enjoyed the site very much. His comeback about the coffee is classic. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Dave Heil wrote in message ...
William wrote: Mike Coslo wrote in message ... "Jeff, you've never been under Incoming, have you? While trying to get return artillery support on a radio while your ears, your whole body is numbed by HE infall on your position? Most folks in that position don't wet their pants...every sphincter tightens up, ears go deaf, eyes close tight, and every breath may be the last." --Len Anderson, 2000 Hey guys, just as a general question, how many sphincters does a human have anyhow? I thought there was just one.... - Mike KB3EIA - I think there's one at each end of the stomach, and one at the end of the large intestine. ...and certainly one at each end of an NCTA parade. Dave K8MN ....and in tar-paper shacks. |
In article , PAMNO
(mother superior) writes: In article , Mike Coslo writes: William wrote: PAMNO (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Subject: Who peed in the pool From: Mike Coslo Date: 9/17/2004 8:11 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote: Subject: Who peed in the pool From: Mike Coslo Date: 9/16/2004 6:49 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Len Over 21 wrote: Tsk, tsk. You want a meeting with charts and graphs and an experienced presenter to show you examples of the infamous Double Standard?!?!? hmm, maybe. *Your answer* is what needs explaining. If I don't care about your mode, nor Steve's mode of expression, and you two are on opposite sides of the discussion, I need an explanation of why that means that I have a double standard. Tsk. Still need an "explanation?" Not a good reply, Coslo. Nor a good explanation. Lennie doesn't HAVE a "Double Standard" that he can use as an example, Mike. That's why he dodged answering your post. Nope, I took the summer off to rest a torn meniscus. Takes longer to heal as time marches on. Who filled in under your name in here "all summer?" What are you talking about? You'll have to forgive Lennie...If you posted even once in that time period, he assumes that you anxiously devoured each and ever word he wrote as if there were no other nourishment to be had. Or you may be smoking some "good stuff" that Bob Casey said I was... :-) nahh. nothing stronger than the occasional beer for me. 3.2 stuff? :-) You smoke beer? How is that done? :-) So. you deliberately misunderstand me to serve as the content of your replies? noted! 8^) Of course. "The Dodge" (not the automobile). A typical Lenniesque diversion from having to acknowledge a comment which might embarrass him. Tsk. You should get a subscription to Psychology Today and fill yourself in on what "relationships" are. It is okay. This happens all over Netnews. Don't let it bother you too much. This is where Lennie gets most of his "education"...Periodicals that his wife subscribed to...Of course he'd have everyone here believe that it was HIS education that carried the day. If you know all this Steve, why bother with Len at all? Because Steve lies, and Steve has a mission, and Steve is nuts. Like the guy in the movie, Acropolis Now, he was lying on his back in a hoe house, the ceiling fan started to look like a rotary wing propellor, then he says, "I asked for a mission, and for my sins, they gave me one." No "hi, hi" on that one. Here's the question Steve. I think I know the answer already, but let's check it out. As long as Lenover21 continues to post in his present style, I assume that you are happy to post in retort to him. Yes? %#$%&**@!!! You actually asked such a question??? That was me that asked such a question. The answer is that, to some folks, it's OK if Len does it but not OK if anybody who disagrees with Len does it. You got all that from the preceding quoting?!? You aren't in any road race, you are in Road Rage! :-) If you'll take careful notice, Mike, with rare exception over the last few months, I rare reply directly to anything he says. Most of it (like the last couple with you here) have been as a result of someone else's posts echoing him. I'm pretty convinced that even though there are times you find him exasperating, it doesn't upset you to make the posts? What would upset me even more is letting a bully go unchallenged. A bully? Len only has as much power as you give him. Proof of the saying "He who angers me, controls me. " Len works jard to anger you, so you'll come off the handle, call him names, etc. Works EVERY time! Note how upset he gets when people *don't* react in kind. Note how he's trying to get mild-mannered Mike Coslo worked up so that Mike will reply in kind. Poor Mike. Supports Steve. Get's blasted. No poor Mike. Getting "blasted" by Lenover21 is just part of posting here. Unless you agree with Len on everything. Tsk, tsk. Wounds of past engagements still bothering you? :-) Can't take the slightest opposition to your opinions, can you? Whatsa nice guy to do? "Steve's not such a bad sort, I mean he never called me kids..." Yaknow, with all due respect, Brian, if you believe that your family has been threatened, print out the offending email, and take it to your DA. If he or she finds it to be credible and have merit, then appropriate action will be taken. Or you could file papers that would prevent him from ever communicating with you in any form. Consider, though, some of Len's threats against others: Oh, wow, here we go with old-post-quotes again! Everyone revisit the PAST and see how the mother superior has been so wronged and wounded! Rehash the past...go over it again...and again...and again... It's like a doggie chew toy...old, worn, no nutrient left. Jimmie likes those. He should get them in pairs, use one for the computer rehash. Make it twain-compliant. That way he gets a "chew-chew twain!" ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- And Steve is crazy. Tomorrow, Steve will still be crazy, Lady Astor will still be ugly, and Len will still be laughing at you guys. Lady Astor was most certainly *not* ugly She is ugly now...and I'm still laughing... :-) |
Subject: Radio Stories
From: (William) Date: 9/24/2004 11:26 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: Radio Stories From: (William) Date: 9/23/2004 3:18 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message .com... (William) wrote in message . com... (N2EY) wrote in message . com... The point here is that, when directly asked, ol' Cecil made good. When directly asked, I also made good. You've been "directly asked" to "make good" on countless issues and have yet to come clean on a single one. My positions WRT amateur radio policy are crystal clear. That is why you attack me. I am not "attacking" you, Brian. Then why the homosexual and pedophilia inuendo? Any sane person would call them attacks. I challenge your assertions. Your assertions are squirelly. You prefer to make inuendo as well as bald faced lies. The term is "boldfaced", Brian. And you have yet to prove ANYthing I have said is not truthful, Brian. You continue to make assertions of fact about your experience and skills in Amateur Radio, yet never pony up any validation of them. Yet I remain a superior radio operator. Too bad for you. "Superior radio operator"....?!?! BBBBWWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! You can't make a simple QSO on an HF phone band, Brian ! ! ! ! ! ! ! He said he was an antenna guru and "CW expert" (yes, he said he was a "CW expert") and that Morse was his "favorite fun mode". I said that I wanted to build an antenna, that I am not a cw expert, and that Morse is not my favorite mode. So when somebody asked for a sked, he was there. And I said "No." You said no because you're a coward. Or you lied about making the antenna...Or both. I have nothing to prove to you. Yesterday I had nothing to prove to you. Tomorrow I will have nothing to prove to you. I will not play your games. It's not my "games", Brian...They are yours. They are not. Yes they are. Now add your BOLDFACED claim of being a "superior radio operator"...! ! ! ! Yet ANOTHER claim of "superiority" from an NCTA that has absolutely ZERO documentation of validity! You are the one making assertions of skill, knowledge and experience. Nope, not me. Yet the fact remains that I am a superior operator when compared to you. However there is NOTHING to validate any of it. Doesn't need to be. I am sane. You are not. That makes all the difference. Now you have made a medical diagnosis, Brian. I DEMAND to know your medical or psychiatric doctorate licensure number and in what states you are lciensed to practice in. No excuses or shaggy-dog stories, he showed up with a good signal and worked everybody who could hear him. No excuses here, either. Yeah..."no excuses"..."no answers"..."no reasons"..."no validity"..."no facts"..."no common sense"... You attack me because my rationale is strong, and my will is strong. What "rationale"...?!?! My rationale. That which a crazy man cannot fathom. "I refuse to answer"...?!?!? BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! I detect a maniacal laugh. Indeed you are crazy. The "maniacal laugh" was at YOU, Brian! What a CARD! And "strong will"...?!?! The strongest. Your insane will cannot compare. Uh huh! Riiiiiiight! You conduct yourself politely and reasonably when Len's out-of-pocket, and then when you "team up" with him, you parrot him down to the diminutives and insults. Yet you are Yell Dimuitive Man Complex (Yell DMC). Kind of like Napolean, only far less important, actually insignificant. Well, Brian, YOU stated that I could not be civil and address you by name/etc... Well for two weeks now I have addressed you as nothing OTHER than "Brian"...I have been painstakingly careful to not even allow myself the error of doint it by reason of innocent typo. And here again you have dived right back into the name calling. Thanks. Thanks for proving me right...AGAIN. You have no will but to get Lennie's nod-of-approval. Len is your shepard that you shall not want. Absolutely. NO ONE, except you and Vippy, want Lennie. I don't associate with pathological liars, except to gt them into therapy. You don't have enough say-so in your own behaviour as to decide which hand you'll wipe with. Odd you say that. Have you been examining my defecation habits with your remote viewing skills? That would be just like a creep like you. Stand-up guy. Thank you. Just like you, Burke, to take an accolade for another and bestowe it upon yourself. I have a box full of real medals that were really awarded to me. You have a box full of trinkets that you got at a garage sale. The difference, Brian, is that I ACKNOWLEDGE what I collect as opposed to what I earned. What you earned in seven hostile actions? Hi, hi! Still can't geto over that, can you, Brian? I get visions of John Kerry for some reason. I am sure you do. Scan 'em and post 'em!!! Clear your "good" name. For what? Claiming that I have collected various patches, medals and other "militaria" that I cannot "legitiamately" wear? Why? There are millions of people who do the same thing. I have a "box full of real medals that were really awarded to me" too...And I am NOT speaking of my CAP awards, all of which were also earned too. Hi, hi! Must be a real nightmare earnign CAP medals. How many search and resuce missions have YOU been on, Brian? How many hours, let alone days, have you been away from home looking for someone else's loved ones? How many of them have YOU bee credited with finding? And since you've taken it upon yourself to be the typo guru, allow me to point out to YOU that it is "earning" medals. Kinda like Lennie's efforts to embellish his Army record with the sacrifices of men who died three years before he was in the Army. And you have been engaged in seven hostile actions! Yes, I was. Hi, hi! As predicted, Mr. Burke refuses your request, Why would I accept it? To prove some of your own boasts of proficiency in operating? I have nothing to prove to you. Go get a monkey to do your tricks. I don't need a monkey, Brian. Then you have no one but yourself. Get busy. My "proficiency" is already accomplished. DXCC of one. You CAN find the DXCC list, can't you, Brian? It's no more complicated than the A-1 Operator's list. I say you just can't do it. Not up to it and don't have the skills. And what you say matters? It obviously matters to you. You're spending a lot of time ttrying to get out from under it. And what you say matters? Obvioulsy it does. You seem to be very defensive about it. and tries to make it look like you are the bad guy. He can do that all by himself. You've been doing a pretty fair job of it lately. But no where NEAR your level, But you admit that he participates in it none-the-less. But you admit that he participates in it none-the-less??? Brian...Keep up the "good" work...You are your own best "ambassador"... Should I threaten bricks and slashes and terror? You take the low road, I take the high road. No, you don't. Yes. I do. You lie. You decieve. You dodge and hide. You one scarey little jelly belly dood. Already disproven, yet here you are trying to perpetuate yet another one of your mistruths, Brian. And yet again another example of you not doing what YOU said you could/would do. (And yet another suggestion on typos, Brian...It's "dude". ) You are welcomed to repost the item wherein you think I "threaten(ed) bricks and slashes and terror". The WHOLE post, Brian...IN CONTEXT. Steve, K4YZ Google it up and set me straight. Hi, hi! Best of Luck! I can't "Google up" what YOU think was a threat, Brian. You are again encouraged to repost, IN IT'S ENTIRETY, that post that you think was a threat. Otherwise you've just perpetuated yet ANOTHER one of your mistruths. Steve, K4YZ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:27 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com