RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   Who peed in the pool? (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/27694-who-peed-pool.html)

Steve Robeson K4CAP September 17th 04 11:42 AM

Subject: Who peed in the pool
From: Mike Coslo
Date: 9/16/2004 6:49 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

Len Over 21 wrote:


Tsk, tsk. You want a meeting with charts and graphs and an
experienced presenter to show you examples of the infamous
Double Standard?!?!?


hmm, maybe. *Your answer* is what needs explaining. If I don't care
about your mode, nor Steve's mode of expression, and you two are on
opposite sides of the discussion, I need an explanation of why that
means that I have a double standard.



Tsk. Still need an "explanation?"

Not a good reply, Coslo.


Nor a good explanation.


Lennie doesn't HAVE a "Double Standard" that he can use as an example,
Mike. That's why he dodged answering your post.

Nope, I took the summer off to rest a torn meniscus. Takes longer to
heal as time marches on.



Who filled in under your name in here "all summer?"


What are you talking about?


You'll have to forgive Lennie...If you posted even once in that time
period, he assumes that you anxiously devoured each and ever word he wrote as
if there were no other nourishment to be had.

Or you may be smoking some "good stuff" that Bob Casey said I
was... :-)

nahh. nothing stronger than the occasional beer for me.



3.2 stuff? :-)

You smoke beer? How is that done? :-)


So. you deliberately misunderstand me to serve as the content of your
replies? noted! 8^)


Of course. "The Dodge" (not the automobile). A typical Lenniesque
diversion from having to acknowledge a comment which might embarrass him.

Tsk. You should get a subscription to Psychology Today and
fill yourself in on what "relationships" are.


It is okay. This happens all over Netnews. Don't let it bother you too
much.


This is where Lennie gets most of his "education"...Periodicals that his
wife subscribed to...Of course he'd have everyone here believe that it was HIS
education that carried the day.

Now this ia a bizarre conclusion. I do not condone violence against
anyone.


But you made no comment on his implied threats.


Nor I to you on your's to Dan Jeswald. That's between you and Steve,
and you and Dan. Making threats is bad and makes for bad karma.

Why do you want to dictate the content of my postings? Want to be the
moderator?


No threats were made. (By me, anyway...) Of course Lennie's quick to
want to be the victim, and to absolve himself of the fact that his antics and
behaviour here invoke that kind of mischeviousness in others.

Tsk. If you want to think someone who works Frenchmen out of band
on 6m is "correct," then feel free...


Thanks for the chuckle. I *really* didn't expect that! 8^)


How many Frenchmen has Lennie worked?

And did DAVE operate illegally?

But, you've never been in the military, don't know what "live fire" is
about (from weaponry, that is).

I've served my country for a lot longer than you ever did.

You are being very irrelevant now.



Tsk. Another "hostile action" hero claiming what? :-)


No hostile actions.

Sounds very rank to me...


and no rank.


Lennie loves to berate othrs for "assuming", "rank and priviledge", and
swears he does NOT berate others for thier services regardless.

The above, of course, proves him to once again lying, but then hey, after
the first 20 or 30, who could keep track?

They've managed to create the Archaic Radiotelegraphy Society
(ARS) that keeps trying to recapture the "pioneering days" of a past
that existed before they were born. [they get very angry if one
doesn't respect their meeting 1934 standards and practices in the
year 2004]


any more?


The only one here, of course, who is trying to deamnd stagnation at any
point is Lennie himself. His entire world pivots around 1950's era Japan and
his "career" as a radio mechanic at ADA.

None of us who have been licensed more than 3 years has any doubts about
the changes that occur frequently in our Regulations.

Leonard is AGAIN lying. Or even worse...fantasizing.

I've had a full career in radio-electronics and am happy for the

experience.
[not to mention monetarily independent] Never once in a half century
have I been required to learn or use morse code for any communications
purpose...nor even have to obtain an amateur license in order to show
"interest in radio." Hi hi.


Oh good, we're going on another side trip. It is good to hear a success
story. Hopefully you give thanks for every day that you don't have to
use Morse code... 8^)


Yes...the "side trips" are frequent and colorful for Lennie. Of course he
screwed up by being so "detailed" in one of them...Gave me enough information
to go to afriend of mine whoi was a career engineer at one of the places he
(Lennie) "worked" at...The ensuing conversation was enlightening.

Amateur radio is a hobby. It isn't a job, isn't a guild, isn't a union,
isn't some sort of para-military "service" that is essential for

national
security. It is regulated by a federal agency which does not require a
single agency staffer to have any amateur radio license.


Hobbies are supposed to be fun. I don't see much "fun" in this
particular wading pool...just a bunch of very angry PCTA calling names
and demanding strict adherence to their particular brand of "fun."
Tsk.


The anger is there, and it is real. Perhaps there is some confusion as
to just *who* is feeling the anger.


There's no doubt about who's feeling the anger, Mike. It's not you or I.
We're on thie air every day, enjoying the priviledges bestowed upon us by the
FCC.

Anderscum is a very bitter, angry and disappointed old man, and he's
intent on taking his inadequacies out on Amateur Radio, for what ever reason he
thinks we "owe" him that.

He's just pitiful.

73

Steve, K4YZ








Mike Coslo September 17th 04 02:32 PM

Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote:
Subject: Who peed in the pool
From: Mike Coslo
Date: 9/16/2004 6:49 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

Len Over 21 wrote:



Tsk, tsk. You want a meeting with charts and graphs and an
experienced presenter to show you examples of the infamous
Double Standard?!?!?


hmm, maybe. *Your answer* is what needs explaining. If I don't care
about your mode, nor Steve's mode of expression, and you two are on
opposite sides of the discussion, I need an explanation of why that
means that I have a double standard.


Tsk. Still need an "explanation?"

Not a good reply, Coslo.


Nor a good explanation.



Lennie doesn't HAVE a "Double Standard" that he can use as an example,
Mike. That's why he dodged answering your post.


Nope, I took the summer off to rest a torn meniscus. Takes longer to
heal as time marches on.


Who filled in under your name in here "all summer?"


What are you talking about?



You'll have to forgive Lennie...If you posted even once in that time
period, he assumes that you anxiously devoured each and ever word he wrote as
if there were no other nourishment to be had.


Or you may be smoking some "good stuff" that Bob Casey said I
was... :-)

nahh. nothing stronger than the occasional beer for me.


3.2 stuff? :-)

You smoke beer? How is that done? :-)


So. you deliberately misunderstand me to serve as the content of your
replies? noted! 8^)



Of course. "The Dodge" (not the automobile). A typical Lenniesque
diversion from having to acknowledge a comment which might embarrass him.


Tsk. You should get a subscription to Psychology Today and
fill yourself in on what "relationships" are.


It is okay. This happens all over Netnews. Don't let it bother you too
much.



This is where Lennie gets most of his "education"...Periodicals that his
wife subscribed to...Of course he'd have everyone here believe that it was HIS
education that carried the day.


Now this ia a bizarre conclusion. I do not condone violence against
anyone.


But you made no comment on his implied threats.


Nor I to you on your's to Dan Jeswald. That's between you and Steve,
and you and Dan. Making threats is bad and makes for bad karma.

Why do you want to dictate the content of my postings? Want to be the
moderator?



No threats were made. (By me, anyway...) Of course Lennie's quick to
want to be the victim, and to absolve himself of the fact that his antics and
behaviour here invoke that kind of mischeviousness in others.


Tsk. If you want to think someone who works Frenchmen out of band
on 6m is "correct," then feel free...


Thanks for the chuckle. I *really* didn't expect that! 8^)



How many Frenchmen has Lennie worked?

And did DAVE operate illegally?


But, you've never been in the military, don't know what "live fire" is
about (from weaponry, that is).

I've served my country for a lot longer than you ever did.

You are being very irrelevant now.


Tsk. Another "hostile action" hero claiming what? :-)


No hostile actions.


Sounds very rank to me...


and no rank.



Lennie loves to berate othrs for "assuming", "rank and priviledge", and
swears he does NOT berate others for thier services regardless.


The above, of course, proves him to once again lying, but then hey, after
the first 20 or 30, who could keep track?


They've managed to create the Archaic Radiotelegraphy Society
(ARS) that keeps trying to recapture the "pioneering days" of a past
that existed before they were born. [they get very angry if one
doesn't respect their meeting 1934 standards and practices in the
year 2004]


any more?



The only one here, of course, who is trying to deamnd stagnation at any
point is Lennie himself. His entire world pivots around 1950's era Japan and
his "career" as a radio mechanic at ADA.

None of us who have been licensed more than 3 years has any doubts about
the changes that occur frequently in our Regulations.

Leonard is AGAIN lying. Or even worse...fantasizing.


I've had a full career in radio-electronics and am happy for the


experience.

[not to mention monetarily independent] Never once in a half century
have I been required to learn or use morse code for any communications
purpose...nor even have to obtain an amateur license in order to show
"interest in radio." Hi hi.


Oh good, we're going on another side trip. It is good to hear a success
story. Hopefully you give thanks for every day that you don't have to
use Morse code... 8^)



Yes...the "side trips" are frequent and colorful for Lennie. Of course he
screwed up by being so "detailed" in one of them...Gave me enough information
to go to afriend of mine whoi was a career engineer at one of the places he
(Lennie) "worked" at...The ensuing conversation was enlightening.


This may sound odd, Steve, but the side trips *are* really my favorite
part of Lenover21's posts. That above sample wasn't all that good, but I
always like to read or listen to old timers stories. I am very
interested in radio history.

As for the rest of the content..... sometimes okay, sometimes not... 8^)


Amateur radio is a hobby. It isn't a job, isn't a guild, isn't a union,
isn't some sort of para-military "service" that is essential for national
security. It is regulated by a federal agency which does not require a
single agency staffer to have any amateur radio license.


Hobbies are supposed to be fun. I don't see much "fun" in this
particular wading pool...just a bunch of very angry PCTA calling names
and demanding strict adherence to their particular brand of "fun."
Tsk.


The anger is there, and it is real. Perhaps there is some confusion as
to just *who* is feeling the anger.


There's no doubt about who's feeling the anger, Mike. It's not you or I.
We're on thie air every day, enjoying the priviledges bestowed upon us by the
FCC.


I believe so. I have always tried to keep the tone civil, and yet that
seems to anger him. I have been known to point out when his reply to
something makes no sense to me, but perhaps that is my own stupidity,
no? Yet he is angry with me.

Anderscum is a very bitter, angry and disappointed old man, and he's
intent on taking his inadequacies out on Amateur Radio, for what ever reason he
thinks we "owe" him that.

He's just pitiful.


It *is* sad. I think that Lenover21 has much to offer, and yet ends up
alienating those that may be able to benefit by what he has to offer.

But there is still time, and there is still hope.


- Mike KB3EIA -


Dave Heil September 17th 04 03:54 PM



N2EY wrote:

In article , Dave Heil
writes:

Len Over 21 wrote:

I'm not claiming "hostile action" experience in the military. :-)


"Jeff, you've never been under Incoming, have you? While
trying to get return artillery support on a radio while your
ears, your whole body is numbed by HE infall on your
position? Most folks in that position don't wet their
pants...every sphincter tightens up, ears go deaf, eyes
close tight, and every breath may be the last."

--Len Anderson, 2000


:-)


Oh yes, the classic "sphincter post". You shoulda posted the whole thing, Dave
- it was classic how Len tore into Jeff/KH6O's recollection of experiences in
big-time radio. (If running 500 kHz at NPM, handling all sorts of traffic,
weather and SOS operations wasn't big-time radio, nothing was).


Len's view is that no one else has ever handled high volume radio
traffic; no one else has ever used high power equipment. There are some
hams who can come near, some who can equal and some who can exceed his
experience *and* who are radio amateurs as well. Some don't care for
morse code. Some use it at times. Some use it quite often. Some use
it exclusively.

Well, you aren't *exactly* claiming it. You described the terror of
being under incoming artillery without explaining that you'd never
actually been under any. Perhaps you should have ended that now famous
paragraph with "...or so I've been told".

Come to think of it, that spiffy illustration sort of parallels your
amateur radio experience, doesn't it?

How many minutes flying time were you from death by Soviet Bears were
you?

You mean the plane which did not even enter service until Len was long gone
from Japan?


Yep, that one. That was another which should have ended with, "or so
I've been told".

Len don't know but he's been told
Ten-Tec gear is made of gold
If he tempts the Russian bear
He'll have to change his underwear

Dave K8MN

Len Over 21 September 17th 04 08:38 PM

In article , Mike Coslo writes:


I believe so. I have always tried to keep the tone civil, and yet that
seems to anger him. I have been known to point out when his reply to
something makes no sense to me, but perhaps that is my own stupidity,
no? Yet he is angry with me.


"Anger?" None. Coslo doesn't understand that "discussion" requires
understanding that opposite opinions are neither "stupidity,"
"ignorance," or behavior equivalent to the Antichrist.

If Coslo wants love and admiration for his viewpoints, he ought ot seek
out a private forum where all Think Alike, sharing the same opinions,
whether or not those opinions were brainwashed into them or arrived
at by group agreement.

Anderscum is a very bitter, angry and disappointed old man, and he's
intent on taking his inadequacies out on Amateur Radio, for what ever
reason he thinks we "owe" him that.

He's just pitiful.


heh heh heh heh

The above is what Coslo condones as "rational discourse?" :-)

Of course it is. If said by a PCTA extra, it is most acceptible.

If said by an NCTA, it would be subject to many an angry posting
from all the PCTA in here (there's only a few, but they are
aggressively hostile whether civil in manner or not).

It *is* sad. I think that Lenover21 has much to offer, and yet ends up
alienating those that may be able to benefit by what he has to offer.


Oh, my. How condescending can Coslo become?

Poor baby.

Tsk. Consider the many years of morse propaganda under the
"officialdom" of the "leadership" membership organization about
amateur radio...and their faithful followers (a minority) with ten
kinds of condescension of all who didn't love, honor, and obey
morse code.

Did all those faithful followers, united in morsemanship, "have
so much to offer?"

Of course they did. They said so. Even as we view the screen
there are thousands of mighty macho morsemen waiting to come
to the aid of their country, saving all through their wonderful skill
at morse code!

In their dreams, of course. :-)

Coslo makes a grandeloquent - but condescending - blabber on
"having much to offer!" :-)

Has Coslo anything to "offer?" :-)

What will Coslo return in compensation for being "offered" anything?

His good will and appreciation? Acceptance into the group by a
self-perceived chieftan descended from gods of amateur radio?

Tsk. Coslo needs an olfactory exam. He (and others) have long
been "peeing in the pool" and now they complain about the odor!




N2EY September 17th 04 09:21 PM

Dave Heil wrote in message ...
N2EY wrote:

In article , Dave Heil
writes:

Len Over 21 wrote:

I'm not claiming "hostile action" experience in the military. :-)

"Jeff, you've never been under Incoming, have you? While
trying to get return artillery support on a radio while your
ears, your whole body is numbed by HE infall on your
position? Most folks in that position don't wet their
pants...every sphincter tightens up, ears go deaf, eyes
close tight, and every breath may be the last."

--Len Anderson, 2000


:-)


Oh yes, the classic "sphincter post". You shoulda posted the whole thing,
Dave
- it was classic how Len tore into Jeff/KH6O's recollection of experiences in
big-time radio. (If running 500 kHz at NPM, handling all sorts of traffic,
weather and SOS operations wasn't big-time radio, nothing was).


It should be mentioned that the NPM mentioned above was the Coast
Guard (military) station in Hawaii, smack dab in the biggest ocean on
Earth. Big-time squared. Of course the operation used Morse Code in a
big way - and not in the 1930s, either, but about a half-century
later.

So of course Len had to denigrate and disrespect such operation.

Len's view is that no one else has ever handled high volume radio
traffic; no one else has ever used high power equipment.


Naw, it's simpler than that: Len hates Morse Code, he hates most of
ham radio, particularly the traditional parts, and wants to see it
wiped out or transmogrified into something very different from what
you and I think of as ham radio.

There are some
hams who can come near, some who can equal and some who can exceed his
experience *and* who are radio amateurs as well. Some don't care for
morse code. Some use it at times. Some use it quite often. Some use
it exclusively.


Of course. But that's not the point.

Well, you aren't *exactly* claiming it. You described the terror of
being under incoming artillery without explaining that you'd never
actually been under any. Perhaps you should have ended that now famous
paragraph with "...or so I've been told".

Come to think of it, that spiffy illustration sort of parallels your
amateur radio experience, doesn't it?

How many minutes flying time were you from death by Soviet Bears were
you?

You mean the plane which did not even enter service until Len was long gone
from Japan?


Yep, that one. That was another which should have ended with, "or so
I've been told".


Not really. Nobody back then would have told him such stories.

Len wrote that it was about 500 miles from air bases in North Korea
and the USSR to where he was. Described it as about an hour flight
time. Mentioned the "Bear" specifically, which the Rooskies know as
the TU-95.

What wasn't mentioned was that the distances are actually over 660
miles. Also unmentioned was that the Bear/TU-95 didn't enter
production until 1956 and didn't enter service with the USSR's air
force until 1957.

All of this was pointed out in a post:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...&output=gplain

which did not get a very nice reception from Len.

Mr. Burke also chimed in, describing the source of the distances as "a
gas station map" despite the fact that it was US Army issue, and used
in combat over Japan. (7th Air Force, B-24 navigator's map - I have a
few of them).

Len don't know but he's been told
Ten-Tec gear is made of gold
If he tempts the Russian bear
He'll have to change his underwear

Doesn't matter if it's made by Ten Tec, Yaesu, Icom, Elecraft, or even
Southgate Radio, if it's used for Morse Code operation on the ham
bands, you can bet Len will make fun of it.

So predictable.

73 de Jim, N2EY

Mike Coslo September 18th 04 02:11 AM

Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote:

Subject: Who peed in the pool
From: Mike Coslo
Date: 9/16/2004 6:49 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

Len Over 21 wrote:



Tsk, tsk. You want a meeting with charts and graphs and an
experienced presenter to show you examples of the infamous
Double Standard?!?!?


hmm, maybe. *Your answer* is what needs explaining. If I don't care
about your mode, nor Steve's mode of expression, and you two are on
opposite sides of the discussion, I need an explanation of why that
means that I have a double standard.


Tsk. Still need an "explanation?"

Not a good reply, Coslo.


Nor a good explanation.



Lennie doesn't HAVE a "Double Standard" that he can use as an example,
Mike. That's why he dodged answering your post.


Nope, I took the summer off to rest a torn meniscus. Takes longer to
heal as time marches on.


Who filled in under your name in here "all summer?"


What are you talking about?



You'll have to forgive Lennie...If you posted even once in that time
period, he assumes that you anxiously devoured each and ever word he wrote as
if there were no other nourishment to be had.


Or you may be smoking some "good stuff" that Bob Casey said I
was... :-)

nahh. nothing stronger than the occasional beer for me.


3.2 stuff? :-)

You smoke beer? How is that done? :-)


So. you deliberately misunderstand me to serve as the content of your
replies? noted! 8^)



Of course. "The Dodge" (not the automobile). A typical Lenniesque
diversion from having to acknowledge a comment which might embarrass him.


Tsk. You should get a subscription to Psychology Today and
fill yourself in on what "relationships" are.


It is okay. This happens all over Netnews. Don't let it bother you too
much.



This is where Lennie gets most of his "education"...Periodicals that his
wife subscribed to...Of course he'd have everyone here believe that it was HIS
education that carried the day.


Here's the question Steve. I think I know the answer already, but let's
check it out.

As long as Lenover21 continues to post in his present style, I assume
that you are happy to post in retort to him. Yes?

I'm pretty convinced that even though there are times you find him
exasperating, it doesn't upset you to make the posts?

I also believe that for good or bad, you enjoy it to a certain extent.

So you guys have a relationship. It's a pretty strange one, made easier
by Netnews, but this sort of thing has existed for a long time. It's the
old Winston Churchhill/Lady Astor thing. They traded barbs with each
other, and I have to believe they enjoyed it.

Why Lenover21 resists my suggestions that this is what is going on is
beyond me. It is no insult, its just how things go sometimes.



Now this ia a bizarre conclusion. I do not condone violence against
anyone.



But you made no comment on his implied threats.


Nor I to you on your's to Dan Jeswald. That's between you and Steve,
and you and Dan. Making threats is bad and makes for bad karma.

Why do you want to dictate the content of my postings? Want to be the
moderator?



No threats were made. (By me, anyway...) Of course Lennie's quick to
want to be the victim, and to absolve himself of the fact that his antics and
behaviour here invoke that kind of mischeviousness in others.


Tsk. If you want to think someone who works Frenchmen out of band
on 6m is "correct," then feel free...


Thanks for the chuckle. I *really* didn't expect that! 8^)



How many Frenchmen has Lennie worked?

And did DAVE operate illegally?


But, you've never been in the military, don't know what "live fire" is
about (from weaponry, that is).

I've served my country for a lot longer than you ever did.

You are being very irrelevant now.


Tsk. Another "hostile action" hero claiming what? :-)


No hostile actions.


Sounds very rank to me...


and no rank.



Lennie loves to berate othrs for "assuming", "rank and priviledge", and
swears he does NOT berate others for thier services regardless.


I do not have now, and I never did have any military rank. That needs
to be clear. But there are more ways than that of serving your country.

The above, of course, proves him to once again lying, but then hey, after
the first 20 or 30, who could keep track?


They've managed to create the Archaic Radiotelegraphy Society
(ARS) that keeps trying to recapture the "pioneering days" of a past
that existed before they were born. [they get very angry if one
doesn't respect their meeting 1934 standards and practices in the
year 2004]


any more?



The only one here, of course, who is trying to deamnd stagnation at any
point is Lennie himself. His entire world pivots around 1950's era Japan and
his "career" as a radio mechanic at ADA.

None of us who have been licensed more than 3 years has any doubts about
the changes that occur frequently in our Regulations.

Leonard is AGAIN lying. Or even worse...fantasizing.


I've had a full career in radio-electronics and am happy for the


experience.

[not to mention monetarily independent] Never once in a half century
have I been required to learn or use morse code for any communications
purpose...nor even have to obtain an amateur license in order to show
"interest in radio." Hi hi.


Oh good, we're going on another side trip. It is good to hear a success
story. Hopefully you give thanks for every day that you don't have to
use Morse code... 8^)



Yes...the "side trips" are frequent and colorful for Lennie. Of course he
screwed up by being so "detailed" in one of them...Gave me enough information
to go to afriend of mine whoi was a career engineer at one of the places he
(Lennie) "worked" at...The ensuing conversation was enlightening.


Amateur radio is a hobby. It isn't a job, isn't a guild, isn't a union,
isn't some sort of para-military "service" that is essential for


national

security. It is regulated by a federal agency which does not require a
single agency staffer to have any amateur radio license.


Hobbies are supposed to be fun. I don't see much "fun" in this
particular wading pool...just a bunch of very angry PCTA calling names
and demanding strict adherence to their particular brand of "fun."
Tsk.


The anger is there, and it is real. Perhaps there is some confusion as
to just *who* is feeling the anger.



There's no doubt about who's feeling the anger, Mike. It's not you or I.
We're on thie air every day, enjoying the priviledges bestowed upon us by the
FCC.

Anderscum is a very bitter, angry and disappointed old man, and he's
intent on taking his inadequacies out on Amateur Radio, for what ever reason he
thinks we "owe" him that.

He's just pitiful.

73

Steve, K4YZ









Mike Coslo September 18th 04 02:39 AM

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Mike Coslo writes:



I believe so. I have always tried to keep the tone civil, and yet that
seems to anger him. I have been known to point out when his reply to
something makes no sense to me, but perhaps that is my own stupidity,
no? Yet he is angry with me.



"Anger?" None.


hmmm. It is possible that you have been so angry for so long that you
aren't aware of it any more.


Coslo doesn't understand that "discussion" requires
understanding that opposite opinions are neither "stupidity,"
"ignorance," or behavior equivalent to the Antichrist.


Thank you for letting me know that. Now that I understand, we need to
talk (cuz I think that is sort of like how you act once in a while).
REspectfully speaking, of course.

If Coslo wants love and admiration for his viewpoints, he ought ot seek
out a private forum where all Think Alike, sharing the same opinions,
whether or not those opinions were brainwashed into them or arrived
at by group agreement.


Nahh, I don't want that. That doesn't seem like much fun at all.


Anderscum is a very bitter, angry and disappointed old man, and he's
intent on taking his inadequacies out on Amateur Radio, for what ever
reason he thinks we "owe" him that.

He's just pitiful.


heh heh heh heh

The above is what Coslo condones as "rational discourse?" :-)


Nahh, I don't condone it. I don't say it either. Are you sure you don't
want to be a moderator? Yahoo groups can be set up that way.


Of course it is. If said by a PCTA extra, it is most acceptible.

If said by an NCTA, it would be subject to many an angry posting
from all the PCTA in here (there's only a few, but they are
aggressively hostile whether civil in manner or not).


I think you really would like to be a moderator. You would be able to
control how people reply to you. That is okay. Some people like that
structured kind of group.

It *is* sad. I think that Lenover21 has much to offer, and yet ends up
alienating those that may be able to benefit by what he has to offer.



Oh, my. How condescending can Coslo become?


But it is still sad.

Poor baby.


Now that is a strange comment!


Tsk. Consider the many years of morse propaganda under the
"officialdom" of the "leadership" membership organization about
amateur radio...and their faithful followers (a minority) with ten
kinds of condescension of all who didn't love, honor, and obey
morse code.


Here we go again! I'd really prefer to hear a radio story instead of a
Morse code one. THe Morse code thing is getting kind of dreary and old,
don't you think?

Did all those faithful followers, united in morsemanship, "have
so much to offer?"


I really do love hearing stories and experience from old timers.

Of course they did. They said so. Even as we view the screen
there are thousands of mighty macho morsemen waiting to come
to the aid of their country, saving all through their wonderful skill
at morse code!


hmmm,

In their dreams, of course. :-)

Coslo makes a grandeloquent - but condescending - blabber on
"having much to offer!" :-)


Gee, if I hurt your feelings, I'm sorry.

Has Coslo anything to "offer?" :-)


Quite a bit, it would seem.

What will Coslo return in compensation for being "offered" anything?


I can bring cookies. Chocolate chip or Oatmeal raisin?

His good will and appreciation? Acceptance into the group by a
self-perceived chieftan descended from gods of amateur radio?


I don't think that the American Indians believed their chieftains were
descended from the gods of any sort. Of course I could be wrong, and if
anyone wants to correct me, please do.

Or is this one of those little jokes you do, like J-38 Keys on a flag
from the Revolutionary war? That was a good one! 8^)

Tsk. Coslo needs an olfactory exam. He (and others) have long
been "peeing in the pool" and now they complain about the odor!


Did you ever notice the awful smell sometimes after eating asparagus?
So what do you think, is the urine smell imparted by asparagus due to
methyl mercaptan alone, or S-methyl-thioacrylate and
S-methyl-3-(methylthio)thiopropionate, or possibly a combination of
methyl mercaptan, dimethyl sulphide, and small amounts of
sulphur-oxidised compounds?

And how would ya like to be the people that actually research that kind
of stuff. Eeww 8^)

- Mike KB3EIA -




Steve Robeson K4CAP September 18th 04 03:35 AM

Subject: Who peed in the pool
From: Dave Heil
Date: 9/17/2004 9:54 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:



N2EY wrote:

In article , Dave Heil


writes:

Len Over 21 wrote:

I'm not claiming "hostile action" experience in the military. :-)

"Jeff, you've never been under Incoming, have you? While
trying to get return artillery support on a radio while your
ears, your whole body is numbed by HE infall on your
position? Most folks in that position don't wet their
pants...every sphincter tightens up, ears go deaf, eyes
close tight, and every breath may be the last."

--Len Anderson, 2000


:-)


Oh yes, the classic "sphincter post". You shoulda posted the whole thing,

Dave
- it was classic how Len tore into Jeff/KH6O's recollection of experiences

in
big-time radio. (If running 500 kHz at NPM, handling all sorts of traffic,
weather and SOS operations wasn't big-time radio, nothing was).


Len's view is that no one else has ever handled high volume radio
traffic; no one else has ever used high power equipment. There are some
hams who can come near, some who can equal and some who can exceed his
experience *and* who are radio amateurs as well. Some don't care for
morse code. Some use it at times. Some use it quite often. Some use
it exclusively.

Well, you aren't *exactly* claiming it. You described the terror of
being under incoming artillery without explaining that you'd never
actually been under any. Perhaps you should have ended that now famous
paragraph with "...or so I've been told".

Come to think of it, that spiffy illustration sort of parallels your
amateur radio experience, doesn't it?

How many minutes flying time were you from death by Soviet Bears were
you?

You mean the plane which did not even enter service until Len was long gone
from Japan?


Yep, that one. That was another which should have ended with, "or so
I've been told".


Lennie's whole life is a series of "so I've been tolds"...

Len don't know but he's been told
Ten-Tec gear is made of gold
If he tempts the Russian bear
He'll have to change his underwear


Wonder how Sir Creepieness will try to worm his way out from under yet
more embarrassments uttered from his own keyboard and truned against him...?!?!

Nice job, guys.

73

Steve, K4YZ






Steve Robeson K4CAP September 18th 04 10:03 AM

Subject: Who peed in the pool
From: Mike Coslo
Date: 9/17/2004 8:32 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote:
Subject: Who peed in the pool


Anderscum is a very bitter, angry and disappointed old man, and he's
intent on taking his inadequacies out on Amateur Radio, for what ever

reason he
thinks we "owe" him that.

He's just pitiful.


It *is* sad. I think that Lenover21 has much to offer, and yet ends up
alienating those that may be able to benefit by what he has to offer.

But there is still time, and there is still hope.


I used to think so, Mike...

At one time, I just thought Lennie was playing "Devil's Advocate".

Nope. He's just a creep.

When someone uses CBers as the example against what we should NOT want in
Amateur Radio, I just redirect them to some of Lennie's posts and say "See, it
CAN be a lot worse!"

73

Steve, K4YZ






Steve Robeson K4CAP September 18th 04 10:06 AM

Subject: Who peed in the pool
From: Mike Coslo
Date: 9/17/2004 8:39 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Mike Coslo

writes:



I believe so. I have always tried to keep the tone civil, and yet that
seems to anger him. I have been known to point out when his reply to
something makes no sense to me, but perhaps that is my own stupidity,
no? Yet he is angry with me.



"Anger?" None.


hmmm. It is possible that you have been so angry for so long that you
aren't aware of it any more.


Coslo doesn't understand that "discussion" requires
understanding that opposite opinions are neither "stupidity,"
"ignorance," or behavior equivalent to the Antichrist.


Thank you for letting me know that. Now that I understand, we need to
talk (cuz I think that is sort of like how you act once in a while).
REspectfully speaking, of course.

If Coslo wants love and admiration for his viewpoints, he ought ot seek
out a private forum where all Think Alike, sharing the same opinions,
whether or not those opinions were brainwashed into them or arrived
at by group agreement.


Nahh, I don't want that. That doesn't seem like much fun at all.


Anderscum is a very bitter, angry and disappointed old man, and he's
intent on taking his inadequacies out on Amateur Radio, for what ever
reason he thinks we "owe" him that.

He's just pitiful.


heh heh heh heh

The above is what Coslo condones as "rational discourse?" :-)


Nahh, I don't condone it. I don't say it either. Are you sure you don't


want to be a moderator? Yahoo groups can be set up that way.


Of course it is. If said by a PCTA extra, it is most acceptible.

If said by an NCTA, it would be subject to many an angry posting
from all the PCTA in here (there's only a few, but they are
aggressively hostile whether civil in manner or not).


I think you really would like to be a moderator. You would be able to
control how people reply to you. That is okay. Some people like that
structured kind of group.

It *is* sad. I think that Lenover21 has much to offer, and yet ends up
alienating those that may be able to benefit by what he has to offer.



Oh, my. How condescending can Coslo become?


But it is still sad.

Poor baby.


Now that is a strange comment!


Tsk. Consider the many years of morse propaganda under the
"officialdom" of the "leadership" membership organization about
amateur radio...and their faithful followers (a minority) with ten
kinds of condescension of all who didn't love, honor, and obey
morse code.


Here we go again! I'd really prefer to hear a radio story instead of a
Morse code one. THe Morse code thing is getting kind of dreary and old,
don't you think?

Did all those faithful followers, united in morsemanship, "have
so much to offer?"


I really do love hearing stories and experience from old timers.

Of course they did. They said so. Even as we view the screen
there are thousands of mighty macho morsemen waiting to come
to the aid of their country, saving all through their wonderful skill
at morse code!


hmmm,

In their dreams, of course. :-)

Coslo makes a grandeloquent - but condescending - blabber on
"having much to offer!" :-)


Gee, if I hurt your feelings, I'm sorry.

Has Coslo anything to "offer?" :-)


Quite a bit, it would seem.

What will Coslo return in compensation for being "offered" anything?


I can bring cookies. Chocolate chip or Oatmeal raisin?

His good will and appreciation? Acceptance into the group by a
self-perceived chieftan descended from gods of amateur radio?


I don't think that the American Indians believed their chieftains were
descended from the gods of any sort. Of course I could be wrong, and if
anyone wants to correct me, please do.

Or is this one of those little jokes you do, like J-38 Keys on a flag
from the Revolutionary war? That was a good one! 8^)

Tsk. Coslo needs an olfactory exam. He (and others) have long
been "peeing in the pool" and now they complain about the odor!


Did you ever notice the awful smell sometimes after eating asparagus?
So what do you think, is the urine smell imparted by asparagus due to
methyl mercaptan alone, or S-methyl-thioacrylate and
S-methyl-3-(methylthio)thiopropionate, or possibly a combination of
methyl mercaptan, dimethyl sulphide, and small amounts of
sulphur-oxidised compounds?

And how would ya like to be the people that actually research that kind


of stuff. Eeww 8^)

- Mike KB3EIA -


















All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com