![]() |
Len Over 21 wrote: In article , Mike Coslo writes: And I suspect that his lack of condemnation of Quitefine or Blackguard is that they are not doing what a lot of anonymii do, which is to post libelous and extremely insulting material. There is a difference between civil anonymity and non-civil anonymity. To not get that is to not get it. You ain't got it yet... And the proof of the point is here. - Mike KB3EIA - |
Len Over 21 wrote: In article , Mike Coslo writes: Oh, and the anonymousies are anonymous because they can't handle it under their own identity. Think of that. :-) Dunno. I don't see anything either of them have posted that is particularly "non-handlable". Both are NOT INVOLVED! No ID, nothing. Follow der uber-oberst's commands given in here. He is PCTA extra. Since when does "der uber-oberst's" commands affect me? Or you for that matter? For an ostensibly smart fella, you fall into categorization pretty easily. I'll post what I want, and if you don't post because of some "command" given by someone else here, you are the victim. But since you do post whatever you want, it shows the fallacy of your statement, so why do you keep posting that? Of course you know! ;^) I am, The fifth wheel of the four Morsemen of the Apocalypse *80) - Mike KB3EIA - |
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Mike Coslo writes: William wrote: Mike Coslo wrote in message ... I'm merely amused by the lack of consistency with which Steve approaches the anonymii. Call it PCTA double standard if you will - all perfectly acceptable on RRAP. You are taking in the data, and coming to the wrong conclusion. No. Brian isn't reaching the conclusion YOU want. I don't care *what* conclusion Brian reaches. I will call it wrong tho'. It isn't the base content but the underlying tone which gets the response. I simply look at Steve as a feedback generator. Feedback is derived from input, as it were. Classic case of a servo loop with too much gain...results in oscillation and instability. Nursie's loop filter is way off what it should be. More oscillation. You shouldn't be too mean to him - you *need* his feedback. Heck your fishing expeditions wouldn't be half as much fun without him here. The objections to Quitefine and Blackguard are their anonymity, not their content. Okay. Your answer to all their questions is "you're anonymous" Tsk. it a Task it, eh? 8^) The anonymousies are NOT INVOLVED! No ID, nothing. [see the commands uff das uber-oberst...] So what. non-involvement isn't an issue with me. Note that I post to you? Last time I checked, Dave didn't control me. yelling across the room Hey Dave, do you control what I post? Clever answer, that! And not an answer at all. You've not made any "answer" in your posting. Nothing at all. Umm, it was his answer, and a comment by me. But you knew that, eh? What you've demonstrated is just another item in the becoming- clear PCTA extra Double Standard: Anyone attacking NCTAs is "OK." Anyone against PCTA extras should be forbidden everything. :-) Who's attacking anyone? Paraaanoiia! - Mike KB3EIA - |
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... [snip] I am, The fifth wheel of the four Morsemen of the Apocalypse *80) - Mike KB3EIA - So who are the "four Morsemen of the Apocalypse?" Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
In article , Mike Coslo
writes: And we can include you as the fourth Stooge. Would that be Joe? ;^) Shemp. btw, Moe, Curly and Shemp were brothers. 73 de Jim, N2EY nyuk-nyuk-nyuk |
In article . net, "KØHB"
writes: Just to clear up any confusion on your part, here are my thoughts on the predominate topics regularly discussed here on rrap. 1 -- I think that Morse (CW) is a fun operating mode, sort of like restoring old-time automobiles. Sailboats and piston-engine aircraft come to mind, too. 2 -- I do not think that Morse testing ought to be required to obtain an amateur radio license of any class. And you manage to make that opinion clear and concise without calling anyone names, insulting their heritage, etc. 3 -- I think that you, Len, and Brian are a modern-day reincarnation of the Three Stooges. You guys ought to petition NBC or CBS to revive that show on TV. I have to ask... Who is Moe, who is Larry, and who is Curly/Shemp? 73 de Jim, N2EY |
N2EY wrote: In article , Mike Coslo writes: And we can include you as the fourth Stooge. Would that be Joe? ;^) Shemp. btw, Moe, Curly and Shemp were brothers. 73 de Jim, N2EY nyuk-nyuk-nyuk And Larry's wife was a babe! nyaaah, nyaah, nyaah...woowoowoowwoowwoo - Mike KB3EIA - |
N2EY wrote: In article . net, "KØHB" writes: Just to clear up any confusion on your part, here are my thoughts on the predominate topics regularly discussed here on rrap. 1 -- I think that Morse (CW) is a fun operating mode, sort of like restoring old-time automobiles. Sailboats and piston-engine aircraft come to mind, too. 2 -- I do not think that Morse testing ought to be required to obtain an amateur radio license of any class. And you manage to make that opinion clear and concise without calling anyone names, insulting their heritage, etc. 3 -- I think that you, Len, and Brian are a modern-day reincarnation of the Three Stooges. You guys ought to petition NBC or CBS to revive that show on TV. I have to ask... Who is Moe, who is Larry, and who is Curly/Shemp? hehe, well we all know who Moe is! Now figuring out the other two is more of a problem. - Mike KB3EIA - |
Dee D. Flint wrote: "Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... [snip] I am, The fifth wheel of the four Morsemen of the Apocalypse *80) - Mike KB3EIA - So who are the "four Morsemen of the Apocalypse?" If my memory serves me right, the four Morsemen we Larry Roll Dave Hiel Dick Carroll Jim Micollis Lenover21 would know exactly - he coined it. - Mike KB3EIA - |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com