![]() |
In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes: "William" wrote in message om... (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , Mike Coslo writes: If my memory serves me right, the four Morsemen we Larry Roll Dave Hiel Dick Carroll Jim Micollis Lenover21 would know exactly - he coined it. I would have told Dee...but she never reads my posts (what she said in here). :-) Yeh, what up widat? ;^) (you now she reads every one of dem) The only way I catch a glimpse of lenover21 is when someone such as yourself responds to him. I have him filtered out as I don't care to read his rambling, disjointed, and multitudinous posts. Usually when I see that a post is a reply to one of his, I'll skip over it. Not always though such as this one. Tsk. If it isn't within 50 PPM tolerance of ARRL political speak, differing opinions are "rambling, distored, and multitudinous?" :-) Amateur radio must be Just So for Dee or she cannot tolerate words of independence. [she hefts her mama spanking paddle...] Too bad about fear of being downsized or outsourced if the amateur job isn't done Just So? :-) Tsk. |
In article ,
(William) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , Mike Coslo writes: If my memory serves me right, the four Morsemen we Larry Roll Dave Hiel Dick Carroll Jim Micollis Lenover21 would know exactly - he coined it. I would have told Dee...but she never reads my posts (what she said in here). :-) Yeh, what up widat? ;^) (you now she reads every one of dem) Actually irrelevant. Mama Dee doesn't have long enough arms to wield her spanking paddle again "children" far away. Tsk. She makes Pronouncements...sounding like ARRL-southwest. Proper etty-kett at all times, using "official" How To Act notices. Job fear can drive many over the edge. If one doesn't behave like 'real' hams are 'supposed' to be, they will be fired, downsized, or outsourced. |
In article , Mike Coslo
writes: William wrote: Mike Coslo wrote in message ... William wrote: Mike Coslo wrote in message ... There is a difference between civil anonymity and non-civil anonymity. To not get that is to not get it. - Mike KB3EIA - Incorrect. If there is no disagreement, then anonymity is just peachy. But it is their anonymity that is -attacked- when there is a disagreement, i.e., Steve calls them cowardly scum for hiding behind a mask. But I am not Steve! What a broad paintbrush we paint with. - Mike KB3EIA - You tolerate it, even condone it. What a broad zone of tolerance you have for the PCTA, and how narrow it gets... I tolerate Leo too. Tolerance isn't in fashion much these days. Too bad. Why do you state the obvious? PCTA don't allow a single bit of tolerance for those who do not love, honor, and cherish the beloved morse code. A few might blow air-kisses at NCTA in an attempt to demonstrate their "tolerance," but that is just lip-service. ARS = Archaic Radiotelegraphy Society to the PCTA. |
In article ,
(William) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article . net, "KØHB" writes: "Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote It's just a matter of trying to determine which face you're presenting with any given topic. What you see is what you get, Steve. Just to clear up any confusion on your part, here are my thoughts on the predominate topics regularly discussed here on rrap. 1 -- I think that Morse (CW) is a fun operating mode, sort of like restoring old-time automobiles. 2 -- I do not think that Morse testing ought to be required to obtain an amateur radio license of any class. 3 -- I think that you, Len, and Brian are a modern-day reincarnation of the Three Stooges. You guys ought to petition NBC or CBS to revive that show on TV. Two out of three ain't bad... :-) Wonder if he's drunk? And abrasive as all sailors can be. Reencacting Cinderella Liberty. It might be the funny little hat and bell-bottoms they have to wear. Also the regulation uniform... That's why they got their name stenciled over their back pocket. So you can tell one dumbass from the next. Now, now...we have to be "civil" to the uniform wearers, those resplendant in PCTA Class-As. Then you've got multiple-personality Steve asking what face someone is presenting!!! Hi, hi! Such comedy, such slapstick! Old-school vaudeville...the sticks molded out of old Handbooks. Curtain call happened long ago but they hang around hoping for an audience. Let me know when one of these guys goes over Niagara in a barrel. Offhand, I'd say they all had done it. That's why they are as they are. Trauma from all the tumbling going over them falls. |
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , (N2EY) writes: snip I have a similar system. Some authors are totally blocked, others I read completely. Saves time and makes rrap a much better experience. That works very well for ostriches. Depends if there is any content of worth. rest snipped - Mike KB3EIA - |
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Mike Coslo writes: William wrote: Mike Coslo wrote in message ... William wrote: Mike Coslo wrote in message ... There is a difference between civil anonymity and non-civil anonymity. To not get that is to not get it. - Mike KB3EIA - Incorrect. If there is no disagreement, then anonymity is just peachy. But it is their anonymity that is -attacked- when there is a disagreement, i.e., Steve calls them cowardly scum for hiding behind a mask. But I am not Steve! What a broad paintbrush we paint with. - Mike KB3EIA - You tolerate it, even condone it. What a broad zone of tolerance you have for the PCTA, and how narrow it gets... I tolerate Leo too. Tolerance isn't in fashion much these days. Too bad. Why do you state the obvious? Sometimes the obvious needs stated. You clearly know that. PCTA don't allow a single bit of tolerance for those who do not love, honor, and cherish the beloved morse code. Uh huh. A few might blow air-kisses at NCTA in an attempt to demonstrate their "tolerance," but that is just lip-service. How do you *know* that? - Mike KB3EIA - |
In article , Mike Coslo writes:
Len Over 21 wrote: In article , Mike Coslo writes: William wrote: Mike Coslo wrote in message ... William wrote: Mike Coslo wrote in message ... There is a difference between civil anonymity and non-civil anonymity. To not get that is to not get it. - Mike KB3EIA - Incorrect. If there is no disagreement, then anonymity is just peachy. But it is their anonymity that is -attacked- when there is a disagreement, i.e., Steve calls them cowardly scum for hiding behind a mask. But I am not Steve! What a broad paintbrush we paint with. - Mike KB3EIA - You tolerate it, even condone it. What a broad zone of tolerance you have for the PCTA, and how narrow it gets... I tolerate Leo too. Tolerance isn't in fashion much these days. Too bad. Why do you state the obvious? Sometimes the obvious needs stated. You clearly know that. It's quite obvious there is little (nearly zero) tolerance of NCTAs by the PCTA. In here. You knew that...but, lacking a good comeback, you mumble into your keyboard a lot of null sentence content. :-) PCTA don't allow a single bit of tolerance for those who do not love, honor, and cherish the beloved morse code. Uh huh. Well, that's how it is with the ARS [Archaic Radiotelegraphy Society] If the code test goes, the PCTA extras lose their main bragging right statement. Tsk. A few might blow air-kisses at NCTA in an attempt to demonstrate their "tolerance," but that is just lip-service. How do you *know* that? Observation. With open eyes. :-) Take in all, don't bury head in sand to avoid hearing independent thoughts. Let the ARRL by your radio hobby "Miss Manners" and Tell You What You Should Do, implant all the "correct" thoughts you should think. They've done that for many years. Lots of hams follow their lead to the letter. [in psywar circles that is termed "brainwashing"] Always reject "improper" thoughts expressed by anyone else. League would like that. Follow them like lemmings. Not me. Been in real communications radio on HF and am open to all ideas, not those that were "official" back before I was born. Independent thinking is not for the faint of heart...or those who feel they get their "chops busted" when someone rejects their "official" opinions. |
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (William) writes: Dave Heil wrote in message ... Len Over 21 wrote: In article , Mike Coslo writes: Len Over 21 wrote: In article , Mike Coslo writes: William wrote: Mike Coslo wrote in message Heck your fishing expeditions wouldn't be half as much fun without him here. "Fishing expeditions?" I don't fish. PCTA bait their hooks and offer me their lines. No problem at all to reel them in. Easy thing. You seem to have some confusion on the concept of fishing. Let's see...."they" bait their hooks and offer you a line. Now then, *you* have a reel? It doesn't sound like an easy thing at all. Dave, if you're a big enough fish, the fisherman becomes the quary. Brian, he just handed you the line... :-) Let him go, he's undersized. Hi hi. Must be ruff not being rare-DX anymore. |
William wrote:
Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: Nice article about MARS in Sept CQ. I may rejoin. Rejoin? Rejoin. I wasn't aware that CQ had become a membership organization. I just subscribe. Dave K8MN |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:19 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com