"Len Over 21" wrote in message
...



Danny boy, consider that you make a big target. Fills the
sight picture very nicely. Just a few ounces of pressure.....

[not talking about radio at all but then Danny boy wasn't doing
that, either]


Poor Poor Lennie, now resorting to terroristic threats. Correct me , oh
know it all, isn't this improper under the patriot act? Should anyone be
interested...please submit to proper authorities. I won't bother because I
know he is a sick person, and impotent also considering his
response.....did I hit that nerve old boy?

Let us now simplify things........we all have your number, you are just fun
to play with.

Dan/W4NTI

Subject: Radiosport contesting --- an idea to validate 97.1(a)
From: "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@getrid of this mindspring.com
Date: 9/12/2004 6:36 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id: . net


"Len Over 21" wrote in message
...

Danny boy, consider that you make a big target. Fills the
sight picture very nicely. Just a few ounces of pressure.....

[not talking about radio at all but then Danny boy wasn't doing
that, either]

Poor Poor Lennie, now resorting to terroristic threats. Correct me , oh
know it all, isn't this improper under the patriot act? Should anyone be
interested...please submit to proper authorities. I won't bother because I
know he is a sick person, and impotent also considering his
response.....did I hit that nerve old boy?

Let us now simplify things........we all have your number, you are just fun
to play with.

It's some of that "NCTA" double standard, Dan.

Of course Lennie can't SEE the "sight picture" , so what's to worry?

73

Steve, K4YZ

"Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote in message
...
Subject: Radiosport contesting --- an idea to validate 97.1(a)
From: "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@getrid of this mindspring.com
Date: 9/12/2004 6:36 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id: . net


"Len Over 21" wrote in message
...

Danny boy, consider that you make a big target. Fills the
sight picture very nicely. Just a few ounces of pressure.....

[not talking about radio at all but then Danny boy wasn't doing
that, either]

Poor Poor Lennie, now resorting to terroristic threats. Correct me ,
oh
know it all, isn't this improper under the patriot act? Should anyone
be
interested...please submit to proper authorities. I won't bother because
I
know he is a sick person, and impotent also considering his
response.....did I hit that nerve old boy?

Let us now simplify things........we all have your number, you are just
fun
to play with.

It's some of that "NCTA" double standard, Dan.

Of course Lennie can't SEE the "sight picture" , so what's to worry?

73

Steve, K4YZ








No worry...I would just love to read about him getting questioned by the
feds.

Dan/W4NTI

In article . net, "Dan/W4NTI"
w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com writes:

"Len Over 21" wrote in message
...

Danny boy, consider that you make a big target. Fills the
sight picture very nicely. Just a few ounces of pressure.....

[not talking about radio at all but then Danny boy wasn't doing
that, either]

Poor Poor Lennie, now resorting to terroristic threats.

Sure looks like one to me, Dan.

Correct me , oh
know it all, isn't this improper under the patriot act?

Even without it.

Note the lack of smiley - not that a smiley excuses such a threat.

It's not the first time - I recall Len mentioning "one by twos" needing a whack
with a two by four or some such. (referring to assult on holders of certain
amateur radio callsigns)

Civil discourse, huh? Easy to do from a continent away.

73 de Jim, N2EY

PAMNO (N2EY) wrote in message ...
In article . net, "Dan/W4NTI"
w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com writes:

"Len Over 21" wrote in message
...

Danny boy, consider that you make a big target. Fills the
sight picture very nicely. Just a few ounces of pressure.....

[not talking about radio at all but then Danny boy wasn't doing
that, either]

Poor Poor Lennie, now resorting to terroristic threats.

Sure looks like one to me, Dan.

Correct me , oh
know it all, isn't this improper under the patriot act?

Even without it.

Note the lack of smiley - not that a smiley excuses such a threat.

It's not the first time - I recall Len mentioning "one by twos" needing a whack
with a two by four or some such. (referring to assult on holders of certain
amateur radio callsigns)

Civil discourse, huh? Easy to do from a continent away.

73 de Jim, N2EY

Jim, I noticed that you were silent with respect to Steve's remarks
about bricks through windows and terrorizing Lens wife.