LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old September 22nd 04, 09:57 PM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Bert Craig"
writes:

"Alun" wrote in message
.. .
PAMNO (N2EY) wrote in news:20040921201024.04815.00000600@mb-
m17.aol.com:

In article et, "KØHB"
writes:

"N2EY" wrote


Is the 5 wpm test really such a big deal?


Yes.

Why?

73 de Jim, N2EY


It puts people off, especially those who have no plans to ever use CW, and
there are a lot of those.


If I remember correctly, this is why the no-code Tech license was created.


Then you should also remember that no-code-TEST Techs were
forbidden operation below 30 MHz in the USA.

Somehow some amateurs still believe in the myth that morsemanship
is "essential" (enough for "qualifications") to operate below 30 MHz.

Oh, want increased "privileges?" Earn them. Sometimes earning something
(Like a degree, for example.) means "learning" a few things that you may
never use.


The alleged "need" to do morse code below 30 MHz is an artificiality.

That doesn't bother the qualifications of all those other radio services
operating below 30 MHz. Tsk, tsk.

Heaven forbid we should teach this concept to our kids. Instead they have a
whole generation of underachevers who would rather whine than achieve.
Remember the Regents!


[you spelled "reagent" wrong...but that's perhaps too subtle...]

Yes, heaven forbid that ANYONE EVER be allowed to transmit
below 30 MHz without full and complete "qualifications" by testing
in morsemanship! :-)

It "puts people off," it'd almost be funny...if it weren't so sad.


The "sadness" is that the PCTA simply can't get up to speed
on the newer technology nor do they want to change their ways.
Tsk, tsk.

Everyone must do as they do...or else! :-)


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New ARRL Proposal N2EY Policy 331 March 4th 04 12:02 AM
1960's incentive licensing proposal N2EY Policy 3 January 24th 04 03:46 PM
My restructuring proposal Jason Hsu Policy 0 January 20th 04 06:24 PM
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing Arf! Arf! General 0 January 11th 04 09:09 PM
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing N2EY Policy 4 January 6th 04 02:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017