|
How ya gonna vote Comrade?
|
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...ia_us_election I've often wondered what the world would be like today if we'd let the Krauts take the Kremlin back then instead of backing Stalin . . And THEN have creamed the Krauts. |
PAMNO (N2EY) wrote in message ...
In article , (Brian Kelly) writes: Mike Coslo wrote in message ... http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...re_eu/russia_u s_election I've often wondered what the world would be like today if we'd let the Krauts take the Kremlin back then instead of backing Stalin . . And THEN have creamed the Krauts. They almost did! But Adolf managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory by such dumb moves as dividing his invasion force and exterminating rather than befriending the Ukranians. The high point of German occupation of the USSR came just before Pearl Harbor. Then they started being pushed back. Had Stalin lost, the western alliance would have had the job of defeating a Germany that had USSR's resources behind it, and no second front. Scary 73 de Jim, N2EY Wow! You guys sure take some kind of vector off of a left turn. Talk about off off topic! Ooop! Not allowed to say PCTA are off topic. My bad. So sorry. May a thousand "camel humpers" (?is that what Steve called them?) move into my nice neighborhood. |
William wrote:
PAMNO (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Brian Kelly) writes: Mike Coslo wrote in message ... http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...re_eu/russia_u s_election I've often wondered what the world would be like today if we'd let the Krauts take the Kremlin back then instead of backing Stalin . . And THEN have creamed the Krauts. They almost did! But Adolf managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory by such dumb moves as dividing his invasion force and exterminating rather than befriending the Ukranians. The high point of German occupation of the USSR came just before Pearl Harbor. Then they started being pushed back. Had Stalin lost, the western alliance would have had the job of defeating a Germany that had USSR's resources behind it, and no second front. Scary 73 de Jim, N2EY Wow! You guys sure take some kind of vector off of a left turn. And that "left turn is who the "reformed commies" endorse for Prez! Talk about off off topic! Ooop! Not allowed to say PCTA are off topic. My bad. So sorry. What the heck, Brian? If you post something, and someone disagrees with it, is THAT what you mean by not being allowed to have a different opinion? I kind of thought that was what we were here for. As for off topic, yourself and are the ones complaining of messages being off topic. C'mon, you are starting to sound like a "victim". As a conservative, I can tell you that you don't have to be a victim. You are responsible for your actions, and don't have to be a victim. Once you do that, your life will take on new meaning, with unlimited possibilities opening up that were denied you by the liberal's "victim trap" - Mike KB3EIA - |
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
William wrote: PAMNO (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Brian Kelly) writes: Mike Coslo wrote in message ... http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...re_eu/russia_u s_election I've often wondered what the world would be like today if we'd let the Krauts take the Kremlin back then instead of backing Stalin . . And THEN have creamed the Krauts. They almost did! But Adolf managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory by such dumb moves as dividing his invasion force and exterminating rather than befriending the Ukranians. The high point of German occupation of the USSR came just before Pearl Harbor. Then they started being pushed back. Had Stalin lost, the western alliance would have had the job of defeating a Germany that had USSR's resources behind it, and no second front. Scary 73 de Jim, N2EY Wow! You guys sure take some kind of vector off of a left turn. And that "left turn is who the "reformed commies" endorse for Prez! Talk about off off topic! Ooop! Not allowed to say PCTA are off topic. My bad. So sorry. What the heck, Brian? If you post something, and someone disagrees with it, is THAT what you mean by not being allowed to have a different opinion? I kind of thought that was what we were here for. As for off topic, yourself and are the ones complaining of messages being off topic. C'mon, you are starting to sound like a "victim". Sorry, didn't mean to give that impression. It was supposed to be tongue-in-cheek, but my keyboard emoticons are lacking. Dang-it, there's that victim trap again! ;^) As a conservative, I can tell you that you don't have to be a victim. You are responsible for your actions, and don't have to be a victim. Once you do that, your life will take on new meaning, with unlimited possibilities opening up that were denied you by the liberal's "victim trap" - Mike KB3EIA - Reminds me of the "parade of victims" that NPR features each day. Why does George Bush continue to fund those idiots? |
William wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote in message ... William wrote: (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Brian Kelly) writes: Mike Coslo wrote in message ... http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...re_eu/russia_u s_election I've often wondered what the world would be like today if we'd let the Krauts take the Kremlin back then instead of backing Stalin . . And THEN have creamed the Krauts. They almost did! But Adolf managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory by such dumb moves as dividing his invasion force and exterminating rather than befriending the Ukranians. The high point of German occupation of the USSR came just before Pearl Harbor. Then they started being pushed back. Had Stalin lost, the western alliance would have had the job of defeating a Germany that had USSR's resources behind it, and no second front. Scary 73 de Jim, N2EY Wow! You guys sure take some kind of vector off of a left turn. And that "left turn is who the "reformed commies" endorse for Prez! Talk about off off topic! Ooop! Not allowed to say PCTA are off topic. My bad. So sorry. What the heck, Brian? If you post something, and someone disagrees with it, is THAT what you mean by not being allowed to have a different opinion? I kind of thought that was what we were here for. As for off topic, yourself and are the ones complaining of messages being off topic. C'mon, you are starting to sound like a "victim". Sorry, didn't mean to give that impression. It was supposed to be tongue-in-cheek, but my keyboard emoticons are lacking. Dang-it, there's that victim trap again! ;^) As a conservative, I can tell you that you don't have to be a victim. You are responsible for your actions, and don't have to be a victim. Once you do that, your life will take on new meaning, with unlimited possibilities opening up that were denied you by the liberal's "victim trap" - Mike KB3EIA - Reminds me of the "parade of victims" that NPR features each day. Why does George Bush continue to fund those idiots? NPR gets less and less gvt funding every year. 65 percent private/35 percent public There is a downside to that though. When Newt ad his buds originally started the pull the pursetrings on NPR, the idea was that they would melt and go away like the wicked witch of the west after getting doused by Dorothy. They didn't - they thrived, adapting to the new situation. As they receive less and less government funding, they have more and more autonomy. At this point I would assume that they enjoy the money that they still get from the gvt And that is the downside - less control. I actually get my news from NPR and Reuters now. Despite NPR's middle to left perspective, they actually report so much more than the other organizations - Network news sucks, CNN is weird, and Fox News is great if you are a Pub that only wants to hear news that agrees with your world view. - Mike KB3EIA - |
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
William wrote: Mike Coslo wrote in message ... William wrote: (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Brian Kelly) writes: Mike Coslo wrote in message ... http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...re_eu/russia_u s_election I've often wondered what the world would be like today if we'd let the Krauts take the Kremlin back then instead of backing Stalin . . And THEN have creamed the Krauts. They almost did! But Adolf managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory by such dumb moves as dividing his invasion force and exterminating rather than befriending the Ukranians. The high point of German occupation of the USSR came just before Pearl Harbor. Then they started being pushed back. Had Stalin lost, the western alliance would have had the job of defeating a Germany that had USSR's resources behind it, and no second front. Scary 73 de Jim, N2EY Wow! You guys sure take some kind of vector off of a left turn. And that "left turn is who the "reformed commies" endorse for Prez! Talk about off off topic! Ooop! Not allowed to say PCTA are off topic. My bad. So sorry. What the heck, Brian? If you post something, and someone disagrees with it, is THAT what you mean by not being allowed to have a different opinion? I kind of thought that was what we were here for. As for off topic, yourself and are the ones complaining of messages being off topic. C'mon, you are starting to sound like a "victim". Sorry, didn't mean to give that impression. It was supposed to be tongue-in-cheek, but my keyboard emoticons are lacking. Dang-it, there's that victim trap again! ;^) As a conservative, I can tell you that you don't have to be a victim. You are responsible for your actions, and don't have to be a victim. Once you do that, your life will take on new meaning, with unlimited possibilities opening up that were denied you by the liberal's "victim trap" - Mike KB3EIA - Reminds me of the "parade of victims" that NPR features each day. Why does George Bush continue to fund those idiots? NPR gets less and less gvt funding every year. 65 percent private/35 percent public There is a downside to that though. When Newt ad his buds originally started the pull the pursetrings on NPR, the idea was that they would melt and go away like the wicked witch of the west after getting doused by Dorothy. Because they were nothing more than a mouthpiece for the left. No point in tax dollars funding that. They didn't - they thrived, adapting to the new situation. As they receive less and less government funding, they have more and more autonomy. At this point I would assume that they enjoy the money that they still get from the gvt And that is the downside - less control. What control did they have previously? I actually get my news from NPR and Reuters now. Despite NPR's middle to left perspective, they actually report so much more than the other organizations - Network news sucks, CNN is weird, and Fox News is great if you are a Pub that only wants to hear news that agrees with your world view. - Mike KB3EIA - It's a sham when NPR rolls over to BBC at night. |
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...ia_us_election WTF is all this political crapola suddenly doing on rrap. Next thing you know we'll be arguing about whether the democraps or the republicannots were responsible for the sinking of the Titanic, and whether CW could have saved the WTC. |
Subject: How ya gonna vote Comrade?
From: "KØHB" Date: 10/28/2004 1:57 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: . net "Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...re_eu/russia_u s_election WTF is all this political crapola suddenly doing on rrap. Next thing you know we'll be arguing about whether the democraps or the republicannots were responsible for the sinking of the Titanic, and whether CW could have saved the WTC. You mean we don't already...?!?! Steve, K4YZ |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com