Remember Me?
Menu
Home
Search
Today's Posts
Home
Search
Today's Posts
RadioBanter
»
rec.radio.amateur
»
Policy
>
Operation with Expired License
LinkBack
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes
Prev
Next
#
6
January 13th 05, 01:24 AM
bb
Posts: n/a
wrote:
Mel A. Nomah wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
: So it appears that, in *some* cases (where a renewal
: application was previously filed), a ham with an expired
: license may be able to operate legally in the grace
: period.
After all the indignant and self-righteous heat you've applied to
LenOver on
this issue, it appears you were equally ignorant of the content
of
Part
97.
What "indignant and self-righteous heat"?
The usual.
Len claimed that *all* amateurs with expired licenses could *legally*
continue to operate in the grace period. Nothing about renewals being
filed, etc. I
simply pointed out that he was mistaken on that point - but he won't
admit it.
If a ham with an expired license followed Len's claim and operated
with
an expired-but-in-the-grace-period license without a pending
pre-expiration renewal application, s/he'd be violating Part 97.
By comparison, after it was pointed out to me that the rules allow
continued operation if a renewal is filed, I amended my original
statements.
At what point is anyone else allowed to amend their statements?
If a ham with an expired license followed my claim and did not
operate
with
an expired-but-in-the-grace-period license, there would be no
violation
of Part 97. If the ham had applied for renewal before expiration,
s/he
would
miss out on operating when in fact it would be legal, but that's
erring
on the
side of safety.
Sounds rather punitive.
97.21(a)(3)(ii) puts it this way:
"When the application has been received by the FCC
on or before the license expiration date, the license
operating authority is continued until the final disposition
of the application."
Yes, it does. And that's why I amended my statement.
Is this an admission that you were (gulp) wrong? 8(
It could be argued that what 97.21(a) (3) (ii) says is that if
you renew before the expiration date, the license never really
expires in the first place.
You are welcome to argue it, but please do so from the antenna mount.
Been there in the rules for decades, and is commonly known among
most
people
who are even slightly conversant with Part 97.
So is the fact that hams *cannot* legally operate in the grace period
with an expired license if no renewal application has been filed. But
Len claims *all*
hams can legally operate in the grace period. That's simply not so.
Yet
he
won't admit it.
(gulp)
Len gets very upset when someone like me points out his errors.
There are no others like you. You are unique. You are Miccolis.
Didn't you catch on to this when KV4FZ stayed on the air for years
after
expiration while his renewal was being litigated?
Sure. But he applied for renewal long before the expiration date.
And a renewal was granted on or about the expiration date?
Of course, Herb being an accomplished Morse operator, you'd
probably
cut him
more slack than you cut for LenOver (not that either deserves any).
Not at all - just the opposite.
Hi, hi!
Herb, being a licensed amateur
operator, should
get *less* slack, because he should have known better.
Less slack, more flak.
Just how much flak did you give KV4FZ???
None.
Len's ignorance isn't the problem;
Nor is it Jim's problem.
it's his resistance to accepting his
mistakes and his attacks on those who point them out.
Indeed.
Thanks for clearing up that point about renewals.
73 de Jim, N2EY
Mel's swell.
Reply With Quote
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Show Printable Version
Search this Thread
:
Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode
Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode
Posting Rules
Smilies
are
On
[IMG]
code is
On
HTML code is
Off
Trackbacks
are
On
Pingbacks
are
On
Refbacks
are
On
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems
Paul
Policy
0
January 10th 05
05:41 PM
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004
private
General
0
May 10th 04
09:39 PM
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License)
N2EY
Policy
0
November 30th 03
01:28 PM
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules
JJ
General
159
August 12th 03
12:25 AM
ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st
Dwight Stewart
Policy
300
August 12th 03
12:25 AM
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
03:16 PM
.
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
Contact Us
RadioBanter forum home
Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2017
LinkBack
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks