"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
...
Todd Daugherty wrote:

"Dan" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Phil Kane" wrote in message
.giganews.com...

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:05:31 -0600, Todd Daugherty wrote:


A Petition for Rulemaking is not the proper way to get this ruling.
It would be dismissed out of hand.

Strike One.


OK what is then???

Consult your local communications attorney admitted to practice
before the FCC.

You are not my client and I'm not going to do the "heavy lifting"
for you.

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane



Amazing, ain't it Phil? Look at all these so called educated folks
discussing the pro and con of "amateur broadcasting"..

Looks like 14.275 has become the new sewer of ham radio. Riley ain't

gonna

do squat. You want to get rid of these clowns? Get on freq before they
show up. End of problem.

Dan/W4NTI


For your information Dan, my show is not going to be 14.275. Since your
are
slow due to all that inbreeding down there in alabama I get you up to
speed
here. The N9OGL SHOW will be on Sunday at 4.00 pm CST; it was suppose to
be
today however, we got hit by a terrible snow storm. Unlike K1MAN my
program
is only on for a hour/ hour and a half. My program deals with issues in
amateur radio. So feel free to get your wife/sister to sit around the
radio
and listen to my INFORMATION BULLETIN


But the big question is: What are you going to do if the frequency is in
use at "bulliten time"?

- Mike KB3EIA -


He will come on here, bitch and whine, and then wonder why folks tell him
to go screw himself.

Dan/W4NTI

Last I heard he cut a deal with Steve Anderson to be his butt buddy in
prison.

Dan/W4NTI

"Dave" wrote in message
...
speaking of da man... where is he, haven't heard him in a while. did his
radio shack timer break again? or maybe he packed up and went with one of
his 'jump teams'???

"Dan" wrote in message
nk.net...
Help me here please Toad Daugherty.

Why did you get into Ham Radio in the first place? According to your
Blog
site you got into Packet, liked it a lot....etc. Now your on here
yapping
about being a wanabee broadcaster. Sorta sounding like K1MAN.......I
got
a
idea....how about you BOTH getting together and running a "broadcast" It
will save on tape for all concerned,.

Dan/W4NTI

"Todd Daugherty" wrote in message
...
The cloeses "communication attorney" is 200 miles away....oh well I
just
keep doing my thing :) and this "problem will never be solved.

Todd n9ogl


"Phil Kane" wrote in message
ganews.com...
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:05:31 -0600, Todd Daugherty wrote:

A Petition for Rulemaking is not the proper way to get this
ruling.
It would be dismissed out of hand.

Strike One.

OK what is then???

Consult your local communications attorney admitted to practice
before the FCC.

You are not my client and I'm not going to do the "heavy lifting"
for you.

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane

On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 02:34:37 GMT, "Dan"
wrote:


"Buck" wrote in message
.. .
You want to get rid of these clowns? Get on freq before they
show up. End of problem.


Pardon me while I laugh. They will probably stomp all over anyone who
tries to use that frequency.


Buck
--
For what it's worth.


Who is they?

Dan/W4NTI

\

I was thinking this was the thread about the guys that are holding
their own frequency. They are obnoxious and anytime they hear anyone
of frequency not talking to them, they run them off.


Buck
--
For what it's worth.

"Dan" wrote in message
nk.net...
Hey Toad,

If you want to be a broadcaster, here is a far out idea.....Get a license
to be a broadcaster.
Tried that seven times with waivers and the FCC wouldn't consider my
application and waiver so my opinion is **** YOU, THE FCC AND THE HORSES YOU
ALL RODE ON!!!

Todd N9OGL


If you want to express your opinion on ham radio, about ham subjects,
here
is a radical thought.......get on the air, engage someone in
conversation....and here it is....express your views. Far out eh?

Dan/W4NTI

"Todd Daugherty" wrote in message
...
Again, I think the only way to solve this problem as I stated before is
to
have the FCC clarify the rules only then will this problem be resolved.
untill then I will continue to inform Amateurs with my opinions about
issues
in amateur radio.

Todd N9OGL

"Dee Flint" wrote in message
...

"Todd Daugherty" wrote in message
...
Opinion: A belief or conclusion held with confinfidence but not
substantiated by proof (2) A judgement based on special KNOWLEDGE (3)
A
judgement or estimation


Please note that in definition 2, you have put the emphasis on the
wrong
word. The emphasis should be on JUDGEMENT not on knowledge. Note that
various and conflicting judgements (opinions) can be formed from the
same
knowledge.

There is of course no rule that hams cannot be opinionated. There is
of
course no rule that they cannot discuss their opinions in the course of
ordinary two way conversations. However the limited "broadcasting"
allowed
by part 97 specifies information bulletins. Opinions are not
information
although of course they may be derived from information.







----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000
Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:57:28 -0600, Todd Daugherty wrote:

If you want to be a broadcaster, here is a far out idea.....Get a license
to be a broadcaster.

Tried that seven times with waivers and the FCC wouldn't consider my
application and waiver

After several times you didn't get the message, did you ??

so my opinion is **** YOU, THE FCC AND THE HORSES YOU
ALL RODE ON!!!

Does your mother know that you use such language in public ??

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane

Well Phil, Since I didn't get a broadcast license I guess you ****ing ham
operator are going to have to deal with me.
As for the language I'm ****ed off about the whole deal and I'll continue to
be ****ed off. Here you have a ****ing agency going to court telling a judge
that all a person has to do is apply for a license and ask for a waiver. But
when a person does apply for a license and a waiver they don't consider it.
Bottom line the FCC ARE A BUNCH OF ****ING LIARS!! so Phil go to your old
bosses or perhaps that dumbass Hollingsworth is on here and you both can
tell your bosses that I said that they SHOULD EAT **** AND DIE!
I often get sick of all these ****ing ham operators who bitch and whine
about the code issue, the changes in the amateur license structure. These
little ****er don't realize how ****ing easy they've got it. With that said,
just a reminder since I don't have a broadcast license that I'm going to
uses the ham bands. So my opinion is you and the FCC is to go ****
yourselves.

Todd N9OGL




"Phil Kane" wrote in message
ganews.com...
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:57:28 -0600, Todd Daugherty wrote:

If you want to be a broadcaster, here is a far out idea.....Get a
license
to be a broadcaster.

Tried that seven times with waivers and the FCC wouldn't consider my
application and waiver

After several times you didn't get the message, did you ??

so my opinion is **** YOU, THE FCC AND THE HORSES YOU
ALL RODE ON!!!

Does your mother know that you use such language in public ??

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:12:11 -0600, Todd Daugherty wrote:

Well Phil, Since I didn't get a broadcast license I guess you ****ing ham
operator are going to have to deal with me.
As for the language I'm ****ed off about the whole deal and I'll continue to
be ****ed off. Here you have a ****ing agency going to court telling a judge
that all a person has to do is apply for a license and ask for a waiver. But
when a person does apply for a license and a waiver they don't consider it.
Bottom line the FCC ARE A BUNCH OF ****ING LIARS!! so Phil go to your old
bosses or perhaps that dumbass Hollingsworth is on here and you both can
tell your bosses that I said that they SHOULD EAT **** AND DIE!
I often get sick of all these ****ing ham operators who bitch and whine
about the code issue, the changes in the amateur license structure. These
little ****er don't realize how ****ing easy they've got it. With that said,
just a reminder since I don't have a broadcast license that I'm going to
uses the ham bands. So my opinion is you and the FCC is to go ****
yourselves.

Such clear, concise, and courteous language ..... shows us all the
level of your maturity and the clarity of your thought proccesses.

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane

Todd Daugherty wrote:

Well Phil, Since I didn't get a broadcast license I guess you ****ing ham
operator are going to have to deal with me.
As for the language I'm ****ed off about the whole deal and I'll continue to
be ****ed off. Here you have a ****ing agency going to court telling a judge
that all a person has to do is apply for a license and ask for a waiver. But
when a person does apply for a license and a waiver they don't consider it.
Bottom line the FCC ARE A BUNCH OF ****ING LIARS!! so Phil go to your old
bosses or perhaps that dumbass Hollingsworth is on here and you both can
tell your bosses that I said that they SHOULD EAT **** AND DIE!
I often get sick of all these ****ing ham operators who bitch and whine
about the code issue, the changes in the amateur license structure. These
little ****er don't realize how ****ing easy they've got it. With that said,
just a reminder since I don't have a broadcast license that I'm going to
uses the ham bands. So my opinion is you and the FCC is to go ****
yourselves.

Todd N9OGL

Toddyboy, you just continue to prove what a stupid juvenile little twit
you are. No go tell mommy to get you a glass of warm milk and do your
homework and after you pass through puberty and grow up some, come back
and try to talk with some intellegence.

Phil Kane wrote:

On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:12:11 -0600, Todd Daugherty wrote:


Well Phil, Since I didn't get a broadcast license I guess you ****ing ham
operator are going to have to deal with me.
As for the language I'm ****ed off about the whole deal and I'll continue to
be ****ed off. Here you have a ****ing agency going to court telling a judge
that all a person has to do is apply for a license and ask for a waiver. But
when a person does apply for a license and a waiver they don't consider it.
Bottom line the FCC ARE A BUNCH OF ****ING LIARS!! so Phil go to your old
bosses or perhaps that dumbass Hollingsworth is on here and you both can
tell your bosses that I said that they SHOULD EAT **** AND DIE!
I often get sick of all these ****ing ham operators who bitch and whine
about the code issue, the changes in the amateur license structure. These
little ****er don't realize how ****ing easy they've got it. With that said,
just a reminder since I don't have a broadcast license that I'm going to
uses the ham bands. So my opinion is you and the FCC is to go ****
yourselves.


Such clear, concise, and courteous language ..... shows us all the
level of your maturity and the clarity of your thought proccesses.

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane

And he wonders why the FCC didn't consider his application and waiver.

hey dumbass that wasn't the reason so why don't you and philly go back to
kissing those *******s at the FCC asses.

Todd N9OGL

"Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message
...
Phil Kane wrote:

On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:12:11 -0600, Todd Daugherty wrote:


Well Phil, Since I didn't get a broadcast license I guess you ****ing
ham
operator are going to have to deal with me.
As for the language I'm ****ed off about the whole deal and I'll
continue to
be ****ed off. Here you have a ****ing agency going to court telling a
judge
that all a person has to do is apply for a license and ask for a waiver.
But
when a person does apply for a license and a waiver they don't consider
it.
Bottom line the FCC ARE A BUNCH OF ****ING LIARS!! so Phil go to your
old
bosses or perhaps that dumbass Hollingsworth is on here and you both can
tell your bosses that I said that they SHOULD EAT **** AND DIE!
I often get sick of all these ****ing ham operators who bitch and
whine
about the code issue, the changes in the amateur license structure.
These
little ****er don't realize how ****ing easy they've got it. With that
said,
just a reminder since I don't have a broadcast license that I'm going to
uses the ham bands. So my opinion is you and the FCC is to go ****
yourselves.


Such clear, concise, and courteous language ..... shows us all the
level of your maturity and the clarity of your thought proccesses.

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane

And he wonders why the FCC didn't consider his application and waiver.





----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----