wrote in message
oups.com...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6852019/

73 de Jim, N2EY

.....but what people want to know is if there are
more bare titties shown at this Year's Super Bowl
haltime show, will the far right monkeys be rattling
the bars on their cages and throwing feces at the
fcc because they were 'forced' to see a tittie on national television.....?

(think about it a minute...they got all worked up
in a frothing lather when J.J. showed her bedazzled
breastie nipple on the Super Bowl halftime
show...but you didn't hear jack shi+ from joe sixpack
when the Abu Graib photos were released to the
news media...........GO FIGURE..... (grin)

skinshedder wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6852019/

73 de Jim, N2EY

....but what people want to know is if there are
more bare titties shown at this Year's Super Bowl
haltime show, will the far right monkeys be rattling
the bars on their cages and throwing feces at the
fcc because they were 'forced' to see a tittie on national
television.....?

(think about it a minute...they got all worked up
in a frothing lather when J.J. showed her bedazzled
breastie nipple on the Super Bowl halftime
show...but you didn't hear jack shi+ from joe sixpack
when the Abu Graib photos were released to the
news media...........GO FIGURE..... (grin)

Dan Rather's handler is the one that got the photo's and released them
to Al Jazeer. Once they broke the story, she ran them on CBS.

wrote:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6852019/

73 de Jim, N2EY

Wonder which BPL intity he will wind up with in a nice cushy high
paying job as his reward for pushing BPL?

On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:09:47 GMT, King Zulu wrote:

The first requirement for FCC chief should be NO law
degree. Some brains and some technical comprehension would be a plus.

One of the best, if not THE best Chairman that the FCC had was
Dick Wiley (Nixon appointee-mid 1970s) who was a top-notch lawyer
before coming to the Commission. He had an engineering assistant
to whom he could turn to explain the issues, and Dick was sharp
enough to listen and understand what he was being told.

I got to brief him about a special project involving TV technical
standards for which I was heading up the field measurements and
analysis portion, and from his many questions he seemed to understand
what was going on the first time.

After his term was over, he went back to his old law firm (Wiley,
Rein, and Fielding) where he still is.

I wish we could get him back. He would have made short shrift of
the BPL business.

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane

On 23 Jan 2005 00:30:49 GMT, N2EY wrote:

What I find interesting about "Dr." Laura is that she doesn't/hasn't lived
up to the very values she preaches to others. For example, she insists
on being called "Doctor" - but she's not an MD, Psy. D or even Ed.D.
She's got a Ph.D, but not in human psychology or therapy.

It is in Physiology. We in the ba.broadcast group usually refer to
her as "the Quactor".

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane

Phil Kane wrote:
On 23 Jan 2005 00:30:49 GMT, N2EY wrote:

What I find interesting about "Dr." Laura is that she doesn't/hasn't
lived
up to the very values she preaches to others. For example, she
insists
on being called "Doctor" - but she's not an MD, Psy. D or even Ed.D.
She's got a Ph.D, but not in human psychology or therapy.

It is in Physiology. We in the ba.broadcast group usually refer to
her as "the Quactor".

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane

Academia is full of folks who insist upon being called "doctor," and
I'm not talking about medical schools. Jim doesn't seem to mind it.

As far as her moral values, perhaps she discovered them later in life
than did our precious N2EY. I guess God doesn't allow for mistakes or
late learners.

In article ws.com, "Phil
Kane" writes:

On 23 Jan 2005 00:30:49 GMT, N2EY wrote:

What I find interesting about "Dr." Laura is that she doesn't/hasn't lived
up to the very values she preaches to others. For example, she insists
on being called "Doctor" - but she's not an MD, Psy. D or even Ed.D.
She's got a Ph.D, but not in human psychology or therapy.

It is in Physiology.

Which is not even closely related.

We in the ba.broadcast group usually refer to
her as "the Quactor".

Bwaahaahaa! Good one!

The sad part is that many of her listeners think she really is qualified.

I think there was an episode of "Frasier" where he has to deal with a quack
radio "doctor", who asks him to write the foreword in her new book.

73 de Jim, N2EY

On 23 Jan 2005 00:30:49 GMT, N2EY wrote:
What I find interesting about "Dr." Laura is that she doesn't/hasn't lived
up to the very values she preaches to others. For example, she insists
on being called "Doctor" - but she's not an MD, Psy. D or even Ed.D.
She's got a Ph.D, but not in human psychology or therapy.


The "D" stands for "doctor." One can be a doctor of mathematics, doctor
of chemistry, doctor of medicine, doctor of psychology, et cetera. All
can use the title "doctor." Heck, even a lawyers can use that title due
their degree being a Juris Doctor ("Doctor of Law").

I'm sure you called some of your professors "Doctor" and never gave
it a second thought.

73, Jeff KH6O

--
Chief Petty Officer, U.S. Coast Guard
Mathematics Lecturer, University of Hawaii System

Jeffrey Herman wrote:
On 23 Jan 2005 00:30:49 GMT, N2EY wrote:

What I find interesting about "Dr." Laura is that she doesn't/hasn't lived
up to the very values she preaches to others. For example, she insists
on being called "Doctor" - but she's not an MD, Psy. D or even Ed.D.
She's got a Ph.D, but not in human psychology or therapy.



The "D" stands for "doctor." One can be a doctor of mathematics, doctor
of chemistry, doctor of medicine, doctor of psychology, et cetera. All
can use the title "doctor." Heck, even a lawyers can use that title due
their degree being a Juris Doctor ("Doctor of Law").

I'm sure you called some of your professors "Doctor" and never gave
it a second thought.


I'd bet he didn't call them Doctor followed by their first name!

And the other thing is, at least with all the PhD's I work with, asking
any one of them to comment outside their field gets the answer prefaced
with a "well, it isn't my field of expertise" or something to that effect.

Dr Laura is shelling out "advice" that is not related to her field of
expertise.

- Mike KB3EIA -

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

Jeffrey Herman wrote:
On 23 Jan 2005 00:30:49 GMT, N2EY wrote:

What I find interesting about "Dr." Laura is that she doesn't/hasn't lived
up to the very values she preaches to others. For example, she insists
on being called "Doctor" - but she's not an MD, Psy. D or even Ed.D.
She's got a Ph.D, but not in human psychology or therapy.

The "D" stands for "doctor." One can be a doctor of mathematics, doctor
of chemistry, doctor of medicine, doctor of psychology, et cetera.

My favorite is doctor of electrical engineering.

All can use the title "doctor."

Yes, they can. But most that I know do not *require* it, outside their field of
expertise.

Heck, even a lawyers can use that title due
their degree being a Juris Doctor ("Doctor of Law").

But they don't usually do that.

I'm sure you called some of your professors "Doctor" and never gave
it a second thought.

Sure - because they were functioning in their field of expertise.

I'd bet he didn't call them Doctor followed by their first name!

Not a one.

And the other thing is, at least with all the PhD's I work with, asking
any one of them to comment outside their field gets the answer prefaced
with a "well, it isn't my field of expertise" or something to that effect.

BINGO!

Heck, you can ask most Ph.D EEs about house wiring, and most of them will
preface their remarks that way, because it *isn't* their field of EE.

Dr Laura is shelling out "advice" that is not related to her field of
expertise.

Exactly!

73 de Jim, N2EY