Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() bb wrote: robert casey wrote: The FCC doesn't want to end up doing this sort of micro- management. It's better if hams decide (via ARRL or such group) what subbands are where. And if something needs to change it doesn't take years to do it. The FCC acknowledges such as "good amateur practice". Riley says that "Good Amateur Practice" is enforceable. No one here believes it, though. Who doesn't believe it, Brain? Quotes? Posts? I know for a fact that Dave Heil, Jim Miccolis and myself have all stated that FCC policy has been to minimize enforcement action in lieu of self-policing, but has and will continue to issue citations to those who violate established band plans, etc, when required to do so. Now...WHO doesn't believe that "Good Amateur Practice" isn't enforceable? Steve, K4YZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
CW Testing Question | Policy | |||
calling kc8qjp calling kc8qjp | CB | |||
AD9850 DDS - Help prevent suicide | Homebrew | |||
AD9850 DDS - Help prevent suicide | Homebrew | |||
National Two Meter AM Calling Freq? | Boatanchors |