Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dr. Daffodil Swain wrote: Why not maintain the 5WPM requirement in the U.S., but give No-Code Techs access to the 80, 40, 15, and 10 meter old novice sub-bands. This would allow aspiring upgraders a place to hone their skills without having to just listen to recordings. Also, the sending skills can be developed as well. A side benefit would be hearing the sound of CW again ( even if it's bad) in these largly unused segments. Just a thought. This makes no sense at all. If the so called no-code techs can't do code now, how would giving them access to code only portion of the bands help them learn code? If they want to listen to code, they can do that now without a license. There are code portions of the 2 meter and 6 meter bands that they have access to now, but I'll bet none of them go there to practice code! Five wpm isn't that much, if you know the characters already. If you don't know the characters, then I see no way that you are going to practice sending code? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Beg to differ -- I have worked several no code techs on six meters who were
practicing their code. -- Caveat Lector (Reader Beware) Help The New Hams Someone Helped You Or did You Forget That ? "whoever" whoever@wherever wrote in message ... Dr. Daffodil Swain wrote: SNIP This makes no sense at all. If the so called no-code techs can't do code now, how would giving them access to code only portion of the bands help them learn code? If they want to listen to code, they can do that now without a license. There are code portions of the 2 meter and 6 meter bands that they have access to now, but I'll bet none of them go there to practice code! Five wpm isn't that much, if you know the characters already. If you don't know the characters, then I see no way that you are going to practice sending code? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
That's sort of what I meant when I said there are places on 2 and 6.
I'll bet the ones you worked could do 5 wpm or at least copy at that speed. I'm saying the ones that can't do code aren't doing it on the bands they have now so why give them more? If they can do it on 6 meters then they can take the code test and they will have all the novice sub bands to use! Caveat Lector wrote: Beg to differ -- I have worked several no code techs on six meters who were practicing their code. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Agree
-- Caveat Lector (Reader Beware) Help The New Hams Someone Helped You Or did You Forget That ? "whoever" whoever@wherever wrote in message ... That's sort of what I meant when I said there are places on 2 and 6. I'll bet the ones you worked could do 5 wpm or at least copy at that speed. I'm saying the ones that can't do code aren't doing it on the bands they have now so why give them more? If they can do it on 6 meters then they can take the code test and they will have all the novice sub bands to use! Caveat Lector wrote: Beg to differ -- I have worked several no code techs on six meters who were practicing their code. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"whoever" whoever@wherever wrote in message ... That's sort of what I meant when I said there are places on 2 and 6. I'll bet the ones you worked could do 5 wpm or at least copy at that speed. I'm saying the ones that can't do code aren't doing it on the bands they have now so why give them more? If they can do it on 6 meters then they can take the code test and they will have all the novice sub bands to use! Actually it might give them more incentive to work on it since they could use it right away. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Dee Flint" wrote in message
... "whoever" whoever@wherever wrote in message ... That's sort of what I meant when I said there are places on 2 and 6. I'll bet the ones you worked could do 5 wpm or at least copy at that speed. I'm saying the ones that can't do code aren't doing it on the bands they have now so why give them more? If they can do it on 6 meters then they can take the code test and they will have all the novice sub bands to use! Actually it might give them more incentive to work on it since they could use it right away. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Sadly, it's exactly the opposite. They appear to have no wish to "work" for HF privileges. Anything other than a complete "gimme" is unsuitable. -- Vy 73 de Bert WA2SI FISTS #9384 QRP ARCI #11782 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
This makes no sense at all. If the so called no-code techs can't do code now, how would giving them access to code only portion of the bands help them learn code? If they want to listen to code, they can do that now without a license. There are code portions of the 2 meter and 6 meter bands that they have access to now, but I'll bet none of them go there to practice code! One feature of letting them use HF code bands is propagation. They would more likely be able to find someone else to QSL with somewhere in the country vs only in their county. And as hams already they should know the protocols about listening first to see if the freq is in use at the time or not, etc. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |