| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#3
March 21st 05, 07:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
K4YZ wrote:
D. Stussy wrote: On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, K4YZ wrote: D. Stussy wrote: On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, K4YZ wrote: D. Stussy wrote: Regardless, there are two things being varied: The mark/space condition, and the duration of each, so there is no way that morse code can be binary. Sure it can. But the REAL question is how can we blame it on Bill Pasternak and threaten to sue him over it.....?!?! Steve, K4YZ The very comment above is absolute proof of Steve Robeson's stupidity. How's that, Dieter? Which word was beyond your understanding? Everyone else clearly understood my statement about your [lack of] mental ability. There is no ambiguity. But I am not the one with the probelm, Dieter! You've led a years long campaign to smear a man who does nothing but good things for Amateur Radio then claim others have "mental ability" problems. Getting tired of making stupid assertions in public then getting your nose rubbed in it? I haven't made any stupid assertions. Sure you have. At least three years of smears, deceit and blatant lies about Bill Paternak and Amateur Radio Newsline, I have made only one conclusion - and you have failed to provide any evidence (let alone credible evidence) that even hints that my conclusion is wrong. Since there are TWO things being varied, there is a minimum of four states, and thus code cannot be binary (two states). QED, asshole. You seem to have the mental problems, Dieter. I wasn't addressing the binary states (or lack of) of accurately sent Morse Code. I was addressing your Quixotie-like crusade style. As for who's the...well...You know...I guess it's the person who can't express himself without profanity. QED, Dieter. You're a putz. Steve, K4YZ |
Threaded Mode
