Dieter,

I just thought I'd create one thread to keep all your silliness
under one masthead...I'll quote verbatim my other replies to you today
too, including your comments with attributes.

Steve, K4YZ

Made under "Is Morse code Binary?"

D. Stussy wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, K4YZ wrote:
D. Stussy wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, K4YZ wrote:
D. Stussy wrote:
Regardless, there are two things being varied: The
mark/space
condition, and
the duration of each, so there is no way that morse code can
be
binary.

Sure it can.

But the REAL question is how can we blame it on Bill
Pasternak
and
threaten to sue him over it.....?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

The very comment above is absolute proof of Steve Robeson's
stupidity.

How's that, Dieter?

Which word was beyond your understanding? Everyone else clearly
understood my
statement about your [lack of] mental ability. There is no
ambiguity.

Getting tired of making stupid assertions in public then
getting
your nose rubbed in it?

I haven't made any stupid assertions.

I have made only one conclusion - and you have failed to provide any
evidence
(let alone credible evidence) that even hints that my conclusion is
wrong.
Since there are TWO things being varied, there is a minimum of four
states, and
thus code cannot be binary (two states). QED, asshole.

K4YZ wrote:
D. Stussy wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, K4YZ wrote:
D. Stussy wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, K4YZ wrote:
D. Stussy wrote:
Regardless, there are two things being varied: The
mark/space
condition, and
the duration of each, so there is no way that morse code
can
be
binary.

Sure it can.

But the REAL question is how can we blame it on Bill
Pasternak
and
threaten to sue him over it.....?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

The very comment above is absolute proof of Steve Robeson's
stupidity.

How's that, Dieter?

Which word was beyond your understanding? Everyone else clearly
understood my
statement about your [lack of] mental ability. There is no
ambiguity.

But I am not the one with the probelm, Dieter!

You've led a years long campaign to smear a man who does nothing
but good things for Amateur Radio then claim others have "mental
ability" problems.

Getting tired of making stupid assertions in public then
getting
your nose rubbed in it?

I haven't made any stupid assertions.

Sure you have.

At least three years of smears, deceit and blatant lies about
Bill
Paternak and Amateur Radio Newsline,

I have made only one conclusion - and you have failed to provide
any
evidence
(let alone credible evidence) that even hints that my conclusion is
wrong.
Since there are TWO things being varied, there is a minimum of four
states, and
thus code cannot be binary (two states). QED, asshole.

You seem to have the mental problems, Dieter.

I wasn't addressing the binary states (or lack of) of accurately
sent Morse Code.

I was addressing your Quixotie-like crusade style.

As for who's the...well...You know...I guess it's the person who
can't express himself without profanity.

QED, Dieter.

You're a putz.

Steve, K4YZ

D. Stussy wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, K4YZ wrote:
D. Stussy wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, K4YZ wrote:
D. Stussy wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, K4YZ wrote:
D. Stussy wrote:
Regardless, there are two things being varied: The
mark/space
condition, and
the duration of each, so there is no way that morse code
can
be
binary.

Sure it can.

But the REAL question is how can we blame it on Bill
Pasternak
and
threaten to sue him over it.....?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

The very comment above is absolute proof of Steve Robeson's
stupidity.

How's that, Dieter?

Which word was beyond your understanding? Everyone else clearly
understood my
statement about your [lack of] mental ability. There is no
ambiguity.

But I am not the one with the probelm, Dieter!

You've led a years long campaign to smear a man who does
nothing
but good things for Amateur Radio then claim others have "mental
ability" problems.

Wrong again, idiot. As for mental ability, you are the only one with
a problem
- and it is clear that your comprehension is less than what many
mentally
retarded people have. Example:

Over in another place on the internet, www.allaudio.org - in post
10066386, you
dared make a claim that I would have a problem with a weasel like you
pocketing
the cash from running your own church's radio station - simply
because it is a
non-profit. Fortunately, your own words prove your ignorance and
inability to
understand why I may have legal grounds to pursue a criminal
complaint against
the AR Newsline operators. The problem that you fail to understand
is that
when ANY non-profit charity solicits donations FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE
then
expends those donations on something other than the declared purpose
or its
underlying administrative expenses, such is illegal. The
solicitation becomes
fraudulent and the diversion of funds embezzlement. It doesn't
matter that the
diverted purpose happens to be another exempt purpose; it's still
unlawful.
That's exactly what AR Newsline does: They solicit only for "news
gathering"
activities and divert funds to their scholarship activity - and in
their own
reports, they admit as much.

I am not trying to shut down AR Newsline simply because I think that
Bill
Pasternak is a prick for the way that he FAILS to obtain truthful
stories. I
will be shutting it down because it is a criminal conspiracy to
defraud the
public hiding behind the guise of a non-profit organization.

Getting tired of making stupid assertions in public then
getting
your nose rubbed in it?

I haven't made any stupid assertions.

Sure you have.

At least three years of smears, deceit and blatant lies about
Bill
Paternak and Amateur Radio Newsline,

Let's see:
1) His organization was a consistent spammer to this group until I
got that
stopped about 5 months ago.
2) He defrauds the public by soliciting funds on false grounds, only
to divert
those funds as "reimbursements" to his own pocket - per AR Newsline's
own
reports. It's HIS words, so either he truthfully reported his
embezzlement or
he has lied about it - either way, he has no public trust, and thus
there's no
lie on my part.

You've now been proven to be the fool that everyone knows you are.
PLONK!

I have made only one conclusion - and you have failed to provide
any
evidence
(let alone credible evidence) that even hints that my conclusion
is
wrong.
Since there are TWO things being varied, there is a minimum of
four
states, and
thus code cannot be binary (two states). QED, asshole.

You seem to have the mental problems, Dieter.

I wasn't addressing the binary states (or lack of) of
accurately
sent Morse Code.

The title of your post says otherwise, idiot.

I was addressing your Quixotie-like crusade style.

As for who's the...well...You know...I guess it's the person
who
can't express himself without profanity.

QED, Dieter.

You're a putz.

And that's the best you can come up with?

You're an idiot because the understanding of the issue is beyond you.

You're a weasel because you thought that you could "badmouth" me in a
place you
thought I'd never find out about.

You're a fool because it is clear that if I were wrong, others would
have said
so. You stand alone.

K4YZ wrote:
D. Stussy wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, K4YZ wrote:

You've led a years long campaign to smear a man who does
nothing
but good things for Amateur Radio then claim others have "mental
ability" problems.

Wrong again, idiot. As for mental ability, you are the only one
with
a problem
- and it is clear that your comprehension is less than what many
mentally
retarded people have. Example:

Over in another place on the internet, www.allaudio.org - in post
10066386, you
dared make a claim that I would have a problem with a weasel like
you
pocketing
the cash from running your own church's radio station - simply
because it is a
non-profit.

I've never posted to "allaudio", Dieter.

Never, not once...Any post in that forum would have to be a
re-addressal from this forum or were comments carried from this forum
by another.

Sorry. You are (again) wrong.

Also, I do not run ANY "curch radio station".

Fortunately, your own words prove your ignorance and inability to
understand why I may have legal grounds to pursue a criminal
complaint against
the AR Newsline operators. The problem that you fail to understand
is that
when ANY non-profit charity solicits donations FOR A SPECIFIC
PURPOSE
then
expends those donations on something other than the declared
purpose
or its
underlying administrative expenses, such is illegal. The
solicitation becomes
fraudulent and the diversion of funds embezzlement. It doesn't
matter that the
diverted purpose happens to be another exempt purpose; it's still
unlawful.
That's exactly what AR Newsline does: They solicit only for "news
gathering"
activities and divert funds to their scholarship activity - and in
their own
reports, they admit as much.

And YOU continue to ignore the fact that there is absolutely NO
attempt by ARN to disguise, divert, redirect or otherwise defraud
ANYone.

And TELL us, Dieter, when did you file those complaints?

When's the trial?

Will they put the Michael Jackson trial on hold so you can
persecute this foul wretch of a man who raises monies for teenager's
scholarships?

I am not trying to shut down AR Newsline simply because I think
that
Bill
Pasternak is a prick for the way that he FAILS to obtain truthful
stories.

Sure you are. Your one and ONLY reason to be pushing ANY of
these
buttons is because you got your toes stepped on and you're going to
insult, harrass and intimidate

I will be shutting it down because it is a criminal conspiracy to
defraud the
public hiding behind the guise of a non-profit organization.

No you wont'. You're a loud mouthed punk with a chip on your
shoulder. And even if you do get it in for legal review, there's no
leg to stand on and it will get dismissed. Too many REAL frauds out
there.

Getting tired of making stupid assertions in public then
getting
your nose rubbed in it?

I haven't made any stupid assertions.

Sure you have.

At least three years of smears, deceit and blatant lies
about
Bill
Paternak and Amateur Radio Newsline,

Let's see:
1) His organization was a consistent spammer to this group until I
got that
stopped about 5 months ago.

YOU didn't stop ANY thing.

2) He defrauds the public by soliciting funds on false grounds,
only
to divert
those funds as "reimbursements" to his own pocket - per AR
Newsline's
own
reports. It's HIS words, so either he truthfully reported his
embezzlement or
he has lied about it - either way, he has no public trust, and thus
there's no
lie on my part.

Still no embezzlement, Dieter. He's STILL allowed to take a part
of the funds for costs and reasonable expenses. The IRS says so.

Despite crowing about all his alleged excesses, you've not, in
over
THREE YEARS, produced a SINGLE bit of evidence to corroborate your
claims. Not a single receipt, bit of testimony or

You've now been proven to be the fool that everyone knows you are.
PLONK!

No fool here, Dieter. Check the mirror.

YOU, on the otherhand, are still making grandiose claims about
fraud and embezzlement that you have not substantiated with a single
sentence of corroborating evidence.

I have made only one conclusion - and you have failed to
provide
any
evidence
(let alone credible evidence) that even hints that my
conclusion
is
wrong.
Since there are TWO things being varied, there is a minimum of
four
states, and
thus code cannot be binary (two states). QED, asshole.

You seem to have the mental problems, Dieter.

I wasn't addressing the binary states (or lack of) of
accurately
sent Morse Code.

The title of your post says otherwise, idiot.

It wasn't my title.

And since I've been very careful to avoid the adjectives with
you
all this time, Dieter, and you've NOT extended me the same courtesy,
I
guess I can return the favor...but won't. You ARE your own worst
enemy, Dieter.

I was addressing your Quixotie-like crusade style.

As for who's the...well...You know...I guess it's the person
who
can't express himself without profanity.

QED, Dieter.

You're a putz.

And that's the best you can come up with?

What more do I need? You make claims then don't substantiate
them.

You're an idiot because the understanding of the issue is beyond
you.

I understand just fine.

You're trying to persecute Bill Pasternak and Amateur Radio
Newsline for some perceived injustice from a story whose reporting
you
didn't care for.

You've not substantiated a single claim.

You're a weasel because you thought that you could "badmouth" me in
a
place you
thought I'd never find out about.

I didn't make those posts, Dieter. I do not know of any
"allaudio" site, I don't post there, and besides, I can "badmouth"
you
from right here with your own words...I don't need to do so covertly.

You're a fool because it is clear that if I were wrong, others
would
have said
so. You stand alone.

So far, Dieter, no fewer than a half dozen other posters have
chimmed in at one time or another on the Dieter-Vs-Pasternak/ARN
issue,
and not a one of them has expressed any support for your claims.

Why is that?

Steve, K4YZ

On Mon, 20 Mar 2005, K4YZ wrote:
I just thought I'd create one thread to keep all your silliness
under one masthead...I'll quote verbatim my other replies to you today
too, including your comments with attributes.

Couldn't take the heat, could you? We had a SINGLE thread already - under YOUR
name, weasel.

D. Stussy wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2005, K4YZ wrote:
I just thought I'd create one thread to keep all your
silliness
under one masthead...I'll quote verbatim my other replies to you
today
too, including your comments with attributes.

Couldn't take the heat, could you? We had a SINGLE thread already -
under YOUR
name, weasel.

I am not the one making the errors, Dieter...

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
D. Stussy wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2005, K4YZ wrote:
D. Stussy wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, K4YZ wrote:

You've led a years long campaign to smear a man who does
nothing
but good things for Amateur Radio then claim others have
"mental
ability" problems.

Wrong again, idiot. As for mental ability, you are the only
one
with
a problem
- and it is clear that your comprehension is less than what
many
mentally
retarded people have. Example:

Over in another place on the internet, www.allaudio.org - in
post
10066386, you
dared make a claim that I would have a problem with a weasel
like
you
pocketing
the cash from running your own church's radio station - simply
because it is a
non-profit.

I've never posted to "allaudio", Dieter.

Then explain this: http://www.allaudio.org/detail-10066386.html

If it's not really you, then someone is using/abusing your
identity.

Never, not once...Any post in that forum would have to be a
re-addressal from this forum or were comments carried from this
forum
by another.

Sorry. You are (again) wrong.

Also, I do not run ANY "church radio station".

You did in your HYPOTHETICAL post you were making there.

Congratulations! You got the ENTIRE URL right this time!

And here's another HOT FLASH for ya, Hot Rod...That post was
STILL
not made by me in "allaudio"...It WAS made by me in THIS forum and
re-posted there WITHOUT my consent.

Now...I know this is going to be reeeeeeeeeeally hard for you to
understand, Dieter, because the foregoing only further proves my
assertions of YOUR lack of understanding...But USENET newsgroup
readers
from MANY other companies and servers pick-up items from other USENET
groups and re-post them.

Had you gone back and read the attributes, you'd know better.

But you didn't. Just like Lennie Anderson..Any chance to jump
in
and attempt a "swipe"...Didn't work, Dieter...

And TELL us, Dieter, when did you file those complaints?

You'll find out.

Yeahyeahyeah...You've been making those same "claims" for three
years.

When's the trial?

I wouldn't know. I'm not the district attorney.

I can tell you now...there won't be one.

Will they put the Michael Jackson trial on hold so you can
persecute this foul wretch of a man who raises monies for
teenager's
scholarships?

Different county, so of course not.

Oh NO, Dieter! THIS is the Crime of the Century! Any jurist
worth
his salt will put HIS agenda on hold knowing full-well the attention
of
every man and woman will be on this!

I am not trying to shut down AR Newsline simply because I think
that
Bill
Pasternak is a prick for the way that he FAILS to obtain
truthful
stories.

Sure you are. Your one and ONLY reason to be pushing ANY of
these
buttons is because you got your toes stepped on and you're going
to
insult, harrass and intimidate

I thought that was your job (to insult, harass, and intimidate).
My
job, as a
responsible citizen, is to see that the law is enforced.

That being the case, it will be MY job as a responsible citizen
to
make sure the DA knows exactly how long you've been planning this
persecution and why.

Then YOU can suffer the DA's scrutiny as he investigates why YOU
tried to manipulate the legal system for personal vendettas.

I will be shutting it down because it is a criminal conspiracy
to
defraud the
public hiding behind the guise of a non-profit organization.

No you wont'. You're a loud mouthed punk with a chip on
your
shoulder. And even if you do get it in for legal review, there's
no
leg to stand on and it will get dismissed. Too many REAL frauds
out
there.

You won't be saying that after BP is prosecuted. You forget that I
am an
ex-IRS agent. I know what I'm talking about when it comes to this
stuff.

I wonder why you are an EX-IRS agent.

Have fun, Dieter...You're just a bitter putz with a personal
agenda
to keep your wounded pride and ego from getting any more bruised than
what it is.

Getting tired of making stupid assertions in public
then
getting
your nose rubbed in it?

I haven't made any stupid assertions.

Sure you have.

At least three years of smears, deceit and blatant lies
about
Bill
Paternak and Amateur Radio Newsline,

Let's see:
1) His organization was a consistent spammer to this group
until
I
got that
stopped about 5 months ago.

YOU didn't stop ANY thing.

The evidence here speaks for itself: ARN was posted weekly - and
it
no longer
is. It has stopped. You forget that every week for about 2 years,
I
sent a
post to his ISP's abuse mailbox.

I am sure you did. But the FACTS are that ARN stopped for other
reasons.

Furthermore, if his ISP actaully found any validity for your
claims, they wouldn't have taken 2 years to take action.

Still no embezzlement, Dieter. He's STILL allowed to take a
part
of the funds for costs and reasonable expenses. The IRS says so.

Only for the PURPOSE he solicited the funds for; not for OTHER
purposes, exempt
or not.

Still no embezzlement, Dieter. He's STILL alowed to take a part
of
the funds for costs and reasonable expenses. Your former employer
says
so.

Despite crowing about all his alleged excesses, you've not,
in
over
THREE YEARS, produced a SINGLE bit of evidence to corroborate
your
claims. Not a single receipt, bit of testimony or

You've now been proven to be the fool that everyone knows you
are.
PLONK!

No fool here, Dieter. Check the mirror.

YOU, on the otherhand, are still making grandiose claims
about
fraud and embezzlement that you have not substantiated with a
single
sentence of corroborating evidence.

I have made only one conclusion - and you have failed to
provide
any
evidence
(let alone credible evidence) that even hints that my
conclusion
is
wrong.
Since there are TWO things being varied, there is a minimum
of
four
states, and
thus code cannot be binary (two states). QED, asshole.

You seem to have the mental problems, Dieter.

I wasn't addressing the binary states (or lack of) of
accurately
sent Morse Code.

The title of your post says otherwise, idiot.

It wasn't my title.

And since I've been very careful to avoid the adjectives
with
you
all this time, Dieter, and you've NOT extended me the same
courtesy, I
guess I can return the favor...but won't. You ARE your own worst
enemy, Dieter.

I was addressing your Quixotie-like crusade style.

As for who's the...well...You know...I guess it's the
person
who
can't express himself without profanity.

QED, Dieter.

You're a putz.

And that's the best you can come up with?

What more do I need? You make claims then don't
substantiate
them.

You're an idiot because the understanding of the issue is
beyond
you.

I understand just fine.

It's clear from your posts at the other forum at the web site
mentioned above
that you do not. You're a liar too, and everyone else here knows
it.

Lied...?!?! About what? The only "lie" I am accused of is
having
not done the things in my military career that I've mentioned but
refuse to discsuss further...

You are welcome to try and prove otherwise.

If you're depending upon posts made by Brian Burke and Lennie
Anderson to substantiate your claim, you're going to find yourself
behind the power curve yet again.....

You're trying to persecute Bill Pasternak and Amateur Radio
Newsline for some perceived injustice from a story whose
reporting
you
didn't care for.

You can't even paraphrase that correctly. The parties he defamed
should sue
him. It's clear that BP has no interest in the truth.

If the "parties he defamed" were actually defamed, they should
sue!

But it's been YEARS ago and YOU are the ONLY putz crowing about
it!
It would appear that there was NOT enough "evidence" to persue the
deamation suit in the first place!

You've not substantiated a single claim.

You're a weasel because you thought that you could "badmouth"
me
in a
place you
thought I'd never find out about.

I didn't make those posts, Dieter. I do not know of any
"allaudio" site, I don't post there, and besides, I can
"badmouth"
you
from right here with your own words...I don't need to do so
covertly.

Liar. The URL I posted may only be 1 of 2 that I found you
referring
to me
about, but all indications show that it is clearly you.

I am still not lying, Dieter.

I did not post in "allaudio". That a newsgroup reader may have
re-posted from Google is entirely possible...But I did not post
in
"allaudio".

You are welcome to try and prove otherwise!

You're a fool because it is clear that if I were wrong, others
would
have said
so. You stand alone.

So far, Dieter, no fewer than a half dozen other posters have
chimmed in at one time or another on the Dieter-Vs-Pasternak/ARN
issue,
and not a one of them has expressed any support for your claims.

Why is that?

Because you're only counting one side, just like BP does.

Nope.

Please remind us of all the eliable respondents in THIS forum who
have "sided" with you...Please be so kind as to only cite persons who
sign thier name and/or callsign...They are the only one's I refer
to...Otherwise it would have been more than "a half dozen"....

Again...You come up short, Dieter.

Steve, K4YZ

D. Stussy wrote:

Snip to...

I'm looking at it right now. Try this:

http://www.allaudio.org/detail-10066386.html

Your post is the second one of three, entered February 7, 2005 at
03:35:10.

Its presence speaks for itself and demonstrates that you are a liar.

Now, as to YOUR CLAIM that it is just another version of THIS
NEWSGROUP,
explain why no posts by me show up? I used google's search engine to
find my
name and it found ONLY TWO instances of my name being used in any way
at that
site - and BOTH instances were in posts made by YOU.

Tahe that, scumbag.

You really need to slow down whe you are trying to impress us with
your prolific use of profanities and insults, Dieter.

You've been identified as a liar.

No I've not. You found some posts that somehow got re-posted to
this other site. It's called "cross-posting".

You have now been
proven a liar... and in the face of your own self-generated
evidence, everyone
can see that you're a back-stabbing weasel too.

I can't explain as to why you're stuff doesn't come through,
Dieter...Maybe they have a bit more class..?!?!

But the FACTS are the posts STILL originated in Google. I never
posted via "allaudio"...

I am not "back-stabbing"...Congratulations that you found another
newsreader that cites Google, but it's not my doing.

Your other post: http://www.allaudio.org/detail-9595312.html
Dated: October 9, 2004 at 12:48:16 (using your K4CAP
callsign).

Yep..it's there too...But it's STILL not an original post to
"allaudio". I am not a member of "allradio" or I would sign in, get
ALL the headers and feed them to you.

(No problem...I doubt you'd have the gonads to admit your error
anyway...It would take away your basis for calling me weasel,
backstabber, idiot, etc, and it
There were Holy Roller posts, "eHarmony" solicitations, and
discussions on anything BUT Dieter Stussy. Perhaps whatever
re-posted
post is farther down the message chain, but if you're going to try
an
accuse anyone of something, Dieter, yoiu owe it to yourself to get
your
accusations RIGHT...and that includes ALL the right attributes.

The accusations are plain and the evidence is there for everyone to
see. The
URLs are listed above.

Yes, they are.

And the facts remain that the original posts were made in Google,
not "allradio"...

And you're STILL wrong!

Steve, K4YZ

Here's the "proof" of YOUR error, Dieter...

Please notice closely the "Audio Talk!- Radio Amateur Policy

IT WAS A CROSS POST, NIT-WIT...JUST LIKE I TOLD YOU IT WAS!

BTW...I am wondering WHERE in THIS post am I "badmouthing" you...?

This is the ONLY paragraph where I mention you:

"Of course then I will have to contend with Dieter Stussy daring me
to 'come out and argue the issues' over donations."

Where was the "badmouthing"...??? I addressed you by given name,
and you DO have a habit of arguing with people over "donations"...

So....Pony up an apology, or an excuse?

Steve, K4YZ

QUOTE:

Good News! -- Jesus Christ Went To The Cross So You Can Go To He


Audio Talk!- Radio Amateur Policy

Good_News_For_You_Al
Posted Feb 6, 2005 11:37:42
Subject: Good News! -- Jesus Christ Went To The Cross So You Can Go To
He

Guest





Good News!

Do you know how simple it is to go to Heaven after this
life has ended?

The good news is that God came from Heaven to earth
in the person of Jesus Christ over 2000 years ago and
died for our past, present and future sins(misdeeds).
He was born in the land of Israel supernaturally to a
virgin Jewish woman named Mary. He lived a sinless life
for thirty-three years and then sacrificed His sinless
blood and died on a cross to pay the death penalty for
our sins.

After Jesus died He rose from the dead three days later
as He said He would. The Holy Bible also tells us that
Jesus Christ ascended into Heaven and that all who accept
Him as their Lord and Saviour will live forever with Him
in Heaven where there is no more death, sorrow, sickness
and pain.

The Holy Bible very clearly explains how simple it is
to be saved and on your way to Heaven, "For if you
confess with your mouth, "Jesus is Lord," and believe
in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you
WILL BE SAVED." (Romans 10:9)

You can be saved right now and on your way to Heaven if
you will open your heart to Jesus and pray the following
prayer:

Dear Jesus Christ, I want to be saved so that I can have
a home in Heaven when I die. I agree with You that I am a
sinner. I believe You love me and want to save me. I
believe that You bled and died on the cross to pay the
penalty for my sins. I believe that You rose from the dead.
Please forgive my sins and come into my heart and be my
Lord and Saviour. Thank You Lord Jesus Christ for
forgiving me and saving me through Your merciful grace.
Amen.

You are now a Christian if you said the prayer and allowed
God to save you. Welcome to the family of God.


Have a great day!
Internet Evangelist R.L. Grossi





1. http://www.biblegateway.com || Free Online Bible
2. http://www.tbn.org/index.php/8/1.html || Free Online Movies
3. http://www.worshipmusic.com/0310263670.html || The Passion Of The
Christ
4. http://www.gieson.com/Library/projec...alk/index.html ||
Animation
5. http://www.carm.org/cults/cultlist.htm || Beware Of Cults
6. http://www.equip.org/free/DH198.htm || About Hell
7. http://www.powertochange.com/questions/qna2.html || Is Jesus God?





K4YZ
Posted Feb 7, 2005 03:35:10
Subject: Good News! -- Jesus Christ Went To The Cross So You Can Go
T

Guest




Good_News_For_You_All([at]yahoo.com wrote:
| Good News!
|
| Do you know how simple it is to go to Heaven after this
| life has ended?

Yet another unsolicited rendering of religious fervor...Just what
the world needs...Yet another "evangelist" to "save" us from someone
else's religion.

I am in the wrong business.

Instead of saving lives, I will save souls...Put up an internet
"crusade", then evenutally an HF broadcast station from which to
solicit tons of donations from sick, dependent and scared people who
think if they don't send me $10 right now they are going straight to
Hell.

Eventually I can get a real, live satellite program of my own and
really rake in the big bucks. Then I can allow myself to be "found
out" having the same sex that every other heterosexual male in the
world enjoys, take a huge golden parachute severance pay from my
now-mega-million "congregation" and retire to some South Pacific island
of my own.

Of course then I will have to contend with Dieter Stussy daring me
to 'come out and argue the issues' over donations.

I was going to pursue a career in quasi-professional electronics
engineering by hijacking others proprietary work, but they told me some
idiot in California already tried that schtick...Now they look out for
guys like that! My luck...a day late and a dollar short. Wonder who
the idiot was...?!?!

Steve in Winchester, TN