Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mel A. Nomah wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... : cl wrote: : : I have never been able to see the difference between reading a book : that contains the answers to questions, and reading a question pool. : Both are entered into my memory the same way. : You can't be serious! (And here I was under the impression you made you living in an educational environment.) No wonder "Johnny can't read"! Yup, I do. And sorry, but I can read the book, or read the pool, and get the same thing. The answers are just more verbose in the books. The purpose of the examination is to determine if the prospective licensee understands some things about amateur rules, about elementary transmitter and receiver functions, basic electricity, amateur communications procedure, and safety. Sure. Knowing ahead of time the VERBATIM questions and VERBATIM correct answer reduces the test to a simple test of memory. The applicant need not UNDERSTAND a damned thing, but only have normally developed memorization skills. The concept of "memorizing" the Q and A of say the Extra pool is amusing. Especially when there is a little scrambling going on for the answers. Personally, I took the on-line tests, and those questions that I missed were looked up. Mostly without reference to the question pool, except for the ones for band edges. The band edges are rote memorization anyhow. Then I went back and retook the tests until I aced them just about every time. That was a lot easier than rote memorization of 800 (IIRC) some questions. I have no problem with Q&A study aids containing sample questions which guide the student through the appropriate study material, but the actual VERBATIM examination material should NOT be available to the student (applicant), or there is no reason to UNDERSTAND the material --- just memorize the test. Well, whatchya gonna do? The tests themselves are only the beginning, be they the "super easy" tests administered today, or the "incredibly hard" tests administered under the steely glare of an F.C.C. field agent at the time when hams were real men and women. I've looked at some of the older questions. The only thing about them that is difficult is that they tend to pertain to operating with equipment and different condition than today. - Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BBC Says Morse Code Still Alive and Well In UK | Policy | |||
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |