| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... "Actually, what is being discussed is freedom of choice of modes in a hobby in a free society. There is absolutely nothing prohibiting someone who wants to take full advantage of CW's many advantages from becoming skillful in the mode." --- CAM in RRAP Extended to all modes? Get rid of those darn satellite mode questions on the tests! I personally have no use for that! Good point, and I agree. If we are going to have incredibly difficult satellite questions on the Extra written exam, like the following verbatim example..... Q: Which of the following types of communications may space stations transmit? A. Automatic retransmission of signals from Earth stations and other space stations B. One-way communications C. Telemetry consisting of specially coded messages D. All of these choices are correct .....then there ought to be similarly incredibly difficult CW questions on the Extra written exam, like: Q: Which of the following alphanumeric characters corresponds to the Morse sound "di-dah" A. A B. B C. C D. All of these choices are correct After all, fair is fair, and the CW mode ought to have test questions just like all other modes. Thanks for pointing that out. I'll bet you like those schools where the students determine the curriculum! Not at all Mike. You've persuaded me that there ought to be test questions for Morse just like there are test questions for each other mode. We seem to be in complete agreement on the matter. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
KØHB wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... "Actually, what is being discussed is freedom of choice of modes in a hobby in a free society. There is absolutely nothing prohibiting someone who wants to take full advantage of CW's many advantages from becoming skillful in the mode." --- CAM in RRAP Extended to all modes? Get rid of those darn satellite mode questions on the tests! I personally have no use for that! Good point, and I agree. If we are going to have incredibly difficult satellite questions on the Extra written exam, like the following verbatim example..... Q: Which of the following types of communications may space stations transmit? A. Automatic retransmission of signals from Earth stations and other space stations B. One-way communications C. Telemetry consisting of specially coded messages D. All of these choices are correct .....then there ought to be similarly incredibly difficult CW questions on the Extra written exam, like: Q: Which of the following alphanumeric characters corresponds to the Morse sound "di-dah" A. A B. B C. C D. All of these choices are correct After all, fair is fair, and the CW mode ought to have test questions just like all other modes. Thanks for pointing that out. I'll bet you like those schools where the students determine the curriculum! Not at all Mike. You've persuaded me that there ought to be test questions for Morse just like there are test questions for each other mode. We seem to be in complete agreement on the matter. Ahh, appearing to agree with me to discount my point! I could ace the entire test if asked is dih-dah meant "A". But that isn't the point. You did of course leave out my point that you can argue yourself out of any testing via your argument...... such as.... Extended to all modes? Get rid of those darn satellite mode questions on the tests! I personally have no use for that! For a strict appliance operator who is going to buy everything they use and have someone else install it? No one should have to do anything they don't want to do! Ditch all those unneeded questions. 0 question test. - Mike KB3EIA - |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... ..... my point that you can argue yourself out of any testing via your argument...... No you can't. I fully support a Morse familiarity test. Cross my heart and hope to die! I just don't support a "skill demonstration", unless you want to require a "skill demonstration" of every knowledge area on the test, and deny licenses to everyone who cannot demonstrate all required skills. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
KØHB wrote: "Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... ..... my point that you can argue yourself out of any testing via your argument...... No you can't. Yes you can. I fully support a Morse familiarity test. Cross my heart and hope to die! I just don't support a "skill demonstration", unless you want to require a "skill demonstration" of every knowledge area on the test, and deny licenses to everyone who cannot demonstrate all required skills. No other part of the testing is a skill. You can buy a Yeacomwood rig, have other people set up your antenna and setup. You can talk into a microphone, (assuming that people know to mash the PTT or adaptive device that performs the same function) and it will "work". I can buy or download and install the software that I use for PSK31. It's a major stretch to consider that a skill. More like knowledge. But CW is a different matter. You aren't going to read a book and sit down at the key and start sending or receiving Morse. *Thst's* a skill. Even with computer generated Morse and Receiving programs such as CWGet (all which do s so-so job of the mode) it is a valuable skill which can work with minimal equipment. - Mike KB3EIA - |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Michael Coslo" wrote in message
... No other part of the testing is a skill. My point EXACTLY, Mike. While there are many skills associated with our hobby, only one of those skills is singled out for a required demonstration. Interestingly, if that skill is so vital as to need a skill demonstration, it would seem that no-one who had not been tested would be allowed to use it on the air. Yet a basic Technician licensee is perfectly free to use Morse on the air without having passed a Morse test. So much for the need for a demonstration before a license grant! 73, de Hans, K0HB |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
K=D8HB wrote: "Michael Coslo" wrote in message ... No other part of the testing is a skill. My point EXACTLY, Mike. While there are many skills associated with our hobby, only one of those skills is singled out for a required demonstration. Interestingly, if that skill is so vital as to need a skill demonstration, it would seem that no-one who had not been tested would be allowed to use it on the air. Yet a basic Technician licensee is perfectly free to use Morse on the air without having passed a Morse test. So much for the need for a demonstration before a license grant! 73, de Hans, K0HB I wonder how Dee would accomodate the disabled examinees for the Tower Climbing pass/fail exam. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
K=D8HB wrote: "Michael Coslo" wrote in message ... No other part of the testing is a skill. My point EXACTLY, Mike. While there are many skills associated with our hobby, only one of those skills is singled out for a required demonstration. Interestingly, if that skill is so vital as to need a skill demonstration, it would seem that no-one who had not been tested would be allowed to use it on the air. Yet a basic Technician licensee is perfectly free to use Morse on the air without having passed a Morse test. So much for the need for a demonstration before a license grant! 73, de Hans, K0HB I wonder how VE Dee would accomodate the disabled in the Tower Climbing pass/fail skill exam? |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"bb" wrote in message
oups.com... KØHB wrote: "Michael Coslo" wrote in message ... No other part of the testing is a skill. My point EXACTLY, Mike. While there are many skills associated with our hobby, only one of those skills is singled out for a required demonstration. Interestingly, if that skill is so vital as to need a skill demonstration, it would seem that no-one who had not been tested would be allowed to use it on the air. Yet a basic Technician licensee is perfectly free to use Morse on the air without having passed a Morse test. So much for the need for a demonstration before a license grant! 73, de Hans, K0HB I wonder how VE Dee would accomodate the disabled in the Tower Climbing pass/fail skill exam? Not that Tower climbing will likely ever become an issue with the exam, but if it were, then I'd suggest there would be questions relating to the proper safety techniques of doing such a job, wherein "actual" "physical" demonstration is not needed nor required. Given that - a wheel chair bound person "could" pass those parts of an exam. I can't fathom tower climbing becoming a major issue. There is a question or so relating to wearing a "hard hat" when working "near" a tower in case someone drops a tool or other item. So, there ya go. Perhaps you can consider that as a step in the "tower" safety process. It would be only "questions" relating to such things, what's the big deal about pass/fail? You either answer the question correctly as you would be expected to with any other - or you don't! We have to count the number of correct answers given and see it they add up to a passing grade, if not - too bad! It won't matter if they're handicapped or not. We can accommodate them as to taking the exam, we don't accommodate them as to giving them the "answers". cl |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"bb" wrote I wonder how VE Dee would accomodate the disabled in the Tower Climbing pass/fail skill exam? The Somolian judges gave this a 9.8 on the Olympic Troll-O-Meter, but they were over-ruled by the umpires in instant replay, who award it a 2.6 The Somolian judges lodged a formal protest! It was sufficiently trollish, of course, but way too obvious. It was poorly written, poorly executed, and was so incredibly lame as to lack the true drawing power of a really masterful troll. Maybe as high as a 3.3 for the intense stupidity of the premise, but a 9.8? Never! The Somolian judges tear their hair out, throw their balalaikas down in dismay, and perform the traditional Somolian Dismay Chant! They demand a recount! Recount denied. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
KØHB wrote:
"Michael Coslo" wrote in message ... No other part of the testing is a skill. My point EXACTLY, Mike. While there are many skills associated with our hobby, only one of those skills is singled out for a required demonstration. Interestingly, if that skill is so vital as to need a skill demonstration, it would seem that no-one who had not been tested would be allowed to use it on the air. Yet a basic Technician licensee is perfectly free to use Morse on the air without having passed a Morse test. So much for the need for a demonstration before a license grant! I see it as a license progression thing. The Morse code is the skill demonstration, and HF access is the carrot. I know someone who is going to bust my chops now!!! 8^) - Mike KB3EIA - |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| BBC Says Morse Code Still Alive and Well In UK | Policy | |||
| Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
| Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
| NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||