| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
May 22nd 05, 09:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
From: "bb" on Sat,May 21 2005 5:04 pm
wrote: wrote: For years and years the ARRL has emphasized morsemanship over and above all other skills in amateur radio. How, Len? Let's look at some examples... Policy: In 1953, when the FCC opened all amateur operating privileges to all US radio amateurs except Novices and Technicians, ARRL did not try to require more code testing for full privileges. Their very, very last effort at leadership. Fifty two years ago. HALF A FRIGGIN LIFETIME AGO FOR RADIO EXPERIMENTORS!!! Idiot! Jimmie was THERE...in his heart. :-) Gosh and gee-whilikers...in 1953 I was doing HF communications while in the U.S. Army and didn't have to know a thing about morse code. Reason is probably that NONE of the three dozen high power transmitters at one station (only the 3rd largest in the Army network) used any morse code. NONE of the personnel at that station were required to know morse code to operate all those transmitters (minimum 1 KW RF out, maximum 15 KW but later increased to 40 KW). HF bands, 24/7 operations, nearly a quarter million messages handled each month. In 1963, in its original "incentive licensing" proposal to FCC, ARRL proposed that full privileges be available only to Advanced and Extra licensees, and that the Advanced be reopened to new issues. This meant that full priviliges would require more written testing but not more code testing. I advocate that full privs be established for 90WPM tested amateurs. Got any??? Privs for those not able to achieve 90WPM will be reassigned to the BPL bands. Idiot! As Jimmie Noserve likes to put it, "that's simply 'untrue'." :-) Brian, you have to understand that Jimmie is the Compleat (amateur) Manchurian Candidate. Fully brainwashed into thinking that the ARRL is the holy grail of "truth" and all good works. In 1990, ARRL supported the creation of a nocodetest amateur radio license. Why not 1987??? Idiot! Where was the ARRL's leadership when the FCC made the "Novice Enhancement?" Why did the FCC have to go it alone without the ARRL's """Leadership???""" Extra-wipe! Idiot! Jimmie is WRONG BY OMISSION. According to all the documents PRIOR to the final decision on FCC 90-53, the ARRL was AGAINST that. The ARRL only supported the final R&O on the creation of the no-code-test Technician class AFTER THE FACT. Jimmie just can't bring himself to admit that many OTHER parties were trying to cancel the code test PRIOR to 1990. Some time spent in the FCC Reading Room of the correspondence PRIOR to 1990 will show enough support for No-Code-Test that the FCC was lobbied into the 90-53 issuance. Once the NO-CODE-TEST Technician class was established, the ARRL had no other choice to "support" it...it would have been politically destructive to the League to oppose it AFTER THE FACT. Jimmie wants to OMIT certain details to show that the ARRL is in the "leadership." It isn't. The ARRL still hasn't gotten a membership larger than a quarter of all licensed U.S. radio amateurs. The FASTEST GROWING CLASS in U.S. amateur radio - since 1991 - is that very same NO-CODE-TEST Technician class. NO OTHER class has grown so large, so quickly, in the history of amateur radio as regulated by the FCC since 1934. Jimmie is going to trot out his outworn cliches' and other statements (nearly all sinning by omission of details) and state "that is simply wrong." :-) He can't think for himself anymore in amateur radio matters, apparently. He is one of the number-one bunting putter-upper and flag waver for the League. The ARRL can do NO wrong in his eyes. N2EY is so full of EXTRA excrement that I just can't allow the rest of his original post to be quoted. You offend thinking people unlike any "off color" callsign that you would care to strike. In my view, Jimmie is so brainwashed that he can't help himself. He, like Stebie da Avenging Angle of Dearth, is into such a fantasy that Jimmie really thinks what he writes is "truth" and anything contrary is "untrue." Jimmie just can't conceive of his words being in error, therefore he speaks "truth." As to the "off-color callsign" (Kim's vanity call), that's just his personal morality thing. It's almost like he took Vows and was ordained a Priest in the Holy Orders of the Church of St. Hiram...of the Latter-Day Radio Saints? Or was it Former-Day Radio Saints? Must be that for his wanting to cite all those "leadership" actions happening during and before he was born. Another amateur "role-model" to emulate on seeking the "highest goals" in amateur radio...complete Nirvana in morsemanship. Ho hum. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| N9OGL to bust 2 Meter band Plan With "Information Bulletin" Broadcasts | Policy | |||
| The FAQ (Well, Question 1, at least) | Homebrew | |||
| The FAQ (Well, Question 1, at least) | General | |||
| FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #651 | Dx | |||
Threaded Mode
