| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
May 24th 05, 06:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
From: "K4YZ" on Mon,May 23 2005 4:38 am
wrote: From: "K4YZ" on Sun,May 22 2005 2:53 am bb wrote: wrote: Don't try to lump yourself in with me, Brain. Most of my time in the USMC was crewing the MC version of the Pave Low (CH53A and D), a lot of which got me put in places I was not real happy to be in. Whoa, there, "SEA STALLION." The CH-53A to CH-53D are called "Sea Stallion," NOT "Pave Low." CH-53E is called "Super Sea Stallion." No screaming eagle, huh, rear area gutless one...?!?! Ya think that MAYBE that's why I said "...the MC version of the Pave Low..."...?!?! Brain was in the Air Force. That's why the cross-reference. 1. Helicopters are NOT a radio subject, let alone AMATEUR RADIO. 2. Military aircraft nomenclature, names are NOT a requirement in AMATEUR RADIO. 3. Are there any AMATEURS operating "helicopter mobile?" :-) The "Pave Low" is the MH-53E through O suffix, operated mostly by the USAF. More specifially "Pave Low II" to "Pave Low VI." Amazing how "smart" you are with the click of a mouse, eh...?!?! All the information on the Internet is at ANYONE's disposal. Too bad you can't retain some of that... Not my job. Too bad Stebie can't remember to get names correct on helicopters he has "served." :-) The "CH" in the type designation stands for Cargo, Helicopter. Very good....Still not any "smoking gun", though... The CH-53A through CH-53D are CARGO HAULERS. As is the CH53E Super Sea Stallion, on which I was qual'ed. 1. The colloquial term for "qualified" is spelled "qualled" as it is pronounced. 2. The CH-47 and CH-54 are also Cargo Handlers, types that I've designed test sets for...and gotten them in production and eventually delivered (RCA EASD). Some of the MH-53s are into special ops. But, the Sea Stallion is basically a CARGO HAULER, first operational in 1966. Actually first operational in 1965. FORTY YEAR OLD DESIGN. :-) The "CARGO HAULER" was used for "special ops" through out it's career too, Lennie. That's why the USMC had them fitted with VULCAN's, -50's, etc. Tsk...next thing will be Stebie bragging on his "special ops" experience...maybe with a "HALO Drop" story? :-) The tactical and strategic use of helicopters is NOT anything close to AMATEUR RADIO POLICY. That's also why the USMC fit's them for vertical envelopment. NOT applicable to AMATEUR RADIO POLICY. The USMC, The Air Force and the Navy all used them for SpecOp insertions, Maritime patrol, security-of-the seas missions. NOT applicable to AMATEUR RADIO POLICY. The airframe comes off the same production line at Sikorsky at Stratford, CT. NOT applicable to AMATEUR RADIO POLICY. The same airframe...Over 80% interchangeable. NOT applicable to AMATEUR RADIO POLICY. And the missions of the CH-53 (ALL variants) far exceed "CARGO HAULING". NOT applicable to AMATEUR RADIO POLICY. Of course you didn't know that because the scope of your knowledge stopped at your wrist. Not my job to know details of helicopters. :-) I didn't lie about a single thing, Lennie. Not in Stebieworld. Stebie NEVER lies in Stebieworld...everyone else does there... :-) If you want a REAL education, you should read some of the histories of the USMC's various Sea Stallion units...Most notably HMH-462, HMH-464, HMH-363 and HMH-361. I was in all except 464 at one time or another. NOT applicable to AMATEUR RADIO POLICY. Take the time to do some research and you'll find a few of those "seven hostile actions" you claim I never participated in. Is Stebie's name featured anywhere on those "research pages?" So far, none of us readers have found out the WHEN and WHERE of Stebie's famous "seven hostile actions." Hint: This newsgroup is NOT about the Glory of the USMC or about helicopters. Try to stay focussed. If you write names of helicopters, try to get them CORRECT. If you are going to LIE, BLUFF, SCAM, try to get your military nomenclature CORRECT. I did so. Absolutely correct. You did NOT do so! Tsk, tsk. I corrected you and you admitted to the INCORRECT "cross-reference" (your term for covering up your mistake). :-) Stand down. You do not now have, nor did you ever, nor will you ever have the authority, expertise, training, experience or qualifications to give me an order or to imply you are giving me an order. BWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAHAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAgaspHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HEHEHHEEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! Tsk. Stebie ought to go to work for "Sgt Grit - 'if we don't have it, Chesty wouldn't want it." NOBODY can tell mighty Stebie ANYTHING! BWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAHAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAgaspHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HEHEHHEEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! The service history and deployment of the CH53-series aircraft is yet another "field" in which YOUR "experience" is from a mouse click. Absolutely! :-) BWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAHAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAgaspHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA HAHAHAHAHAH HEHEHHEEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! I've spent 53 years working in RADIO-ELECTRONICS, not helicopters. This forum is NOT about helicopters. This newsgroup is about RADIO, specifically amateur radio policy. So, Stebie, how much time did you spend in Building 82? :-) Temper fry... |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| N9OGL to bust 2 Meter band Plan With "Information Bulletin" Broadcasts | Policy | |||
| The FAQ (Well, Question 1, at least) | Homebrew | |||
| The FAQ (Well, Question 1, at least) | General | |||
| FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #651 | Dx | |||
Threaded Mode
